User talk:Jarekt: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Arapaima (talk | contribs)
Arapaima (talk | contribs)
Line 254: Line 254:
:All {{done}}--[[User:Jarekt|Jarekt]] ([[User talk:Jarekt#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 04:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
:All {{done}}--[[User:Jarekt|Jarekt]] ([[User talk:Jarekt#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 04:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC)


==No license on my 3 JPG of Lake Léman, 31/12/2013==
==No license or bad license on my JPG (of Lake Léman, 31/12/2013 - & others)==
Thank you Jarekt for warning me kindly about my blunder. Since I'm afraid I shan't be able to do it properly by myself, could you add the correct license authorizing everyone to use those JPG in Wikipedia without restriction. Of course this goes too for all the images I formerly deposited on WP Commons & happened to mis-license or not license : since I gave them, they are for everybody to use. Thanks a lot for your work, & best wishes for 2014 (I understand you are a cleaner & maintainer, so ''Anima !'' as they say in spanish). Thanks, ''Znadrovié'', & t;y; [[User:Arapaima|Arapaima]] ([[User talk:Arapaima|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 07:17, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you Jarekt for warning me kindly about my blunder. Since I'm afraid I shan't be able to do it properly by myself (being an old dunce in computerizing), could you add the correct license authorizing everyone to use those JPG in Wikipedia without restriction. Of course this goes too for all the images I formerly deposited on WP Commons & happened to mis-license or not license : since I gave them, they are for everybody to use in WP. Thanks a lot for your work, & best wishes for 2014 (I understand you are a cleaner & maintainer, so ''Anima !'' as they say in spanish). Thanks, ''Znadrovié'', & t;y; [[User:Arapaima|Arapaima]] ([[User talk:Arapaima|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 07:17, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:36, 10 January 2014


Thanx

Thank you for your "help", sorry for my mistake, but you can add right license yourself. Its more easy than asking me. --Palu (talk) 20:33, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Paulu, It is not more easy, since I search for all the images uploaded last week that do not have a license and alert all the uploaders that the licenses are missing. I is a batch process. Also since I often run into images by same people, this process also alerts uploaders that something they are doing is not right, so they can be aware of it. Just fixing it, would be a full time job, even if for some cases it is simple. --Jarekt (talk) 20:58, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK, sorry. --Palu (talk) 07:35, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weteran (Veteran) Wroclaw dwarf 01.JPG

Witaj! Pracuje aktualnie nad zamieszczeniem fotografii wszystkich wrocławskich krasnali i ujednoliceniem ich opisu w miarę uzyskiwania niezbędnych informacji. Wstawiłem szablon Artwork dla File:Weteran (Veteran) Wroclaw dwarf 01.JPG. Proszę rzuć okiem czy jest to zrobione właściwie, ponieważ chciałbym wstawić ten szablon stopniowo dla wszystkich krasnali (a jest ich do tego momentu już 272), a nie chciałbym narobić zamieszania. Proszę Cię o pomoc ponieważ w opisie szablonu nie znalazłem jasnych informacji jak opisywać rzeźby czyli dzieła sztuki 3D. Pozdrowienia z Wrocławia. --Pnapora (talk) 16:55, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Poprawiłem File:Weteran (Veteran) Wroclaw dwarf 01.JPG ożywając szablon {{Art photo}}. Jest chyba w tym wypadku lepszy. --Jarekt (talk) 03:57, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Bardzo dziękuję. Teraz będę mógł powoli zmienić wszystkie opisy w tej kategorii. Życzę Ci rodzinnych Świąt Bożego Narodzenia. --Pnapora (talk) 06:40, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Use of #property data planned?

Gday Jarekt. Do you have information on when Commons is going to start to inhale Wikidata #property information into our templates? Having to populate Commons, and Wikidata equally is a nuisance, and I would much prefer to populate WD and have those details flow through to {{Creator}} templates, and then add any missed/additional data. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:14, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First, I think we need to wait for wikidata properties to be accessible on pages that do not have interwiki links to that specific wikidata page. As I understand it that is what we need to get it to work, I might be wrong. Also wikidata is not much on the radar since me and most other active template developers are learning lua, which is much more sane way of writing templates. I just started to look on modules that call wikidata from lua, but I was not thinking about rewriting Creator template yet and I did not hear about anybody else thinking about it. But I agree that it would be nice to have that capability. --Jarekt (talk) 03:45, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) bugzilla:58856 have to be fixed for this to work. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 05:59, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks I was trying to find this bug report number. --Jarekt (talk) 03:00, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Guys there is still a debate here on how the links wikidata<->commons should be done.
I am not sure we should invest too much in wikidata now (I say that, but I modified VN to access wikidata ;-))
You should also look at bug 47930 that involves commons template to be able to access multiple wikidata items (category and article for the same species, for exemple)
Cheers and Happy new year Liné1 (talk) 09:17, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why delete?

What is the problem with this picture? It is a memorial statue, unveiled last June, of one of our WWII heroes. I made the picture myself. Pvt pauline (talk) 18:26, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pvt, I am not aware of anybody planning to delete this picture or any talking about any issues with it, but I might have missed something. What made you thing it is in trouble? --Jarekt (talk) 03:06, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Logo Metra Warszawskiego na Commons

Qrcze, muszę Ci powiedzieć, że podzielam też trochę te obawy. Czy damy rade to prawnie obronić, kiedy zwróci się do nas autor z żądaniem usunięcia tego pliku? Może dałbyś się namówić na komentarz w tej dyskusji, aby rozwiać wątpliwości? Pozdrawiam serdecznie, i korzystając z okazji - Wesołych Świąt! Boston9 (talk) 20:14, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ja nie jestem takim znowu fachowcem w sprawach licencji i wszystko co wiem to to co zaobserwowałem na Commons, wiec czasami się zastanawiam na ile decyzje oparte na argumentach prawnych maja wspólnego z prawem uprawianym poza światem Wikipedii. Licencje dotyczące grafik logo o ile składają się tylko z Logotypu (np. to) zazwyczaj uważane są za PD i używają {{PD-textlogo}}. Także logo które używają "prostych" figur graficznych, np. to mogą używać {{PD-shape}}. Ale nie ma wiele przykładów grafik które są zbyt skomplikowane i nie są w PD, ale np. większość logo wikipedii nie używa tych dwóch licencji. Jeden z problemów z licencjami Logo to to ze wiele kompanii lubi jak maja ich logo w artykułach Wikipedii i nie protestują ze wiele tych licencji jest bzdurne. Wracając do file:Metro Warszawskie logo.png to jest to dosyć "proste" logo i mamy wiele innych bardziej skomplikowanych logo które twierdza ze nie spełniają wymogu oryginalności. Ale trzeba pamiętać ze to logo musi spełniać taki wymóg w Polsce i w Stanach, wiec jeśli w Polsce sprawa była w sadzie to może być dosyć proste sprawdzić czy któryś z prawników używał podobny argument. Jeśli sad zgodził się ze prawa autorskie do kogoś należą, to potrzebujemy zgodę tego kogoś by trzymać ta grafikę na Commons. --Jarekt (talk) 13:55, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2014 !

* * * 2014! * * *
Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:17, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

08:22, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

1st run, now ~1700 files in this category. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 13:54, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I am looking at them already. --Jarekt (talk) 14:00, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jarekt, it's ✓ Done I've put a licence on these both files, sorry to have forget --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:47, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Jarekt, je ne comprends pas. Peux-tu me corriger la licence de ce fichier s'il te plait ? Merci infiniment par avance. Etxeko (talk) 19:05, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Protestos em Porto Alegre 2013.jpg

hi! problem solved. thanks! tetraktys (talk) 19:48, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Amell

The file was originally uploaded to Flickr under a valid Creative Commons license. What else do you need? I read the guidelines and everything required is provided.

It looks like someone erased the license you provided.I fixed it. --Jarekt (talk) 04:09, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks.

Multiple restores

Hi Jarekt. I noticed your post at UDEL. I don't know of any mass restore tool on Commons. I asked Rillke about one a few weeks ago. I've done a few of these myself, and I had to do them one-by-one by hand. In one case, I had to restore over 200 images, one at a time! It's tough, but if you find a better alternative please let me know about it on my talk. INeverCry 21:36, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will ask around. may be I will find something. --Jarekt (talk) 13:11, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

08:40, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Ciao Jarekt, ho corretto il mio file multimediale GIUSEPPE IADANZA. Grazie per la segnalazione e buon anno 2014! Giuseppe Iadanza (talk) 14:41, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what the problem with license or copyright is with this file. The uploader gave it a particular license. I maintained the same license when I adjusted the tone of the image. It seems fine to me. Can you advise me what the problem is? The window itself is over 100 years old and on public display. Amandajm (talk) 06:22, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The license looks fine to me. The file was missing one at some point but you added it. --Jarekt (talk) 12:42, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Emergency Request...sort of

Dear Admin Jarekt,

A user named Nevertime constantly uploads images from flickr without ordering a {{Flickrreview}}

Almost all of this person's have not been reviewed like these:

Someone needs to order a bot to review All this user's uploads from flickr Which have not been marked. Jcb suggests you. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:24, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Admin Jcb said to ask you on his talkpage. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:46, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done I added {{Flickrreview}} to over 200 flickr images uploaded by Nevertime that were lacking the review. --Jarekt (talk) 14:07, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjęcie z odsłonięcia pomnika Fryderyka Chopina w Warszawie (1926)

Witaj, wszystkiego najlepszego w Nowym Roku:) Wgrałem wczoraj skan odezwy ŻOB, i umieściłem w trzech artykułach. Dla pewności dodałem obydwie licencje, nie udało mi się bowiem ustalić, kto ją napisał - chociaż Bernard Mark wspomina, że mógł być to Samsonowicz z Bundu - i czy przeżył powstanie. Nie ustaję w wyszukiwaniu wartościowych materiałów, które mogłyby wzbogacić Wiki, no i mam znów pytanie do Ciebie. Europeana ma w domenie publicznej zdjęcie z odsłonięcia pomnika Fryderyka Chopina 14 listopada 1926. Łamię sobie głowę, czy i jaką amerykańską licencję można byłoby dobrać dla tej fotografii. Jeżeli w opisie dam Marked PD by Europeana to nie wystarczy, prawda? Z góry serdeczne dzięki za pomoc. Boston9 (talk) 00:11, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ja myślę o wrzuceniu reszty zdjęć z Raportu Stroopa czy powstania w Getcie Warszawskim. Co fotografii z Europeana to spróbował bym licencji {{Anonymous-EU}} z Amerykańską {{PD-1996}}. Przeczytaj tu dlaczego (w 1996 Polska używała 50-cio letniej wersji {{Anonymous-EU}}). Takze bym dodał w rubryce "Permission" Marked PD by Europeana. --Jarekt (talk) 04:45, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dzięki! Boston9 (talk) 07:19, 3 January 2014 (UTC) PS. Stroop – absolutnie tak![reply]

08:34, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Azimuth parameter in location template / Irritating direction of the north arrow

I wrote User:Ebraminio and he refered to you. What do you think on User_talk:Ebraminio#Azimuth_parameter_in_location_template_.2F_Irritating_direction_of_the_north_arrow? IMHO the direction of the arrow is wrong and should be according to the heading paramter of EXIF an/or Location template. Thanks for the reply. --Tuxyso (talk) 12:55, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for alerting me about this discussion. I will answer at the VillagePump. --Jarekt (talk) 13:00, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please also adjust the template-text which is wrong now: If the thumbnail on the right side is in the correct orientation, please just purge this image (maybe refresh your browser cache) and remove this template. And make sure to note that in older browsers the magic you inserted won't go to happen, except we add something to our Common.css for IE 6-8. See Template talk:Rotate#A new class?. Also I wonder why {{Transform-rotate}} is not used. -- Rillke(q?) 21:56, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will answer about changes to {{Rotate}}, where I probably should should have discussed it beforehand anyway. About {{Transform-rotate}} vs. {{RotateStyle}} they are almost identical and should be merged. I will do it and keep the older one. I was only aware of {{RotateStyle}}. --Jarekt (talk) 17:39, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In the second thought all the changes needed to already translated text would create quite a mess, but I still think it would be more clear. By the way I did not know that our rotation magic does not work for all browsers. {{RotateStyle}} is used to show north direction in the {{Location}} templates with a header, Nobody ever complained that it does not work for IE, but I just tested with mine and it does not work. --Jarekt (talk) 17:53, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Logo, eøs-midlene. Property rights

Reference is made to your comment on my uploaded logo lacking source. Sorry for that, but i did not find the right way of labelling it. I work for the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. We have the ownership of this logo, and it is free to use for everyone. It can be downloaded from this address: http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/UD/EOS-midlene/Faktaark_logoer_mm/Logo_Norway_CMYK_highres.jpg

What would be the right way of labelling it? Best, chr

Resolved

--Jarekt (talk) 04:35, 10 January 2014 (UTC) [reply]

fixed

As to the File:Praça Rui Barbosa em Tapes 003.JPG, was a failure in time to change the layout. Note that in the exif of my photos, the license is usually clear, Cc-by-sa-3.0. Just upload photos of my own. Thanks for the warning.--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 21:05, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Absence de licence Blasons

Bonsoir Jarekt, L’assistant d'importation ne fonctionne pas bien chez moi (les miniatures s'affichent rarement) mais surtout il me refuse les blasons, tous les blasons échiquetés sable et argent. J'utilise donc l'ancien formulaire. Il semble que ce soit cet ancien formulaire qui ne ne prends pas en compte le paramètre |Source= ("Own work / Travail personnel / Obra personal"). Est-il possible d'automatiser cette tache (ajout de la licence) pour tous ces blasons échiquetés. Merci d'avance. Etxeko (talk) 23:31, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Jarekt a indiqué qu'il avait des problemes pour comprendre cette question, je pense qu'il faudrait la poser sur le bistro ou des francophone devraient etre capable de te repondre, je l'ai donc transferee vers : commons:bistro#Absence de licence Blasons. Cqui (talk) 08:16, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Jarekt, I would add a translation on your page but we should direct him to the bistro as it is general use of upload wizard issue. --Cqui (talk) 08:16, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks --Jarekt (talk) 13:01, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Joan Saura Martí picture

Jarekt, I obtained permission from the author of this picture to upload it at Wikicommons. He wrote a Wikimedia statement and sent it to me by e-mail (De: Frederic Navarro Cifani [48] Enviado el: martes, 10 de diciembre de 2013 19:15 Para: Margarida Ullate Estanyol Asunto: Autorització). I resent it to 'info-ca@wikimedia.org' the following day. Wrong procedure? Thanks.

For permission you should have send it to OTRS, see Commons:OTRS/ca. As for Joan Saura Martí picture, it did not have a license template, but someone fixed it for you. --Jarekt (talk) 17:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Senator Ellen Corbett Picture

Jarekt, Please take a look at the File:Senator Ellen M Corbett CA10.jpg. I added {{PD-self}} but I am not sure if I did it correctly. I have never edited anything in Wikipedia. The picture was given to me by the Senator's Office and I have provided that email as Ticket: ticket:2013121910019854. Please advise is something more needs to be done. Thanks for you help!

All ✓ Done--Jarekt (talk) 04:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No license or bad license on my JPG (of Lake Léman, 31/12/2013 - & others)

Thank you Jarekt for warning me kindly about my blunder. Since I'm afraid I shan't be able to do it properly by myself (being an old dunce in computerizing), could you add the correct license authorizing everyone to use those JPG in Wikipedia without restriction. Of course this goes too for all the images I formerly deposited on WP Commons & happened to mis-license or not license : since I gave them, they are for everybody to use in WP. Thanks a lot for your work, & best wishes for 2014 (I understand you are a cleaner & maintainer, so Anima ! as they say in spanish). Thanks, Znadrovié, & t;y; Arapaima (talk) 07:17, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]