Commons:Deletion requests/2024/07/15: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Line 149: Line 149:
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ed Feingersh Marilyn Monroe 1955 no9.webp}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ed Feingersh Marilyn Monroe 1955 no9.webp}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ed Feingersh Marilyn Monroe 1955 no2.webp}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ed Feingersh Marilyn Monroe 1955 no2.webp}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ed Feingersh Marilyn Monroe 1955 no5.webp}}

Revision as of 17:24, 15 July 2024

[[Media:]]

July 15

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description says that the creator keeps it under CC4 in a facebook post which is great. But Commons doesn’t work like that. The facebook account is not even verified. It has to be proved by legal means which is by COM:VRT/CONSENT or uploading the photo by the creator in Commons. Mehedi Abedin 14:21, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's the problem with that? We do not need that accounts are verified here, either. It is sufficient if it is clear that the license was granted by the uploader (either here or anywhere else), which seems to be the case. PaterMcFly (talk) 15:07, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I'd agree with PaterMcFly. The metadata on the photo algins with the Facebook ID. On Facebook, the CC BY 4.0 license is clearly stated and linked with the upload. There doesn't appear to be a question that the work is from another photographer. —Tcr25 (talk) 17:35, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pointless nomination. Xoak (talk) 10:16, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:09, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lousy, redundant, copies of File:Diagramme surgénération 03.png, unused, should be SVG. Taylor 49 (talk) 00:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although from a correctly-licensed video, the art is still a derivative of a copyrighted work (specifically this photograph). reppoptalk 00:44, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:09, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No scope. 181.203.82.193 01:26, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:46, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No scope, less own work. 181.203.82.193 01:27, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:46, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No scope 181.203.82.193 01:29, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:47, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

contrafactio - copyright Rsergeydm (talk) 02:23, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Нарушение авторских прав RevenkoSergey (talk) 03:32, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope anyway. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:38, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGE, too complex of its decorations. Lemonaka (talk) 02:44, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. A photograph of a whole bottle is not considered a derivative work of the label of the bottle, per Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits, Inc. S5A-0043Talk 03:27, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: label visible seems simple text. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:56, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: abstract artwork imported from Flickr. No obvious educational use case.

Omphalographer (talk) 03:03, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:15, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional image Mazbel (Talk) 04:05, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This logo is a vital component of the cultural institution Chinchilla Café, which itself is associated with hundreds of open copyright photographs and artwork featured on Wikimedia Commons. RobinIsadorable (talk) 16:25, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by krd. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Fma12 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.lecoqsportif.com/ - Converting to DR because this is an extensively used image The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:09, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Squirrel Conspiracy: I assume the rooster puts it above TOO. Can I crop it out and leave the wordmark? ReneeWrites (talk) 06:03 15 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm not a fan of the idea of doctoring logos to get them under the threshold of originality, because then they are not accurate anymore. That said, if you got rid of the rooster, it would be under the threshold. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:43, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ReneeWrites: I agree with The Squirrel Conspiracy. Uploading a text-only version seperately would be the best choice, IMO. Fma12 (talk) 09:51, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is a good idea. I uploaded the wordmark here: File:Wordmark Le Coq Sportif.svg. ReneeWrites (talk) 12:04, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ReneeWrites - Calling it a wordmark instead of a logo is a good idea. That solves my concern. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:03, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@The Squirrel Conspiracy: The original logo is still in use in a bunch of places, should those be replaced or turned to redlinks? Usually when a logo sees widespread use it's due to a template but that doesn't appear to be the case here. If they should be replaced, I could use GR and put in the edit summary that the logo has been replaced with a wordmark due to copyvio. ReneeWrites (talk) 05:43, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I recommend you to replace the cock logo with the wordmark you uploaded. In the case some projects allow NFCC images, the original cock logo could be included in them. Fma12 (talk) 20:38, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@The Squirrel Conspiracy: All usage of the logo has been replaced and I put in the edit summary why, so it can now safely be deleted. ReneeWrites (talk) 15:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:55, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This audio is taken from a meme and is most likely not the user's own work. Based on wikt:ambassing, the pronunication is also likely inaccurate. Tymewalk (talk) 04:47, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete? This is borderline vandalism; it's obviously not a genuine attempt to demonstrate pronunciation. Omphalographer (talk) 04:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:47, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file of File:P20240710AS-1985 (53847935047).jpg A1Cafel (talk) 04:49, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Same resolution 3000 x 2000 px but different file size 3.04MB / 3.22 MB because of different source Twitter / Flickr // sikander { talk } 🦖 12:18, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:40, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file of File:President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris are briefed about the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump.jpg A1Cafel (talk) 04:49, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nom. Also not in use. SCP-2000 12:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:55, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:12, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:55, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Goroth (talk) 05:04, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete not a simple logo, per COM:TOO Japan. メイド理世 (talk) 05:22, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Would it the logo be okay without the feathers and coloring (just the text and font)? --Goroth (talk) 04:37, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:05, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See  Comment on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Triangle Park Mural - Asheville, North Carolina (2013-11-12 20.14.04 by denise carbonell).jpg. --Clusternote (talk) 23:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:05, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment By the way, you always seem to request the deletion of each individual file separately, rather than the deletion of the entire category these files belong.
What is the difference between the files you individually requested and the other files in the same category (i.e. Category:Murals in Asheville, North Carolina), or the entire files in the Category:Murals in the United States ?
Note that, in the previous deletion request I was notified from you (i.e. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deer antler warning sign (1992-10 by sodai-gomi).jpg), you requested only one file that falls under the exemption provisions of the copyright law of the country (exclusion rule of Copyright law of Japan, article 45-2 and article 46). It seems that the appropriateness of each deletion request should be carefully considered. --Clusternote (talk) 23:56, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See  Comment on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Triangle Park Mural - Asheville, North Carolina (2013-11-12 20.14.04 by denise carbonell).jpg. --Clusternote (talk) 23:58, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See  Comment on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Triangle Park Mural - Asheville, North Carolina (2013-11-12 20.14.04 by denise carbonell).jpg. --Clusternote (talk) 23:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See  Comment on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Triangle Park Mural - Asheville, North Carolina (2013-11-12 20.14.04 by denise carbonell).jpg. --Clusternote (talk) 23:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See  Comment on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Triangle Park Mural - Asheville, North Carolina (2013-11-12 20.14.04 by denise carbonell).jpg. --Clusternote (talk) 23:58, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See  Comment on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Triangle Park Mural - Asheville, North Carolina (2013-11-12 20.14.04 by denise carbonell).jpg. --Clusternote (talk) 23:58, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See  Comment on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Triangle Park Mural - Asheville, North Carolina (2013-11-12 20.14.04 by denise carbonell).jpg. --Clusternote (talk) 23:58, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Broken SVG, replacement available Yugoslavia-Army-OR-9 (1982–2006).svg Ђидо (talk) 05:10, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:10, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See  Comment on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Triangle Park Mural - Asheville, North Carolina (2013-11-12 20.14.04 by denise carbonell).jpg. --Clusternote (talk) 23:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete. This site claims the artwork "was finished in 2002 by painter Tom Acosta and his son, Elden Justice." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:35, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User Files 2, User own photos (ko)

Even if I create a Korean template, “ko?” is still displayed... YeBoy371 (talk) 04:52, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Recreated the template. YeBoy371 (talk) 01:24, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 05:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Diddykong1130 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: F5, the source URL provided is to the Youtube channel not the video the screenshot was taken from. The source of has to be the video itself in order to review the license status; this is a correctable fault, so changing to DR to allow for fix and conversation rather than speedydelete  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:47, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Source URL has been updated by user. I recommend keeping since the necessary update was made. Diddykong1130 (talk) 14:56, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Diddykong1130 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: F5, the source URL provided is to the Youtube channel not the video the screenshot was taken from. The source of has to be the video itself in order to review the license status; convert to DR to allow for a fix prior to deletion rather than speedy  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:48, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Source URL has been updated by user. I recommend keeping since the necessary update was made. Diddykong1130 (talk) 14:54, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Diddykong1130 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: F5, the source URL provided is to the Youtube channel not the video the screenshot was taken from. The source of has to be the video itself in order to review the license status; allow for correction of source, rather than manage through speedy  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:49, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Source URL has been updated by user. I recommend keeping since the necessary update was made. Diddykong1130 (talk) 14:54, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Diddykong1130 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: F5, the source URL provided is to the Youtube channel not the video the screenshot was taken from. The source of has to be the video itself in order to review the license status; allow for correction of source rather than manage through speedy  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:50, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Source URL has been updated by user. I recommend keeping since the necessary update was made. Diddykong1130 (talk) 14:53, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Günther Frager as no source (No source since) Krd 06:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete There is no source, nor date when it was taken. Apparently it was published in some Italian newspaper after her assassination in 1992. Morvillo Francesca was at that time 46 (she was born in 1945) and this photo to be in the US public domain needs to be taken before 1976, i.e. on her late twenties. As she was a public figure, it is likely that the photo was taken when she was a judge. If it was taken after 1989, it is definitively copyrighted due to Berne Convention and if it was taken during 1980s, it has its US copyright restored by URAA. Günther Frager (talk) 07:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Find a Grave is not a reliable source and Maria Schicklgruber died at age 51 in 1847, the photo is clearly not her. Swinub (talk) 06:17, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:44, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a low-quality attack image uploaded by someone who has been vandalizing the related article at the English Wikipedia. WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:24, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete. Obvious attack images like this can be speedily deleted. Omphalographer (talk) 18:41, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:53, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

from Facebook. Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:24, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image. And from Facebook. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:31, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pd-textlogo does not apply, no permission Krd 06:31, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Simple font, simple cross - it's not above the threshold. Welkend (talk) 08:35, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Welkend. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:44, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unused file. Can be written in wikitext if needed in future. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:36, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free screenshot. Wolverène (talk) 06:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Village pump/Copyright #Fantasy euro banknotes: not issued by the ECB so {{Money-EU}} doesn’t apply.

Geohakkeri (talk) 07:02, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - Per above and Commons:Village Pump/Copyright#Fantasy euro banknotes. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 23:20, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
From checking of some of the bank notes, I see that this is a completely new design (so {{Money-EU}} doesn't apply), and the note comes from a commercial website and so it's doubtful that the author would release them under a free license. (In one case the image is misleadingly marked as "own work", probably by virtue of having scanned it.)  Delete. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 10:43, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These German Notgeld (emergency money) bills from the 1920s are the works of Hans Philipp, who died in 1961. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2032.

Rosenzweig τ 07:10, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused diagram. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:22, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:38, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:21, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shubham Narayan Naik (talk · contribs)

COM:OOS: Unused personal pictures.

doclys (❀) 07:41, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work; see watermark. doclys (❀) 07:44, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata indicates ‘screenshot’. doclys (❀) 07:52, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, DW, each image needs source. --Gbawden (talk) 09:02, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as AI but the background here isn't AI generated, it's slightly pixelised and the text is actually legible. Even if the background turns out to be freely licenced and the photoshopped foreground person AI-generated, Commons has enough images of Category:AI-generated women. Belbury (talk) 08:08, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:14, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image has appeared in multiple websites: [1], [2], [3], no EXIF and so cannot be the work of uploader Gpkp (talk) 08:34, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joesmooth (talk · contribs)

None of these are own work as claimed. PCP

Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:21, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from here. Who is the photographer / copyright holder, and where is their permission? 87.150.15.9 09:05, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Oea Burg declared to have created this photo. We have no reason not to believe this even when the photo is used elsewhere on the web. Ganescha (talk) 12:49, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that this image was uploaded to Commons in 2007, while the website you referenced is from 2020. The image on the website could therefore have been taken from Commons. However, it could also have been used by the same creator. As you have noted elsewhere, he apparently works as a freelance photographer. Ganescha (talk) 19:19, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: While the file was uploaded to Commons in 2020 (not 2007), it is much larger than the one on the external web site, so it was not taken from there. --Rosenzweig τ 16:19, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 리그마스터 (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by kowiki LTA Xinema. All files are copyright violations and should be deleted.

Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 09:10, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 00:49, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: Either private family photo or some strange kind of professional promo photo. In either case photographer /copyright holder not credited and no permission. 87.150.15.9 09:13, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see no reason for deletion. Peter Luckner, the gentleman on the left, has been working on "multisensory design". The sensual experience of the potato crisps could be related to this - especially as it doesn't look like a pub scene. Ganescha (talk) 12:44, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Copyvio certainly is a reason for deletion. As long as we don't have the photographer's permission (so far, we don't even have a clue as to who the photographer is), this is a clear copyvio.
For the German WP, we also have a personality rights issue (Recht am eigenen Bild), especially as far as the young woman is concerned. --87.150.15.9 14:27, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I still don't see any copyright violation. The user Oea Burg uploaded the image and named himself as the creator. I did nothing else when I uploaded images. The rights of the young woman in the picture, on the other hand, are indeed an issue. Whether that is a reason for deletion remains to be seen. However, I have pointed this out to the user on his discussion page in the German Wikipedia. --Ganescha (talk) 19:12, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor exposure and focus/resolution. Have File:Coloured flames of methanol solutions of metal salts and compounds.jpg as high quality DMacks (talk) 09:47, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think {{BadPNG}} can also apply here.  Delete, low quality due to poor exposure and resolution. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 18:58, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:21, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pixelated and uneven bonds. Have File:Diphenyltin.svg DMacks (talk) 09:49, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, low quality, pixelated, uneven bonds. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 11:29, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:21, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mn(OH)2 is no a molecular substance. DMacks (talk) 09:52, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusual choice of atom-sizes. Category:Formaldehyde has multiple more-standard ball&stick repersentations DMacks (talk) 09:54, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-res curves. Category:Formaldehyde has multiple higher-quality alts DMacks (talk) 09:55, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:21, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:01, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:15, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:01, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:44, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:02, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:02, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:03, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:03, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:04, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:04, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:07, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:08, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:10, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:10, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:15, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cali cadaawe (talk · contribs)

2 old photos which are not own work and DW photos of paintings? need more info to determine FOP, PD status etc

Gbawden (talk) 10:10, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Most of them without question:
 Comment File:Boqormaxamuud.jpg isn't showing up in other searches. File:Boqorkiijubaland.jpg does show up here and in a few other places. The second photo is identified as being of en:Abd al-Rahman al-Mahdi (at right), his son (center) and historian Abdul Rahman Ali Taha in London. It appears the first photo is of Abd al-Rahman al-Mahdi, too. The London picture was likely taken in 1946 or 1947; it's ID'd online as being in front of 10 Downing Street and in November/December 1946 Abd al-Rahman al-Mahdi was in London to make his case for Sudanese independence from Egypt. I'm not finding a definitive source for the photo, unfortunately. —Tcr25 (talk) 14:11, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Guten Tag, wir sind die Hauseigentümer und möchten nicht, dass ein Bild des Hauses öffentlich im Internet ist. Wir bitten daher um Löschung des Fotos aus Privatsphäregründen. Vielen Dank. Earthcitizen366 (talk) 10:32, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Kein Löschgrund, es gibt kein de:Recht am Bild der eigenen Sache. Das Haus ist ein Kulturdenkmal, also für uns relevant, und das Foto augenscheinlich von einer öffentlichen Straße aus aufgenommen. --Rosenzweig τ 13:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion, die Privatsphäre ist nicht verletzt. --Achim55 (talk) 19:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Von der dargestellten Person nicht freigegeben 2003:E6:6749:1601:9096:1F10:4071:B962 10:35, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ich, die Urheberin dieses Fotos, stimme dem Löschantrag zu. Es liegt ein Foto von Elena Ternovaja vor, das verwendet werden kann. --Amrei-Marie (talk) 12:01, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Als Nachtrag das Foto, das alternativ verwendet werden kann: File:Charlotte Gneuß, Frankfurter Buchmesse 2023.jpg. Danke!

Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 16:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 10:38, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 10:43, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These German Notgeld (emergency money) bills from the 1920s are the works of de:Hans Kruzwicki, who died in 1971. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2042.

Rosenzweig τ 10:43, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 10:43, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://wellcomecollection.org/works/p6q45qb3 It is possible this item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. Works in this archive are available under a CC-BY-NC licence. Geohakkeri (talk) 10:44, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 10:45, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 10:47, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://wellcomecollection.org/works/vzzcqeyx It is possible this item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. Works in this archive are available under a CC-BY-NC licence. Geohakkeri (talk) 10:48, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's a signature on the poster, Haywood Norfolk, but I'm not finding in searches anything indicating if this was a person or the printer. —Tcr25 (talk) 13:09, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Russia, artist Veniamin Pinchuk died in 1987 A1Cafel (talk) 10:51, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From [4], copyright violation. RAL1028 (talk) 10:51, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These German Notgeld (emergency money) bills from the 1920s are works of de:Wilhelm Schnarrenberger, who died in 1966. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2037.

Rosenzweig τ 10:51, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


From [5], copyright violence. RAL1028 (talk) 10:54, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 11:03, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:21, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 11:09, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:21, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The person depicted has withdrawn her consent to publication. Amrei-Marie (talk) 21:57, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The person depicted has withdrawn her consent to publication. - Commons owes me hundreds of portraits of writers. I will have to stop my photographic commitment if I have to work against the will of the authors and to their - also subjectively perceived - detriment. This person is a barely known author - what applies to famous public figures cannot yet apply to her. Amrei-Marie (talk) 11:22, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Deletion was originally requested by the uploader shortly after upload (so would qualify for a courtesy deletion), but file is still COM:INUSE at d:Q126077832. If it were not in use, it could be deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 13:12, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your support @Rosenzweig. As I often connect photos to Wikidata, I took the liberty of removing this photo from Wikidata. I very much hope that nothing stands in the way of deletion now! Amrei-Marie (talk) 12:46, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:57, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SamTatrault (talk · contribs)

Getty Images photo: https://www.gettyimages.co.jp/detail/%E3%83%8B%E3%83%A5%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B9%E5%86%99%E7%9C%9F/bol-bol-of-the-phoenix-suns-in-action-during-the-first-half-of-%E3%83%8B%E3%83%A5%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B9%E5%86%99%E7%9C%9F/1852981634

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 11:46, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:21, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

author's own request : " Merci de bien vouloir supprimez la photo après" Eliedion (talk) 12:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikimedia page in question should be considered for deletion for several compelling reasons. Firstly, the information on the page is significantly outdated, presenting details that no longer accurately represent the individual. For instance, key aspects such as career achievements, personal milestones, and other notable activities have not been updated for several years. This not only misleads readers but also undermines the credibility of Wikimedia as a source of current and reliable information. In an era where information is constantly evolving, it is crucial that public platforms maintain up-to-date content to ensure accuracy and relevance. Jamie Diamon (talk) 12:19, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No valid reason for deletion of this photograph. --Achim55 (talk) 20:13, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the photograph isn't even in use. So the criticism above (whether it applies or not) is completely missplaced and should instead be made on the talk page of the relevant wikipedia article. PaterMcFly (talk) 05:18, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Nominate for deletion because a better version of the image already existed (dioma_Balinés.png). Cal1407 (talk) 12:25, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unused file. No author given. Hard to find that the source given has this image. Public domain iimage? Estopedist1 (talk) 12:36, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

from 15min.lt. Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:45, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant, falscher Urheber NDG (talk) 12:48, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

falsches Logo DieFroehliche (talk) 09:36, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: obviously withdrawn, see DR history. --Krd 14:26, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant, falscher Urheber NDG (talk) 12:49, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These German Notgeld (emergency money) bills from the 1920s are works of de:Georg Kötschau, who died in 1976. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2047.

Rosenzweig τ 12:49, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by عمر كاظم عذاب (talk · contribs)

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope

--Alaa :)..! 13:14, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:36, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by عمر كاظم عذاب (talk · contribs)

Personal photos for non-Wikipedian: out of scope (no indication of notability).

-- Karim (talk) 12:55, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:31, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no freedom of panorama in this interior image, beside of this there are serveral trademark logos etc. Alabasterstein (talk) 12:55, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep We don't care about trademarks and the Swatch logo is obviously below TOO. Any other logos are so small that they're de minimis. PaterMcFly (talk) 15:13, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Neil Allen (cropped).jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Veracious (talk) 13:21, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a duplicate of File:Opening_Day_of_1961_Baseball_Season._President_Kennedy_throws_out_first_ball._(first_row)_Vice_President_Johnson..._-_NARA_-_194197.jpg. While this image was uploaded earlier, the resolution is identical, this one is not actually in use anywhere and the other image is also annotated with the names of the people in the picture. Note that this photographs is also duplicated in inferior form here but I don't understand the superseded image policy well enough to nominate that one for deletion. Denniscabrams (talk) 13:28, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Denniscabrams: So you are saying we should delete a TIFF because we have a JPEG? That doesn't make sense. - Jmabel ! talk 18:29, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think my post was pretty clear. If you'd rather delete the JPEG then you'd have to replace its nine usages on Wikipedia with the TIFF and should probably also annotate the TIFF. Denniscabrams (talk) 19:19, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, both. This is an uncompressed TIF, and thus has has a better quality than jpg. For internet use, the jpg may do, but for creating derivative works, the high-quality version will be better. PaterMcFly (talk) 05:22, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep the tiff and jpg for the reasons above. There are a significant number of paired TIF/JPG files from the Library of Congress and NARA on Commons. Caddyshack01 (talk) 22:57, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 14:07, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:17, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 14:09, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image file already there on commons and uploaded by the author before. Link to the image file is here: File:Wiki Technical Training 2024 Day 2 6.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gopala Krishna A (talk • contribs) 06:23, 15 July 2024‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image file already uploaded by the author before. Link to the file is here: File:Wiki Technical Training 2024 Day 2 5.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gopala Krishna A (talk • contribs) 06:17, 15 July 2024‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP Japan. These photos were taken in Japan and the subjects are copyrighted. --IDCM (talk) 14:40, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:22, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested by the person being photographed Boat toad 舟集 (talk) 14:45, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This picture shows young men wearing blue clothes in the temple and using his smartphone. I guess you mean that man photographed by you and he requested you to delete this picture? If yes, please read COM:PEOPLE. Additionally, the picture was taken in Taiwan, but we don't seem to have information about personality rights in Taiwan. It would be greatly appreciated if you can provide some some legal references. I believe this will help us understand local laws and can speed up processing significantly for deletion requests.--125.230.85.141 05:30, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(How funny! :) Regrettably from Facebook. 186.172.89.38 14:46, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete. Description makes it clear the intent of the upload was to ridicule the subject. Omphalographer (talk) 18:39, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:51, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brengt verwarring, het is beter dat deze redirect verdwijnt. Industrees (talk) 14:58, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been tagged as {{No permission}} since 26 June 2024, by EugeneZelenko. doclys (❀) 15:07, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is my picture. I do not give permission for public use. I created this account just to request its deletion. Obf27 (talk) 15:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

bad copy of File:BV043424832.tif (see file size) MBH 15:19, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image lacks a proper source and is not in the public domain under the Commons:URAA. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 15:44, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is a postcard in my collection and neither on the backside nor the frontside is there any information about the publisher or the photographer. There is a poststamp on the backside, so we know for the image must have taken at 1931 or earlier. It is to me unclear what the US rules are about unknown (orphan) works or pictures where the rigths have been bough by the postcard publisher. (The same principle as pictures without author names in newspapers)(in Europe it is mostly 70 years) In Europe many photografic archives/records where destroyed during the war years (or clearing up the old junk)
Ps: I Will Come back on the uraa and precautionary principle about old European postcards, later. (There are quite a lot of them) I need time to develop good arguments. Smiley.toerist (talk) 18:25, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This other copy was posted in 1929. Getting closer to U.S. public domain. The postcard might well have been published before 1929. At worst, if deleted, it would be undeleted in five months when the U.S. public domain gets upgraded to published before 1930. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:17, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The publisher is: J. Sleding, Amsterdam Smiley.toerist (talk) 15:06, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I started a discussion in Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#URAA-restored_copyrights_of_old_European_postcards Smiley.toerist (talk) 09:46, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you scanned the image, please indicate something like {{Self-scanned}} in the source field. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:17, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Of the publisher Category:J. Sleding, the Commons only have works from in and around Roermond. However there are also Amsterdam postcards from this publisher. see: https://www.lastdodo.nl/nl/areas/1092483-j-sleding-amsterdam. And from much earlier than mentioned in Creator:J. Sleding (1934), even 1908.Smiley.toerist (talk) 12:39, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Deer carcass that has been covered by a mudslide" - I don't see it. Is this in scope? -- Deadstar (msg) 15:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looks more like a blocked sockpuppeteer 😀 Delete. 200.39.139.4 16:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I see exactly what the desc says. I see no involvement of blocked editors. I see a file that should be renamed per Criterion #2. DMacks (talk) 18:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No sense of humor at all? I was refering to what you see exactly, but we others can not. By the way did you come to this discussion after me? Do you have an issue with me? 200.39.139.4 16:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of a toy, very dark, watermarked by uploader. Out of scope. -- Deadstar (msg) 16:01, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unremarkable image of a waterdrop hanging off a metal bar? No description, watermarked by user. -- Deadstar (msg) 16:01, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PENIS 200.39.139.3 16:05, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 16:11, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The maps in this image all appear to have a copyright notice in the top right. Belbury (talk) 16:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Eurotram 1005 (talk) 16:11, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a nice photo, why can't we keep it? Edelseider (talk) 09:21, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 16:11, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TurboLazer (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images by youtuber; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:21, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

You must have a photography permit to take photos. The photography permission is not mentioned. 117.104.231.10 06:26, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a concern of Wikimedia Commons. --Rosenzweig τ 09:19, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the statue of Genghis Khan, not Modu Chanyu. Okusulay (talk) 16:27, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo shows the sculpture of Modu Chanyu in Ulaanbaatar. The map bears the inscription "Xiongnu Empire" ("Хүннүгийн эзэнт улс" in mongolian), not Mongol Empire. KoizumiBS (talk) 19:45, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Wiki-CBO (talk · contribs)

Each of these logos is at the borderline of the simple logos we allow versus the complex ones that we do not. Wiser eyes than mine are needed here. I have thus created a full discussion rather than opting for speedy deletion.

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NIILM University.png
is the logo Wiki-CBO (talk) 03:16, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:NIILM University, LOGO.png is the secondary logo Wiki-CBO (talk) 03:20, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i don't have any relation or personal interest from this i saw and read from niilmuniversity.ac.in Wiki-CBO (talk) 03:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source : https://www.niilmuniversity.ac.in/web/assets/img/logo.png Wiki-CBO (talk) 09:00, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You uploaded this as your own work. Can you elaborate on that? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:50, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello :)
The logos i added from university website https://niilmuniversity.ac.in Wiki-CBO (talk) 12:00, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How i add to fairly used tag? Wiki-CBO (talk) 12:01, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is not my own work. Wiki-CBO (talk) 12:02, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:NIILM University.png
Source: https://student.niilmuniversity.ac.in/images/logo.png Wiki-CBO (talk) 09:05, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment These files are now unused. The corresponding enwiki articles have been deleted. There is no Fair Use on Commons. Fair use on enwiki depends upon the image being used. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 11:57, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, self promotional image; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:44, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation Dronebogus (talk) 16:45, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

English Wikipedia hosts en:File:Handala.gif under fair use. whym (talk) 11:09, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Nhuận An (talk) 16:53, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tôi đã đăng tải ghi nhầm file Nhuận An (talk) 16:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, G7-speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 18:59, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Nhuận An (talk) 16:53, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tôi đã đăng tải ghi nhầm file Nhuận An (talk) 16:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, G7-speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 18:59, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Erick Soares3 as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1 |2=While it might fit the bill for PD in Brazil under Template:PD-Brazil-Photo, I'm now quite sure that it wouldn't fit for US PD. Erick Soares3 (talk) 23:56, 12 July 2024 (UTC) Yann (talk) 17:03, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete:
1-) it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days)? Yes
2-) it was first published before 1 March 1989 without copyright notice or before 1964 without copyright renewal or before the source country established copyright relations with the United States? No
3-) it was in the public domain in its home country (Brazil) on the URAA date (1 January 1996)? No.
And the template says that it need to fit all 3 options before being PD in the US. Erick Soares3 (talk) 18:18, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And how do you know about the first and the second points? Yann (talk) 20:40, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann On the first point: I couldn't find any reference about this launch in the American media. On the second point: it couldn't have been published before 1989 because the image was taken in 2 November 1997. Erick Soares3 (talk) 12:42, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be glad to let the (good) VLS-1 launch images here, but I can't see how since (as the template says), it couldn't be public domain in the US. Erick Soares3 (talk) 12:44, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:54, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Elizium23 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is not original work. If it is a NASA file then it should be credited to NASA, even if it is Public Domain. Yann (talk) 17:07, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Support as nominator. This uploader is developing a track record of deceptive self-representation, evasiveness, and falsification of licensing. This seems like a rather obvious case to me. Elizium23 (talk) 20:53, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this comes from NASA, the license should be fixed, rather than deleting the file. Yann (talk) 08:31, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Commons processes never cease to puzzle me. I dutifully pulled down a menu and touched the "Report Copyvio" button to report this as a copyright violation, but that button's actual function was to request a speedy deletion.
Likewise, at File:Nasa--methalox-rocket-launch.jpg, all I did was press "No permission" which I expected to report that there was no license permission, but again this turns into a speedy request.
There's no need to request deletion of these files. Unfortunately I prefer automated and streamlined workflows to arduous and manual ones. In the past, admins have indicated that I'd need to manually tag hundreds of files for deletion discussions. It'd be really nice if these buttons did what they said on the tin and no more. Or if the filing process could be automated better. It would really help people like me. Because I often avoid filing requests if they're too much work. Elizium23 (talk) 08:52, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Elizium23: Creating unneeded DRs do not help. The source and the license must be fixed, that's all. Yann (talk) 08:56, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. License and source fixed. --Yann (talk) 08:59, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Omphalographer as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work - photo of a 2006 sculpture Yann (talk) 17:10, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Arroser as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: il est indiqué "tous droits réservés" dans l'EXIF.... Yann (talk) 17:12, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fr:Paladium is deleted due to non-notability (fr:Discussion:Paladium/Admissibilité). Probably its logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 17:18, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 185.172.241.184 as Logo PD-shape? Yann (talk) 17:18, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: composite photo with no provenance for component parts; blatantly not uploader's own work Yann (talk) 17:19, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eleven low-resolution photographs of people who were killed in a bombing in 1993, uploaded as 'own work' in 2021, arranged in a grid such as would be found in a magazine or newspaper. Do you need more? DS (talk) 17:43, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There was no date, but OK. Yann (talk) 20:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: from https://www.araldicacivica.it/comune/piaggine/ not in cc or gfdl Yann (talk) 17:22, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete All Coats of arms designed by araldicacivica.it are under CC-BY-NC-ND as per disclaimer Arrow303 (talk) 17:05, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:09, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Voorts as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: under copyright Yann (talk) 17:22, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: It's not clear to me why my speedy was declined. This image is very clearly still under copyright, per the link to Getty above. Moreover, it was not published until 2019, according to the source that's linked on the file page (via Google Translate): "The world became familiar with the images only last year thanks to a comprehensive exhibition in London." voorts (talk/contributions) 21:20, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The source can be viewed at archive.org, but it does not tell much. The gallery itself that held the exhibition has this webpage, which says that the exhibition was a collaboration with Getty and cautiously states that "This exhibition will include very rarely seen, possibly never before printed or exhibited images". So, some images might have been unpublished. That doesn't help much either. Commons does not have other photos by Ed Feingersh. That may be an indication that his photos were either published and copyrighted or unpublished. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:36, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Voorts as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: under copyright Yann (talk) 17:23, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: It's not clear to me why my speedy was declined. This image is very clearly still under copyright, per the link to Getty above. Moreover, it was not published until 2019, according to the source that's linked on the file page (via Google Translate): "The world became familiar with the images only last year thanks to a comprehensive exhibition in London." voorts (talk/contributions) 21:20, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Voorts as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: [6] Yann (talk) 17:23, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: It's not clear to me why my speedy was declined. This image is very clearly still under copyright, per the link to Getty above. Moreover, it was not published until 2019, according to the source that's linked on the image page (via Google Translate): "The world became familiar with the images only last year thanks to a comprehensive exhibition in London." voorts (talk/contributions) 21:19, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Voorts as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: [7] Yann (talk) 17:23, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: It's not clear to me why my speedy was declined. This image is very clearly still under copyright, per the link to Getty above. Moreover, it was not published until 2019, according to the source that's linked on the file page (via Google Translate): "The world became familiar with the images only last year thanks to a comprehensive exhibition in London." voorts (talk/contributions) 21:20, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Voorts as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: [8] Yann (talk) 17:24, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Voorts as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: [9] Yann (talk) 17:24, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: It's not clear to me why my speedy was declined. This image is very clearly still under copyright, per the link to Getty above. Moreover, it was not published until 2019, according to the source that's linked on the image page (via Google Translate): "The world became familiar with the images only last year thanks to a comprehensive exhibition in London." voorts (talk/contributions) 21:19, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Voorts as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: [10] Yann (talk) 17:24, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: It's not clear to me why my speedy was declined. This image is very clearly still under copyright, per the link to Getty above. Moreover, it was not published until 2019, according to the source that's linked on the file page (via Google Translate): "The world became familiar with the images only last year thanks to a comprehensive exhibition in London." voorts (talk/contributions) 21:20, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]