[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Chief Whip: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Propose merger. See Talk.
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
(19 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Government position}}
{{short description|Government position}}
{{Multiple issues|
{{More citations needed|date=May 2020}}
{{Globalize|2=England|2name=the United Kingdom|date=May 2020}}
{{Globalize|2=England|2name=the United Kingdom|date=May 2020}}
{{tone|date=January 2019}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2023}}
}}
{{merge|Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury|discuss=Talk:Chief Whip#Merger?|date=December 2022}}

{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2013}}
The '''Chief Whip''' is a political leader whose task is to enforce the [[Whip (politics)|whipping system]], which aims to ensure that [[legislator]]s who are members of a [[political party]] attend and vote on [[legislation]] as the party leadership prescribes.
The '''Chief Whip''' is a political leader whose task is to enforce the [[Whip (politics)|whipping system]], which aims to ensure that [[legislator]]s who are members of a [[political party]] attend and vote on [[legislation]] as the party leadership prescribes.


== United Kingdom ==
== United Kingdom ==
{{uk-gov-positions}}
{{uk-gov-positions}}
In [[Politics of the United Kingdom|British politics]], the Chief Whip of the governing party in the [[House of Commons of the United Kingdom|House of Commons]] is usually also appointed as [[Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury]], a [[Cabinet of the United Kingdom|Cabinet]] position. The Government Chief Whip has an official residence at [[12 Downing Street]]. However, the Chief Whip's office is currently located at [[9 Downing Street]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1339750/Campbell-ousts-the-Chief-Whip.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220112/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1339750/Campbell-ousts-the-Chief-Whip.html |archive-date=12 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=Campbell ousts the Chief Whip | work=[[The Daily Telegraph]]|location=London|first=Sarah|last=Womack|date=7 September 2001|access-date=28 April 2010}}{{cbignore}}</ref>
In [[Politics of the United Kingdom|British politics]], the Chief Whip of the governing party in the [[House of Commons of the United Kingdom|House of Commons]] is usually also appointed as [[Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury]], a [[Cabinet of the United Kingdom|Cabinet]] position. The Government Chief Whip has an official residence at [[12 Downing Street]]. However, the Chief Whip's office is currently{{when|date=July 2024}} located at [[9 Downing Street]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1339750/Campbell-ousts-the-Chief-Whip.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220112/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1339750/Campbell-ousts-the-Chief-Whip.html |archive-date=12 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=Campbell ousts the Chief Whip | work=[[The Daily Telegraph]]|location=London|first=Sarah|last=Womack|date=7 September 2001|access-date=28 April 2010}}{{cbignore}}</ref>


The Chief Whip can wield great power over their party's MPs, including cabinet ministers, being seen to speak at all times with the voice of the [[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom|Prime Minister]]. [[Margaret Thatcher]] was known for using her Chief Whip as a "cabinet enforcer".{{Citation needed|date=October 2021}}
The Chief Whip can wield great power over their party's MPs, including cabinet ministers, being seen to speak at all times on behalf of the [[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom|Prime Minister]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=April 30, 2023 |title=Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury (Chief Whip) |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/ministers/parliamentary-secretary-to-the-treasury-and-chief-whip }}</ref> [[Margaret Thatcher]] was known for using her Chief Whip as a "cabinet enforcer".{{Citation needed|date=October 2021}}


The role of Chief Whip is regarded as secretive, as the Whip is concerned with the discipline of their own party's [[Member of Parliament|Members of Parliament]], never appearing on television or radio in their capacity as whip. An exception occurred on 1 April 2019 when [[Julian Smith (politician)|Julian Smith]] chose to criticise his own government and Prime Minister.<ref>{{cite web|last=Cappuro|first=Daniel|title=''Julian Smith: The beleaguered Chief Whip with a long record of mistakes''|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/04/01/julian-smith-beleaguered-chief-whip-long-record-mistakes/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220112/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/04/01/julian-smith-beleaguered-chief-whip-long-record-mistakes/ |archive-date=12 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|date=1 April 2019|newspaper=The Telegraph|access-date=1 April 2019}}{{cbignore}}</ref> Whips in the House of Commons do not, by convention, speak in debates.{{Citation needed|date=October 2021}}
The role of the Chief Whip is regarded as secretive, as the Whip is concerned with the discipline of their own party's [[Member of Parliament|Members of Parliament]], never appearing on television or radio in their capacity as whip. An exception occurred on 1 April 2019 when [[Julian Smith (politician)|Julian Smith]] chose to criticise his own government and Prime Minister.<ref>{{cite web|last=Cappuro|first=Daniel|title=''Julian Smith: The beleaguered Chief Whip with a long record of mistakes''|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/04/01/julian-smith-beleaguered-chief-whip-long-record-mistakes/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220112/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/04/01/julian-smith-beleaguered-chief-whip-long-record-mistakes/ |archive-date=12 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|date=1 April 2019|newspaper=The Telegraph|access-date=1 April 2019}}{{cbignore}}</ref> Whips in the House of Commons do not, by convention, speak in debates.{{Citation needed|date=October 2021}}


The Government Chief Whip is assisted by the Deputy Chief Whip, other whips, and assistant whips. In order to provide the whip with a salary, the government whips are appointed to positions in [[HM Treasury]] and in the [[Royal Household]] under the [[Lord Steward|Lord Steward of the Household]]. The whips are not fully active in either of these departments, though they do undertake a number of responsibilities. The Deputy Chief Whip is [[Treasurer of the Household|Treasurer of HM Household]], the next two whips are [[Comptroller of the Household|Comptroller of HM Household]] and [[Vice-Chamberlain of the Household|Vice-Chamberlain of HM Household]]. The remaining whips are [[Lord High Treasurer|Lords Commissioners of the Treasury]]. Assistant whips, and whips of opposition parties, generally do not receive such appointments. The Government Chief Whip in the House of Lords also holds the role of [[Captain of the Honourable Corps of Gentlemen-at-Arms]], while the Government Deputy Chief Whip in the Lords holds the role of [[Captain of the Yeomen of the Guard]].{{Citation needed|date=October 2021}}
The Government Chief Whip is assisted by the Deputy Chief Whip, other whips, and assistant whips. In order to provide the whip with a salary, the government whips are appointed to positions in [[HM Treasury]] and in the [[Royal Household]] under the [[Lord Steward|Lord Steward of the Household]]. The whips are not fully active in either of these departments, though they do undertake a number of responsibilities. The Deputy Chief Whip is [[Treasurer of the Household|Treasurer of HM Household]], the next two whips are [[Comptroller of the Household|Comptroller of HM Household]] and [[Vice-Chamberlain of the Household|Vice-Chamberlain of HM Household]]. The remaining whips are [[Lord High Treasurer|Lords Commissioners of the Treasury]]. Assistant whips, and whips of opposition parties, generally do not receive such appointments. The Government Chief Whip in the House of Lords also holds the role of [[Captain of the Honourable Corps of Gentlemen-at-Arms]], while the Government Deputy Chief Whip in the Lords holds the role of [[Captain of the Yeomen of the Guard]].{{Citation needed|date=October 2021}} Other whips, who are fewer in number due to the decreased importance of party discipline in the Lords, are appointed as [[Lord-in-waiting|Lords in Waiting]], if men, and Baronesses in Waiting, if women. As well as their duties as whips, Lords whips speak in the chamber (unlike Commons whips) to support departmental ministers, or act as a spokesperson for government departments with no minister in the Lords.{{Citation needed|date=October 2021}}


Outside the government, the Official Opposition Chief Whip in the Commons, like the [[Leader of the Opposition (United Kingdom)|Leader of the Opposition]], receives a [[stipend]] in addition to their parliamentary salary, because their additional responsibilities will make them unable to hold down another job.<ref name="whip salaries">{{cite web |title=Salaries of Leader of Opposition and Opposition Whips |url=https://erskinemay.parliament.uk/section/6025/salaries-of-leader-of-opposition-and-opposition-whips/ |website=Erskine May: Parliamentary Practice |access-date=15 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210909171025/https://erskinemay.parliament.uk/section/6025/salaries-of-leader-of-opposition-and-opposition-whips/ |archive-date=9 September 2021 |date=2019 |quote=...&nbsp; Since 1965, provision has been made for the payment of a salary to the Opposition Chief Whip&nbsp;... |url-status=live |at=4.43}}</ref>
Outside the government, the Official Opposition Chief Whip in the Commons, like the [[Leader of the Opposition (United Kingdom)|Leader of the Opposition]], receives a [[stipend]] in addition to their parliamentary salary, because their additional responsibilities will make them unable to hold down another job.<ref name="whip salaries">{{cite web |title=Salaries of Leader of Opposition and Opposition Whips |url=https://erskinemay.parliament.uk/section/6025/salaries-of-leader-of-opposition-and-opposition-whips/ |website=Erskine May: Parliamentary Practice |access-date=15 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210909171025/https://erskinemay.parliament.uk/section/6025/salaries-of-leader-of-opposition-and-opposition-whips/ |archive-date=9 September 2021 |date=2019 |quote=...&nbsp; Since 1965, provision has been made for the payment of a salary to the Opposition Chief Whip&nbsp;... |url-status=live |at=4.43}}</ref>
Line 24: Line 18:
The whips, although superficially dictatorial, act as communicators between [[backbencher]]s and the party leadership. Ultimately, if backbenchers are unhappy with the leadership's position, they can threaten to revolt during a vote and force the leadership to compromise.{{Citation needed|date=October 2021}}
The whips, although superficially dictatorial, act as communicators between [[backbencher]]s and the party leadership. Ultimately, if backbenchers are unhappy with the leadership's position, they can threaten to revolt during a vote and force the leadership to compromise.{{Citation needed|date=October 2021}}


While the whip was formally introduced to British politics by the [[Irish Parliamentary Party]] under [[Charles Stewart Parnell]] in the 1880s,{{citation needed|date=September 2013}} in 1846 the [[Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington|Duke of Wellington]] advised the new [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative Party]] leader [[Edward Smith-Stanley, 14th Earl of Derby|Lord Stanley]] to ensure that his "whippers-in" were personally loyal.{{citation needed|date=September 2013}} According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the use of the term "whippers-in" was first recorded in the parliamentary sense in the [[The Annual Register|Annual Register]] of 1772.<ref name="SN/PC/02829">{{cite web |last1=Walpole |first1=Jennifer |last2=Kelly |first2=Richard |title=The Whip's Office - Standard Note - SN/PC/02829 |url=https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN02829/SN02829.pdf |website=Parliament Research Briefings |access-date=15 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210704231938/https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN02829/SN02829.pdf |archive-date=4 July 2021 |date=10 October 2008 |url-status=live}}</ref>
While the whip was formally introduced to British politics by the [[Irish Parliamentary Party]] under [[Charles Stewart Parnell]] in the 1880s,{{citation needed|date=September 2013}} in 1846 the [[Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington|Duke of Wellington]] advised the new [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative Party]] leader [[Edward Smith-Stanley, 14th Earl of Derby|Lord Stanley]] to ensure that his "whippers-in" were personally loyal.{{citation needed|date=September 2013}} According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the use of the term "whippers-in" was first recorded in the parliamentary sense in the [[The Annual Register|Annual Register]] of 1772.<ref name="SN/PC/02829">{{cite web |last1=Walpole |first1=Jennifer |last2=Kelly |first2=Richard |title=The Whip's Office Standard Note SN/PC/02829 |url=https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN02829/SN02829.pdf |website=Parliament Research Briefings |access-date=15 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210704231938/https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN02829/SN02829.pdf |archive-date=4 July 2021 |date=10 October 2008 |url-status=live}}</ref>


===The Whip as a Party Line===
===The Whip as a Party Line===


In the UK Parliament the importance of a vote is indicated by underlining of items on the "whip", which is the name of the letter the Chief Whip sends to all the MPs in their party at the start of the week. This letter informs them of the schedule for the days ahead and includes the sentence "Your attendance is absolutely essential" next to each debate in which there will be a vote. This sentence is underlined once, twice, or three times depending on the consequences that will be suffered if they do not turn up, hence the origin of the terms ''one-line whip'', ''two-line whip'' and ''three-line whip''. The actual vote they are to make is communicated to them in the chamber by hand signals during the division when the time comes (usually after the [[division bell]] has been rung). Neither these instructions, which are visible to everyone in the chamber, nor the "whip" letter at the start of the week, are recorded in ''[[Hansard]]'', as they are considered a matter internal to the [[political party]]. Any explicit direction to an MP as to how they should vote would be a breach of [[parliamentary privilege]].<ref name="ifg whip role">{{cite web |last1=Tingary |first1=Paeony |last2=Durrant |first2=Tim |title=Whips: what is their role? |url=https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainers/whips |website=Institue for Government |access-date=15 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220421220105/https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainers/whips |archive-date=21 April 2022 |date=6 March 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref>{{Citation needed|date=October 2021}}
In the UK [[House of Commons]], the importance of a vote is indicated by underlining items on the "whip", which is the name of the letter the Chief Whip sends to all the MPs in their party at the start of the week. This letter informs them of the schedule for the days ahead and includes the sentence "Your attendance is absolutely essential" next to each debate in which there will be a vote. This sentence is underlined once, twice, or three times depending on the consequences that will be suffered if they do not turn up, hence the origin of the terms ''one-line whip'', ''two-line whip'' and ''three-line whip''. The actual vote they are to make is communicated to them in the chamber by hand signals during the division when the time comes (usually after the [[division bell]] has been rung). Neither these instructions, which are visible to everyone in the chamber, nor the "whip" letter at the start of the week, are recorded in ''[[Hansard]]'', as they are considered a matter internal to the [[political party]]. Any explicit direction to an MP as to how they should vote would be a breach of [[parliamentary privilege]].<ref name="ifg whip role">{{cite web |last1=Tingary |first1=Paeony |last2=Durrant |first2=Tim |title=Whips: what is their role? |url=https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainers/whips |website=Institute for Government |access-date=15 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220421220105/https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainers/whips |archive-date=21 April 2022 |date=6 March 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref>{{Citation needed|date=October 2021}}


The consequences of defying the party whip depend on the circumstances and are usually negotiated with the party whip in advance. The party whip's job is to ensure the outcome of the vote. The party in the majority can always win a vote, if its members obey the whip.{{Citation needed|date=October 2021}}
The consequences of defying the party whip depend on the circumstances and are usually negotiated with the party whip in advance. The party whip's job is to ensure the outcome of the vote. The party in the majority can always win a vote if its members obey the whip.{{Citation needed|date=October 2021}}


If the party has a large Commons majority, it can make allowances for MPs who are away on important business, or whose political circumstances require them to take a particular issue very seriously. Theoretically at least, expulsion from the party is an automatic consequence of defying a three-line whip.<ref name="ifg whip role" />{{Citation needed|date=October 2021}}
If the party has a large Commons majority, it can make allowances for MPs who are away on important business, or whose political circumstances require them to take a particular issue very seriously. Theoretically at least, expulsion from the party is an automatic consequence of defying a three-line whip.<ref name="ifg whip role" />{{Citation needed|date=October 2021}}


Other such offences include betraying party loyalties. An example of this during [[John Major]]'s government was when nine Conservative MPs had the whip removed after voting against the government on its stance on the [[Maastricht Treaty]], becoming known as Eurosceptics. In practice they remained Conservative MPs supporting the government on other issues. [[Sir Bill Cash]], [[Sir John Redwood]] and [[Sir Iain Duncan Smith]] are still Conservative MPs. This was also the only time when MPs who were being whipped were cooperating with the opposite side's whips. In most cases the 'pairing' system enables one from each side to cancel out the other's vote if absent simultaneously. Despite the whip, individuals are entitled to vote according to their own beliefs, particularly when there is a "free vote" on a matter of conscience.{{efn| An example of this could be a vote to bring back [[hanging]] as a [[death penalty]].}}
Other such offences include betraying party loyalties. An example of this during [[John Major]]'s government was when nine Conservative MPs had the whip removed after voting against the government on its stance on the [[Maastricht Treaty]], becoming known as Eurosceptics. In practice they remained Conservative MPs supporting the government on other issues. [[Sir Bill Cash]], [[Sir John Redwood]] and [[Sir Iain Duncan Smith]] are still Conservative MPs. This was also the only time when MPs who were being whipped were cooperating with the opposite side's whips. In most cases, the 'pairing' system enables one from each side to cancel out the other's vote if absent simultaneously. Despite the whip, individuals are entitled to vote according to their own beliefs, particularly when there is a "free vote" on a matter of conscience.{{efn| An example of this could be a vote to bring back [[hanging]] as a [[death penalty]].}}


There are some cases in which the whip is removed because an issue is a matter of conscience. These include adoption, religion and equal opportunities. The impact of a whip being imposed on a matter of conscience can be damaging for a party leader. One such case was that of Iain Duncan Smith, who imposed a three-line whip against the adoption of children by unmarried couples which, at the time, meant gay couples could never adopt. Several [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative]] MPs voted against the official party line, and Smith's authority was weakened.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Watt |first1=Nicholas |author1-link=Nicholas Watt |title=Tory leader fends off gay adoption policy revolt |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2002/nov/02/uk.conservatives |access-date=15 August 2022 |work=[[The Guardian]] |date=2 Nov 2002 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211016144917/https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2002/nov/02/uk.conservatives |archive-date=16 Oct 2021 |url-status=live}}</ref>
There are some cases in which the whip is removed because an issue is a matter of conscience. These include adoption, religion and equal opportunities. The impact of a whip being imposed on a matter of conscience can be damaging for a party leader. One such case was that of Iain Duncan Smith, who imposed a three-line whip against the adoption of children by unmarried couples which, at the time, meant gay couples could never adopt. Several [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative]] MPs voted against the official party line, and Smith's authority was weakened.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Watt |first1=Nicholas |author1-link=Nicholas Watt |title=Tory leader fends off gay adoption policy revolt |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2002/nov/02/uk.conservatives |access-date=15 August 2022 |work=[[The Guardian]] |date=2 November 2002 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211016144917/https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2002/nov/02/uk.conservatives |archive-date=16 October 2021 |url-status=live}}</ref>


Whips often employ a mixture of promises, cajoling and persuasion to force an unpopular vote. A whip should know major figures in an MP's local [[constituency]] party and the MP's agent. There have been cases where sick MPs were wheeled into the House from far afield to vote for the government on a crucial vote. Former MP [[Joe Ashton]] recalled a case from the latter days of [[James Callaghan]]'s government:
Whips often employ a mixture of promises, cajoling and persuasion to force an unpopular vote. A whip should know major figures in an MP's local [[constituency]] party and the MP's agent. There have been cases where sick MPs were wheeled into the House from far afield to vote for the government on a crucial vote. Former MP [[Joe Ashton]] recalled a case from the latter days of [[James Callaghan]]'s government:


<blockquote>I remember the famous case of [[Leslie Spriggs]], the then-Member for St. Helens. We had a tied vote, and he was brought to the House in an ambulance having suffered a severe heart attack. The two Whips went out to look in the ambulance and there was Leslie Spriggs laid there as though he was dead. I believe that [[John Stradling Thomas]] said to [[Joseph Harper (British politician)|Joe Harper]], "How do we know that he is alive?" So, he leaned forward, turned the knob on the heart machine, the green light went around, and he said, "There, you've lost—it's 311." That is an absolutely true story. It is the sort of nonsense that used to happen. No one believes it, but it is true.<ref>{{cite web | title = Hansard Commons | date = 14 July 1997 | location = Column 507, Paragraph 20 | url = https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199798/cmhansrd/vo970604/debtext/70604-49.htm#70604-49_para20 | url-status=live | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20010519101045/http://www.publications.parliament.uk:80/pa/cm199798/cmhansrd/vo970604/debtext/70604-49.htm | archive-date = 19 May 2001 }}</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>I remember the famous case of [[Leslie Spriggs]], the then-Member for St. Helens. We had a tied vote, and he was brought to the House in an ambulance having suffered a severe heart attack. The two Whips went out to look in the ambulance and there was Leslie Spriggs lying there as though he was dead. I believe that [[John Stradling Thomas]] said to [[Joseph Harper (British politician)|Joe Harper]], "How do we know that he is alive?" So, he leaned forward, turned the knob on the heart machine, the green light went around, and he said, "There, you've lost—it's 311." That is an absolutely true story. It is the sort of nonsense that used to happen. No one believes it, but it is true.<ref>{{cite web | title = Hansard Commons | date = 14 July 1997 | location = Column 507, Paragraph 20 | url = https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199798/cmhansrd/vo970604/debtext/70604-49.htm#70604-49_para20 | url-status=live | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20010519101045/http://www.publications.parliament.uk:80/pa/cm199798/cmhansrd/vo970604/debtext/70604-49.htm | archive-date = 19 May 2001 }}</ref></blockquote>


A [[Minister (government)|minister]] who defies the whip is generally dismissed from their job immediately, if they have not already resigned, and returns to being a backbencher. Sometimes their votes in Parliament are called the "[[payroll vote]]", because they can be taken for granted. The consequences for a back-bencher can include the lack of future promotion to a government post, a reduction of party campaigning effort in his or her constituency during the next election, deselection by his or her local party activists, or, in extreme circumstances, "withdrawal of the whip" and expulsion from the party.<ref>{{cite journal |first1=J. Richard | last1=Piper |title=British Backbench Rebellion and Government Appointments, 1945-87 |journal=Legislative Studies Quarterly |date=May 1991 |volume=16 |issue=2 |pages=219–38 |publisher=Washington University |jstor=439979}}</ref>
A [[Minister (government)|minister]] who defies the whip is generally dismissed from their job immediately, if they have not already resigned, and returns to being a backbencher. Sometimes their votes in Parliament are called the "[[payroll vote]]", because they can be taken for granted. The consequences for a back-bencher can include the lack of future promotion to a government post, a reduction of party campaigning effort in his or her constituency during the next election, deselection by his or her local party activists, or, in extreme circumstances, "withdrawal of the whip" and expulsion from the party.<ref>{{cite journal |first1=J. Richard | last1=Piper |title=British Backbench Rebellion and Government Appointments, 1945-87 |journal=Legislative Studies Quarterly |date=May 1991 |volume=16 |issue=2 |pages=219–38 |publisher=Washington University | doi=10.2307/439979 |jstor=439979}}</ref>

A similar arrangement exists for whips in the [[House of Lords]]. The Government Chief Whip is usually appointed [[Captain of the Honourable Corps of Gentlemen-at-Arms]], while the Deputy Chief Whip is usually appointed [[Captain of the Yeomen of the Guard|Captain of the Queen's Bodyguard of the Yeomen of the Guard]]. Other whips, who are fewer in number due to the decreased importance of party discipline in the Lords, are appointed as [[Lord-in-waiting|Lords in Waiting]], if men, and Baronesses in Waiting, if women. As well as their duties as whips, Lords whips speak in the chamber (unlike Commons whips) to support departmental ministers, or act as a spokesperson for government departments with no minister in the Lords.{{Citation needed|date=October 2021}}


===Lists of chief whips by party===
===Lists of chief whips by party===
Line 63: Line 55:


== India ==
== India ==
In [[Politics of India|India]], the concept of the whip was inherited from colonial British rule. Every major political party appoints a whip who is responsible for the party's discipline and behaviour on the floor of the [[Parliament of India|house]]. Usually, that person directs the party members to stick to the party's stand on certain issues and directs them to vote as per the direction of senior party members.<ref name="Derek O'Brien is TMC's Chief Whip in Rajya Sabha">{{cite news|title=Derek O'Brien is TMC's Chief Whip in Rajya Sabha|url=http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=770815|access-date=3 August 2012|newspaper=[[Outlook (Indian magazine)|Outlook India]]|date=2 Aug 2012|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131014225153/http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=770815|archive-date=14 October 2013|df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref name="leaders and chief whip act">{{cite web|title=leaders and chief whips of recognised parties and groups in parliament (facilities) act, 1998 |url=http://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsnew/msa_section/leader_chief1998.pdf |publisher=Rajya Sabha Secretariat |access-date=3 August 2012 |archive-date=8 July 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140708205456/http://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsnew/msa_section/leader_chief1998.pdf |url-status=dead |df=dmy }}</ref> However, there are some cases, such as Indian presidential election, where no whip can be issued to direct [[Member of Parliament]] or [[Member of Legislative Assembly]] on whom to vote.<ref name="Issuing whips to MPs, MLAs in Presidential poll is an offence: EC">{{cite news|title=Issuing whips to MPs, MLAs in Presidential poll is an offence: EC|url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-07-10/india/32617646_1_presidential-poll-mps-and-mlas-electoral-college|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130905065149/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-07-10/india/32617646_1_presidential-poll-mps-and-mlas-electoral-college|url-status=dead|archive-date=5 September 2013|access-date=3 August 2012|newspaper=[[The Times of India]]|date=10 Jul 2012}}</ref>
In [[Politics of India|India]], the concept of the whip was inherited from colonial British rule. Every major political party appoints a whip who is responsible for the party's discipline and behaviour on the floor of the [[Parliament of India|house]]. Usually, that person directs the party members to stick to the party's stand on certain issues and directs them to vote as per the direction of senior party members.<ref name="Derek O'Brien is TMC's Chief Whip in Rajya Sabha">{{cite news|title=Derek O'Brien is TMC's Chief Whip in Rajya Sabha|url=http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=770815|access-date=3 August 2012|newspaper=[[Outlook (Indian magazine)|Outlook India]]|date=2 August 2012|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131014225153/http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=770815|archive-date=14 October 2013}}</ref><ref name="leaders and chief whip act">{{cite web|title=leaders and chief whips of recognised parties and groups in parliament (facilities) act, 1998 |url=http://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsnew/msa_section/leader_chief1998.pdf |publisher=Rajya Sabha Secretariat |access-date=3 August 2012 |archive-date=8 July 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140708205456/http://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsnew/msa_section/leader_chief1998.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> However, there are some cases, such as Indian presidential election, where no whip can be issued to direct [[Member of Parliament]] or [[Member of the Legislative Assembly]] on whom to vote.<ref name="Issuing whips to MPs, MLAs in Presidential poll is an offence: EC">{{cite news|title=Issuing whips to MPs, MLAs in Presidential poll is an offence: EC|url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-07-10/india/32617646_1_presidential-poll-mps-and-mlas-electoral-college|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130905065149/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-07-10/india/32617646_1_presidential-poll-mps-and-mlas-electoral-college|url-status=dead|archive-date=5 September 2013|access-date=3 August 2012|newspaper=[[The Times of India]]|date=10 July 2012}}</ref>


== In other countries ==
== In other countries ==
Line 69: Line 61:


{{div col|colwidth=30em}}
{{div col|colwidth=30em}}
* [[Politics of Argentina|Argentina]] – [[Jefe de Bancada (Argentina)]]
* [[Politics of Australia|Australia]] – [[party whip (Australia)]]
* [[Politics of Australia|Australia]] – [[party whip (Australia)]]
* [[Politics of Bangladesh|Bangladesh]]
* [[Politics of Bangladesh|Bangladesh]]
Line 84: Line 77:
* [[Politics of South Africa|South Africa]] – [[Chief Whip of the Majority Party]]
* [[Politics of South Africa|South Africa]] – [[Chief Whip of the Majority Party]]
* [[Politics of Trinidad and Tobago|Trinidad and Tobago]]
* [[Politics of Trinidad and Tobago|Trinidad and Tobago]]
* [[Politics of Turkey|Turkey]] – {{ill|Deputy Chair of the Parliamentary Group|tr|Kategori:TBMM_Grup_Ba%C5%9Fkanvekilleri}}
* [[Politics of Uganda|Uganda]]
* [[Politics of Uganda|Uganda]]
* [[Politics of the United States|United States]] – several equivalent positions: [[Party leaders of the United States House of Representatives|House Majority and Minority Whips]] and the [[Party leaders of the United States Senate|Senate Majority and Minority Whips]]
* [[Politics of the United States|United States]] – several equivalent positions: [[Party leaders of the United States House of Representatives|House Majority and Minority Whips]] and the [[Party leaders of the United States Senate|Senate Majority and Minority Whips]]
* [[Politics of Wales|Wales]] – [[Chief Whip (Wales)|Chief Whip]]
{{div col end}}
{{div col end}}


Line 93: Line 88:


== See also ==
== See also ==

* [[Whip (politics)]]
* The [[Public Whip]]
* The [[Public Whip]]


Line 101: Line 94:


== References ==
== References ==
{{Reflist|40em}}
{{Reflist}}


{{Downing Street}}
{{Downing Street}}

Revision as of 22:50, 6 July 2024

The Chief Whip is a political leader whose task is to enforce the whipping system, which aims to ensure that legislators who are members of a political party attend and vote on legislation as the party leadership prescribes.

United Kingdom

In British politics, the Chief Whip of the governing party in the House of Commons is usually also appointed as Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury, a Cabinet position. The Government Chief Whip has an official residence at 12 Downing Street. However, the Chief Whip's office is currently[when?] located at 9 Downing Street.[1]

The Chief Whip can wield great power over their party's MPs, including cabinet ministers, being seen to speak at all times on behalf of the Prime Minister.[2] Margaret Thatcher was known for using her Chief Whip as a "cabinet enforcer".[citation needed]

The role of the Chief Whip is regarded as secretive, as the Whip is concerned with the discipline of their own party's Members of Parliament, never appearing on television or radio in their capacity as whip. An exception occurred on 1 April 2019 when Julian Smith chose to criticise his own government and Prime Minister.[3] Whips in the House of Commons do not, by convention, speak in debates.[citation needed]

The Government Chief Whip is assisted by the Deputy Chief Whip, other whips, and assistant whips. In order to provide the whip with a salary, the government whips are appointed to positions in HM Treasury and in the Royal Household under the Lord Steward of the Household. The whips are not fully active in either of these departments, though they do undertake a number of responsibilities. The Deputy Chief Whip is Treasurer of HM Household, the next two whips are Comptroller of HM Household and Vice-Chamberlain of HM Household. The remaining whips are Lords Commissioners of the Treasury. Assistant whips, and whips of opposition parties, generally do not receive such appointments. The Government Chief Whip in the House of Lords also holds the role of Captain of the Honourable Corps of Gentlemen-at-Arms, while the Government Deputy Chief Whip in the Lords holds the role of Captain of the Yeomen of the Guard.[citation needed] Other whips, who are fewer in number due to the decreased importance of party discipline in the Lords, are appointed as Lords in Waiting, if men, and Baronesses in Waiting, if women. As well as their duties as whips, Lords whips speak in the chamber (unlike Commons whips) to support departmental ministers, or act as a spokesperson for government departments with no minister in the Lords.[citation needed]

Outside the government, the Official Opposition Chief Whip in the Commons, like the Leader of the Opposition, receives a stipend in addition to their parliamentary salary, because their additional responsibilities will make them unable to hold down another job.[4]

The whips, although superficially dictatorial, act as communicators between backbenchers and the party leadership. Ultimately, if backbenchers are unhappy with the leadership's position, they can threaten to revolt during a vote and force the leadership to compromise.[citation needed]

While the whip was formally introduced to British politics by the Irish Parliamentary Party under Charles Stewart Parnell in the 1880s,[citation needed] in 1846 the Duke of Wellington advised the new Conservative Party leader Lord Stanley to ensure that his "whippers-in" were personally loyal.[citation needed] According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the use of the term "whippers-in" was first recorded in the parliamentary sense in the Annual Register of 1772.[5]

The Whip as a Party Line

In the UK House of Commons, the importance of a vote is indicated by underlining items on the "whip", which is the name of the letter the Chief Whip sends to all the MPs in their party at the start of the week. This letter informs them of the schedule for the days ahead and includes the sentence "Your attendance is absolutely essential" next to each debate in which there will be a vote. This sentence is underlined once, twice, or three times depending on the consequences that will be suffered if they do not turn up, hence the origin of the terms one-line whip, two-line whip and three-line whip. The actual vote they are to make is communicated to them in the chamber by hand signals during the division when the time comes (usually after the division bell has been rung). Neither these instructions, which are visible to everyone in the chamber, nor the "whip" letter at the start of the week, are recorded in Hansard, as they are considered a matter internal to the political party. Any explicit direction to an MP as to how they should vote would be a breach of parliamentary privilege.[6][citation needed]

The consequences of defying the party whip depend on the circumstances and are usually negotiated with the party whip in advance. The party whip's job is to ensure the outcome of the vote. The party in the majority can always win a vote if its members obey the whip.[citation needed]

If the party has a large Commons majority, it can make allowances for MPs who are away on important business, or whose political circumstances require them to take a particular issue very seriously. Theoretically at least, expulsion from the party is an automatic consequence of defying a three-line whip.[6][citation needed]

Other such offences include betraying party loyalties. An example of this during John Major's government was when nine Conservative MPs had the whip removed after voting against the government on its stance on the Maastricht Treaty, becoming known as Eurosceptics. In practice they remained Conservative MPs supporting the government on other issues. Sir Bill Cash, Sir John Redwood and Sir Iain Duncan Smith are still Conservative MPs. This was also the only time when MPs who were being whipped were cooperating with the opposite side's whips. In most cases, the 'pairing' system enables one from each side to cancel out the other's vote if absent simultaneously. Despite the whip, individuals are entitled to vote according to their own beliefs, particularly when there is a "free vote" on a matter of conscience.[a]

There are some cases in which the whip is removed because an issue is a matter of conscience. These include adoption, religion and equal opportunities. The impact of a whip being imposed on a matter of conscience can be damaging for a party leader. One such case was that of Iain Duncan Smith, who imposed a three-line whip against the adoption of children by unmarried couples which, at the time, meant gay couples could never adopt. Several Conservative MPs voted against the official party line, and Smith's authority was weakened.[7]

Whips often employ a mixture of promises, cajoling and persuasion to force an unpopular vote. A whip should know major figures in an MP's local constituency party and the MP's agent. There have been cases where sick MPs were wheeled into the House from far afield to vote for the government on a crucial vote. Former MP Joe Ashton recalled a case from the latter days of James Callaghan's government:

I remember the famous case of Leslie Spriggs, the then-Member for St. Helens. We had a tied vote, and he was brought to the House in an ambulance having suffered a severe heart attack. The two Whips went out to look in the ambulance and there was Leslie Spriggs lying there as though he was dead. I believe that John Stradling Thomas said to Joe Harper, "How do we know that he is alive?" So, he leaned forward, turned the knob on the heart machine, the green light went around, and he said, "There, you've lost—it's 311." That is an absolutely true story. It is the sort of nonsense that used to happen. No one believes it, but it is true.[8]

A minister who defies the whip is generally dismissed from their job immediately, if they have not already resigned, and returns to being a backbencher. Sometimes their votes in Parliament are called the "payroll vote", because they can be taken for granted. The consequences for a back-bencher can include the lack of future promotion to a government post, a reduction of party campaigning effort in his or her constituency during the next election, deselection by his or her local party activists, or, in extreme circumstances, "withdrawal of the whip" and expulsion from the party.[9]

Lists of chief whips by party

Principal Private Secretary to the Chief Whip

The Government Chief Whip's office is headed by a Principal Private Secretary, who also acts as a go-between for ministers and the opposition to keep parliamentary business moving. The first officeholder, Charles Harris, was appointed privately in 1919 to assist Lord Edmund Talbot, the Conservative chief whip. He was retained by successive Conservative chief whips on a private basis, serving as their secretary during periods when the party was in government (1922–23, 1924–29 and 1935 onwards) until 1939, when the post formally became part of the civil service (as Assistant to the Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury) and Harris was appointed into it, with a salary of £850.[10] He retired in 1961 and was succeeded by Freddie Warren; all subsequent appointees have been permanent civil servants.

India

In India, the concept of the whip was inherited from colonial British rule. Every major political party appoints a whip who is responsible for the party's discipline and behaviour on the floor of the house. Usually, that person directs the party members to stick to the party's stand on certain issues and directs them to vote as per the direction of senior party members.[12][13] However, there are some cases, such as Indian presidential election, where no whip can be issued to direct Member of Parliament or Member of the Legislative Assembly on whom to vote.[14]

In other countries

There are also Chief Whips or similar positions in:

In fiction

British Chief Whips have appeared in TV series such as House of Cards, Yes Minister, The New Statesman and The Thick of It.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ An example of this could be a vote to bring back hanging as a death penalty.

References

  1. ^ Womack, Sarah (7 September 2001). "Campbell ousts the Chief Whip". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022. Retrieved 28 April 2010.
  2. ^ "Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury (Chief Whip)". 30 April 2023.
  3. ^ Cappuro, Daniel (1 April 2019). "Julian Smith: The beleaguered Chief Whip with a long record of mistakes". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022. Retrieved 1 April 2019.
  4. ^ "Salaries of Leader of Opposition and Opposition Whips". Erskine May: Parliamentary Practice. 2019. 4.43. Archived from the original on 9 September 2021. Retrieved 15 August 2022. ...  Since 1965, provision has been made for the payment of a salary to the Opposition Chief Whip ...
  5. ^ Walpole, Jennifer; Kelly, Richard (10 October 2008). "The Whip's Office – Standard Note – SN/PC/02829" (PDF). Parliament Research Briefings. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 July 2021. Retrieved 15 August 2022.
  6. ^ a b Tingary, Paeony; Durrant, Tim (6 March 2019). "Whips: what is their role?". Institute for Government. Archived from the original on 21 April 2022. Retrieved 15 August 2022.
  7. ^ Watt, Nicholas (2 November 2002). "Tory leader fends off gay adoption policy revolt". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 16 October 2021. Retrieved 15 August 2022.
  8. ^ "Hansard Commons". Column 507, Paragraph 20. 14 July 1997. Archived from the original on 19 May 2001.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  9. ^ Piper, J. Richard (May 1991). "British Backbench Rebellion and Government Appointments, 1945-87". Legislative Studies Quarterly. 16 (2). Washington University: 219–38. doi:10.2307/439979. JSTOR 439979.
  10. ^ a b David Butler, "Harris, Sir Charles Joseph William", The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed., Oxford University Press, September 2004). Retrieved 20 November 2019.
  11. ^ His entry in Who Was Who states that he was "Secretary to the Government Chief Whip" between 1958 and 1979, but Sir Charles Harris did not retire until 1961 and The Times reported only in that year that Warren succeeded him as Secretary ("Presentation to Sir Charles Harris", The Times, 21 July 1961, p. 8; "Chief Whip Appoints New Secretary", The Times, 2 August 1961, p. 7). His obituary in The Times gives 1961 to 1978 ("Sir Alfred Warren." The Times, 15 May 1990, p. 14.).
  12. ^ "Derek O'Brien is TMC's Chief Whip in Rajya Sabha". Outlook India. 2 August 2012. Archived from the original on 14 October 2013. Retrieved 3 August 2012.
  13. ^ "leaders and chief whips of recognised parties and groups in parliament (facilities) act, 1998" (PDF). Rajya Sabha Secretariat. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 July 2014. Retrieved 3 August 2012.
  14. ^ "Issuing whips to MPs, MLAs in Presidential poll is an offence: EC". The Times of India. 10 July 2012. Archived from the original on 5 September 2013. Retrieved 3 August 2012.