[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Content word: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Removed hyphen to conform to proper style/usage.
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.3) (Eastmain - 13061
 
Line 3: Line 3:
All words can be classified as either content or function words, but it is not always easy to make the distinction. With only around 150 function words, 99.9% of words in the [[English language]] are content words. Although small in number, function words are used at a disproportionately higher rate than content and make up about 50% of any English text because of the conventional patterns of usage that binds function words to content words almost every time they are used, which creates an interdependence between the two word groups.<ref name=Sankin>{{citation|title=A Course in Modern English Lexicology|edition=Revised and Enlarged, Second|first=A.A.|last=Sankin|editor=R.S. Ginzburg |editor2=S.S. Khidekel |editor3=G. Y. Knyazeva |editor4=A.A. Sankin|chapter=I. Introduction|page=7|publisher={{lang|ru|VYSŠAJA ŠKOLA}}|orig-year=1966|location=Moscow|year=1979|chapter-url=http://www.bsu.by/Cache/pdf/229523.pdf|access-date=30 July 2016}}</ref>
All words can be classified as either content or function words, but it is not always easy to make the distinction. With only around 150 function words, 99.9% of words in the [[English language]] are content words. Although small in number, function words are used at a disproportionately higher rate than content and make up about 50% of any English text because of the conventional patterns of usage that binds function words to content words almost every time they are used, which creates an interdependence between the two word groups.<ref name=Sankin>{{citation|title=A Course in Modern English Lexicology|edition=Revised and Enlarged, Second|first=A.A.|last=Sankin|editor=R.S. Ginzburg |editor2=S.S. Khidekel |editor3=G. Y. Knyazeva |editor4=A.A. Sankin|chapter=I. Introduction|page=7|publisher={{lang|ru|VYSŠAJA ŠKOLA}}|orig-year=1966|location=Moscow|year=1979|chapter-url=http://www.bsu.by/Cache/pdf/229523.pdf|access-date=30 July 2016}}</ref>


Content words are usually [[open class (linguistics)|open class]] words, and new words are easily added to the language.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Winkler|first=Elizabeth Grace|title=Understanding Language|publisher=Continuum|year=2007|isbn=978-08264-84833|pages=84–85}}</ref> In relation to [[English phonology]], content words generally adhere to the minimal word constraint of being no shorter than two [[mora (linguistics)|morae]] long (a minimum length of two light syllables or one heavy syllable), but function words often do not.<ref>{{cite web|title=Function Words|first=Liina|last=Pylkkanen|website=NYU Department of Psychology|url=http://www.psych.nyu.edu/pylkkanen/Neural_Bases/13_Function_Words.pdf|access-date=December 18, 2016}}</ref>
Content words are usually [[open class (linguistics)|open class]] words, and new words are easily added to the language.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Winkler|first=Elizabeth Grace|title=Understanding Language|publisher=Continuum|year=2007|isbn=978-08264-84833|pages=84–85}}</ref> In relation to [[English phonology]], content words generally adhere to the minimal word constraint of being no shorter than two [[mora (linguistics)|morae]] long (a minimum length of two light syllables or one heavy syllable), but function words often do not.<ref>{{cite web|title=Function Words|first=Liina|last=Pylkkanen|website=NYU Department of Psychology|url=http://www.psych.nyu.edu/pylkkanen/Neural_Bases/13_Function_Words.pdf|access-date=December 18, 2016|archive-date=August 30, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170830014227/http://www.psych.nyu.edu/pylkkanen/Neural_Bases/13_Function_Words.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==

Latest revision as of 14:28, 3 April 2023

Content words, in linguistics, are words that possess semantic content and contribute to the meaning of the sentence in which they occur. In a traditional approach, nouns were said to name objects and other entities, lexical verbs to indicate actions, adjectives to refer to attributes of entities, and adverbs to attributes of actions. They contrast with function words, which have very little substantive meaning and primarily denote grammatical relationships between content words, such as prepositions (in, out, under etc.), pronouns (I, you, he, who etc.) and conjunctions (and, but, till, as etc.).[1]

All words can be classified as either content or function words, but it is not always easy to make the distinction. With only around 150 function words, 99.9% of words in the English language are content words. Although small in number, function words are used at a disproportionately higher rate than content and make up about 50% of any English text because of the conventional patterns of usage that binds function words to content words almost every time they are used, which creates an interdependence between the two word groups.[1]

Content words are usually open class words, and new words are easily added to the language.[2] In relation to English phonology, content words generally adhere to the minimal word constraint of being no shorter than two morae long (a minimum length of two light syllables or one heavy syllable), but function words often do not.[3]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Sankin, A.A. (1979) [1966], "I. Introduction" (PDF), in R.S. Ginzburg; S.S. Khidekel; G. Y. Knyazeva; A.A. Sankin (eds.), A Course in Modern English Lexicology (Revised and Enlarged, Second ed.), Moscow: VYSŠAJA ŠKOLA, p. 7, retrieved 30 July 2016
  2. ^ Winkler, Elizabeth Grace (2007). Understanding Language. Continuum. pp. 84–85. ISBN 978-08264-84833.
  3. ^ Pylkkanen, Liina. "Function Words" (PDF). NYU Department of Psychology. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 30, 2017. Retrieved December 18, 2016.