[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

MediaDefender: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 16: Line 16:
==Email leak==
==Email leak==


On September 14, 2007, thousands of the company's internal emails were stolen. The people who stole these emails are guilty of many state and federal crimes, including identity theft and invasion of privacy. Also, because these emails also included confidential emails with government officials, the illegal actions may also constitute breaches of national and state security (MediaDefender was helping states to catch and stop pedophiles). People who continue to download and disseminate this information may also be liable for additional crimes.
On September 14, 2007, thousands of the company's internal emails were stolen. The people who stole these emails are guilty of many state and federal crimes, including identity theft and invasion of privacy. Additionally, because these emails included confidential emails with government officials, the illegal actions may also constitute breaches of national and state security not involving copyright protection. People who continue to download and disseminate this information may be liable for additional crimes.


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 07:12, 16 September 2007

MediaDefender is a company which offers services designed to prevent and stop people who engage in peer-to-peer copyright infringement, using tactics such as flooding peer-to-peer networks with decoy files that tie up a user's computer[1]. MediaDefender is based in Los Angeles California in the United States, and its president is Randy Saaf. MediaDefender has approximately 60 employees[2].

Increasingly these type of organizations are being hired to stymie P2P traders through a variety of methods including: posting fake files online, recording individuals who contribute copyrighted material, etc. Key clients include Universal Pictures, 20th Century Fox, Virgin Records, HBO, Paramount Pictures, and BMG [3].

On August 1, 2005, ARTISTdirect announced that it had acquired MediaDefender for $42.5 million in cash. MediaDefender is estimated to have between 2,000 and 6,000 servers [4] using 9 GB/s of bandwidth and hosted in California.

Miivi.com

In February 2007, MediaDefender launched a video sharing site called Miivi.com. On July 4, 2007, file-sharing news site p2pnet alleged that Miivi.com was created to trap uploaders of copyrighted content.[5][6] The site's origins were discovered by a blogger who looked up Miivi.com domain registration information.[7]

After the allegation was re-posted throughout the blogosphere, Miivi.com was shut down on July 4, 2007.[8] MediaDefender denied further allegations that it was trying to convict anyone. In an interview with Ars Technica, a MediaDefender employee claimed that "MediaDefender was working on an internal project that involved video and didn't realize that people would be trying to go to it and so we didn't password-protect the site." MediaDefender blamed file-sharing groups such as The Pirate Bay for starting the story.[9] This statement was revealed to be a deliberate falsehood by the subsequent email leak.

When questioned, the MPAA denied any involvement with MediaDefender.[10] On September 14, 2007, internal emails from MediaDefender were leaked to The Pirate Bay, appearing to indicate that Miivi.com was created to catch potential copyright violator. The emails also revealed that the the site was closed when this fact became public knowledge, and was scheduled to be re-launched as www.viide.com (as of September 15, 2007, viide.com has not been opened up to the public).

Part of the campaign to suppress the leak involved alterations to their Wikipedia page, as shown by "Ben E: Can you please do what you can to eliminate this entry? Let me know if you have any success. R".

Email leak

On September 14, 2007, thousands of the company's internal emails were stolen. The people who stole these emails are guilty of many state and federal crimes, including identity theft and invasion of privacy. Additionally, because these emails included confidential emails with government officials, the illegal actions may also constitute breaches of national and state security not involving copyright protection. People who continue to download and disseminate this information may be liable for additional crimes.

See also

References