User talk:Benzoyl: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Line 391: Line 391:
{{Autotranslate|1=File:しずかちゃん (6779016749).jpg|2=|3=|base=Idw}} [[User:G I Chandor|G I Chandor]] ([[User talk:G I Chandor|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 00:44, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
{{Autotranslate|1=File:しずかちゃん (6779016749).jpg|2=|3=|base=Idw}} [[User:G I Chandor|G I Chandor]] ([[User talk:G I Chandor|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 00:44, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
:Thanks for letting me know. --[[User:Benzoyl|Benzoyl]] ([[User talk:Benzoyl#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 09:49, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
:Thanks for letting me know. --[[User:Benzoyl|Benzoyl]] ([[User talk:Benzoyl#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 09:49, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

== [[:File:Japan Expo 2008 - Cacas Dr Slump (2652862339).jpg]] ==
{{Autotranslate|1=File:Japan Expo 2008 - Cacas Dr Slump (2652862339).jpg|2=|3=|base=Idw}} [[User:G I Chandor|G I Chandor]] ([[User talk:G I Chandor|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 03:14, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:14, 15 December 2017

User talk:Benzoyl/log9 - User talk:Benzoyl/log8 - User talk:Benzoyl/log7 - User talk:Benzoyl/log6 - User talk:Benzoyl/log5 - User talk:Benzoyl/log4 - User talk:Benzoyl/log3 - User talk:Benzoyl/log2

User talk:Benzoyl/log1 1-100 21:49, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

User talk:Benzoyl 101- 11:13, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

archive

アップロードするファイルやファイル名の付け方など再考をお願いします

Benzoylさん、こんにちは。 多くのファイルをアップロードされていますが、下記などをお読みになってアップロードするファイルやファイル名の付け方など再考してもらえませんでしょうか?

--BunBun-J (talk) 03:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. User talk:BunBun-J --Benzoyl (talk) 03:27, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
「教育的な目的」については、他の方の選択次第でして、一概には言えません。例:

and more --Benzoyl (talk) 03:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

えーっと

お久しぶりです。ちょっと気になったのですが、上にも案内がきてますがコモンズの収載基準をごぞんじですか?
File:醤油煮 味噌煮 水煮 (22275074669).jpgもそうですが、いったいどのような教育的価値があるのでしょう?
削除依頼により削除されている写真も多そうです。もう少し考えてアップロードして貰えませんか?--Vigorous action (talk) 09:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

どうも。お久しぶりです。アップロード(というか拾い)したうちの幾つかは教育的価値に疑問があるものもあるかもしれません。
ただ、この缶詰を指摘されるのは結構心外です。黒金銀は、何らかの文化的影響のある選択(ゴージャス感?)とも考えられます。その他も含めて引き続き議論を継続いたしましょう。WPと異なり、こちらではキャラが変わってますかもしれませんが、よろしくお願いいたします。 --Benzoyl (talk) 09:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
なお、過去に削除依頼により削除されている写真のほとんどは、著作権問題 Copyright artworkのものです。--Benzoyl (talk) 09:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
例えばFile:Pink Pout (16795048267).jpg どう利用されるか分からないものです。(ru:Губы de:Altfränkische Sprache WPに限らず、[1])--Benzoyl (talk) 09:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
じゃあ、著作権絡みでいうならこの写真伊藤食品さんの著作物の二次利用ですけど、ライセンスは無問題?伊藤食品さんは缶詰のデザインにもこだわりがあるようですけど。
さらに、File:イー・モバイル 2013 心斎橋筋 (9871988613) (2).jpgですけど、一般人の顔がわかる程度に写ってますが、被写体の許可などの権利関係の処理はお済みですか?--Vigorous action (talk) 05:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
文字だけを見ればテキスト何だろうけど、配色とかレイアウトってのもデザイン構成の一つですよ。
あと、フリッカーの写真はライセンスはCC-BY-SAになってても実は盗作ってのが結構あるので本当に必要なもの&自分できちんとリスク判断出来るもの以外は手を出さない方がいいと思うよ。--Vigorous action (talk) 05:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
配色とかレイアウトは、本件は使用色の少なさから判断しました。話が五輪エンブレムみたいな流れになってますが。
他からの引用写真は、結構かどうかは分かりませんが、確かにありますね。#File:Small willy perhaps? (3504481977).jpgがそうでした。日本国内のは同一ユーザーの前後の写真も見てますので、判断できる感じとも思います(画質がまちまちなのとかはカメラ自体が異なってるなど)。何はともあれ、ご忠告ありがとうございます、と慎んで申し上げます。--Benzoyl (talk) 06:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
ああ、書き忘れてた。文字であっても『書』と見なされれば著作権は発生します。ちなみに鯖はだれが書いても写真の文字のようにはなりません。--Vigorous action (talk) 13:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
『書』としての独創性。例えば「イラスト素材: 鯛焼き」 [2] [3] 結構、字体似てますよね。魚の下の点3つを繋げるのは。 --Benzoyl (talk) 00:39, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
v_aさんの、トークページ過去ログ方法を模倣したら、ひどい目にあってしまいました(コモンズでは非推奨らしい)。
#Talk page archiving
といっても、私の自己責任ですが。
ただ、個人的には「過去ログ化後」の(編集履歴からの)アクセスとしては、v_aさん方式の方が便利と感じております。
以上です。失礼いたしました。--Benzoyl (talk) 00:10, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Men handshakes has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Reguyla (talk) 18:27, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 01:24, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Massive creation of questionable categories. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.
Beeblebrox (talk) 01:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 01:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Benzoyl (talk) 01:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ref - User:Benzoyl/Kenkyu

--Benzoyl (talk) 00:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page archiving

Archiving your talk page by moving it to an archive is not a 'standard' way to do it... it obscures the page history. Please read the instructions at COM:ARCHIVE. Material should be archived through a cut-paste move to the archive page. Thanks. Reventtalk 02:08, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[4] Sorry and thanks. I'll do my best reading COM:ARCHIVE --Benzoyl (talk) 02:12, 10 December 2016 (UTC) check of "page history" is very important. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:20, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I read [5] thanks.
But I should do over again now? ‎I do not know (understand) good enough.
Absolutely, Next chance in future, User talk:Benzoyl/log3 (Make in advance, after that, Copy<or>Cut and Paste to "log3") I don't make the same mistakes twice. --Benzoyl (talk) 11:51, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Incidentally, The same way in Japanese Wikipedia (user Mr.v_a [#えーっと]) - [6] I won't do this-way again. --Benzoyl (talk) 12:04, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Benzoyl:  Yes, just copy-paste the material to the archive page, then remove it from your talk page. (You can have this done automatically by a bot). That way the history of your talk page stays intact. Reventtalk 02:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no personal attacks

Personal attacks like this are not acceptable behaviour in Wikimedia projects. You may be be blocked if you continue to do it. Ankry (talk) 14:53, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's not, what I meant personal attack. true respect.
But, on this occasion, the misinterpretation arose. I'll never do that again.
English also Japanese, language is difficult. International communication is difficult.
That's why, It might be, There is "Photos", "Wikimedia Commons" for Non-verbal communication. Thanks. --Benzoyl (talk) 00:05, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

too many expensive function calls.

Archived to User talk:Benzoyl/log4 for reducing. But, still have trouble now, 2sections. 
{{Autotranslate|base=Idw/heading}}
  • 03:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
  • 04:08, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
  • 00:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

--Benzoyl (talk) 12:00, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

caused by #Bicolor ? --Benzoyl (talk) 02:57, 19 February 2017 (UTC) --Benzoyl (talk) 23:56, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:JR SKISKI Zenbu yuki no sei da as That's all because of the snow.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 05:29, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:スタバ 2017 (33430426225).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Quark Logo (talk) 08:25, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Grawlixes

As I basically already told you in 2015 (see User_talk:Benzoyl/log1#File:Cats_having_sex_in_Israel.jpg.E2.80.8E), Commons categories are much more practical and concrete than you seem to think. Their purpose is not to drag in remote philosophical and metaphorical associations... AnonMoos (talk) 19:43, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paula Multitask (3917335633).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Quark Logo (talk) 10:10, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 12:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 00:01, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Category:People_looking_food has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 14:16, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 00:01, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Space Mountain chicken exit, Tokyo Disneyland 途中退出口 2006 (134184211).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 18:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 00:01, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 06:42, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 23:23, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Mailbox (4468446690).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

John of Reading (talk) 20:58, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 23:23, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:遊び (429256717).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 12:24, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 03:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Before and after images of cooking has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 06:52, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 09:12, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Memories has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Auntof6 (talk) 17:06, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 08:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Mature women has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--ghouston (talk) 05:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 08:21, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Geometry

Please, don’t venture in such categorization until you mastered some understanding what a diagonal is, and what the angular units (such as “degree”) mean. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:23, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Category:Oblique lines --Benzoyl (talk) 08:22, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 21:39, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 10:21, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Discasto talk 22:40, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 12:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You added this picture, but there are no english description. Please write what is this racket? For table tennis or for lawn tennis? --Peter Porai-Koshits (talk) 09:45, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It may be Battledore and shuttlecock ? [7] But, It can not be concluded, sorry. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:32, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Enlarge this image, Second from the right racket, white letters be written "JAQUES LONDON" ? --Benzoyl (talk) 02:47, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Okey, thx. Its really looks like w:Battledore and shuttlecock. Also you can contact with JAQUES LONDON and ask. But why this image has category "2009 World Table Tennis Championships"? What is connection with WTTC-2009? --Peter Porai-Koshits (talk) 06:37, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
For a limited period 28 April 2009 - 5 May, These rackets (on loan from ITTF museum Lausanne) were displayed at 2009 World Table Tennis Championships, Yokohama, for as a part of sports (=tabel tennis) promotion to visitors (=audience). --Benzoyl (talk) 06:50, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Other's whole photo - [8] ([9])
Thanks @ Peter Porai-Koshits, That goes for me, too. --Benzoyl (talk) 07:18, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It should be noted, "New! ITTF Museum moves to Shanghai" [10] --Benzoyl (talk) 06:57, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think in this case correct description will be:
Some exhibits from the racket collection of the ITTF museum. For a limited period 28 April 2009 - 5 May, these rackets were displayed at 2009 World Table Tennis Championships.
If you agree with text above, I can add this description on russian to the image. Also I think good idea to rename file from "ITTFミュージアム (3503758853).jpg" to "The racket collection of the ITTF museum on exhibition of 2009.jpg" or something like this. Thank you. --Peter Porai-Koshits (talk) 07:47, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Kindly add this description on russian to the image. --Benzoyl (talk) 07:59, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, ‎It filed an application. to File:The racket collection of the ITTF museum on exhibition of 2009 (3503758853).jpg --Benzoyl (talk) 07:57, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@ 06:37, 28 June 2017 (UTC) - I'm really sorry, I couldn't contact with JAQUES LONDON and ask. Due to, I'm not good at English. --Benzoyl (talk) 01:35, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Benzoyl,

do we really need this category?--石炭発電所 (talk) 08:01, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There are 94 files (mean "many") in this category. I think "need". also by themes Category:Music diagrams in Japanese, Category:Biological diagrams in Japanese etc. --Benzoyl (talk) 13:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:創作かかしコンテスト (15673920365).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:52, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 00:27, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:28, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 23:30, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:1960年代の交通公社の時刻表 (7887576454).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DAJF (talk) 03:33, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Japanese Magazines in 2008 (3386517004).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DAJF (talk) 03:35, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:とまります 親を幸せにする結婚式。 川越氷川神社 (16719860450).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 05:08, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:ライザップ 2015 (16383912594).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 05:09, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:寿がきや 2006 (187065505).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 06:34, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dancyu (3062384304).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 02:03, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:モグタン 日本パスタ協会 日曜日はパスタを食べよう (2369763873).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 03:36, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:不法投棄 2006 (208055730).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ariga (talk) 12:22, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 10:59, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Crysta-nagahori Cooling Tower at Amerikamura in 2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 07:22, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Japan 2012 (8309566563).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 07:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Hair behind the ears (either) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 15:20, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 01:09, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, G I Chandor (talk) 01:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shrine to the Overexposed Kitten (249980446).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 01:59, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bench (4550225298).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 02:06, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:生八ツ橋 カントリーマアム 2016 (29706906101).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 02:18, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 01:09, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Category:Degree_of_frost has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Auntof6 (talk) 00:25, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Benzoyl!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

Elisfkc (talk) 20:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Benzoyl (talk) 05:59, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:新聞制作技術展 2009 (4153648749).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:23, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 10:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Category:Old_buildings has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Jmabel ! talk 04:48, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 21:37, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

New and old has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 07:26, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 21:37, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, (talk) 17:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 23:45, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, (talk) 19:26, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 23:45, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:てらだ 2017 (36753355321).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sw0 (talk) 00:38, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:セブンイレブン 2016 (33062431001).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sw0 (talk) 00:40, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:ポッ拳 あばれる君 2016 (29507514185).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sw0 (talk) 00:40, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:お誕生日サービス 受付 2016 Pokemon Store (28071711464).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sw0 (talk) 00:49, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:ポケモンセンタートウホク (30648496386).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 11:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 21:41, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:父の日の買いものリスト (´Д` ) (18388863493).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:09, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 23:55, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:しずかちゃん (6779016749).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 00:44, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 09:49, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Japan Expo 2008 - Cacas Dr Slump (2652862339).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 03:14, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]