Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Mona.jpeg: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
FSHL (talk | contribs)
that one wasn't my !vote
Line 2: Line 2:
Out of project scope. Filmed persons consent? [[User:EugeneZelenko|EugeneZelenko]] 15:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Filmed persons consent? [[User:EugeneZelenko|EugeneZelenko]] 15:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
* Image seems unobjectionable and potentially of some sort of use. If it had information on source and subject, I would vote to keep. However it is currently lacking any of that, so unless that is soon taken care of, {{vd}} -- [[User:Infrogmation|Infrogmation]] 18:35, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
* Image seems unobjectionable and potentially of some sort of use. If it had information on source and subject, I would vote to keep. However it is currently lacking any of that, so unless that is soon taken care of, {{vd}} -- [[User:Infrogmation|Infrogmation]] 18:35, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
* {{comment}} per above, only {{vk}} if source and subject information are provided. {{vd}} Please.[[User:Wooyi|Wooyi]] 19:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
* {{comment}} per above, only {{vk}} if source and subject information are provided. [[User:Wooyi|Wooyi]] 19:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
*{{vd}} Please.
*{{vk}} - Not sufficient reason for deletion – is still in use and as an elementary result of this trivial fact definitively not out of scope... --[[User:FSHL|FSHL]] 17:39, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
*{{vk}} - Not sufficient reason for deletion – is still in use and as an elementary result of this trivial fact definitively not out of scope... --[[User:FSHL|FSHL]] 17:39, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:46, 20 August 2007

Out of project scope. Filmed persons consent? EugeneZelenko 15:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Image seems unobjectionable and potentially of some sort of use. If it had information on source and subject, I would vote to keep. However it is currently lacking any of that, so unless that is soon taken care of,  Delete -- Infrogmation 18:35, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment per above, only  Keep if source and subject information are provided. Wooyi 19:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Please.
  •  Keep - Not sufficient reason for deletion – is still in use and as an elementary result of this trivial fact definitively not out of scope... --FSHL 17:39, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]