Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:GSI Mariner beached on banks of the Mackenzie River, Inuvik, NT.jpg

File:GSI Mariner beached on banks of the Mackenzie River, Inuvik, NT.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2016 at 15:43:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

GIS Mariner beached on the shores of the Mackenzie River near inuvik in the Canadian Arctic

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships
Info created by Daniel Case - uploaded by Daniel Case - nominated by Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 15:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have been inspired by some of the recent successful nominations of shipwrecks to nominate this one. More a beached ship than a wrecked one, though. -- Daniel Case (talk) 15:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Hehe! :) Now this is right up my alley, so pardon me for being a bit picky Daniel. It needs a bit of perspective adjustment. The walls of the crew cabins right below the pilothouse as well as those of the aft cabin under the railing, should be just as straight as those of a house. Right now they are leaning a bit into center. The antennae are probably tilted IRL due to wind activity. Swab up the ~~deck~~ pic, ye landlubber! w.carter-Talk 17:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done At least to the extent that I could without cutting off the top of the mast. I hope that's enough of a bit. Daniel Case (talk) 18:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good enough. Lucky it was red boat since it makes a good contrast + complementary color with the foliage. w.carter-Talk 18:39, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I fail to see anything outstanding in this photograph. The bush on the left foreground spoils the composition entirely. --Kreuz schnabel 20:30, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support For me is outstanding ,funny and very curios --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:37, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Very cool picture. I like the bush on the left, which I find good for the composition. A bit of the foreground is somewhat unsharp, but in the entire context, complaining about that feels like nitpicking to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting composition. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. A different take on the usual fare of shipwrecks. —Bruce1ee^talk 05:12, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:54, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:58, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No FP/ JukoFF (talk) 10:47, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment No FP? JukoFF can you explain your vote? Normally here the people talk. Thanks --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:55, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see in the picture is nothing outstanding. This is not the Titanic :) JukoFF (talk) 18:58, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support @Daniel Case: I bet this'd be a cool place to live if you fixed it up right. INeverCry 18:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think that would be the only realistic way to use it. I thought its registration would have run out by now, but according to Transport Canada, it was renewed for another three years. So who knows? Daniel Case (talk) 02:07, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support Really like this one! Love the atmosphere. Shadows seem a bit overbrightened, but it's not objectionable. -- Thennicke (talk) 09:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:55, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 20:34, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /INeverCry 20:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport