Accessing C++ base::Features
in Java is implemented via a Python script which analyzes the *_features.cc
file and generates the corresponding Java class, based on a template file. The template file must be specified in the GN target. This outputs Java String constants which represent the name of the base::Feature
.
Create a template file (ex. FooFeatures.java.tmpl
). Change “Copyright 2020” to be whatever the year is at the time of writing (as you would for any other file).
// Copyright 2020 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be // found in the LICENSE file. package org.chromium.foo; // Be sure to escape any curly braces in your template by doubling as // follows. /** * Contains features that are specific to the foo project. */ public final class FooFeatures {{ {NATIVE_FEATURES} // Prevents instantiation. private FooFeatures() {{}} }}
Add a new build target and add it to the srcjar_deps
of an android_library
target:
if (is_android) { import("//build/config/android/rules.gni") } if (is_android) { java_cpp_features("java_features_srcjar") { # External code should depend on ":foo_java" instead. visibility = [ ":*" ] sources = [ "//base/android/foo_features.cc", ] template = "//base/android/java_templates/FooFeatures.java.tmpl" } # If there's already an android_library target, you can add # java_features_srcjar to that target's srcjar_deps. Otherwise, the best # practice is to create a new android_library just for this target. android_library("foo_java") { srcjar_deps = [ ":java_features_srcjar" ] } }
The generated file out/Default/gen/.../org/chromium/foo/FooFeatures.java
would contain:
// Copyright $YEAR The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be // found in the LICENSE file. package org.chromium.foo; // Be sure to escape any curly braces in your template by doubling as // follows. /** * Contains features that are specific to the foo project. */ public final class FooFeatures { // This following string constants were inserted by // java_cpp_features.py // From // ../../base/android/foo_features.cc // Into // ../../base/android/java_templates/FooFeatures.java.tmpl // Documentation for the C++ Feature is copied here. public static final String SOME_FEATURE = "SomeFeature"; // ...snip... // Prevents instantiation. private FooFeatures() {} }
The script only supports limited syntaxes for declaring C++ base::Features. You may see an error like the following during compilation:
... org/chromium/foo/FooFeatures.java:41: error: duplicate declaration of field: MY_FEATURE public static final String MY_FEATURE = "MyFeature";
This can happen if you've re-declared a feature for mutually-exclsuive build configs (ex. the feature is enabled-by-default for one config, but disabled-by-default for another). Example:
#if defined(...) const base::Feature kMyFeature{ "MyFeature", base::FEATURE_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT}; #else const base::Feature kMyFeature{ "MyFeature", base::FEATURE_DISABLED_BY_DEFAULT}; #endif
The java_cpp_features
rule doesn't know how to evaluate C++ preprocessor directives, so it generates two identical Java fields (which is what the compilation error is complaining about). Fortunately, the workaround is fairly simple. Rewrite the definition to only use directives around the enabled state:
const base::Feature kMyFeature{ "MyFeature", #if defined(...) base::FEATURE_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT #else base::FEATURE_DISABLED_BY_DEFAULT #endif };
The standard pattern is to create a FooFeatureList.java
class with an isEnabled()
method (ex. ContentFeatureList
). This should call into C++ (ex. content_feature_list
), where a subset of features are exposed via the kFeaturesExposedToJava
array. You can either add your base::Feature
to an existing feature_list
or create a new FeatureList
class if no existing one is suitable. Then you can check the enabled state like so:
// It's OK if ContentFeatureList checks FooFeatures.*, so long as // content_feature_list.cc exposes `kMyFeature`. if (ContentFeatureList.isEnabled(FooFeatures.MY_FEATURE)) { // ... }
At the moment, base::Features
must be explicitly exposed to Java this way, in whichever layer needs to access their state. See https://crbug.com/1060097.