Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive/2017-52

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie not used on user page Syced (talk) 12:04, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:11, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 10:22, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:10, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 10:22, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:10, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is freedom of panorama in USA for architecture, but not for plaques. The photo violates copyright and can be re-uploaded into some projects locally as fair use. Taivo (talk) 11:08, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 00:46, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Mitte27 (talk) 00:26, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, no EXIF, user's uploads are of different sizes. Unlikely to be own work. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:14, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Mitte27 (talk) 00:26, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, no EXIF, user's uploads are of different sizes. Unlikely to be own work. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:14, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 02:53, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata. Taivo (talk) 10:39, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 02:53, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small unused selfie. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 03:11, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:08, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 15:18, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: in use Alan (talk) 16:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Mitte27 (talk) 03:18, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio image. Downloaded from the web Störm (talk) 08:17, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:45, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, non notable person Afifa Afrin (talk) 13:38, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small unused personal photo without camera data, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:05, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, unidentified subject, not in use, out of COM:SCOPE.   — Jeff G. ツ 14:38, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep This isn't really a personal photograph, and even if the uploader’s sister is in the casket she can't be personally identified and this image could realistically be used in a Wikipedia article (or outside of Wikimedia projects) for information relating for funerals. In fact this picture 📷 is of superb quality, and yes the author vandalised the categories but if they didn't do that this image would've just been seen as a useful image of a funeral, this request seems to be more of a w:en:WP:DENY nature than a Commons:Scope one. Sent from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 09:29, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I wanted to keep the photo and categorize it as "Funerals in ..." Er, which country? Unidentified country reduces greatly educational value. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No useful category or description -- therefore useless for any purpose because no one can find it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, not in use, out of COM:SCOPE.   — Jeff G. ツ 14:41, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment I was hoping we could elicit more information from the uploader, but it might be a delicate matter—and anyway the user seems quite uncommunicative and has been blocked for incompetent or disruptive editing on several projects, so it was a long shot at best.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 18:46, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I wanted to keep the photo and categorize it as "Funerals in ..." Which country? USA, Tanzania, Austria? Unidentified country reduces greatly educational value. Taivo (talk) 11:45, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No useful category or description -- therefore useless for any purpose because no one can find it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:49, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image already deleted and uploaded again. Also, EXIF is not valid. ~AntanO4task (talk) 10:59, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:17, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Poor quality image, where there are many better available. BeckenhamBear (talk) 19:01, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters.

Probably falling under COM:DW: (sorting of files done by user:esby

G I Chandor (talk) 03:28, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some files clearly fall under COM:DM, that would be a great thing if the DR initiator could spare us of nominating files the instant they contain an 'one piece/fate stay night' poster or goodies and they are not the main subject. some stands in convention are to be crowded with such articles, that does not make photographying the stand a copyright violation. Esby (talk) 09:56, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - DM does not apply if everything in the image is copyrighted. The test is that you must be able to remove the copyrighted item and the average observer would not notice. If you removed the copyrighted works from the last four of these, you would have a large white wall. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:05, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:39, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]