User talk:Welkend: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Line 139: Line 139:
::Dir dennoch einen geruhsamen Abend! [[User:Welkend|Welkend]] ([[User talk:Welkend#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 19:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
::Dir dennoch einen geruhsamen Abend! [[User:Welkend|Welkend]] ([[User talk:Welkend#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 19:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
:::Deine Reaktionen verwundern mich schon sehr. Den Hinweis, dass dein SVG fehlerhaft ist, hattest du mindestens dreimal bekommen, bevor du es dann zweimal per Editwar wieder reinrevertiert hast. Und es ist ja nun wirklich gleich auf den ersten Blick sehr leicht erkennbar, dass bei deiner Version der größte und wichtigste Text von dem '''Text'''logo komplett fehlte. Und nein, ein so gravierend fehlerhaftes Logo lässt man nicht erstmal im Artikel und hofft darauf, dass es vielleicht irgendwann später mal korrigiert wird. Danke, dass du nun, nach mehreren weiteren Versuchen, eine Version erzielt hast, die dem Original schon deutlich ähnlicher sieht. Da es aber nach wie vor auch eine andere Schriftart als das Original ist, ist sicherlich das original-PNG (was ja auch eine verlustfreie Darstellung ist) weiterhin die bessere Wahl für WP+WD. [[user:Schmarrnintelligenz|S]][[user talk:Schmarrnintelligenz|I]] 00:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
:::Deine Reaktionen verwundern mich schon sehr. Den Hinweis, dass dein SVG fehlerhaft ist, hattest du mindestens dreimal bekommen, bevor du es dann zweimal per Editwar wieder reinrevertiert hast. Und es ist ja nun wirklich gleich auf den ersten Blick sehr leicht erkennbar, dass bei deiner Version der größte und wichtigste Text von dem '''Text'''logo komplett fehlte. Und nein, ein so gravierend fehlerhaftes Logo lässt man nicht erstmal im Artikel und hofft darauf, dass es vielleicht irgendwann später mal korrigiert wird. Danke, dass du nun, nach mehreren weiteren Versuchen, eine Version erzielt hast, die dem Original schon deutlich ähnlicher sieht. Da es aber nach wie vor auch eine andere Schriftart als das Original ist, ist sicherlich das original-PNG (was ja auch eine verlustfreie Darstellung ist) weiterhin die bessere Wahl für WP+WD. [[user:Schmarrnintelligenz|S]][[user talk:Schmarrnintelligenz|I]] 00:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
::::Tatsächlich scheint die Darstellung des Textes auf der Website unterschiedlich angezeigt zu werden. "Parlament aufmischen" ist nicht Teil des SVG-Logos, sondern separat als Text eingebunden. Im Quelltext ist vermerkt, daß es sich um die Schriftart "Barlow Semi Condensed" handelt - zumindest steht das bei mir so. Genau diese Schriftart habe ich beim Ergänzen genutzt, es entspricht nun also 1 zu 1 dem Logo, das ich sowohl am Rechner (FF und Chrome) als auch am Mobiltelefon (Opera) sehe. Bei dir scheint die Schrift nicht dargestellt zu werden und damit wird dir eine andere Schriftart angezeigt. Nun interessiert mich, ob es eine fehlerhafte Darstellung ist und auch in deinem Quelltext diese Schriftart angegeben ist, jedoch nicht gezeigt wird (denn die Schriftart im png-Logo scheint eine andere zu sein), oder ob bei dir eine ganz andere Schriftart regulär vorhanden ist.
::::Wie gesagt, bei mir ist das Logo 1 zu 1 auf der Website identitisch mit dem, was ich hochgeladen habe. [[User:Welkend|Welkend]] ([[User talk:Welkend#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 06:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:16, 23 April 2024

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Welkend!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:03, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Welkend,

ich sehe, dass Du eine Karte des Landtagswahlergebnisses in Brandenburg hochgeladen hast. Die Wahlkreiseinteilung 2009 scheint sich von der Wahlkreiseinteilung 2014 in einigen Details unterschieden zu haben (nach Liste der Landtagswahlkreise in Brandenburg). Hast Du das berücksichtigt? Grüße --Furfur Diskussion 12:09, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moin, Furfur! Verdammt, das habe ich doch glatt vergessen. Ärgerlich. Mir schien auf dem ersten Blick keine Veränderung vorhanden gewesen zu sein, aber nun sehe ich, daß sich doch manches geändert hat. Mir schien eine Karte auf Grundlage deiner Karte als sinnvollerer Ersatz zu dienen, weil sie meiner Meinung nach übersichtlicher ist.--Welkend (talk) 12:17, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nachtrag: Ich habe es nun geändert. Falls ich etwas vergessen haben sollte oder unsauber gearbeitet habe, laß es mich gerne wissen. Du kannst natürlich auch Änderungen vornehmen, wie ich es bei deinen Dateien gemacht habe. Danke dir jedenfalls für deinen Kommentar!--Welkend (talk) 13:08, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Logo Linksjugend-Solid.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Die QuasiIP (talk) 22:00, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Merki Vinstrihreyfingarinnar - græns framboðs.jpeg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Merki Vinstrihreyfingarinnar - græns framboðs.jpeg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 19:12, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Andreas Audretsch Die Grünen 09. Juli 2017.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Andreas Audretsch Die Grünen 09. Juli 2017.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Rosenzweig τ 19:35, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moin, @Rosenzweig!
Unter dem angegebenen Link wurde zu den Bildern beschrieben:
"Die folgenden Bilder können zur freien Verfügung heruntergeladen werden."
Habe ich etwas falsch verstanden, was meine in den Commons angegebene Lizensierung betrifft?
Gruß, Welkend (talk) 19:45, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, das ist nicht spezifisch genug. "Zur freien Verfügung" ist auch nicht gleichbedeutend mit CC-0. Wenn das zudem wie dort angegeben Bilder eines Fremd-Fotografen sind, wird eine E-Mail-Genehmigung wie unter Commons:Support-Team beschrieben benötigt. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 19:50, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, ich dachte, daß die Aussage explizit genug gewesen wäre. Danke für die Auskunft!
Von mir aus kann das Foto dann auch direkt gelöscht werden. Von meiner Seite gibt es keine weitere Erläuterungen zum Fall und dann kann das Thema zügig beendet werden.
Ein entspanntes Wochenende wünsche ich dir! Welkend (talk) 20:44, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moin

Moin Welkend! Vielen Dank, dass du zu dem Artikel "Rising Insane" das passende Logo aus dem Internet gezogen hast! :) Ich frage mich nun, wie das möglich war, konntest du die Grafik einfach kopieren? Ich wünsche dir noch eine angenehme Sommerwoche. Liebe Grüße, --Mojnsen (talk)

Moin, @Mojnsen!
Sehr gerne doch. Ich bin fast mit allen Metal-Bands durch, die ich in der Liste deutscher Metalbands finden konnte. Bei Rising Insane war das recht simpel. Wenn du auf deren Website gehst, befindet sich das Logo direkt im Header. Manchmal kann man es sich normal rauskopieren, manchmal muß ich den Umweg über die Konsole im Browser gehen oder, wenn es sich um eine SVG-Datei handelt, mit einer Browser-App die SVG-Datei separat aufrufen. Bei dem genannten Logo war es jedoch eine normale png-Datei und ich konnte sie unkompliziert abspeichern, mit Inkscape zuschneiden und hochladen.
Ich wünsche dir ebenfalls eine angenehme Sommerwoche - vielen Dank!
Gruß,--Welkend (talk) 19:26, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die schnelle Antwort und liebe Grüße! Mojnsen (talk) 19:34, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of political party Revival (Възраждане).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Logo of political party Revival (Възраждане).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

rubin16 (talk) 08:55, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Narodni Front Logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 13:39, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Logo Flokks Fólksins.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Εὐθυμένης (talk) 21:54, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bertelsmann BKK Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2003:EA:2700:4F00:45C4:68FF:8065:F498 19:59, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:MiHazank Logo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 22:10, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Unser Land Logo 2020.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 22:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:MiHazank Logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

King of ♥ 22:59, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Tag,

Sie haben die o. g. Grafik bei Wikipedia hochgeladen, die angeblich das Logo der Bibliothek des Konservatismus darstellen soll.

Weder handelt es sich in dieser Form der dargestellten Grafik um unser Logo noch haben wir Sie befugt, unsere Wort-Bild-Marke bei Wikipedia hochzuladen. Das alleinige Nutzungsrecht dafür liegt bei der Bibliothek des Konservatismus.

Bitte löschen Sie die Grafik unverzüglich, spätestens aber zum 4. April 2023. Vielen Dank im voraus.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Dr. Wolfgang Fenske

Leiter der Bibliothek des Konservatismus

62.96.185.42 12:54, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sehr geehrter Herr Fenske,
normale Nutzer können in der Wikimedia nicht eigenständig Löschungen vornehmen, daher habe ich auf Ihren Wunsch hin eine Löschung beantragt. Sehen Sie hier.
Sollte die Löschung nicht vollzogen werden oder sollte es andersgeartete Nachfragen geben, empfehle ich Ihnen den Kontaktbereich. Dort können Ihnen Nutzer mit erweiterten Rechten auf dieser Plattform behilflich sein.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Welkend (talk) 19:57, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Guten Tag,
da die gesetzte Frist nunmehr deutlich verstrichen ist, fordere ich Sie nochmals auf, aktiv auf die Löschung unserer Wort-Bild-Marke beim Wikimedia/Wikipedia hinzuwirken.
Sollte die Datei nicht bis spätestens 15. Mai 2023 gelöscht sein, würden wir uns gezwungen sehen, weitergehende Maßnahmen zu ergreifen.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Dr. Wolfgang Fenske
Leiter der Bibliothek des Konservatismus
--~~ 78.54.56.12 19:12, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sehr geehrter Herr Fenske,
ich habe mich an die Administratoren der Wikimedia Commons gewandt und um eine Rückmeldung zum Löschantrag gebeten. Sehen Sie hier.
Die Conlusio war, daß das Logo mit einfacher Schrift und einfachen geometrischen Bestandteilen prinbzipiell nicht der Löschung auf der Wikimedia Commons unterliegt. Unter dem entsprechenden Löschantrag (sehen Sie hier) gab es seitens dreier Administratoren die Einschätzung, daß die Datei unter der sogenannten "Threshold of originality" (Schöpfungshöhe) liegen würde.
Wie einer der Administratoren schrieb, können Sie darüber hinaus dennoch über den direkten Kontakt eine Löschung der Datei beantragen. Hierzu ist der entsprechende Kontaktbereich nutzbar (sehen Sie hier). Dies kann jedoch nur der entsprechend Betroffene durchführen.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Welkend (talk) 11:38, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Deutsche Bischofskonferenz Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Maorlo (talk) 17:51, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deutsche Bischofskonferenz Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Maorlo (talk) 05:31, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bibliothek des Konservatismus Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

62.96.185.42 07:37, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Identity and Democracy 2020 European MEPs

Do you think you could upload a new version of the image? ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 19:38, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Welkend (talk) 17:24, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks :) ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 17:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:FSV Berolina Stralau Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jonteemil (talk) 18:43, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sozial Liberale Bewegung Logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dafadllyn (talk) 19:04, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Saxony Logo Request

Hi, I Recently created The page on the AFD in Saxony and I was wondering if you could upload the Logo of the party for me. Thank you Zyxrq (talk) 22:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Welkend (talk) 09:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! there is also one more logo I would like to get uploaded. The logo is for the Tavern League of Wisconsin. Zyxrq (talk) 20:26, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Politische-akademie-logo-1.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Alachuckthebuck (talk) 19:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:VfB Fortuna Biesdorf Logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Yours sincerely, Grandmaster Huon (talk) 19:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parlament aufmischen – Stimme der Letzten Generation Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SI 14:38, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Welkend why are you doing this? You publish a faked logo here and insert it to their Wikipedia and Wikidata entries, although you know that it is deliberately misrepresenting them (https://parlament-aufmischen.de/). SI 14:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ich wäre dir sehr verbunden gewesen, wenn du vorher genauer hingesehen hättest, worin der Unterschied zwischen dem von mir hochgeladenen und dem auf der Website eingebundenen Logo besteht. Da ich das Logo von dort herhabe, kann es sich nicht um ein "Fake" handeln und ich bitte dich deinen LA zurückzunehmen und die Einbindungen wieder einzusetzen, die du entfernt hast.
Der einzige Unterschied bestand darin, daß ein Teil des Textes nicht sichtbar bzw. nicht übernommen war. Dies habe ich nun ergänzt und somit ist es exakt das Logo von der entsprecheden Website. Nur weil ein Fehler vorhanden war, der ausgebügelt werden konnte, muß man nicht solch einen Aufriß veranstalten. Ein kurzer Hinweis, daß ein Teil des Logos fehlt, hätte gereicht.
Dir dennoch einen geruhsamen Abend! Welkend (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Deine Reaktionen verwundern mich schon sehr. Den Hinweis, dass dein SVG fehlerhaft ist, hattest du mindestens dreimal bekommen, bevor du es dann zweimal per Editwar wieder reinrevertiert hast. Und es ist ja nun wirklich gleich auf den ersten Blick sehr leicht erkennbar, dass bei deiner Version der größte und wichtigste Text von dem Textlogo komplett fehlte. Und nein, ein so gravierend fehlerhaftes Logo lässt man nicht erstmal im Artikel und hofft darauf, dass es vielleicht irgendwann später mal korrigiert wird. Danke, dass du nun, nach mehreren weiteren Versuchen, eine Version erzielt hast, die dem Original schon deutlich ähnlicher sieht. Da es aber nach wie vor auch eine andere Schriftart als das Original ist, ist sicherlich das original-PNG (was ja auch eine verlustfreie Darstellung ist) weiterhin die bessere Wahl für WP+WD. SI 00:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tatsächlich scheint die Darstellung des Textes auf der Website unterschiedlich angezeigt zu werden. "Parlament aufmischen" ist nicht Teil des SVG-Logos, sondern separat als Text eingebunden. Im Quelltext ist vermerkt, daß es sich um die Schriftart "Barlow Semi Condensed" handelt - zumindest steht das bei mir so. Genau diese Schriftart habe ich beim Ergänzen genutzt, es entspricht nun also 1 zu 1 dem Logo, das ich sowohl am Rechner (FF und Chrome) als auch am Mobiltelefon (Opera) sehe. Bei dir scheint die Schrift nicht dargestellt zu werden und damit wird dir eine andere Schriftart angezeigt. Nun interessiert mich, ob es eine fehlerhafte Darstellung ist und auch in deinem Quelltext diese Schriftart angegeben ist, jedoch nicht gezeigt wird (denn die Schriftart im png-Logo scheint eine andere zu sein), oder ob bei dir eine ganz andere Schriftart regulär vorhanden ist.
Wie gesagt, bei mir ist das Logo 1 zu 1 auf der Website identitisch mit dem, was ich hochgeladen habe. Welkend (talk) 06:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]