:Thanks for adding the source link. --[[User:Bricktop|Bricktop]] ([[User talk:Bricktop#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 19:51, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Revision as of 19:51, 31 March 2010
Hallo Bricktop! Ich glaube wenn Du beim Hochladen von Bildern noch zusätzlich Kategorien z.B Category:Rockets oder Category:Rocket launches angibst verbesserst Du die Zugriffmöglichkeite anderer. --Hegen 13:21, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Hallo Bricktop! Danke für die Reaktion. Leider bin ich mir mit der Englischen oder auch Russischen Sprache - aktiv - derzeit recht unsicher. So möchte ich wenigstens eimal den Bildinhalt in Deutsch schreiben. Aber ich werden mir Mühe geben eine hoffentlich richtige engl. Übersetzung dazuzusetzen. Zusätzlich läge mir die Russische Ergänzung am Herzen - aber hier komme ich noch nicht einmal bis zum Zeichensatz - Die Vorschläge bei "Ich brauche Hilfe" haben mir nicht wirklich weitergeholfen. Noch eine Frage zu Deiner "doppelten" Bildlizensierung - auch damit komme ich nicht ganz klar (Sinn, Zweck, Umfang?)? Obwohl ich einiges an juristischem Mist (Steuerrecht) gewöhnt bin, verschließt sich das mir beim Bildrecht fast vollständig und dann noch auf Englisch. --Hegen 16:21, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thank you Bricktop for the high res image of the seismometer
andre 10:01, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
You can delete all the pictures that you have said to me. Thanks! (Traduction with google traduction):Du kannst alle Abbildungen löschen, die du zu mir gesagt hast. Danke!
I don't want to delete your pictures (besides the fact that I'm not an administrator and can't do it). I only tagged your images as "no source", which means that there is no link provided to the original site you've got your images from. So nobody can prove that these pictures are really in public domain and because of that they may be deleted. If you simply provide sources for your images, you can remove my "no source" tags. See your picture Image:Rollover Atlantis.jpg for an example. --Bricktop01:52, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Do you know if anything is going to be done about Denniss removing categories from images? Was there ever a decision on this? Grenavitar02:11, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No, I don't know anything new about Denniss, because I only have rocket/space images I uploaded by myself on my watchlist and Denniss stoped to precess them. But if you look at his discussion page, he is gaining some positive comments for his recent work. --Bricktop13:43, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The issue link no longer works. I am having some differences with DennisS and his Categorization crusade on Commons. I was wondering if you could give me some advice on how to deal with him. Should I just write a bot that reverts all of his removals of categories? Or is the proper thing to escalate this to Village Pump again and press for a policy resolution. Dennis has reasons for his position, but I think he is in the extreme minority and there needs to be a systemic answer to this because he is just going to continue on year after year destroying metadata about images on commons. Mak19:56, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I would say this issue should be discussed publicly. I also would preffer a clear decision for how to deal with images included both in articles and categories. But I must say, at this moment I haven't a clear opinion in this issue: on one side I can understand Dennis's point, but on the other side his system of putting images in articles and removing from categories could hinder finding images on commons. I also think writing a bot, which reverts Dennis edits, isn't a good idea, because this may lead to a kind of "edit war". But I may be wrong, because I hadn't much contact with Dennis and his edits in the last couple of months. --Bricktop11:54, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
His only response to my communications has been more mass reversions. I really hope this can be aired publically too. I do think this is an honest difference of opinion, but he was using bullying tactics. Today he has not reverted anything so maybe he is thinking about this.
But he really has a weak position from a number of perspectives. Categories cover Hyponymy relationships, and Articles cover Meronymy. His fundamental misunderstanding of these differences creates chaos in building a taxonomy. DennisS's conservative stance on application of categories to information objects is not an expression of greater understanding of categorization fundamentals. He has no cache there, so don't buy into it. If he would bother to educate himself on taxonomy formalisms he will see my point.
But let's take the particular practical question you mentioned. Take the idea that broad categories should be applied to articles not images. OK. Consider the article USS New York (BB-34) . BB34 was in both WWI and WWII. Now DennisS marked the article with both categories (ships of wwI and ships of wwII). Totally wrong. Why? Because BB35 was massively changed during it's lifetime. The BB35 of 1916 and the Great Fleet had secondary swing guns on the sides, and lattice cage masts characteristic of that period. Now, a novice viewing this article might conclude from this article tag that this is coal smoke belching beast is an example of a WWII battleship. The solution? Strip those two categories from the article, and place them on the images to which they apply.
Image:BepiColombo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
auf der zugehörigen NASA-Website steht "BepiColombo images courtesy of ESA", zudem ist das Bild auch in der ESA-Bildergallerie aufgelistet. Ich gehe davon aus, dass das Bild daher weiterhin unfrei ist. --Phrood08:58, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Phrood. Der Grund wieso ich dachte dass dieses Bild frei ist, ist dass auf der NASA-Seite zwei weitere Bilder mit The Mercury Magnetospheric Orbiter and Mercury Surface Element BepiColombo images courtesy of ESA markiert sind. Und ich dachte zunächst dass bezieht sich nur auf diese zwei Bilder. Jetzt habe ich aber genauer hingeschaut: das sind wohl zwei getrennte Sätze, also BepiColombo images courtesy of ESA bezieht sich dann auf alle Bilder der Seite. Daher denke ich Du hast Recht und wir sollten das Bild löschen. --Bricktop09:25, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Вопрос о фотографиях
Привет. Я хотел бы тебя спросить. На странице «Мюнхенской конференции по безопасности» есть фотографии здесь. Там стоит такое разрешение на использование их фотографий.
Our online editorial team will document the event in writing and with pictures.
You can download the texts and photographs (300 dpi) free of charge
for further use as long as you indicate the name of the author/photographer.
Unsere Online-Redaktion dokumentiert die Veranstaltung in Wort und Bild.
Texte und Fotos (Auflösung 300 dpi) können heruntergeladen werden und sind
zur weiteren Nutzung honorarfrei, soweit der Name des Verfassers/Fotografen genannt wird.
Привет! Мне кажется что эти фотки можно использовать. Сейчас спрошу на немецкой Википедии de:Wikipedia_Diskussion:Public-Domain-Bilderquellen, думаю там быстро разрешат этот вопрос. Кстати имхо подходящий template для таких фотографий этот {{copyrightedFreeUseProvidedThat|the name of the photographer is given}}
Мда реакция на немецкой Википедии была не такая бурная как я предполагал... Похоже что этими фотографиями можно пользоваться, но желательно заранее запросить у них по мэйлу письменное разрешение. --Bricktop13:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Uwe, Du hast natürlich recht! Habe die Bilder ohne nachzudenken falsch benannt. Danke für die Korrektur! Gruß --Bricktop11:27, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Delta II 7940 rocket launching CALIPSO and CloudSat.jpg
Nicht schlimm, war kaum Arbeit, trotzdem ärgert man sich immer zuerst, dass man solche blöden Fehler beseitigen muß, die auch noch vom selben Autor wie die letzten sind :-) Hast du noch mehr Bilder, deren Namen ich noch mal vorsichtshalber kontrollieren sollte? :-) MFG --Uwe W.12:30, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keine Ahnung, ob es noch mehr falsch benannte Bilder gibt. Wenn ich es wüßte hätte ich sie selbst schon längst korrigiert ;-). Der Delta-Fehler kam wohl davon, dass ich mich beim uploaden sehr beeilt habe, da ich noch etwas anderes zu tun hatte. Die CALIPSO/CloudSat-Fehler kamen zustande, weil diese Bilder von der Seite des Kennedy Space Centers Media Gallery kamen und ich diesen Ort für die Bildnamen ohne nachzudenken einfach übernahm. Obwohl ich natürlich wußte dass die Delta in VAFB startet.
Image:PROBA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Hi, the Vega program was a Soviet space project around 1986. Yet you claim that the photos from this Soviet space project are owned by NASA? Please add a source + license to this image as quickly as possible. Thuresson13:12, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The source I got the picture from is given on the description page. However it apparently doesn't work any more. I tagged this picture as PD-USGov-NASA because it was on a NASA page and there it wasn't marked as copyrighted by someone else. But since this image comes from a Soviet Vega mission, it could also be not in PD, so I would also vote for deletion of this image. --Bricktop14:54, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ich denke wir können mein Bild getrost löschen lassen, Deines ist ja viel schöner! Habe schon längst mein Bild in anderssprachigen Wikipedias durch Deins ersetzt. --Bricktop21:56, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, mir ist bei Image:STS-121 Discovery approaching ISS.jpg zufällig aufgefallen, dass du da den weissen Rand unten weggeschnitten hast und du das Bild nachher in sehr hoher Qualität gespeichert hast, um durch die nochmalige Kompression die Bildqualität nicht zu stark zu verschlechtern. Dabei ist das Bild allerdings doppelt so gross geworden wie das Original. Wenn du das häufiger machst, kannst du dir ja mal Better JPEG anschauen, damit kann man entlang den JPEG-Blocks (meistens 16x16 Pixel) verlustfrei croppen. Kostet allerdings 25$, ich muss mir auch mal überlegen, ob es mir das Wert ist. Ich habe es hier genau für das benützt, finde ich ziemlich nett :) Gruss! - Pableu10:07, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wenn ich mich da einmischen darf: das praktische kleine Programm jpegcrop ist kostenlos. Ebenfalls interessant ist jpegoptim, mit dem sich vor allem kleine JPEG-Dateien verlustlos verkleinern lassen. --Phrood10:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Darfst dich sehr gerne einmischen. jpegcrop gefällt mir gut, ich habe vorhin schon nach einer kostenlosen Alternative zu Better JPEG gesucht, aber nichts gefunden. Ich brauche ja wirklich nur den Cropping-Teil von Better JPEG, sonst nichts (ausser vielleicht Rotate, aber das können sowieso alle). Und genau das macht jpegcrop. Perfekt, danke! jepgoptimize kannte ich schon, aber das ist auch sehr praktisch. - Pableu10:48, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für die Tips! Fand es auch nicht so gut, die Dateigröße nach dem croppen so anschwellen zu lassen, aber wußte nicht dass man JPEG ohne recompress und nochmaliges Speichern bearbeiten kann. Gruß --Bricktop17:58, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Thanks for creating the articles! I will go through rest of them in the coming days. And I'm replacing the parameter {{{PAGENAME}}} you were using for the mission name, with the actual mission name, because someday we may rename some of the pages or something similar and with the actual mission designation we'll be on the safer side then. Greetings --Bricktop13:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It would be the best solution. Maybe I can get AWB to work with Commons, then I'll replace {{{PAGENAME}}} with {{subst:PAGENAME}} in a semi-automatic mode. --Bricktop00:41, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Do you know this page? There are a lot of images of each STS mission, and I supose that they are in public domain. If you want we can upload best images for to complete the articles. --Emijrp20:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sure I know about this page :). And I already uploaded many images from there. If I see a nice picture there I upload it to Commons, but I am normally only searching for pictures when trying to illustrate some wikipedia articles. But if you want you can go on uploading images from there! --Bricktop00:41, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Привет, Bricktop. На странице STS-116 стоит старая эмблема миссии. Я загрузил новую Image:STS-116_patch.jpg. Я мог бы её вставить в станицу STS-116, но, так как ты этим занимаешься, я подумал, что тебе это будет сподручнее сделать. Мне кажется, что там должны быть обе эмблемы.--Ygrek16:55, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Привет! Вставил новую эмблему, а старую поставил в галерею "Other". А вообще-то я ничего не имею против, если эти STS-странички будут обрабатываться другими пользователями ;-) (с этой целью они и создавались). --Bricktop17:45, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Bricktop, ich bitte um deine Hilfe weil du wohl gut russisch kannst. Es geht um Image:Attention niels epting 01.png das zur Löschung vorgeschlagen ist weil es eine svg-version gibt (Image:Attention niels epting.svg). Das png-bild ist in der russischen wikipedia allerdings in über 100 Seiten eingebunden. In einigen Artikeln konnte ich das bild bereits ändern, aber vielfach ist es wohl in templates eingebunden - und da will und kann (einige sind für die bearbeitung gesperrt) ich nicht rumwerkeln. Es wäre schön wenn du dich da hilfreich einbringen oder jemandem auf ru kontaktieren könntest! --GeorgHH12:48, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Habe hier eine Anfrage an die hiesigen Admins gerichtet und sie um Hilfe bei dem Austauschen der Bilder in geschützten Seiten gebeten. --Bricktop15:27, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Bricktop, ich habe wieder eine Bitte: Es gibt hier identische Bilder von Wappen, deren Ortsname aber unterschiedlich geschrieben ist (Marina Roshcha bzw. Marina Roscha). Könntest du vielleicht den richtigen identifizieren und den jeweils anderen als duplicat markieren?
Hi, I've seen you've (also) taken it upon yourself to remove watermarks. I wonder if you are aware of JpegCrop which enables you to crop a Jpeg image without quality loss (Windows application). Hope to have been of help and wish you fun and productivity ;-). Siebrand12:52, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Herzlichen Dank für die Entfernung von Wasserzeichen in einigen meiner Bilder (z.B. Image:Agarkroete_fg4.jpg). Ich habe inzwischen mit dem Austausch solcher Bilder begonnen. Leider gibt es ein Problem beim Aufspielen.
Nach dem Öffnen der mit einem Warnhinweis versehenen Commons Internetseite nutze ich den Verweis "Eine neue Version dieser Datei hochladen" unter "Dateiversionen" (Bsp.: Image:Hohlweg fg01.jpg). Anschließend wird leider noch immer das alte Bild gezeigt, die veränderte und neue Version erscheint nicht. Nach einigen Tagen funktioniert es dann doch ohne mein Zutun. Sind nur Administratoren zu einem unmittelbaren Austausch befähigt? Findet sich in der "Editors help" ein Hinweis auf das Austauschen vorhandener Bilder? --Dysmachus09:24, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo! Das kommt davon dass die alten Bilder sich noch im Browsercache befinden (und vielleicht auch im Cache der Wikimedia-Server). Benutze einfach die "Aktualisieren"-Funktion des Browsers. Wenn das nicht hilft, dann kannst Du den Browsercache leeren bzw. beim Aktualisieren den Cache umgehen (geht bei mir auf Firefox mit Shift+Aktualisieren). Gruß --Bricktop12:35, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Herzlichen Dank für den Hinweis. Leider scheint es daran nicht zu liegen (Cache immer zuvor gelöscht). Beispielsweise habe ich nun wiederholt das Bild Image:Adler_fg04.jpg versucht neu zu laden (ohne Wasserzeichen). Die Kontrolle von zwei anderen Rechner aus ergab immer, dass das alte Bild (mit Wasserzeichen) noch vorhanden ist. Was kann es sonst noch sein? --Dysmachus15:24, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm bei mir funktioniert es (und bin auch kein Admin). Auch das Image:Adler_fg04.jpg kann ich ohne Wasserzeichen sehen. Es scheint also nur Dein lokales Problem zu sein, auf den Wiki-Servern ist wohl alles OK. Versuch doch mal einfach auf die letzte Bildversion in der "File history" zu klicken. Dann kannst Du direkt auf das Bild zugreifen. Ansonsten würde ich vorschlagen, dass Du einfach die Bilder weiter hochlädst und sie dann einige Tage später prüfst... Gruß --Bricktop16:44, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
P.S.: noch ein Lösungsvorschlag: mit einem anderen Browser, den Du normalerweise nicht benutzst, die Bilder nach dem hochladen checken. --Bricktop16:46, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Badname/Duplicate
Hey, I notice that you have tagged a number of images as {{Badname}}. Just a note, badname should only be used for "incorrectly named images if you are the uploader and they are not used". Otherwise use {{Duplicate}}. Thanks.--Nilfanion17:52, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Sts9 flight insignia.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Shizhao03:45, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
RE: Image:SoyuzTMA9official.jpg
The copyright policy states that images are PD unless otherwise specified, and it was not otherwise specified. Therefore, one can only assume that it is PD, NASA or not. --GW Simulations20:25, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The image source page [1] says Photo credit: Roscosmos / Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center. I would say this is what NASA means by saying images are PD unless otherwise specified. --Bricktop01:14, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have precisely a nasty chat with another user on a similar topic with the image of article Anousheh Ansari. Do you confirm that images stating Photo credit: Roscosmos / Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center are not PD ? 82.120.136.21020:11, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NASA only holds copyright on pictures which are created by NASA (or by NASA-paid employers). Roscosmos and Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center aren't NASA employers, that's why NASA can't copyright their material under its own conditions. --Bricktop00:56, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Aluterus_scriptus_1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Nilfanion22:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Terrestrial Planet Finder PIA04499.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Shizhao02:51, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image:LUNAR-A.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Thank you, Bricktop, for trimming the white border off the few NASA pictures I just uploaded. Due to software problems, I can't do the trimming on the computer I'm using right now. I had planned to do that later on another desktop, but you beat me to it. Many thanks. Happy editing. :-) Take care. -- PFHLai04:37, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Recently you edited Image:Moorish Idol (Zanclus cornutus) 01.jpg (diff), saying that it wasn't Zanclus cornutus, but in fact Heniochus acuminatus. I agree that it is not Zanclus cornutus, but are you confident that it is Heniochus acuminatus, and not a third species? I would like to be as accurate as possible in my uploads, so I wanted to make sure I did it right this time. Thanks for the help! --Tewy05:15, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm in fact not 100% sure that the fish on your picture is a Heniochus acuminatus, because there is another very similar species Heniochus diphreutes (see [2] for a comparison of these two Heniochus species). But for me it looks more like the pictured fish is a H. acuminatus then a H. diphreutes. But to be really sure you should probably consult a specialist. --Bricktop03:30, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just an update for if you're interested, but I found another image I took which was a full version of the tank the species was in, and was able to read the sign above the glass. You were right, the species is in fact a Heniochus acuminatus. I uploaded a new image with the correct title (Image:Longfin Bannerfish (Heniochus acuminatus) 01.jpg) and tagged the old one for deletion. Thanks again for noticing the problem in the first place. --Tewy06:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Planet-C.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Hallo Bricktop. Das Bild Frogfish3.jpg zeigt de:Pelzgroppen (Caracanthus) aus der Ordnung der Panzerwangen (Scorpaeniformes). Und zwar die Art Caracanthus maculatus[3]. Vielleicht benennst du das Bild um. Grüße, --Haplochromis12:46, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wieder ich. Hallo Bricktop. Das Bild des Feilenfisch zeigt nicht Acreichthys tomentosus sondern Pseudomonacanthus peroni. Da hat sich der Fotograf geirrt. Die Fishbasebilder sind zwar nicht optimal, aber man sieht beim ersten Foto die Flecken und die blassen Längsstreifen. Ich hab eine Bestimmungbuch, da ist ein Foto eines lebenden Exemplars, bin mir deshalb ganz sicher. --Haplochromis14:40, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Haplochromis, freut mich immer etwas von Dir zu hören (es ist immer etwas konstruktives!) :-). Habe das Bild jetzt unter Image:Pseudomonacanthus peroni.jpg hochgeladen. Ich versuche zwar normalerweise zu checken ob der Fotograf die Art richtig bestimmt hat (jedenfalls wenn ich an der Kompetenz des Fotografs auf diesem Gebiet zweifele), aber bin eigentlich selber nicht wirklich kompetent genug dafür :-). Gruß --Bricktop19:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That way, the file qualifies for speedy deletion, and you don't have to specifically mention it anywhere, or do anything else - an administrator will check to see whether the name is bad, and it won't even be subject to voting by the community. Thanks, and keep up the good work! – Tintazultalk14:49, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the info! Although I know about the "badname" template and use it frequently on bad named/spelled images, I never used it on an article page. So this time I simply didn't think of the possibility of using it here :-). --Bricktop19:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you.
--Siebrand15:51, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you.
--Siebrand15:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Chromodoris geometrica 1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. |EPO|da:09:44, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Bricktop. I noticed you uploaded Image:Epinephelus tukula is cleaned by two Labroides dimidiatus.jpg, a nice picture of a cleaner fish. When you upload try to think of all the possible pages it could be placed in. In this case cleaner fish is a great idea. Now in this case, the category didn't even exist, but no problem, that's my point, just be bold and create one. I've made Category:Cleaner fish and placed images I've found suitable there today. I encourage you to take the same initiative yourself when editing here - there are a lot of good pages that are just waiting to be created. 130.216.191.18208:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Thanks for uploading Image:ISS after STS-120 in Oktober 2007 1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.
Image:SELENE.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Sorry about this. I was working on applying the Information template to images that are being used on English wikipedia and I could not find this image at the web site you got it from or anywhere else that it is legal to get it from. --carol11:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Image:EURECA.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.
To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.
You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.
The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Images from Soviet Marsnik missions have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Thanks for uploading File:Arothron_hispidus.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).
Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
File:Zond_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Hello Bricktop Lovely gallery.May I use some of your pics on a non profit (ie free) Teaching CD? All thebest from Ireland Robert aka
Notafly (talk) 20:03, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! If you mean the pictures I've taken myself, you can use them for any purpose if you state the source of the picture. At least I think this is how the license works :-). The other pictures in the gallery are from Flikr and other web sources and can also be used for any purpose as long as you state the source (in this case the original source I think). --Bricktop (talk) 10:05, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Nozomi.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
File:SpaceX-Falcon9-variants.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.
If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
