- Add {{subst:delete-subst|REASON (mandatory)}} on the page
- Notify the uploader with {{subst:idw|File:Patricia Medina-Siren of Bagdad-Promo-Van Pelt.jpg}}--~~~~
- On the log, add :
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Patricia Medina-Siren of Bagdad-Promo-Van Pelt.jpg}}
There is no evidence that its copyright was not renewed. --Klodl (talk) 23:14, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - If I'm not mistaken, then the renewal records are publicly accessible. Go find the renewal data for this image (and any you nominated in the past and intend to nominate in the future), and you'll be taken seriously. Until then, this is just a waste of everybodies time. --Latebird (talk) 23:54, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment No, it is wrong. Check the licensing information. [1] (read the context and content). "Must be cleared with" - means a copyright there. Production Stills (photos taken on the set of the film or TV show during the shooting) must be cleared with the studio and can cost anywhere between $150 and $500. Only older star headshots unrelated to movie are public domain. Production Stills follow the copyright status of the movie, while the film is still copyrighted in the US. Such cases should not be allowed in future. If dissatisfied, provide some kind of source of the disproof. --Klodl (talk) 12:34, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
