Commons:Deletion requests/File:8-bit cookies.jpg: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Deleted: Derivative work |
Grey ghost (talk | contribs) m added Category:Undelete in 2076 |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
'''Deleted:''' Derivative work [[User:Fastily|<span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS';color:Indigo;font-weight:bold"><big>F</big><small>ASTILY</small></span>]] [[User talk:Fastily|<span style="color:Indigo"><sup><small>(TALK)</small></sup></span>]] 07:25, 5 September 2012 (UTC) |
'''Deleted:''' Derivative work [[User:Fastily|<span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS';color:Indigo;font-weight:bold"><big>F</big><small>ASTILY</small></span>]] [[User talk:Fastily|<span style="color:Indigo"><sup><small>(TALK)</small></sup></span>]] 07:25, 5 September 2012 (UTC) |
||
{{delf}} |
{{delf}} |
||
[[Category:Undelete in 2076]] |
|||
Revision as of 17:15, 7 July 2024
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Derivative of copyrighted characters Kungfuman (talk) 16:20, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
- The file has free license, the characters aren't copyrightable.
- "the characters aren't copyrightable." - why? Bulwersator (talk) 16:32, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
- Why shouldn't these commercial video game charaters aren't copyrightable like all the others? They are quite simple (like most 8 bit games) but clearly copyrighted (the ghosts even have names) and the ghosts have no simple shape like the Pac Man pie. The game, screenshot or parts of it and chararcters are copyrighted. And all derivatives of it can't be free. The next one bake a Super Mario chararcter. --Kungfuman (talk) 12:36, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- "the characters aren't copyrightable." - why? Bulwersator (talk) 16:32, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
- Similar file with ghosts deleted PacMan Ghosts.png. --Kungfuman (talk) 11:35, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think they are copyrightable. They are clearly covered by trademark, but the simplistic design of the original arcade game characters isn't complicated enough for a copyright. Either way, this isn't a copy, so the copyright doesn't matter. It is a cookie based on the design that varies from the original design heavily (though still clearly infringing on trademark, which isn't an issue here). Compare to File:Pacman Guggenheim.jpg. As the original consists only of a handful of pixels, the cookie itself is clearly not a copy. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 15:14, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- "this isn't a copy, so the copyright doesn't matter" - wtf? Bulwersator (talk) 17:00, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- Copyright is the right to copy, right? It refers to the original work and derivative works. This is worlds away from the handful of pixels that comprises the original. Clearly this is the trademarked character, but it is not a copy of the copyrighted work. Namco could sue if these were sold in a commercial bakery, but the cookies and photo are not a copyright violation. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 23:19, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- It is a clear derivative work Bulwersator (talk) 11:08, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Copyright is the right to copy, right? It refers to the original work and derivative works. This is worlds away from the handful of pixels that comprises the original. Clearly this is the trademarked character, but it is not a copy of the copyrighted work. Namco could sue if these were sold in a commercial bakery, but the cookies and photo are not a copyright violation. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 23:19, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- "this isn't a copy, so the copyright doesn't matter" - wtf? Bulwersator (talk) 17:00, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think they are copyrightable. They are clearly covered by trademark, but the simplistic design of the original arcade game characters isn't complicated enough for a copyright. Either way, this isn't a copy, so the copyright doesn't matter. It is a cookie based on the design that varies from the original design heavily (though still clearly infringing on trademark, which isn't an issue here). Compare to File:Pacman Guggenheim.jpg. As the original consists only of a handful of pixels, the cookie itself is clearly not a copy. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 15:14, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work FASTILY (TALK) 07:25, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
