[go: nahoru, domu]
Jump to content

MediaDefender: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
 
(364 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Cybercrime}}
'''MediaDefender''' is a company which offers services designed to prevent and stop people who engage in [[peer-to-peer]] [[copyright infringement]], using tactics such as flooding peer-to-peer networks with decoy files that tie up a user's computer<ref>[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17345485/ Advertising to the File-Sharing Crowd]</ref>. MediaDefender is based in [[Los Angeles, California|Los Angeles]] [[California]] in the [[United States]], and its president is [[Randy Saaf]]. MediaDefender has approximately 60 employees<ref>[http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/mediadefender.ars]</ref>.


'''MediaDefender, Inc.''' (now [[Peer Media Technologies]]) was a company that fought copyright infringement<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB120001282486582581|title = Showdown Looms over Pirated-Media Directory|newspaper = Wall Street Journal|date = 11 January 2008}}</ref> that offered services designed to prevent alleged [[copyright infringement]] using [[peer-to-peer]] distribution. They used unusual tactics such as flooding peer-to-peer networks with decoy files that tie up users' computers and bandwidth.<ref>Holahan, Catherine (March 5, 2007). "[http://www.americasnetwork.com/americasnetwork/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=408804 Advertising to the File-Sharing Crowd]" ''[[BusinessWeek]]''. Retrieved on September 16, 2007.</ref> MediaDefender was based in [[Los Angeles, California|Los Angeles]], [[California]] in the United States. As of March 2007, the company had approximately 60 employees<ref name="ArsTechnica3-18-2007">{{Cite web |last=Anderson |first=Nate |date=2007-03-19 |title=Peer-to-peer poisoners: A tour of MediaDefender |url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2007/03/mediadefender/ |access-date=16 September 2007 |website=Ars Technica |language=en-us}}</ref> and used 2,000 [[server (computing)|server]]s hosted in California with contracts for 9 [[Gbit/s]] of bandwidth.<ref name="ArsTechnica3-18-2007"/>
Increasingly these type of organizations are being hired to stymie P2P traders through a variety of methods including: posting fake files online, recording individuals who contribute copyrighted material, etc. Key clients include Universal Pictures, 20th Century Fox, Virgin Records, HBO, Paramount Pictures, and BMG <ref>[http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB116113611429796022-_5EZVscJYWWFqv1AmPvXCiOjJms_20071018.html?mod=tff_main_tff_top "Record Labels Turn Piracy Into a Marketing Opportunity"]</ref>.


These types of organizations are being hired to attempt to stymie peer-to-peer (P2P) traders through a variety of methods including posting fake files online and recording individuals who contribute copyrighted material, but also [[marketing]] to individuals using P2P networks.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Angwin |first1=Julia |last2=McBride |first2=Sarah |last3=Smith |first3=Ethan |date=18 October 2006 |title=Record Labels Turn Piracy Into a Marketing Opportunity |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB116113611429796022 |access-date=16 September 2007 |work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]}}</ref> Clients include [[Universal Pictures]], [[20th Century Fox]], [[Virgin Records]], [[HBO]], [[Paramount Pictures]], and [[Bertelsmann Music Group|BMG]]{{Citation needed|date=September 2009}}. On August 1, 2005, the digital media entertainment company [[ARTISTdirect]] announced that it had acquired MediaDefender for $42.5 million in cash.
On August 1, 2005, [[ARTISTdirect]] announced that it had acquired MediaDefender for $42.5 million in cash. MediaDefender is estimated to have between 2,000 and 6,000 [[server (computing)|server]]s <ref>[http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/mediadefender.ars A war of attrition]</ref> using 9 GB/s of bandwidth and hosted in California.

In May 2008, MediaDefender performed a [[Denial-of-service attack|distributed-denial-of-service]] attack on [[Revision3]], despite the fact that they were not hosting unauthorized materials. Jim Louderback, Revision3's CEO, charged that these attacks violated the [[Economic Espionage Act]] and the [[Computer Fraud and Abuse Act]]. As of May 2008, the [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]] was investigating the incident.<ref>
{{cite web |last=Paul |first=Ryan |date=30 May 2008 |title=Revision3 CEO: Blackout caused by MediaDefender attack |url=https://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080529-revision3-ceo-blackout-caused-by-mediadefender-attack.html |accessdate=2008-05-30 |publisher=arstechnica.com}}
</ref>

In August 2009, [[ARTISTdirect]] restructured '''MediaDefender''' and [[MediaSentry]], creating [[Peer Media Technologies]].


==Miivi.com==
==Miivi.com==
In February 2007, MediaDefender launched a video sharing site called '''Miivi.com'''. On July 4, 2007, file-sharing news site '''p2pnet''' alleged that Miivi.com was created to trap uploaders of copyrighted content.<ref>[http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12683 "MediaDefender ‘miivi.com’ scam"] ''P2PNet''</ref><ref>[http://news.digitaltrends.com/news/story/13480/mpaa_dummy_site_snares_pirates "MPAA Dummy Site Snares Pirates"] ''DigitalTrends.com''</ref> The site's origins were discovered by a blogger who looked up Miivi.com domain registration information.<ref>[http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8877/Gotcha!+New+MPAA+Site+Tries+to+Trick+Users+into+Illegally+Downloading+Movies "Domain Registration Information"]</ref> After the allegation was re-posted throughout the [[blogosphere]], Miivi.com was shut down on July 4, 2007.<ref>[http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8880/Fake+MPAA+Video+Download+Site+Goes+Offline "Miivi.com goes down"]</ref> MediaDefender denied further allegations that it was trying to convict anyone. In an interview with [[Ars Technica]], a MediaDefender employee claimed that "MediaDefender was working on an internal project that involved video and didn't realize that people would be trying to go to it and so we didn't password-protect the site." MediaDefender blamed file-sharing groups such as [[The Pirate Bay]] for starting the story.<ref>[http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070706-mediadefender-denies-entrapment-accusations-with-fake-torrent-site.html"MediaDefender denies miivi.com allegations"]</ref> When questioned, the MPAA denied any involvement with MediaDefender.<ref>[http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8886/MPAA+%26+MediaDefender+Respond+to+Exposure+of+Fake+Video+Download+Site"MPAA denies involvement with MediaDefender"]</ref> On September 14, 2007, internal emails from MediaDefender were leaked to [[The Pirate Bay]], appearing to indicate that Miivi.com was created to catch potential [[copyright]] violators, was closed when this fact became public knowledge, and was scheduled to be re-launched as '''www.viide.com''' (as of September 15, 2007, viide.com has not been opened up to the public). Part of the campaign to suppress the leak involved alterations to their Wikipedia page, as shown by "Ben E: Can you please do what you can to eliminate this entry? Let me know if you have any success. R".
In February 2007, MediaDefender launched a video sharing site called Miivi.com. On July 4, 2007, file-sharing news site [[TorrentFreak]] alleged that Miivi.com was created to trap uploaders of copyrighted content.<ref name="TorrentFreak-Anti-PiracyGang">{{Cite web |last=Van der Sar |first=Ernesto |date=4 July 2007 |title=Anti-Piracy Gang Launches their own Video Download Site to Trap People |url=https://torrentfreak.com/anti-piracy-gang-launches-their-own-video-download-site-to-trap-people/ |access-date=17 September 2007 |website=TorrentFreak |language=en}}</ref><ref>[http://news.digitaltrends.com/news/story/13480/mpaa_dummy_site_snares_pirates "MPAA Dummy Site Snares Pirates"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927014737/http://news.digitaltrends.com/news/story/13480/mpaa_dummy_site_snares_pirates |date=2007-09-27 }} ''DigitalTrends.com'' {{Dead link|date=February 2024}}</ref> The site's origins were discovered by a [[blog]]ger who looked up Miivi.com [[domain registration]] information.<ref>[http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8877/Gotcha!+New+MPAA+Site+Tries+to+Trick+Users+into+Illegally+Downloading+Movies "Domain Registration Information"]</ref>{{Citation needed|date=February 2024}}


After the allegation was re-posted throughout the [[blogosphere]], Miivi.com was shut down on July 4, 2007.<ref>[http://www.zeropaid.com/news/8880/Fake+MPAA+Video+Download+Site+Goes+Offline "Miivi.com goes down"]</ref> In an interview with [[Ars Technica]], chief executive [[Randy Saaf]] stated that "MediaDefender was working on an internal project that involved video and didn't realize that people would be trying to go to it and so we didn't password-protect the site".<ref name="ArsTechnicaJuly6">{{Cite web |last=Cheng |first=Jacqui |date=2007-07-06 |title=MediaDefender denies entrapment accusations with fake torrent site |url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2007/07/mediadefender-denies-entrapment-accusations-with-fake-torrent-site/ |access-date=16 September 2007 |website=Ars Technica |language=en-us}}</ref> MediaDefender blamed file-sharing groups such as [[The Pirate Bay]] for starting the story.<ref name="ArsTechnicaJuly6"/> Following MediaDefender's subsequent email leak, TorrentFreak alleged that MediaDefender's statement was revealed to be a deliberate falsehood. Saaf denied that MiiVi was "a devious product" and that the company aimed to entrap users, stating only that it was part of MediaDefender's "trade secrets."<ref>McBride, Sarah (September 17, 2007). "[http://www.moneyweb.co.za/mw/view/mw/en/page94?oid=161203&sn=Detail Antipiracy group suffers email leak]". ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]''. Retrieved on September 16, 2007.</ref><ref name="TorrentFreak-TheBiggestEver">{{Cite web |last=Van der Sar |first=Ernesto |date=15 September 2007 |title=The Biggest Ever BitTorrent Leak: MediaDefender Internal Emails Go Public * TorrentFreak |url=https://torrentfreak.com/mediadefender-emails-leaked-070915/ |access-date=16 September 2007 |language=en}}</ref>
==Email leak==


The [[MPAA]] denied any involvement with MediaDefender.<ref name="ArsTechnicaJuly6"/> On September 14, 2007, internal emails from MediaDefender were leaked on to [[BitTorrent (protocol)|BitTorrent]] file sharing networks, which contradicted MediaDefender's claims of MiiVi being an "internal test site," revealing additional detailed [[information]] about the website and that the site was closed when the connection between it and MediaDefender became public knowledge. It was scheduled to be re-launched as www.viide.com, but has not yet been opened up to the public.<ref name="TorrentFreak-Anti-PiracyGang"/>
On September 14, 2007, thousands of the company's internal emails were leaked, containing information contradicting previous statements and details of strategies intended to deceive pirates. The emails link MediaDefender to projects that management previously denied involvement in, confirm speculation that MiiVi.com was an anti-piracy [[Honeypot_%28computing%29|honeypot]] site, discuss responses to unexpected and negative press, and expose upcoming projects, problems in and around the office, and personal information about employees. Beyond strategic information, the leak also exposed login information for FTP servers, making available a large library of MP3 files likely including artists represented by MediaDefender's clients. As of September 15, 2007 there has been no official response from the company. <ref>[http://torrentfreak.com/mediadefender-emails-leaked-070915/"The Biggest Ever BitTorrent Leak: MediaDefender Internal Emails Go Public"]</ref>


== Leaked information ==
⚫
==See also==
Beginning on September 14, 2007, MediaDefender experienced a security breach caused by a group of hackers led by high school student "Ethan". This group called themselves MediaDefender-Defenders.<ref>[http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/national-news/portfolio/2008/01/14/Media-Defenders-Profile?print=true Media Defenders Profile - National Business News - Print - Portfolio.com<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> According to an SEC filing, this ultimately cost parent company [[ARTISTdirect]] at least $825,000.<ref>[http://www.irconnect.com/mc/irc/secfilings.mc?cmd=disp&id=5543752&type=HTML ARTISTDIRECT INC (Form: 10QSB, Received: 11/14/2007 16:07:22)<!-- Bot generated title -->] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071123102516/http://www.irconnect.com/mc/irc/secfilings.mc?cmd=disp&id=5543752&type=HTML |date=2007-11-23 }}</ref> The breach included emails, a phone conversation, and a number of internal anti-infringement tools, including some source code.
⚫
*[[Copyright social conflict]]


===Leaked e-mails===
⚫
==References==
On September 14, 2007, 6,621 of the company's internal [[e-mail]]s were leaked, containing information contradicting previous statements and details of strategies intended to deceive copyright infringers. The emails link MediaDefender to projects that management previously denied involvement in. The [[Associated Press]] and other media outlets suggest that the leak may confirm speculation that MiiVi.com was an anti-copyright infringement "[[Honeypot (computing)|honeypot]]" site.<ref name="AssociatedPress9-18-2007">Veiga, Alex (September 18, 2007). "[https://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/computersecurity/hacking/2007-09-18-mediadefender-leak_N.htm?csp=34 Hackers leak anti-piracy firm's e-mails]". [[Associated Press]]. Retrieved on September 19, 2007.</ref><ref name="SCMagazine">Carr, Jim (September 18, 2007). "[http://www.scmagazineus.com/Stolen-emails-reveal-anti-piracy-companys-honeypot-strategy/article/35701/ Stolen emails reveal anti-copyright infringement company's 'honeypot' strategy] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071016195004/http://www.scmagazineus.com/Stolen-emails-reveal-anti-piracy-companys-honeypot-strategy/article/35701/ |date=2007-10-16 }}". ''SC Magazine US''. Retrieved on September 19, 2007.</ref> One e-mail suggests using the [[MiiVi]] client program to turn users' PCs into drones for MediaDefender's [[eMule]] spoofing activities. The leaked e-mails discuss responses to unexpected and negative press, and expose upcoming projects, problems in and around the office, [[Domino's]] pizza orders, and other personal information about employees. Beyond strategic information, the leak also exposed login information for [[FTP]] and [[MySQL]] servers, making available a large library of [[MP3]] files likely including artists represented by MediaDefender's clients. The emails also revealed that MediaDefender probably was negotiating with the New York Attorney General's office to allow them access to information about users accessing pornographic material.<ref name="ArsTechnicaSep16" /> As of September 15, 2007, there had been no official response from the company.<ref name="TorrentFreak-TheBiggestEver"/> However, evidence exists that MediaDefender had been employing both legal and illegal actions to remove copies of the leaked emails from their respective hosting sites. In addition to the usual [[cease and desist|cease-and-desist letters]] from their legal department, IP addresses that are owned by MediaDefender were found to have been used in [[denial-of-service attack]]s against sites hosting the leaked emails.<ref>[https://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070919-p2p-sites-ridicule-mediadefender-takedown-notices-in-wake-of-e-mail-leak.html P2P sites ridicule MediaDefender takedown notices in wake of e-mail leak] arstechnica.com</ref>

The e-mails also revealed direction by MediaDefender founder [[Randy Saaf]] to have developer Ben Ebert attempt to eliminate the information about MiiVi from MediaDefender's [[English Wikipedia]] entry.<ref name="ArsTechnicaSep16">[https://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070916-leaked-media-defender-e-mails-reveal-secret-government-project.html Leaked Media Defender e-mails reveal secret government project]</ref> Ebert responds in an email on the same day saying, "I will attempt to get all {{sic|References}} to miivi removed from wiki. I should easily be able to get It contested. We'll see if I can get rid of it."<ref name="MediaDefenderEmail">[http://www.mediadefender-defenders.com/msg03754.html Re: MiiVi got Dugg<!-- Bot generated title -->] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071016200639/http://mediadefender-defenders.com/msg03754.html |date=2007-10-16 }}</ref>

=== Leaked phone conversation ===
On September 16, 2007, MediaDefender-Defenders released a 25-minute excerpt of a phone conversation between the [[New York State Attorney General|New York Attorney General's]] office and MediaDefender as a [[BitTorrent (protocol)|torrent]] on The Pirate Bay. MediaDefender-Defenders claims in information released with the phone conversation that they have infiltrated the "internals" of the company.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Van der Sar |first=Ernesto |date=16 September 2007 |title=MediaDefender Phone Call and Gnutella Tracking Database Leaked |url=https://torrentfreak.com/more-mediadefender-leaks-070916/ |access-date=2024-02-02 |website=TorrentFreak |language=en}}</ref>

===Leaked source code===
On September 20, 2007, MediaDefender-Defenders released the source code of TrapperKeeper, MediaDefender's decoy systems on The Pirate Bay.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Van der Sar |first=Ernesto |date=20 September 2007 |title=MediaDefender Anti-Piracy Tools Leaked |url=https://torrentfreak.com/mediadefender-anti-piracy-tools-leaked-070920/ |access-date=2024-02-02 |website=TorrentFreak |language=en}}</ref> A large chunk of MediaDefender's [[software]] was available by Bittorrent.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2007-09-25 |title=MediaDefender source code leaked to wibble |url=http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=42516 |access-date=2024-02-02 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070925051250/http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=42516 |archive-date=2007-09-25 }}</ref>

==Revision3 controversy==
[[Revision3]] is an [[Internet television|Internet television network]] which distributes video content legally through various means, including the BitTorrent protocol. During the [[Memorial Day]] weekend in 2008, Revision3 came under a [[Denial of Service]] attack originating from MediaDefender IP addresses. The attack left the company's service inaccessible until mid-Tuesday the following week. Revision3 CEO [[Jim Louderback]] accused MediaDefender of injecting its [[Spoofing (anti-piracy measure)|decoy files]] into Revision3's BitTorrent service through a [[Vulnerability (computing)|vulnerability]], then automatically perpetrating the attack after Revision3 increased security.<ref>[http://revision3.com/blog/2008/05/29/inside-the-attack-that-crippled-revision3 Inside the Attack that Crippled Revision3] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130721014755/http://revision3.com/blog/2008/05/29/inside-the-attack-that-crippled-revision3/ |date=2013-07-21 }}</ref><ref>[http://www.latimes.com/technology/la-fi-outage30-2008may30,0,4328786.story Anti-piracy misfire blamed for crash of popular online TV network]</ref>

Randy Saaf defended MediaDefender's actions by stating "Our systems were targeting a tracker not even knowing it was Revision3's tracker", adding that the denial-of-service attack resulted when "Revision3 changed some configurations" to their [[BitTorrent tracker]].<ref>{{cite magazine |title=MediaDefender Defends Revision3 SYN Attack |date=2008-05-31 |magazine=[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230327230304/https://www.wired.com/2008/05/mediadefender-d/ |archive-date=2023-03-27 |url-status=live |url=https://www.wired.com/2008/05/mediadefender-d}}</ref>

⚫
== See also ==
⚫
* [[Copyright social conflict]]
* [[Cyberterrorism]]
* [[BayTSP]]
* [[Streisand effect]]
* [[Torrent poisoning]]

⚫
== References ==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}


== External links ==
== External links ==

* [http://www.mediadefender.com/ MediaDefender's Official Website]
* [http://www.mediadefender.com/ MediaDefender's Official Website]
* [http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19629941-Net2EZ-owned-by-MediaDefender Net2EZ owned by Media Defender]
* [http://www.mediadefender.com/press%20about%20MD/latimes_1_7_04.htm LA Times article about Piracy, with a quote from Randy Saaf].
* [https://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070916-leaked-media-defender-e-mails-reveal-secret-government-project.html "Leaked Media Defender e-mails reveal secret government project"] - Arstechnica
* [http://torrentfreak.com/mpaa-caught-uploading-fake-torrents/ "MPAA Caught Uploading Fake Torrents"] &mdash; ''TorrentFreak'' (IP addresses of fake torrents traced back to MediaDefender)
* [http://torrentfreak.com/mpaa-caught-uploading-fake-torrents/ "MPAA Caught Uploading Fake Torrents"] &mdash; ''TorrentFreak'' (IP addresses of fake torrents traced back to MediaDefender)
* [http://torrentfreak.com/anti-piracy-gang-launches-their-own-video-download-site-to-trap-people/ "Anti-Piracy Gang Launches their own Video Download Site to Trap People"] &mdash; ''TorrentFreak'' (The domain registration of a fake video upload / download service called ''miivi'' has been traced to MediaDefender).
* [http://torrentfreak.com/anti-piracy-gang-launches-their-own-video-download-site-to-trap-people/ "Anti-Piracy Gang Launches their own Video Download Site to Trap People"] &mdash; ''TorrentFreak'' (The domain registration of a fake video upload/download service called ''miivi'' has been traced to MediaDefender.)
* [http://torrentfreak.com/mediadefender-emails-leaked-070915/ Article about email leak at TorrentFreak]
* [http://torrentfreak.com/mediadefender-emails-leaked-070915/ Torrent Freak article about the 9/14/2007 Media Defender internal email leak]
* [https://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070919-p2p-sites-ridicule-mediadefender-takedown-notices-in-wake-of-e-mail-leak.html P2P sites ridicule MediaDefender takedown notices in wake of e-mail leak]
* [http://torrentfreak.com/mediadefender-anti-piracy-tools-leaked-070920/ Post of a list of leaked Programs.]
* [http://torrentfreak.com/mediadefender-parent-company-facing-liquidation-080226/ Torrentfreak's article on Media defender problems]


{{DEFAULTSORT:Mediadefender}}
[[Category:Intellectual property law]]
[[Category:Technology companies]]
[[Category:Copyright enforcement companies]]
[[Category:Cybercrime]]
[[Category:Defunct technology companies of the United States]]

Latest revision as of 11:06, 9 May 2024

MediaDefender, Inc. (now Peer Media Technologies) was a company that fought copyright infringement[1] that offered services designed to prevent alleged copyright infringement using peer-to-peer distribution. They used unusual tactics such as flooding peer-to-peer networks with decoy files that tie up users' computers and bandwidth.[2] MediaDefender was based in Los Angeles, California in the United States. As of March 2007, the company had approximately 60 employees[3] and used 2,000 servers hosted in California with contracts for 9 Gbit/s of bandwidth.[3]

These types of organizations are being hired to attempt to stymie peer-to-peer (P2P) traders through a variety of methods including posting fake files online and recording individuals who contribute copyrighted material, but also marketing to individuals using P2P networks.[4] Clients include Universal Pictures, 20th Century Fox, Virgin Records, HBO, Paramount Pictures, and BMG[citation needed]. On August 1, 2005, the digital media entertainment company ARTISTdirect announced that it had acquired MediaDefender for $42.5 million in cash.

In May 2008, MediaDefender performed a distributed-denial-of-service attack on Revision3, despite the fact that they were not hosting unauthorized materials. Jim Louderback, Revision3's CEO, charged that these attacks violated the Economic Espionage Act and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. As of May 2008, the Federal Bureau of Investigation was investigating the incident.[5]

In August 2009, ARTISTdirect restructured MediaDefender and MediaSentry, creating Peer Media Technologies.

Miivi.com

[edit]

In February 2007, MediaDefender launched a video sharing site called Miivi.com. On July 4, 2007, file-sharing news site TorrentFreak alleged that Miivi.com was created to trap uploaders of copyrighted content.[6][7] The site's origins were discovered by a blogger who looked up Miivi.com domain registration information.[8][citation needed]

After the allegation was re-posted throughout the blogosphere, Miivi.com was shut down on July 4, 2007.[9] In an interview with Ars Technica, chief executive Randy Saaf stated that "MediaDefender was working on an internal project that involved video and didn't realize that people would be trying to go to it and so we didn't password-protect the site".[10] MediaDefender blamed file-sharing groups such as The Pirate Bay for starting the story.[10] Following MediaDefender's subsequent email leak, TorrentFreak alleged that MediaDefender's statement was revealed to be a deliberate falsehood. Saaf denied that MiiVi was "a devious product" and that the company aimed to entrap users, stating only that it was part of MediaDefender's "trade secrets."[11][12]

The MPAA denied any involvement with MediaDefender.[10] On September 14, 2007, internal emails from MediaDefender were leaked on to BitTorrent file sharing networks, which contradicted MediaDefender's claims of MiiVi being an "internal test site," revealing additional detailed information about the website and that the site was closed when the connection between it and MediaDefender became public knowledge. It was scheduled to be re-launched as www.viide.com, but has not yet been opened up to the public.[6]

Leaked information

[edit]

Beginning on September 14, 2007, MediaDefender experienced a security breach caused by a group of hackers led by high school student "Ethan". This group called themselves MediaDefender-Defenders.[13] According to an SEC filing, this ultimately cost parent company ARTISTdirect at least $825,000.[14] The breach included emails, a phone conversation, and a number of internal anti-infringement tools, including some source code.

Leaked e-mails

[edit]

On September 14, 2007, 6,621 of the company's internal e-mails were leaked, containing information contradicting previous statements and details of strategies intended to deceive copyright infringers. The emails link MediaDefender to projects that management previously denied involvement in. The Associated Press and other media outlets suggest that the leak may confirm speculation that MiiVi.com was an anti-copyright infringement "honeypot" site.[15][16] One e-mail suggests using the MiiVi client program to turn users' PCs into drones for MediaDefender's eMule spoofing activities. The leaked e-mails discuss responses to unexpected and negative press, and expose upcoming projects, problems in and around the office, Domino's pizza orders, and other personal information about employees. Beyond strategic information, the leak also exposed login information for FTP and MySQL servers, making available a large library of MP3 files likely including artists represented by MediaDefender's clients. The emails also revealed that MediaDefender probably was negotiating with the New York Attorney General's office to allow them access to information about users accessing pornographic material.[17] As of September 15, 2007, there had been no official response from the company.[12] However, evidence exists that MediaDefender had been employing both legal and illegal actions to remove copies of the leaked emails from their respective hosting sites. In addition to the usual cease-and-desist letters from their legal department, IP addresses that are owned by MediaDefender were found to have been used in denial-of-service attacks against sites hosting the leaked emails.[18]

The e-mails also revealed direction by MediaDefender founder Randy Saaf to have developer Ben Ebert attempt to eliminate the information about MiiVi from MediaDefender's English Wikipedia entry.[17] Ebert responds in an email on the same day saying, "I will attempt to get all References [sic] to miivi removed from wiki. I should easily be able to get It contested. We'll see if I can get rid of it."[19]

Leaked phone conversation

[edit]

On September 16, 2007, MediaDefender-Defenders released a 25-minute excerpt of a phone conversation between the New York Attorney General's office and MediaDefender as a torrent on The Pirate Bay. MediaDefender-Defenders claims in information released with the phone conversation that they have infiltrated the "internals" of the company.[20]

Leaked source code

[edit]

On September 20, 2007, MediaDefender-Defenders released the source code of TrapperKeeper, MediaDefender's decoy systems on The Pirate Bay.[21] A large chunk of MediaDefender's software was available by Bittorrent.[22]

Revision3 controversy

[edit]

Revision3 is an Internet television network which distributes video content legally through various means, including the BitTorrent protocol. During the Memorial Day weekend in 2008, Revision3 came under a Denial of Service attack originating from MediaDefender IP addresses. The attack left the company's service inaccessible until mid-Tuesday the following week. Revision3 CEO Jim Louderback accused MediaDefender of injecting its decoy files into Revision3's BitTorrent service through a vulnerability, then automatically perpetrating the attack after Revision3 increased security.[23][24]

Randy Saaf defended MediaDefender's actions by stating "Our systems were targeting a tracker not even knowing it was Revision3's tracker", adding that the denial-of-service attack resulted when "Revision3 changed some configurations" to their BitTorrent tracker.[25]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Showdown Looms over Pirated-Media Directory". Wall Street Journal. 11 January 2008.
  2. ^ Holahan, Catherine (March 5, 2007). "Advertising to the File-Sharing Crowd" BusinessWeek. Retrieved on September 16, 2007.
  3. ^ a b Anderson, Nate (2007-03-19). "Peer-to-peer poisoners: A tour of MediaDefender". Ars Technica. Retrieved 16 September 2007.
  4. ^ Angwin, Julia; McBride, Sarah; Smith, Ethan (18 October 2006). "Record Labels Turn Piracy Into a Marketing Opportunity". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 16 September 2007.
  5. ^ Paul, Ryan (30 May 2008). "Revision3 CEO: Blackout caused by MediaDefender attack". arstechnica.com. Retrieved 2008-05-30.
  6. ^ a b Van der Sar, Ernesto (4 July 2007). "Anti-Piracy Gang Launches their own Video Download Site to Trap People". TorrentFreak. Retrieved 17 September 2007.
  7. ^ "MPAA Dummy Site Snares Pirates" Archived 2007-09-27 at the Wayback Machine DigitalTrends.com [dead link]
  8. ^ "Domain Registration Information"
  9. ^ "Miivi.com goes down"
  10. ^ a b c Cheng, Jacqui (2007-07-06). "MediaDefender denies entrapment accusations with fake torrent site". Ars Technica. Retrieved 16 September 2007.
  11. ^ McBride, Sarah (September 17, 2007). "Antipiracy group suffers email leak". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved on September 16, 2007.
  12. ^ a b Van der Sar, Ernesto (15 September 2007). "The Biggest Ever BitTorrent Leak: MediaDefender Internal Emails Go Public * TorrentFreak". Retrieved 16 September 2007.
  13. ^ Media Defenders Profile - National Business News - Print - Portfolio.com
  14. ^ ARTISTDIRECT INC (Form: 10QSB, Received: 11/14/2007 16:07:22) Archived 2007-11-23 at the Wayback Machine
  15. ^ Veiga, Alex (September 18, 2007). "Hackers leak anti-piracy firm's e-mails". Associated Press. Retrieved on September 19, 2007.
  16. ^ Carr, Jim (September 18, 2007). "Stolen emails reveal anti-copyright infringement company's 'honeypot' strategy Archived 2007-10-16 at the Wayback Machine". SC Magazine US. Retrieved on September 19, 2007.
  17. ^ a b Leaked Media Defender e-mails reveal secret government project
  18. ^ P2P sites ridicule MediaDefender takedown notices in wake of e-mail leak arstechnica.com
  19. ^ Re: MiiVi got Dugg Archived 2007-10-16 at the Wayback Machine
  20. ^ Van der Sar, Ernesto (16 September 2007). "MediaDefender Phone Call and Gnutella Tracking Database Leaked". TorrentFreak. Retrieved 2024-02-02.
  21. ^ Van der Sar, Ernesto (20 September 2007). "MediaDefender Anti-Piracy Tools Leaked". TorrentFreak. Retrieved 2024-02-02.
  22. ^ "MediaDefender source code leaked to wibble". 2007-09-25. Archived from the original on 2007-09-25. Retrieved 2024-02-02.
  23. ^ Inside the Attack that Crippled Revision3 Archived 2013-07-21 at the Wayback Machine
  24. ^ Anti-piracy misfire blamed for crash of popular online TV network
  25. ^ "MediaDefender Defends Revision3 SYN Attack". Wired. 2008-05-31. Archived from the original on 2023-03-27.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaDefender&oldid=1223018957"