[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

2017 Santa Lúcia massacre: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Past tense and duplicate word. Greater semantic self-congruency for time/tense agreement, but lesser explicit accuracy for dissociation of state of truth from present.
Moved a clause, removed a comma.
Line 19: Line 19:
Two years after the killings, the area of the massacre was still occupied and worked by 200 rural families<ref name="frontline defenders">{{cite web|url=https://www.frontlinedefenders.org/en/statement-report/brazil-two-years-pau-darco-massacre-still-no-justice|title=Brazil: two years since the Pau d'Arco massacre, still no justice|publisher=Front Line Defenders|date=2019-05-24|accessdate=2020-03-28|url-status=live}}</ref>. Of the 17 civilian and military policemen responsible for carrying out the massacre, 13 had been charged and arrested within the first two months<ref name="telesur"/>, 15 had been charged within the first two years<ref name="vanity fair"/>, and one was later cleared of charges<ref name="frontline defenders"/>. Most of them were allowed to remain on the police force.<ref name="vanity fair"/>
Two years after the killings, the area of the massacre was still occupied and worked by 200 rural families<ref name="frontline defenders">{{cite web|url=https://www.frontlinedefenders.org/en/statement-report/brazil-two-years-pau-darco-massacre-still-no-justice|title=Brazil: two years since the Pau d'Arco massacre, still no justice|publisher=Front Line Defenders|date=2019-05-24|accessdate=2020-03-28|url-status=live}}</ref>. Of the 17 civilian and military policemen responsible for carrying out the massacre, 13 had been charged and arrested within the first two months<ref name="telesur"/>, 15 had been charged within the first two years<ref name="vanity fair"/>, and one was later cleared of charges<ref name="frontline defenders"/>. Most of them were allowed to remain on the police force.<ref name="vanity fair"/>


A lawyer who had advised the activists before the killing has consistently been the target of threats since the massacre<ref name="amnesty"/>. These have included persistent visits by vehicles of unknown ownership and delivery of unsolicited packages, including a device that appeared to be a bomb, outside his places of work and residence.<ref name="vanity fair"/>
A lawyer who had advised the activists before the killing has consistently been the target of threats since the massacre<ref name="amnesty"/>. These have included persistent visits by vehicles of unknown ownership and delivery of unsolicited packages outside his places of work and residence, including a device that appeared to be a bomb.<ref name="vanity fair"/>


The officials who ordered the massacre have not yet been identified.<ref name="frontline defenders"/>
The officials who ordered the massacre have not yet been identified.<ref name="frontline defenders"/>

Revision as of 22:01, 28 March 2020

The Pau D'Arco Massacre was the police killing of 10 landless activists associated with the Brazilian Landless Worker's Movement, on the Santa Lúcia farm in Pau d'Arco, Pará. The massacure occurred on May 24, 2017, and was ostensibly carried out as enforcement of an eviction order. [1][2][3][4]

Confrontation

State officials initially reported the killings as having been performed in self-defense, but eyewitnesses and survivors claimed that the victims of the massacre had neither attacked nor received warning from the policemen.[1][5]

In an independent investigation, the magazine piauí found that the injuries inflicted on the victims were more consistent with what would be expected from one-sided executions than what would be expected from a firefight. Specifically, more than half of the victims had been shot multiple times, shot in the back, or shot precisely at close range. Additionally, there was no gunpowder on any of the victims' hands, which prompted the local prosecutor to conclude that none of them had fired a gun in the course of the confrontation.

Under questioning, two of the policemen present for the massacre confirmed that it had effectively been performed as an extrajudicial mass execution. At a press conference, the highest law-enforcement official in the region stated, "There are strong indications this was an execution".[5]

Legality of the eviction order

At the time of the killing, the activists alleged that the ownership deeds of the land they occupied had been forged, which would have meant that it was public land. If this was true, the Brazilian constitution would have required for ownership over it to be transferred to workers without land.[5]

Aftermath

Two years after the killings, the area of the massacre was still occupied and worked by 200 rural families[6]. Of the 17 civilian and military policemen responsible for carrying out the massacre, 13 had been charged and arrested within the first two months[1], 15 had been charged within the first two years[5], and one was later cleared of charges[6]. Most of them were allowed to remain on the police force.[5]

A lawyer who had advised the activists before the killing has consistently been the target of threats since the massacre[3]. These have included persistent visits by vehicles of unknown ownership and delivery of unsolicited packages outside his places of work and residence, including a device that appeared to be a bomb.[5]

The officials who ordered the massacre have not yet been identified.[6]

References

  1. ^ a b c "Brazil Arrests 13 Policemen Involved in Para Campesino Massacre". Telesur. 2017-07-11. Archived from the original on 2017-07-11. Retrieved 2020-03-28.
  2. ^ "Brazil: Pau D'Arco is the second largest slaughter for land conflicts in 20 years; company comments". Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. Retrieved 2020-03-28.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  3. ^ a b "Brazil: Authorities must not let the Pau D'Arco massacre go unpunished". Amnesty International. 2018-05-23. Retrieved 2020-03-28.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  4. ^ "'Who Will Police Kill Now': Brazil Marks 1st Anniversary of Pau D'Arco Massacre of 10 Campesinos". Telesur. 2018-05-29. Retrieved 2020-03-28.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  5. ^ a b c d e f "As Fires Rage in the Amazon, Brazil Massacres Activists Trying to Save the Rain Forest". Vanity Fair. Retrieved 2020-03-28. {{cite magazine}}: Cite magazine requires |magazine= (help)CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  6. ^ a b c "Brazil: two years since the Pau d'Arco massacre, still no justice". Front Line Defenders. 2019-05-24. Retrieved 2020-03-28.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)