Commons:Deletion requests/File:Patricia Medina-Siren of Bagdad-Promo-Van Pelt.jpg: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Klodl (talk | contribs)
AhmadWikiBot (talk | contribs)
m Removing {{DRbox}} from closed DR (Task 3)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{delh}}

<noinclude>{{Commons:Deletion requests/box}}</noinclude>
=== [[:File:Patricia Medina-Siren of Bagdad-Promo-Van Pelt.jpg]] ===
=== [[:File:Patricia Medina-Siren of Bagdad-Promo-Van Pelt.jpg]] ===
There is no evidence that its copyright was not renewed. --[[User:Klodl|Klodl]] ([[User talk:Klodl|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 23:14, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
There is no evidence that its copyright was not renewed. --[[User:Klodl|Klodl]] ([[User talk:Klodl|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 23:14, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Line 6: Line 5:
:{{vk}} - If I'm not mistaken, then the renewal records are publicly accessible. Go find the renewal data for this image (and any you nominated in the past and intend to nominate in the future), and you'll be taken seriously. Until then, this is just a waste of everybodies time. --[[User:Latebird|Latebird]] ([[User talk:Latebird|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 23:54, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
:{{vk}} - If I'm not mistaken, then the renewal records are publicly accessible. Go find the renewal data for this image (and any you nominated in the past and intend to nominate in the future), and you'll be taken seriously. Until then, this is just a waste of everybodies time. --[[User:Latebird|Latebird]] ([[User talk:Latebird|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 23:54, 6 July 2009 (UTC)


*{{comment}} No, it is wrong. Check the licensing information. [http://www.creativeclearance.com/guidelines.html#B1] (read the context and content). "Must be cleared with" - means a copyright there. ''Production Stills (photos taken on the set of the film or TV show during the shooting) must be cleared with the studio and can cost anywhere between $150 and $500.'' Only older star headshots unrelated to movie are public domain. Production Still follows the copyright status of the movie, when is still copyrighted in the US. Such cases should not be allowed in future. If dissatisfied, provide some kind of source of the disproof. --[[User:Klodl|Klodl]] ([[User talk:Klodl|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 12:24, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
*{{comment}} No, it is wrong. Check the licensing information. [http://www.creativeclearance.com/guidelines.html#B1] (read the context and content). "Must be cleared with" - means a copyright there. ''Production Stills (photos taken on the set of the film or TV show during the shooting) must be cleared with the studio and can cost anywhere between $150 and $500.'' Only older star headshots unrelated to movie are public domain. Production Stills follow the copyright status of the movie unless the film itself is listed as PD. Such cases should not be allowed in future. If dissatisfied, provide some kind of source of the counterargument. --[[User:Klodl|Klodl]] ([[User talk:Klodl|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 15:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
----
'''Kept.''' See [[Commons:Deletion requests/File:Snow White and the Three Stooges-Promo3.JPG]]. –[[User:Tryphon|<span style="color: green">Tryphon</span>]][[User talk:Tryphon|<sup style="color:black">☂</sup>]] 19:20, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
{{delf}}

Latest revision as of 08:50, 10 May 2020

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that its copyright was not renewed. --Klodl (talk) 23:14, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - If I'm not mistaken, then the renewal records are publicly accessible. Go find the renewal data for this image (and any you nominated in the past and intend to nominate in the future), and you'll be taken seriously. Until then, this is just a waste of everybodies time. --Latebird (talk) 23:54, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment No, it is wrong. Check the licensing information. [1] (read the context and content). "Must be cleared with" - means a copyright there. Production Stills (photos taken on the set of the film or TV show during the shooting) must be cleared with the studio and can cost anywhere between $150 and $500. Only older star headshots unrelated to movie are public domain. Production Stills follow the copyright status of the movie unless the film itself is listed as PD. Such cases should not be allowed in future. If dissatisfied, provide some kind of source of the counterargument. --Klodl (talk) 15:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Snow White and the Three Stooges-Promo3.JPG. –Tryphon 19:20, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]