Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Photography workshop: Difference between revisions

 Illustration workshop
  Photography workshop
New request Map workshop
  

Skip to:

• Table of contents
• Tagged requests
• First discussion
• End of page
• ▶ New request ◀

Graphics Lab/Photography workshop

The Graphics Lab is a project to improve the graphical content of the Wikimedia projects. Requests for image improvements can be added to the workshop pages: Illustrations, Photographs and Maps. For questions or suggestions one can use the talk pages: Talk:Graphics Lab, Talk:Illustrations, Talk:Photographs and Talk:Maps.
This specific page is the requests page for the photography workshop. Anyone can make a request for a photograph to be improved for a Wikipedia article. The standard format for making a request is shown below, along with general advice, and should be followed.

Advice to requesters

All requests: Please make sure your request is "legitimate" by copyright. If the image(s) are in the public domain or freely licensed, you are fine. If the image(s) are "Fair use", there are only certain things we can do with them without falling afoul of Wikipedia's fair-use policies. If you are requesting assistance with a copyright or fair-use image, don't display it on this page; place {{GLNF|Example.png|caption|align=left}} to create a link to it. Do not add the File: extension. Our fair-use policy does not allow displaying fair-use images out of their articles on ANY account. Please check back regularly to see if progress has been made or if any additional questions need to be answered before the request can be completed. If a request is done to your satisfaction, please mark it with {{resolved}}. SVG requests: Make sure your request can actually BE vectorized. Note that vector drawings are not suitable for certain applications. We generally use SVG format for icons, logos, drawings, maps, flags, and such. Certain things, photographs especially, are totally impossible to vectorize. Per our non-free content policy, vectorization of copyrighted images is not permitted. If a vectorized non-free image is desired, seek out such an image from the copyright holder.

Photography workshop requests archives
	Earlier Image workshops: 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III.

For graphists:

Page header:

New York State Route 57

• 
  Old reference marker on former NY 57
• 
  Closeup of said marker

Article(s): New York State Route 57

Request: When the first pic is rendered at thumbnail size, the text in the marker is only faintly visible because the green and white are (I guess) dulled by the shadows. I also took a closeup pic of the marker; however, in this case the marker is too bright, making it near-illegible again. Is it possible to modify the pics so that the markers look a bit more natural (like here) and are more legible? – TMF 17:08, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):  Done: The second (closeup) file enhanced. PawełMM (talk) 13:54, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Is there any chance of the first being improved? Of the two images above, the first has a better chance of being used in the article if improved. – TMF 09:21, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

 Done: I tried to improve the first. Do you like it? PawełMM (talk) 08:00, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Watermark Removals

• 
   Done
• 
   Done
• 
  Edited  Done
• 
   Done
• ">
     Edited as new file ==>
• 
   Done

Article(s): Josiah Quincy III, Jared Sparks, James Walker (Harvard)

Request: Remove watermarks. Thanks. Connormah^talk 23:05, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

• Comment - tried these, but even with Photoshop's wonderful new Content Aware Fill on the Spot Healing Brush I can't get an acceptable result. Spot healing and clone stamping leave too many traces - the watermarks obscure too much important detail that would need to be redrawn, and then it's not enhancement/restoration, it's pretty much WP:OR - sorry, maybe someone else has more skill at this...  Begoon^talk 17:11, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

A method I have effectively used before (on File:Chester A. Arthur portrait c1882.jpg, for example) is using the upscaled thumbnail image available on the archive's image description page (i.e. this) to replace the watermark: the watermark is placed in different positions on the thumbnail and the full-scale images. Some additional cloning can then be used to make the upscaled and blurry areas seem more natural. It won't look perfect, but the watermarks are certainly removable. —Quibik (talk) 18:52, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Did the first one. I don't think I'll have time to do the others, though. (As a tip to anyone else interested in working with the others: simply adding noise (extracted from the background, for example) to the blurry areas works surprisingly well. Also, the thumbnail images need gamma correction by ~0.67.) —Quibik (talk) 20:28, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

That's clever, and superb - I'll try and find time to try one of the others with your method later today.  Begoon^talk 23:14, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

I had a go at the second one using the technique you described.  Begoon^talk 04:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

You did a great job with the image! I also did some more general cleaning up and uploaded it as a new file. —Quibik (talk) 12:49, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Awesome job, guys - can you possibly look at my request above for Woolsey, also? I'll add in the gallery. Thanks again. Connormah 22:00, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

He was trickier, because there was a lot more noise in this one - in the colour, and there were eyeballs, wisps of hair and other fun stuff behind the watermark which weren't very distinct even in the thumbnail - so I've done the best I can in greyscale...  Begoon^talk 05:43, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

I had another look at this and tried to fix up that pretty awful greyscale attempt. It's still pretty poor, but when I get time I think I may do better from scratch. One for a rainy day.  Begoon^talk 17:30, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Trackpad

• 
  Magic Trackpad
• 
  Magic Trackpad (SVG)

Article(s): Magic Trackpad

Request: Remove opaque background.  Ⓢock  17:10, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s): This doesn't look much like a photograph. It is better if you asked for a vectorized version in the Illustration lab. Finemann (talk) 07:54, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

It is; Apple's simplicity comes into play. It could be vectorized, though...  ℳono  05:31, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

 Done: Created SVG version. The most obvious difference is the lightness of the line separating the two regions; I would need to add another line over the top to fix that. gringer (talk) 13:19, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Shisa

• File:Convenience store Shisa in Isigaki island Japan.jpg
• 

Article(s): Shisa

Request: please create new variant (don't change this one, its perspective is important), crop to face, fix perspective, transparent background, name File:Shisa face.jpg or File:Shisa face.png... Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 06:21, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):  Done as requested. I vectorized the image and it is available at File:Shisa_face.svg. Hope the colors are okay. Finemann (talk) 07:51, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Great, thank you! Can you trim off the advert text and the extra blank space?--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 09:10, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

You mean the japanese written below? I thought that was a part of it. Will redo it Finemann (talk) 09:24, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

 Done Finemann (talk) 09:27, 8 August 2010 (UTC).

Thank you! Yeah, it's just the shop's name. You do great work!--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 10:24, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

How did you make it? Manual trace must've taken hours.... --Shandris^{the azylean} 14:44, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Yeah! It's beautiful, really outstanding!--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 02:37, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

It was pretty easy actually, most vector graphics programs have a trace bitmap feature (I used Inkscape). It takes less than 5 min to do the whole thing! Finemann (talk) 07:59, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

That photo of a sign is MOST LIKELY a copyright violation being a derivative work of a 2d artwork that is likely copyrighted. Therefore the SVG is a derivative work of a copyrighted work. I've marked both of these for deletion on Commons. — raekyT 05:45, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

"Most likely" does not give you free rein to remove tags others have legitimately placed there.--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 06:37, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

It's an uncontroversial deletion on Commons as a commons:COM:DW, but since you want to fight it you can have a DR I suppose.. — raekyT 07:03, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

If it was uncontroversial, there wouldn't be an alternate tag and a suggestion "Appeal: If you think that the file does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, replace this tag with {{delete}}."--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 09:10, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Scouting in Portugal

• File:Scouting in Portugal Acanet 2003.png
• File:Scouting in Portugal Acanet 2004.png
• File:Scouting in Portugal Acanet 2005.jpg
• File:Scouting in Portugal Acanet 2006.png
• File:Scouting in Portugal Acanet 2007.gif

Article(s): Scouting in Portugal

Request: reverse finished badge and original artwork, so images are "before" and "after"... Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 12:58, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

These are probably all copyright violations as derivative works, even one is up for deletion as such. — raekyT 05:55, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Actually, they're probably not copyright violations as derivative works, based on the discussion for that deletion, this is a local event, and unlike national emblems which really are copyrighted, it is both probable that the uploader had a hand in the production or creation of the badges, and that the design was not registered. This would explain why the uploader has both the original artwork and the finished badge. I know this is OR on my part, but I have designed dozens of badges and did not register any of them, as they are for temporary events, a weeklong camp, a training session....--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 06:23, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Actually it is, see my comment in the deletion discussion. — raekyT 06:24, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Your claims had no specifics, please be specific when you are so bold.--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 06:40, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

Edith Rogers/Charles Mitchell

Resolved

• 
• 

Article(s): Edith Rogers

Request: Remove watermark. Thanks. Connormah^talk 18:45, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):  Done -Sreejith K (talk) 03:32, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

MacBook Pro

• 
• 

Article(s): Apple Inc.

Request: Transparent background, PNGify. Remove pattern on left speaker grill (left of keyboard).  ℳono  22:12, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):  Done Wasn't sure which licensing or rationales you wanted, so I uploaded it with a generic Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. EW_ikist^Talk 23:51, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

You need to upload this to Commons, and you can't change the license, the original was 2.0 you can't make it 3.0, you have to include the source where the image came from, in this case Flickr.... — raekyT 05:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

There, done. Sorry, I wasn't really paying attention to the old image's stuff (the .jpg one) as much as I should have been. EW_ikist^Talk 14:30, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Hiroshima

Article(s): Hiroshima

Request: pngify... Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 02:28, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

• Remember to use {{GLNF}} for non-free images linked here... — raekyt 02:43, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Also I don't think there would be a justifiable fair-use claim for it's use on Hiroshima, we have free alternatives to illustrate that article already. — raekyt 02:46, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

Daniel Hynes

Resolved

• 
• 
  Daniel Hynes DNC 2008 head.jpg
• 
  by Quibik

Article(s): Daniel Hynes

Please, crop the photo to focus on Daniel Hynes' picture on the left hand corner of the screen and try to make a head shot photo from it. Wwuww (talk) 3:30, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion:  Done - heavily retouched because it was quite pixellated when pulled out of that big pic. Face was ok - suit/background retouched...  Begoon^talk 09:58, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

The version by Begoon seems to lack perspective correction, so I created a new version with that taken care of. I was a bit less aggressive in noise reduction as well. —Quibik (talk) 12:10, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Yes I didn't even look at that - my effort was horribly distorted - too busy looking at the pixels to step back and look at the picture... I hang my head in shame, and I've done a new version. I don't think it's ever going to make a particularly good shot, though, because of that peculiar "in the middle of a word" expression you often get when snapping someone speaking rather than posed, and the noise in the shot. It's better than no free image at all, though - and Quibik's is still better than mine for colour in the tie etc...  Begoon^talk 16:09, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Archduke Franz Ferdinand

Resolved

• 
• 

Article(s): Franz Ferdinand, Archduke of Austria

Request: Create a decent black and white version. Thanks. Connormah 22:57, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

 Done - File:Franz ferdinand bw.jpg -  Begoon^talk 08:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Herbert Greenfield

Resolved

• 

Article(s): Herbert Greenfield

Request: Remove watermark - thanks. Connormah 00:30, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):  Done --Sreejith K (talk) 18:10, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

I think that the image has changed quite a lot. The person in the new image looks different. Fιηεmαηη ^(talk) 19:28, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Yes, the result Sreejith K got was a bit like I first got when I tried it - I had to spend quite a bit of time getting something better, it was quite a tricky mark because it was very close to the underlying image in many places. See what you think of the latest version.  Begoon^talk 02:31, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Good Job! Fιηεmαηη ^(talk) 07:08, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphic lab workshop template

This image was worked on in the image workshops of the Graphic Lab, at which you can request image improvement

Article(s): Template:GL workshop

Request: Template to be placed on images worked on in these labs (if desired). Make this template look better, and reflect the diversity of wikigraphists and requesters. gringer (talk) 16:02, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

Volga Oblast

Resolved

• Volga Oblasts and ASSRs in 1940.jpg
  Volga Oblasts and ASSRs in 1940.jpg
• Volga Oblasts and ASSRs in 1940 edit.jpg
  Volga Oblasts and ASSRs in 1940 edit.jpg

Article(s): Volga Oblast

Request: flatten crease up middle... Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 06:43, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s): Because this had been here a while now, I had a go. There was a lot of damage around that crease, so it's far from perfect.  Begoon^talk 09:30, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, that's great! Instead of two images, can you overwrite the new one over the old?--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 12:09, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Done  Begoon^talk 12:56, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Herbert Charles Wilson

Resolved

• 

Article(s): Herbert Charles Wilson

Request: Remove watermark. Connormah 19:09, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s): Done as requested. Fιηεmαηη ^(talk) 19:41, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank a bunch - much appreciated. Connormah 19:45, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Any chance anyone can cleanup the photo, as well? I tried, but my web browser's rendering is going out of whack - it always renders the images 2x bigger - 2 specific things though, if possible - trim the white space on top, and remove the white dot in the right side. Thanks a bunch. Connormah 00:44, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Sure will do. Fιηεmαηη ^(talk) 07:07, 21 August 2010 (UTC)  Done

First highway centerline

• 
  1917 photo of the first highway centerline
• 
  Scanned copy from book
• 
  Noise removed, desaturated
• 
  With contrast adjustment
• 
  combined

Article(s): Road surface marking, Timeline of United States inventions (1890–1991), Michigan Highway System, M-15 (Michigan highway), sandboxed article on County Road 492.

Request: Ok, let's start over here. I requested, and received, a scanned copy of the photo above. I've also rescanned the photo from the book, Making Michigan Move, which is where I discovered this photo. MDOT's scan from their archives was done at 72dpi, which resulted in 795 × 465 pixels, 175 KB. The scan I just did from the book came out at 3,294 × 1,916 pixels, 16.1 MB. The problem though is that the book was printed in in a weird sepia for the photos and blue for the text. As well, the scanned version from the book has a noticeable moiré pattern. Is there anything that can be done to salvage this photo? The first version has been nominated at WP:FPC, but it's just too low of resolution and garnering opposition left and right. Imzadi 1979 → 14:40, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s): Opinion: You won't really get anywhere with that scan from the book, I don't think. All you have there is a high resolution scan of a low resolution image so all you've done is perfectly captured the halftone screen used by the printer, resulting in "dots the size of golfballs" - hence the moire. Open it in an editor, and zoom in on, say, the power pole in the trees just right of centre until you can see the halftone dots. The dots are 20-25% of the width of the pole. Now do the same with your b/w image and you'll see that even though it isn't very good there is far more detail even in that, without the giant halftone dots. That's because they scanned an original photo. The only way to get more detail is to get a scan done from the photo at higher than 72 dpi - which I think you indicated you can't do. It doesn't matter how well you scan the book, the intermediate step of the printer applying his halftone screen has removed the detail.  Begoon^talk 01:40, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

I agree with Begoon here. The halftoned image is definitely a lower resolution. See, for example my attempt at removing the halftoning (speckle removal + gaussian blur + size reduction). Despite that, your book scan should probably be JPEG compression at a setting of 95, rather than 100. 100 doesn't mean lossless, in most cases it just needlessly increases the file size. gringer (talk) 05:19, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

I cleaned up the half-tone that was causing the moiré patterns (and desaturated). I uploaded that version without any additional adjustments in consideration of anyone else interested in improving that image. I also uploaded another version with some quick additional contrast adjustments. Compared to the other scan this image is indeed higher-resolution, but unfortunately absolutely lacks in shadow detail.
For other editors: feel free improve upon the first image. Additional noise reduction and level adjustments will probably be useful. You can overwrite my second image. —Quibik (talk) 13:54, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Ok - you gave me an idea. I took the original low res image, resized and cropped it to exactly match the cleaned up book scan, then blended the book scan on top of the low res to give it resolution and detail. It's uploaded above. I haven't done any other clean up except for a tiny blur to the book scan to get rid of the last traces of halftone dots. See what you think. It can certainly still be cleaned up a bit, and levels/contrast adjusted. This was more a "proof of concept" before getting into that.  Begoon^talk 15:47, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

So is it too late to tell you guys that MDOT got me a 300 dpi TIFF scan off the archived photo? It's been covnerted to PNG and uploaded at File:M-15 centerline 1917-2.png Trust me, when I saw that last version though, I was pleasantly blown away this morning. Imzadi 1979 → 16:14, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Ezra Pound

• 
  Ezra Pound portrait

Article(s): Ezra Pound

Request: Can this be clarified and cleaned up a bit? Thanks.. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 16:27, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

Hedgehog spines

• 
  Magnified hedgehog spine.
• 
  Magnified hedgehog spine.

• 
  Hedgehog sting in SEM, 20x en.GIF
• 
  Hedgehog sting in SEM, 200x en.GIF

Article(s): Hedgehog

Request: Could we possibly have the German removed and a nice uniform background? Best to upload separately so as to not annoy any foreign wikis :) J Milburn (talk) 23:47, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s): I uploaded these as Hedgehog sting in SEM, 20x en.GIF and Hedgehog sting in SEM, 200x en.GIF  Begoon^talk

Puerto Rico Highway 139

Resolved

 – Thanks! –Fredddie™ 23:50, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

• 
  Looking down upon Barrio Maraguez from PR-139

Article(s): Puerto Rico Highway 139

Request: The haze over the city is, well, too hazy. –Fredddie™ 21:37, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s): I first straightened the image because the horizon wasn't level, I also corrected the colouring and reduced the haze a bit but to be honest there is always going to be pale colour the further you go in distance, its a natural occurance. Making the horizon colour too vibrant won't look natural but if anyone thinks they can improve it further please by all means give it a shot ;)  Fallschirmjäger  ✉  22:12, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Leafy sea dragon

• 
  Leafy sea dragon - Some chromatic aberration
• 
  Same species - Noisy background, white balanced by GIMP (original)

Article(s): Featured pic candidate

Request: If you can do anything for them (particularly the one to the right).. The only thing I could think to do for the right one is blur out the whole background, which I would rather not do because it's supposed to be camouflaging. I'ḏ♥One 01:45, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

Kirsten Dunst

• 
  Original
• 
  Corrected attempt
• 
  Begoon attempt

Article(s): Kirsten Dunst

Request: Can anyone do anything about the brightness on the top left corner? I've tried, but I can't really do anything, so that's why I'm here. Thanks in advance! Connormah 00:50, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

Assuming you're talking about the bright patch on her hair, level/curve adjustment doesn't seem to help because the highlights are overexposed. Fixes will probably need repainting of that area. It's annoying that the entire section of hair with that angle is too bright, which means a straight clone can't be used. gringer (talk) 02:25, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

I had a go anyway. I duplicated the layer, clipped out an area of good hair, rotated that area to fit over the highlight, adjusted colours to fit with surrounding area, and erased the edge to make the fit a bit cleaner. It's still an obvious modification, and I wouldn't consider it much of an improvement (if any). Feel free to upload improvements over the top of that one. gringer (talk) 02:51, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

I was playing with this at the same time - so here's my effort. I took a different approach and selected the highlight areas with a threshold mask, feathered the area, then painted them with a darker hair colour to create an adjustment layer. It's at about 50% opacity here, and I have the source file, so I can increase or decrease that if you think it's any good. Increasing it too much starts to get noticeable, though.  Begoon^talk 02:58, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Henry Clay by Mathew Brady

• 
  Henry Clay by Mathew Brady

Article(s): Henry Clay

Request: Can one of you wizards bring out the details in this dark daguerreotype by Mathew Brady, while respecting the photographer's original? Many thanks, as always MarmadukePercy (talk) 03:52, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! I agree with your decision to leave the scratches in. MarmadukePercy (talk) 10:30, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):  Done, unless you wanted the scratches removed too; I didn't want to interfere to much with the original work. EW_ikist^Talk 22:32, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Siti Nurhaliza performing

Resolved

• 
  Siti Nurhaliza performing as an opening act for Anugerah Juara Lagu ke-24 (24th Champion of the Songs Awards).

Article(s): List of awards received by Siti Nurhaliza

Request: Can anyone remove the watermark please? XD Syfuel (talk) 18:06, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):  Request taken by Fallschirmjäger. 20:09, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

 Done -  Fallschirmjäger  ✉  20:20, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks a lot!! XDSyfuel (talk) 03:21, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Jim Petersen

Resolved

• 
  Kevin McHale jumping over Hakeem Olajuwon
• File:Petersen crop.jpg

Article(s): Minnesota Mr. Basketball

Request: Could someone crop Jim Petersen, the guy at the right, from this? ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 22:59, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s): Here's a crop - what you end up with is quite indistinct, though, and very low res.  Begoon^talk 04:34, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks! It's pretty low quality, which I was expecting. Anyway, it'll do. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 12:43, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Armenian

Resolved

• 

Article(s): Armenian

Request: trim off bottom dead space... Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 05:27, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):  Done - straightened and cropped  Begoon^talk 10:30, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you again kind sir!--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 12:07, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Nicola magazine

Article(s): Nicola magazine

Request: it's not a cricket on her face, it's a scan or upload error. and please remove border. 御疲れ様です. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 13:02, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):  Done  Begoon^talk 13:29, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Table Tennis the table.jpg

• 
  Description of table tennis table
• 
  There's this...
• 
  also available in blue...

Article(s): Table Tennis

Request: Can somebody fix the spelling of "length"? If you have time, could you also vectorize the image? Thanks so much for your help. Guoguo12--Talk--  16:17, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):

How about the existing vector above ?  Begoon^talk 16:35, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Very good, thanks! Could you also change the commas to periods? Sorry, I didn't notice them before. Thank you. Guoguo12--Talk--  17:27, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Changed - and a blue version in case you prefer that.  Begoon^talk 17:53, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Perfect. Thank you so much; people have been complaining about that picture for years. Guoguo12--Talk--  18:27, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Mir

• 
  The Mir space station seen from STS-79.

Article(s): Mir, STS-79

Request: Hi folks, I'd like to use this image as the new main image on the Mir page, and I was wondering if someone would please be kind enough to give it a brighten and general clean-up before I do? Many thanks, Colds7ream (talk) 17:41, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s):