User talk:Yann: Difference between revisions
Line 156: | Line 156: | ||
:{{ping|Plaga med}} Empty categories are routinely deleted, unless a redirect is really useful. [[User:Yann|Yann]] ([[User talk:Yann#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 13:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |
:{{ping|Plaga med}} Empty categories are routinely deleted, unless a redirect is really useful. [[User:Yann|Yann]] ([[User talk:Yann#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 13:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
::Understood. Then I can recreate the page and populate it? [[User:Plaga med|Plaga med]] ([[User talk:Plaga med|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 13:17, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |
::Understood. Then I can recreate the page and populate it? [[User:Plaga med|Plaga med]] ([[User talk:Plaga med|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 13:17, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::{{ping|Plaga med}} Yes, fine. [[User:Yann|Yann]] ([[User talk:Yann#top|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 13:23, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:23, 14 July 2024
/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
- User:Yann/Valued images, 2009-2014, 2015-2016, 2017-2019
- User:Yann/Quality images, 2005-2014, 2015-2016, 2017-2023
- User:Yann/Featured images, 2009-2018, 2019-2023
- User:Yann/Featured media
You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
File:Tulegen Dautbayev Portrait.jpg
Hi @Yann
You've just closed the undeletion discussion in the following section, but it's not yet finished as I was going to provide more details supporting the case. Could you please re-open it or let me know how I can re-open it?
thanks Almas Dautbay (talk) 15:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Almas Dautbay: Hi,
- There is no way that a 1957 picture from former USSR is in the public domain. In the best case, if it was published at that time, it will be in the public domain in the country of origin in 2028, and in USA in 2053. If it was never published, it will be in the public domain in USA in 2078, as Jim said. Yann (talk) 15:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes,@Yann I'm not challenging that. My hope is to establish the copyright history. After all these discussion here, I'm now trying to contact directly with the descendants of the person depicted in the portrait to get more details. I obtained this photograph from them, and I hope they will be able to provide more details about the history of this specific document photo. I didn’t ask any copyright questions from them earlier, because I was relying on my understanding of the Soviet Law from that time. As I confirmed and quoted above such type of works were not subject to copyright during the Soviet Union time. That’s why I uploaded it almost 3 years ago to Wikimedia without any hesitation or concerns. Now, since we are having this conversation, I will try to reach them and request more details and I will try to return with the details ASAP. Almas Dautbay (talk) 16:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Almas Dautbay: The issue is that the copyright didn't belong to the subject, but to the photographer, unless you could prove that it is a work for hire. Yann (talk) 16:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann Thank you for your response. I understand that the copyright would belong to the photographer and not to the subject. I did not suggest otherwise. This is why I am trying to reach the descendants of the person depicted, to see if they know or remember anything about who exactly took the photograph back then. Thank you for your patience and understanding. I hope to get the answer ASAP, hopefully tomorrow. Almas Dautbay (talk) 17:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann I’ve reached the descendants of this person as I planned, and they gave me the contact of one of his daughters, who is still alive (83 years old) - Svetlana Tulegenovna Dautbayeva. Luckily, she is in good health and sound mind, so she was able to remember and provide more details about this photo.
- As I initially assumed, the photograph was taken in a regular Soviet photo studio, based on the general practices of the time. However, after speaking to this person, I have learned additional context. It turns out that while the photograph was indeed taken using the equipment of a typical Soviet photo studio, it was actually taken by her. She said that photography was her hobby at the time, and this particular photograph was a memorable event for the family. Her father had just received a rare award - the “Order of Lenin” (attached to his jacket in this portrait), and she wanted to create a new portrait of him as a special memorable gift.
- Could you please share the format of explicit permission required from her or the online form that needs to be filled regarding the copyright required to restore this image here? I’ll follow up with the copyright holder accordingly. Almas Dautbay (talk) 19:25, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Almas Dautbay: Ah great! Please ask her to send a permission via COM:VRT. If she is not able to do it on the Internet, you could also get a paper from her with the same text, which you can then send to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. This can be done in Russian as well. Yann (talk) 21:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks @Yann I've requested written permission (in Russian), scanned it and send it to permissions-ru@wikimedia.org <permissions-ru@wikimedia.org> Almas Dautbay (talk) 18:50, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Almas Dautbay: Ah great! Please ask her to send a permission via COM:VRT. If she is not able to do it on the Internet, you could also get a paper from her with the same text, which you can then send to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. This can be done in Russian as well. Yann (talk) 21:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Almas Dautbay: The issue is that the copyright didn't belong to the subject, but to the photographer, unless you could prove that it is a work for hire. Yann (talk) 16:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes,@Yann I'm not challenging that. My hope is to establish the copyright history. After all these discussion here, I'm now trying to contact directly with the descendants of the person depicted in the portrait to get more details. I obtained this photograph from them, and I hope they will be able to provide more details about the history of this specific document photo. I didn’t ask any copyright questions from them earlier, because I was relying on my understanding of the Soviet Law from that time. As I confirmed and quoted above such type of works were not subject to copyright during the Soviet Union time. That’s why I uploaded it almost 3 years ago to Wikimedia without any hesitation or concerns. Now, since we are having this conversation, I will try to reach them and request more details and I will try to return with the details ASAP. Almas Dautbay (talk) 16:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Photos Alpes et Champsaur
Hello Yann,
Juste un bravo pour tes très jolies photos du Champsaur ! J'apprécie aussi le Valgodemar... Merci pour ces contributions. ;) Tisourcier (talk) 14:50, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Undeleting my fotos
Hi Yann,
could you please undelete my fotos that where obviously part of different Wikipedia projects and didnt violate any rules?
It didnt work out another way. I would be really thankful. Mitumial (talk) 13:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Mitumial: You didn't say which picture you want undeleted. I suppose you mean File:IMG Nicolas Lietzau-Schreiber.jpg? Otherwise, undeletion was denied on COM:UDR, so you have to ask there again. Yann (talk) 13:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleting serial copyright violator
This deletion request for File:Iqra Hasan.jpg is bound to be approved, it's an open-and-shut case of copyright violation. Could you now ban the user responsible for this (User:Aksphone8182) after the deletion request is approved? C1MM (talk) 15:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Done Blocked for a week, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 17:13, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello yan! would you be willing to undelete my content? I am the creator for this content and confused about the license at first and tried to change the license via edit tab, turns out it was the one that made this content deleted. Then I tried to upload the same file without realizing that it was actually forbidden.
I then had learned more about license and hereby agree to bestow this content the same license as before as cc by sa 4.0, so can you please undelete this content so it can made available to public again? I already made an undeletion request but It didn't get any response, what do i need to do to get my content back to the web? Errizdwi (talk) 02:53, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Errizdwi: Where do you want to use your content? Any Wikipedia article? Yann (talk) 08:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- yes, I'm planning to use it here https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nasi_kotak Errizdwi (talk) 08:26, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- OK done. Yann (talk) 08:34, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help! Errizdwi (talk) 08:44, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- OK done. Yann (talk) 08:34, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- yes, I'm planning to use it here https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nasi_kotak Errizdwi (talk) 08:26, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Beppe_Grillo_and_Giacinto_Auriti.jpg
Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Beppe_Grillo_and_Giacinto_Auriti.jpg--Cats' photos (talk) 16:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
File:PierreRepp-1953.png
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:PierreRepp-1953.png
Hello Yann,
Comme l'a déjà précisé Ruthven dans un cas similaire (voir lien ci-après), le seul motif URAA ne peut pas permettre la suppression car pour le reste, ce fichier est bien PD-France car il a été réalisé et publié au titte d'oeuvre collective par une agence, avant 1954 (j'ai précisé la source en référence, publiée dans un livre). La suppression n'est donc pas possible.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Berger-Gall-Italie-1984.png
Merci de ta compréhension. ;) Tisourcier (talk) 10:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Tisourcier: Bonjour, La question de l'URAA est compliquée et controversée. En théorie, l'URAA peut s'appliquer aux oeuvres collectives. Je pense que l'on ne devrait pas en tenir compte pour les documents de plus de 70 ans, mais je suis plutôt en minorité de ce point de vue. Yann (talk) 10:29, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
You deleted these images as copyright violations, but they were released by the creator under CC BY-SA - see their source: https://thecatamites.itch.io/anthology-of-the-killer Eldomtom2 (talk) 10:58, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I undeleted them, and created regular DRs instead. Yann (talk) 13:15, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Template, which you deleted, has 44 inclusions. Туча (talk) 15:16, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Need help
Hi Yann. Are you able to oversight something for me at Commons? If so, I'll email you the details. -- Valjean (talk) 16:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Valjean: Hi, Yes sure, but it won't be oversighted, just hidden from anyone, except admins. Yann (talk) 16:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- That'll work. An email will arrive shortly. -- Valjean (talk) 16:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Valjean: Done. Yann (talk) 18:08, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! Have a great day. -- Valjean (talk) 18:12, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Valjean: Done. Yann (talk) 18:08, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- That'll work. An email will arrive shortly. -- Valjean (talk) 16:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted image File:Kentucky_Bourbon_Trail_Passport.png
The representative of the copyright holder, who gave me authority to use the image is off for 4th of July but they will be sending an email when they return. Can we restore the image so when they send an email it will be live again? I had this issue with the other image from yesterday but the copyright holder was able to send an email promptly. Nolansfood (talk) 19:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Nolansfood: Hi, The image wil be undeleted when the permission is validated. The author can provided the name of the file in their email. Yann (talk) 21:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Joaquim Santos 2024.jpg
You recently speedily deleted the above file. I attempted to leave a note regarding this but unfortunately the link allowing me to contest the speedy deletion didn't work for me so instead I left this note on the file's discussion page. Prior to the speedy deletion the image was used on the Joaquim Santos' Wikidata item but we also wanted to reuse the image as he is an organiser of the Wikidata WikiProject IBC 2024 but also in slides for our Wikidata workshop we are putting on, which we will later upload into WikiCommons. Would it be possible for you to undo the speedy deletion of this file? Thanks for your consideration. Ambrosia10 (talk) 08:00, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
This file no deleted, it's blue. メイド理世 (talk) 13:06, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
File:À propos de Nice (1930) par Jean Vigo.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
hinnk (talk) 20:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
WIKIBRASC3
Hello. You recently deleted a file uploaded by the account WIKIBRASC3 ( local | logs | global ). I would like to request that you review their edits here on Commons due to the number of files deleted.
WIKIBRASC3 is about to be banned from creating articles on the Portuguese Wikipedia. However, I have noticed that they have been uploading files here and adding them to articles there, often replacing files uploaded directly to Wikipedia due to license restrictions. Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 19:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Conde Edmond Dantès: Hi, Please write such requests on COM:ANU. Thanks, Yann (talk) 20:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Opinion
Hello, I would like to have your opinion regarding of files such as, among others, this one and whether they're suitable for Commons. Indeed, while the uniform itself (generic colors and design) seems to be OK, however, I can't really say the same thing about the use even if at de minimis scale of logos that otherwise - alone - are mostly forbidden from upload on Commons due to copyright issues. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 21:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Done Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Harrisonkrank. Yann (talk) 12:16, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violations
hi, I recently got a notification from you stating that you will block me if I violate another copyright, I will get blocked. But I dont think that's fair, because after I got notifications of me uploading pictures on wikipedia, I stopped doing it and I only got notified 3 years after I learned my lesson. If I get blocked for something that I didnt do recently, it would not be alright. If that happens, what should I do? Badabingbadaboong (talk) 17:42, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Badabingbadaboong: You won't be blocked if you don't upload any more copyright violations. Yann (talk) 17:54, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Immediately pseudo-procedurally closing this immediately after I voted to delete seems like a clear attempt at supervoting. I’m requesting that you revert this extremely bad close. If you don’t I’m going to report an abuse of administrative privilege. Dronebogus (talk) 23:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- This is really a bad close of DR, @Yann. There's no previous discussion for this photo and we are discussing on that page. There's some reason for deleting this per talk page.
Please revert your close, thank you.
@Dronebogus Lemonaka (talk) 09:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
File:La Chute de la Maison Usher (1928) by Jean Epstein.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
hinnk (talk) 01:46, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Titanus giganteus MHNT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Titanus giganteus MHNT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
DRs of Serbian logos
Hello, thanks for weighing in at Commons:Deletion requests/File:FK Kolubara logo.svg. The same user also nominated some more fairly uncomplex logos for deletion, would you care to weigh in on those DRs as well? If so, please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:KK Crvena Zvezda (logo).svg, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:SD Crvena zvezda and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of FK Crvena zvezda. Jonteemil (talk) 13:13, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I would like to know what is exact cause of deletion for this page? I thought it is normal and convenient to hold files about one publication at one category, in this case it is one Belarusian-language translated book that could hold the book and category for illustrations. Thank you in advance! Plaga med (talk) 12:09, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Plaga med: Empty categories are routinely deleted, unless a redirect is really useful. Yann (talk) 13:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Understood. Then I can recreate the page and populate it? Plaga med (talk) 13:17, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Plaga med: Yes, fine. Yann (talk) 13:23, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Understood. Then I can recreate the page and populate it? Plaga med (talk) 13:17, 14 July 2024 (UTC)