User talk:INeverCry: Difference between revisions

Archives 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13

Kjetil Prestesæter

Would you mind checking into User:Kjetil Prestesæter? The guy is removing warnings from his talk page, despite being sent the {{Dont remove warnings}} warning. He is now also being problematic with me on COM:AN/U. He also seriously needs to calm down, because most of his recent edits are showing anger. A big warning would be pretty reasonable, if that is what you want to do. DLindsley (My talk page) 22:23, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Already taken care of, see here. Natuur12 (talk) 22:26, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

New Hi INC & (talk page stalker)! Whisker wiggling here... Please see this discussion and please review this talk page, as I see some additional situation here and somehow am feeling the presence of folks trying to "game the system". While I see a pile of external links on that page which was started on 29 October, I don't see any citations and searching the name of the actress calls up piles of photos, I'm not sure this polychrome monstrosity is even of her at this point, unless she's lost a pile of weight - which is of course always possible. Thanks for helping keep an eye on this. Cheers!! Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:46, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

امیر توکل کامبوزیا

سلام٬ من متوجه نمیشم٬ این عکسها به لحاظ قانونی برای من هستند٬ چرا حذف میشن؟ حق کپی رایت نقض نشده اصلا — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrecorot (talk • contribs) 18:58, November 2, 2014‎ (UTC)

I would suggest posting an undeletion request at COM:UDEL, or asking a Farsi-speaking admin like Meisam or Ebraminio. INeverCry 04:26, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

سلام. من ۴ مورد اخیری که بارگذاری کردید را بررسی کردم

• File:Fide-Federation-Internationale-des-Ehecs-logo.jpg در اینجا لوگوی فدراسیون جهانی شطرنج را بارگذاری کرده‌اید که احتمالاً متعلق به شما نیست.
• File:57952 185 70555 shatranjfed.jpg همینطور، لوگوی فدراسیون شطرنج ایران.
• File:Mohandes-mj-kambouzia.jpg تصویر در اینجا بارگذاری شده است اگر تصویری قبلاً در جای دیگری بارگذاری شده تشخیص اینکه شما واقعاً صاحب تصویر هستید برای کاربران ویکی‌مدیا کانز سخت است.
• File:Chess championship.jpg مانند بالا در اینجا وجود داشته است.

اگر امکان دارد ترجیحاً با یک ایمیل رسمی (مانند info@anchess.ir برای مثال) به سامانهٔ Commons:OTRS#Licensing_images:_when_do_I_contact_OTRS.3F که در این مواقع استفاده می‌شود (به permissions-commons@wikimedia.org) ایمیل بزنید و نشان دهید که شما خود صاحب تصویری هستید که در قبلاً اینترنت یافت می‌شود، در ایمیل ترجیحاً به انگلیسی اشاره کنید که کدام یک از تصاویر حذف‌شده یقیناً متعلق به خودتان است که احیا بشوند. در پایان باید اشاره که کاربر INeverCry یا هیچ کاربر دیگری خصومت شخصی با شما نداشته و حتی قبل از اینکه ایشان تصاویر را حذف کنند کاربر عادی دیگری آن‌ها را به‌عنوان نقض حق تکثیر به همراه همین پیوندهایی که داده‌ام (یعنی محلی که قبلاً در اینترنت یافت می‌شده) برچسپ زده بود، در اینجا ما فقط کاربران عادی هستیم که معیارهای ساده‌ای از جمله اینکه تصویر در اینترنت یافت نمی‌شود را می‌توانیم بررسی می‌کنیم ولی اگر تصاویری که بارگذاری کرده بودید واقعاً متعلق به خودتان بود (خودتان آن را گرفته‌اید یا به گونهٔ دیگری صاحب آن هستید) کافی است با ایمیل زدن به سامانهٔ اشاره شده مشکل برطرف می‌شود یا اینکه تصاویری که در اینترنت یافت نمی‌شوند را فقط بارگذاری کنید. −ebraminio^talk 09:00, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

سلام٬ همونطور که در عنوان نوشته ام٬ بحث من در مورد صفحه ی امیر توکل کامبوزیا میباشد٬ همه ی اون تصاویر متعلق به من بودند و در اینترنت هم یافت نمی شوند٬ یا اگر یافت میشوند٬از همین صفحه برداشته شده اند چراکه من شخصا این عکس ها رو اسکن کرده بودم. اما اونها هم به کلی حذف شدند٬ حالا باید دوباره این همه عکس رو دونه دونه آپلود کنم؟ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrecorot (talk • contribs) 11:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

همهٔ نگاره‌های را که سال ۲۰۱۳ بارگذاری کرده بودید و مربوط به جناب امیر توکل کامبوزیا بودند را به این دلیل که تحت {{PD-Iran}} قرار می‌گیرند را احیا کردم و همچنین برچسپ نگارهٔ قدیمی ایران ({{PD-Iran}}) را در آن‌ها قرار دادم (به جز جلد کتاب که باید سال چاپشان را دید و یا اگر تجدید چاپ شده باشد دیگر قابل استفاده نیست). نگاره‌های جدیدی که مشکل پایه‌ای داشتند در حذف نگاره‌های قدیم‌تان تأثیر مستقیم داشت ولی از این به بعد لطفاً تصویری که بارگذاری می‌کنید فقط در صورتی که قدیمی است و تحت شرایط ذکرشده در {{PD-Iran}} جای می‌گیرند برچسپ مورد نیاز را در آن‌ها قرار دهید و همچنین فقط در صورتی که کار خودتان باشد own work/اثر شخصی را در آن بنوسیید و در صورتی که تصویر در این دو حالت جای نمی‌گیرد آن را بارگذاری نکنید. ممنون −ebraminio^talk 15:27, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

سلام٬ متشکرم٬ بله در مورد نگاره های جدید حق با شماست٬ تکرار نخواهد شد و اما در مورد جلد کتاب٬ بنده مطمئن هستم که از سال ۱۳۵۹ که منتشر شد٬ دیگر تجدید چاپ نشده پس لطفا اون رو هم احیا کنید٬ ممنون— Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrecorot (talk • contribs)

اگر نظر من را می‌پذیرید از آن دو صرف نظر کنیم چون قوانین ایران به تازگی عوض شده و در رابطه با خود کتاب‌ها سخت‌گیرانه شده −ebraminio^talk 17:37, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

مطمئنا شما بهتر میدانید٬ متشکرم— Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrecorot (talk • contribs)

ممنونم −ebraminio^talk 19:14, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Ebraminio! -- Meisam (talk) 13:54, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Another history cleanup request

Sorry that I've kind of made you my go-to person for this, but please only remove Advisory 24 by Typhoon2013 on File:21E 2014 5day.gif. I believe that while I did try to make the three notices prominent, that he still by bad chance didn't notice. Thank you very much. Dustin (talk) 21:59, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

 Done INeverCry 22:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Is this the right license?

Hiya INC: Please give opinion, this uploader put up a pile of images from the Australian War Memorial, I'm just not sure they're licensed correctly atm in the file descriptions. Uploader gave them a "self" licence. See [1]. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:30, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

It's 1AM, so I'm about to hit the rack. Perhaps @Russavia: or @Fæ: might be able to give these a quick look. I haven't dealt much with WW2 images, or with the CC-PD-Mark-1 "license" much. INeverCry 08:47, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

OK, done... When you have a second today, could you read the discussion at my talk page where you are mentioned? Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:25, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

It looks like you've handled it perfectly so far. I'll keep it on watch. INeverCry 22:44, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

One more question

Hi, INeverCry. Do you remmeber one day you deleted by mistake some photos that I uploaded few years ago. You kindly restored them all except this one. Can you remind me what wrong with it? --Алый Король (talk) 14:07, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Looks like the only thing wrong with it is that I didn't restore it too. I've done so now, and re-closed the DR as keep. My apologies for the mistake/s. INeverCry 22:33, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Good pictures

Hey! Question for ya... So I see that there are "good pictures" just as there are featured. Where can I nominate files? Or is there such a process here on Commons? I've uploaded several pictures I think are worthy of featured/good quality, most of them not my own, though :) Just confused about process. Thanks in advance — MusikAnimal ^talk 06:19, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

For guidelines, have a look at Commons:Image guidelines. Nominations are done and reviewed at Commons:Quality_images_candidates#Nominations. INeverCry 06:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Mistake deletion of an ESA-Rosetta-NAVCAM CC-BY-SA IGO 3.0 image

Hi :) I see that you have deleted File:Comet_67P_Philae_landing_site_20141030_NavCam_mosaic.jpg today. I tell you that the European Space Agency has licensed all ESA/Rosetta/NAVCAM images under a Creative Commons BY-SA IGO 3.0 since November 4, 2014 (http://blogs.esa.int/rosetta/2014/11/04/rosetta-navcam-images-now-available-under-a-creative-commons-licence/). My past deletion request is invalid. Please, can you revert your deletion of this picture ? Thank you in advance and sorry for that. Sincerely, --Neptunia (talk) 22:46, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

By this message I take this opportunity to inform you that there are another pictures that must be deleted from Commons because aren't NAVCAM images and haven't ESA permission for use on Wikipedia : File:Cartographie_comète_01281.jpg, File:ESA_Rosetta_Philae_landing_site_context.jpg, File:Ros_lutetia_10_juillet_2010.jpg, File:Rosetta_CIVA_20141007_selfie_at_comet.jpg and File:Rotating_view_of_comet_on_14_July_2014.gif. Please, can you do it ? Thanks. Sincerely, --Neptunia (talk) 22:55, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Comet 67P Philae landing site 20141030 NavCam mosaic.jpg was tagged for speedy deletion by Ellin Beltz. As for the deletion requests you point to, I'd prefer to wait the usual 7 days. INeverCry 23:04, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Ok it was not me. - File:Comet_67P_Philae_landing_site_20141030_NavCam_mosaic.jpg is licensed under a Creative Commons by ESA since Nov. 4, 2014 (please read this ESA blog page). Ellin Beltz was tagged it without read its license section ! This file is used by some Wikipedia pages in different languages... --Neptunia (talk) 23:15, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

I restored the image, I didn't know ESA had opened up the NavCam images under CC license. Sorry for the inconvenience! Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:53, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

No problem ! Thanks ! ;) --Neptunia (talk) 08:04, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Colla Jove de l'Hospitalet logo deleted

Why did you delete File:Colla Jove de l'Hospitalet - escut.jpg?? It is the logo used for this colla castellera and I don't understany why you just deleted it. I would like to know an explanation. Thanks. --Catalaalatac (talk) 17:57, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) This logo had been listed for deletion because it was too complex for the original licence {{PD-textlogo}}. Obviously the logo consists of more elements than just plain text and geometric elements because there are these two original figures in it. That means you need permission from the original artist to upload it here. It looks though like the nominator forgot to notify you about that deletion discussion. De728631 (talk) 18:09, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

copyvio repeat

I see you're on the job, so could you have a look at File:Blue_dragon.png. It was deleted the other day as a copyvio, it's been reuploaded again by Medium69. He continually reverts the copyvio notice insisting it's his own work. The image is all over Google, e.g. http://www.dragosien.de/dragon/Luxus-Bunti. I think that he thinks that just because he's recoloured it that it's now his own work. He's reverted twice now and I'm not getting into an edit war with the guy. He is a repeat copyvio uploader, and frequently lists other people's work here as his own when only making minor changes to them. Incientally, he's French and I don't think his English is that good. Cheers. --Fred the Oyster (talk) 01:24, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

This is my job. I put online for many years on forums. Stop your harassment. More when I resumed work and I change, I let the previous authors (Sorry my english). --medium69 (talk) 01:28, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

I've re-deleted the file because it was previously deleted as File:Baby dragon bottle milk.png. In order to have a deleted file restored, you would have to post a request at COM:UDEL showing that you are the copyright holder. Please don't re-upload it again, as you might face a block of your account. INeverCry 01:48, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

I will not take my head with you, but also calm Fred the Oyster harassing me for several days now please. Thank you for your understanding.--medium69 (talk) 02:12, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Medium69's idea of harassment is me reverting changes he made to the authorship of File:Spaccato vulcano.svg‎. He is confusing the author of the source image with the author of the vector image. The author of the source image is correctly attributed via a thumbnail link to the original artwork, and I am listed as author of the vector artwork as I created the SVG from scratch. So could you please explain this to this young man as he seems to be rather confused and not a little pissed off at the dragon being deleted. And as seem to be the target of his ire, he's now making inappropriate edits to description pages of work I've created. He also doesn't seem to understand about revert/edit wars. Thanks. Sorry, BTW, for dragging you into this BS. --Fred the Oyster (talk) 02:19, 9 November 2014 (UTC)