Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Archimëa: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
{{unsigned|Grand-Duc}}
Grey ghost (talk | contribs)
Line 132: Line 132:
'''Deleted:''' Notes to various items. The shapes of the consoles have a copyright, so it is not just the screens we must look at. THe written instructions also have a copyright. Costumes do not have a copyright in the USA, but masks do. Costumes are utilitarian even if bizarre, but masks are never utilitarian (except to bank robbers, but the Copyright Office doesn't count that). .&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<strong><strong>Jim</strong></strong> . . . . <small><small>[[User:Jameslwoodward|(Jameslwoodward)]]</small> ([[User talk:Jameslwoodward|talk to me]])</small> 10:11, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
'''Deleted:''' Notes to various items. The shapes of the consoles have a copyright, so it is not just the screens we must look at. THe written instructions also have a copyright. Costumes do not have a copyright in the USA, but masks do. Costumes are utilitarian even if bizarre, but masks are never utilitarian (except to bank robbers, but the Copyright Office doesn't count that). .&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<strong><strong>Jim</strong></strong> . . . . <small><small>[[User:Jameslwoodward|(Jameslwoodward)]]</small> ([[User talk:Jameslwoodward|talk to me]])</small> 10:11, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
{{delf}}
{{delf}}

[[Category:Undelete in 2076]]

Revision as of 17:27, 7 July 2024

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Archimëa (talk · contribs)

There's a lot of files who are photographies of video game (Nintendo, Star Wars) related subjects, most often likely official licensed toy products, but as such unfree for Commons. Additionally, some pictures of arcades machines where I'm unsure if de minimis is applicable for the decorations or not. Assuming protection, they would warrant deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grand-Duc (talk • contribs)

User:Grand-Duc : And what you do for this ???? : Category:Pinball_games, Category:Arcade_games seriously Grand-Duc, it's hard for me not say you all it want to... pffff.
What you do is a shame. It's so stupid --Archimëa (talk) 12:59, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I add that i'm against this deletions untill Category:Pinball_games, Category:Arcade_games still exists --Archimëa (talk) 13:17, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Archimëa: I saw that you wrote a reference to your Wikipedian work in French on your userpage. So, I'll communicate with you in that language, it's easier to me than English. En ce qui concerne les catégories Pinball et jeux d'arcades, je n'ai encore rien fait, et je ne sais pas si je vais faire quelque chose. Tout ce qui peut ou doit être fait le peut être par toi-même, principe Wiki. Je me permets d'ajouter que cette liste de demandes de suppression n'a rien de personnel, j'ai simplement vu le premier des fichiers listés ci-dessous dans la liste des contributions récentes. Comme il avait une référence à une source sur Commons, j'ai pensé que cela en valait la peine de jeter un coup d’œil sur les contributions de l'utilisateur qui avait téléchargé l'image. La liste visible avec l'outil "VisualFileChange" m'a quand même impressioné, le résultat est connu. Grand-Duc (talk) 20:51, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
De minimis to me. People building up some parts at an exhibition. Some parts far in the distance.  Keep --Kungfuman (talk) 12:43, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
De minimis to me. Few artwork from a distance.  Keep --Kungfuman (talk) 12:43, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
People playing pinball from a distance. 10 machines. No focus of the tiny artworks. So de minimis.  Keep --Kungfuman (talk) 12:58, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Very small amount of artwork or logo from a distance. De minimis to me.  Keep --Kungfuman (talk) 12:58, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Metroid est une série de jeux vidéo datant de 1986 pour le plus ancien, la série semble être encors en cours. Le problème n'est pas une protection de droits immatériels sur la photo, mais bien une sur les charactères des jeux. Ce sont des idées de chez Nintendo, et les personnes qui font du Cosplay sont, juridiquement parlant, en infraction des ces droits (mais aucune entreprise n'est si folle d'attaquer les clients et fans qui s'habillent comme un charactère virtuel, mais c'est une autre histoire pour un site internet qui pourrait vendre des images de ce charactère... Nul photographe ne peut licencier des droits sur des figures et des idées qu'il ne possède pas. En principe, cette image est même un candidat pour une suppression express. Grand-Duc (talk) 20:51, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • if there is no copyright here [File:Samus and Link at Igromir 2012 1.jpg], there is no copyright on this file.
Problème de logique: il y a un copyright sur l'image, il est même la base de toute licence y comprise celles de la famille Creative Commons. Il n'y a qu'une façon pour qu'une œuvre ne soit plus soumise à un "copyright" en Europe (ou au moins en Allemange, dont je prends l'Urheberrechtsgesetz comme base): il faut que son créateur soit décédé depuis 70 ans. à ce que je sais, on ne peut pas renoncer à ses droits d'auteur dans les "pays de droit civil" (en contraste sont les pays du "Common law", p. ex. les États-Unis), juste donner une licence gratuite et sans préréquisite.
A cosplayer in a rather simple suit.  Keep --Kungfuman (talk) 12:58, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per COM:COSTUME, costumes and cosplay are in general not considered copyright violations. - AdamBMorgan (talk) 17:36, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Weak keep: I am not sure how COM:COSTUME works with full mascot costumes (and, without an original, I'm not sure if this is cosplay or an official mascot -- if that matters). The policy only mentions specific details, like masks, as copyrightable, exempting full costumes. I think this should be OK but I'm not sure. - AdamBMorgan (talk) 17:36, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merci d'avoir indiqué la source de l'image, j'ai demandé une suppression express.
Not a simple cosplayer but a very detailed original, close to the copyrighted character especially the head.  Delete --Kungfuman (talk) 12:58, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Weak keep: As with the one above, I think this should be OK as a costume but I'm not sure. - AdamBMorgan (talk) 17:36, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
IMO copyrighted contents artwork.  Delete --Kungfuman (talk) 12:58, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Non, pas aveugle, uniquement une image en thumb sans trop de détails. Je veux bien admettre de m'être trompé, ici, mais j'espère encore d'autres opinions - le placement d'éléments d'un interface peut être une idée protégée... // Well I easily could be mistaken here (I only saw a small thumbnail in VisualFileChange), but I think that it's still worth discussing, as the appearance of an interface could be copyrighted, I guess. Grand-Duc (talk) 20:51, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously a screenshot of a copyrighted game.  Delete --Kungfuman (talk) 12:58, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Kungfuman: please take a closer look at the file description. The background image is indeed taken from a copyrighted game (namely Sherlock Holmes Versus Jack the Ripper), but with the appropriate permission (see File:SH5 - 3ème personne.png). Some items and numbers have been inserted over the screenshot to explain the UI of the game Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 2 Interface. Those inserted items have been drawn manually, they do not come from a screenshot (here is an actual screenshot of the game). So the question is about whether the placement of the 7 items is copyrighted. This seems extremely unlikely to me. Orlodrim (talk) 19:46, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pas de problème copryright ici, c'est juste. Mais un GROS problème de qualité: c'est de la m**** floue (Et oui, je peux aussi utiliser de l'argot ou un langage... populaire, disons, si besoin était.... // Actually no copyright problem, but still a heavy quality issue: badly blurred. Grand-Duc (talk) 20:51, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, actually nothing. I guess that it remained selected by error in the VisualFileChange window. I'll remove the DR on the file. Grand-Duc (talk) 19:48, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I can't see any copyrighted parts/artwork here. Some geometrical parts. And the main focus is in the middle with the coins.  Keep--Kungfuman (talk) 12:43, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The copyrighted screen content is very small (and could be blackened out), so IMO de minimis here. The rest is hardware (like game consoles or other cabinets) and should be kept  Keep --Kungfuman (talk) 12:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The copyrighted screen content is very small (and could be blackened out) , so IMO de minimis here. The rest is hardware (like game consoles or other cabinets) and should be kept  Keep --Kungfuman (talk) 12:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grand-Duc (talk) 18:47, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all files which are violating commons policyes (a lot!). A lot of issues here: COM:L, COM:TOYS, COM:DW, COM:SCOPE... --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:38, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Added some explanations in the uploader's language, please ping me if there's a need for translations. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 20:51, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't checked all images. Some are clearly cv like the toys. At least the images from a distance that show few parts of artwork or screens should be kept. --Kungfuman (talk) 12:43, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Notes to various items. The shapes of the consoles have a copyright, so it is not just the screens we must look at. THe written instructions also have a copyright. Costumes do not have a copyright in the USA, but masks do. Costumes are utilitarian even if bizarre, but masks are never utilitarian (except to bank robbers, but the Copyright Office doesn't count that). .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:11, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]