Commons:Deletion requests/File:Patricia Medina-Siren of Bagdad-Promo-Van Pelt.jpg: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Klodl (talk | contribs)
Created page with '{{subst:delete2|image=File:Patricia Medina-Siren of Bagdad-Promo-Van Pelt.jpg|reason=There is no evidence that its copyright was not renewed. --~~~~}}'
 
keep, find renewal record before nominating
Line 3: Line 3:
=== [[:File:Patricia Medina-Siren of Bagdad-Promo-Van Pelt.jpg]] ===
=== [[:File:Patricia Medina-Siren of Bagdad-Promo-Van Pelt.jpg]] ===
There is no evidence that its copyright was not renewed. --[[User:Klodl|Klodl]] ([[User talk:Klodl|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 23:14, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
There is no evidence that its copyright was not renewed. --[[User:Klodl|Klodl]] ([[User talk:Klodl|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 23:14, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

:{{vk}} - If I'm not mistaken, then the renewal records are publicly accessible. Go find the renewal data for this image (and any you nominated in the past and intend to nominate in the future), and you'll be taken seriously. Until then, this is just a waste of everybodies time. --[[User:Latebird|Latebird]] ([[User talk:Latebird|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 23:54, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:54, 6 July 2009

  • Add {{subst:delete-subst|REASON (mandatory)}} on the page
  • Notify the uploader with {{subst:idw|File:Patricia Medina-Siren of Bagdad-Promo-Van Pelt.jpg}}--~~~~
  • On the log, add :
    {{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Patricia Medina-Siren of Bagdad-Promo-Van Pelt.jpg}}

There is no evidence that its copyright was not renewed. --Klodl (talk) 23:14, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - If I'm not mistaken, then the renewal records are publicly accessible. Go find the renewal data for this image (and any you nominated in the past and intend to nominate in the future), and you'll be taken seriously. Until then, this is just a waste of everybodies time. --Latebird (talk) 23:54, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]