[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Driver License Agreement: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Rescuing 2 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8) (AManWithNoPlan - 8525
 
(36 intermediate revisions by 31 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{refimprove|date=February 2017}}
In the [[USA]], the '''Driver License Agreement (DLA)''' is a new interstate compact written by the Joint Executive Board of the [[Driver License Compact]] (DLC) and the [[Non-Resident Violator Compact]] (NRVC) with staff support provided by the [[American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators]] (AAMVA) (composed of motor vehicle and law enforcement administrators and executives). The goals of the DLA are to require each state to honor licenses issued by other member states; to require each state to report traffic convictions to the licensing state; to prohibit a member state from confiscating an out-of-state driver's license or jailing an out-of-state driver for a minor violation; and to require each state to maintain a complete driver's history, including withdrawals and traffic convictions including non-DLA states. When a DLA member state receives a report concerning their drivers from a non-DLA member state, the member state will be required to treat the report the same as if it came from a member state. As with the previous compacts, the DLA requires a state to post all out-of-state traffic convictions to the driver's record, and a state must apply its own laws to all out-of-state convictions. As with the previous compacts, the DLA allows other jurisdictions to access motor vehicle records, in accordance with the Drivers' Privacy Protection Act (DPPA) which will not apply to foreign countries, and to transfer the driver's history if the driver transfers his license.
In the [[United States]], the '''Driver License Agreement''' ('''DLA''') is an [[interstate compact]] written by the Joint Executive Board of the [[Driver License Compact]] (DLC) and the [[Non-Resident Violator Compact]] (NRVC) with staff support provided by the [[American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators]] (AAMVA). The DLA requires all states to honor licenses issued by other member states, report traffic convictions to the licensing state, prohibit a member state from confiscating an out-of-state driver's license or jailing an out-of-state driver for a minor violation; and maintain a complete driver's history, including withdrawals and traffic convictions including those committed in non-DLA states.
The DLA has some changes from the NRVC. Unlike the NRVC, under the DLA, adverse action can be taken against a driver for not responding to violations such as equipment violations, registration violations, parking violations, and weight limit violations. Other changes from the NRVC are that in order for a driver to keep his license under the NRVC, he just had to respond to the citation by paying the fine. With the DLA, the driver must comply with any order from the out of state court. An example would be a driver from [[Arizona]] getting cited for tinted windows while traveling through [[Virginia]], even though the tinted windows are legal back at home. The driver is ordered to fix the tint to meet Virginia law even though the driver left Virginia. Under the NRVC, to retain said license, the driver just pays the fine but with DLA, the driver must do what the court says including but not limited to paying a fine, but also fixing vehicle equipment, and/or community service.


When a DLA member state receives a report concerning its drivers from a non-DLA member state, the member state will be required to treat the report the same as if it came from a member state. As with the previous compacts, the DLA requires a state to post all out-of-state traffic convictions to the driver's record, and a state must apply its own laws to all out-of-state convictions. As with the previous compacts, the DLA allows other jurisdictions to access motor vehicle records, in accordance with the Drivers' Privacy Protection Act (DPPA), and to transfer the driver's history if the driver transfers his license.
In addition, unlike the DLC and NRVC, the Provinces/Territories of Canada and the States/Federal District of Mexico can participate in the DLA. The [[Drivers Privacy Protection Act]] will not apply to foreign jurisdictions. Although no mention of expanding the DLA has ever been discussed by the Joint Executive Board, in a future time, the Driver License Agreement might be expanded to include other foreign or non-foreign [[countries]] such as [[the European Union]] or [[Africa]] or [[Asia]] if a super majority of jurisdictions agree to the expansion.{{fact|date=December 2009}}
The DLA has some changes from the NRVC. Unlike the NRVC, under the DLA, adverse action can be taken against a driver for not responding to violations such as equipment violations, registration violations, parking violations, and weight limit violations. Other changes from the NRVC are that in order for a driver to keep his license under the NRVC, he just had to respond to the citation by paying the fine. With the DLA, the driver must comply with any order from the out of state court. An example would be a driver from [[Arizona]] getting cited for tinted windows while traveling through [[Virginia]], even though the tinted windows are legal back at home. The driver is ordered to fix the tint to meet Virginia law even though the driver left Virginia. Under the NRVC, to retain said license, the driver just pays the fine but with DLA, the driver must do what the court says including paying a fine, but also fixing vehicle equipment, and/or community service.


==History==
==History==


Work on the Driver License Agreement started in 1994/1995 by the [[Driver License Compact]] and the [[Non-Resident Violator Compact]] Joint Executive Board with the idea to combine and improve the compacts and make them enforceable, possibly with federal grant funding. Around the same time, Congress passed the [[North American Free Trade Agreement]] (NAFTA) and the Joint Executive Board decided jurisdictions in Mexico and Canada could join.
Work on the Driver License Agreement started in 1994/1995 by the Driver License Compact and the [[Non-Resident Violator Compact]] Joint Executive Board with the idea to combine and improve the compacts and make them enforceable, possibly with federal grant funding. Around the same time, Congress passed the [[North American Free Trade Agreement]] (NAFTA) and the Joint Executive Board decided jurisdictions in Mexico and Canada could join.


The Federal Government through appropriations in Congress funded the Joint Executive Board in writing the new Driver License Agreement. In 2000, the agreement was ratified by the U.S. states with 2 votes against. After the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, the Joint Executive Board strengthened driver license security provisions in the DLA, and the revised DLA was again ratified by the U.S. states with some votes against. The information on who voted against the DLA is considered confidential and proprietary information by the AAMVA.
The federal government through appropriations in Congress funded the Joint Executive Board in writing the new Driver License Agreement. In 2000, the agreement was ratified by the U.S. states with two votes against. After the [[September 11 attacks]] in 2001, the Joint Executive Board strengthened driver license security provisions in the DLA, and the revised DLA was again ratified by the U.S. states with some votes against. The information on who voted against the DLA is considered confidential and proprietary information by the AAMVA.{{Citation needed|date=April 2010}}


[[Connecticut]] is the first state that joined in January 2002.
[[Connecticut]] was the first state to join in January 2002.


==States that are members==
==States that are members==
* [[Connecticut]]
* [[Connecticut]]
* [[Arkansas]] - can join under administrative rulemakeing under Act 446 as passed by the 2005 Legislative Session
* [[Arkansas]] can join under administrative rulemakeing under Act 446 as passed by the 2005 Legislative Session
* [[Massachusetts]]
* [[Massachusetts]]

==Controversy==
* Sharing of state driver databases not only with other states but also with foreign countries that do not follow the [[Drivers Privacy Protection Act]].
* A stalker would be able to access information on targeted victim by bribing corrupt officials, since DLA members are required to make their databases available to ALL jurisdictions.
* No [[due process]] rights for receiving a traffic ticket or major violation such as DUI while driving out of the country but yet, the ticket when reported to the home jurisdiction can affect retention of a driver's license and cause insurance rates to increase.


==Notes==
==Notes==
* ''[http://www.numbersusa.com/PDFs/AAMVA%20Driver%20License%20Agreement%20text.pdf The Driver License Agreement document (PDF)]''
* ''[http://www.numbersusa.com/PDFs/AAMVA%20Driver%20License%20Agreement%20text.pdf The Driver License Agreement document (PDF)]''
* ''[http://www.ncsl.org/programs/transportation/driverlicenseagree05.htm Analysis] by the [http://www.ncsl.org National Conference of State Legislatures]''
* [[Real ID Act]] of 2005
* [[Real ID Act]] of 2005


==Legislation and other==
==Legislation and other==
* [[AAMVA]] has struck a deal with [[NHTSA]] to get funding to get states to join. Found at [http://www.aamva.org/Documents/ProMemoDLA_ImplementationFunding061506.pdf AAMVA Memo]
* Legislation in the past has been sponsored in [[Kentucky]], [[Michigan]], [[Minnesota]], and [[North Carolina]] to join
* Legislation in the past has been sponsored in [[Kentucky]], [[Michigan]], [[Minnesota]], and [[North Carolina]] to join
* There has been legislation sponsored in the US Congress to mandate that states must participate in the past such as [http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:h.r.00010: HR10 - 9/11 Implementation Act of 2004] and [http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:h.r.00418: HR418 - The Real ID Act of 2005] but the mandate has not made it into the final bills.
* There has been legislation in the past, introduced in the US Congress, to mandate that states must participate. Such legislation included [http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:h.r.00010: HR10 - 9/11 Implementation Act of 2004] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041020092303/http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:h.r.00010: |date=2004-10-20 }} and [http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:h.r.00418: HR418 - The Real ID Act of 2005] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080918045142/http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:h.r.00418: |date=2008-09-18 }} but the mandate has not made it into the final bills.
* Driver's Privacy Protection Act [http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002721----000-.html]
* Driver's Privacy Protection Act [https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2721-]


==References==
==References==
*[http://www.aamva.org American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA]
*[http://www.aamva.org American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA)]


{{Traffic law}}
{{Traffic law}}

[[Category:United States interstate compacts]]
[[Category:United States interstate compacts]]
[[Category:Traffic law]]

Latest revision as of 13:10, 14 August 2021

In the United States, the Driver License Agreement (DLA) is an interstate compact written by the Joint Executive Board of the Driver License Compact (DLC) and the Non-Resident Violator Compact (NRVC) with staff support provided by the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA). The DLA requires all states to honor licenses issued by other member states, report traffic convictions to the licensing state, prohibit a member state from confiscating an out-of-state driver's license or jailing an out-of-state driver for a minor violation; and maintain a complete driver's history, including withdrawals and traffic convictions including those committed in non-DLA states.

When a DLA member state receives a report concerning its drivers from a non-DLA member state, the member state will be required to treat the report the same as if it came from a member state. As with the previous compacts, the DLA requires a state to post all out-of-state traffic convictions to the driver's record, and a state must apply its own laws to all out-of-state convictions. As with the previous compacts, the DLA allows other jurisdictions to access motor vehicle records, in accordance with the Drivers' Privacy Protection Act (DPPA), and to transfer the driver's history if the driver transfers his license.

The DLA has some changes from the NRVC. Unlike the NRVC, under the DLA, adverse action can be taken against a driver for not responding to violations such as equipment violations, registration violations, parking violations, and weight limit violations. Other changes from the NRVC are that in order for a driver to keep his license under the NRVC, he just had to respond to the citation by paying the fine. With the DLA, the driver must comply with any order from the out of state court. An example would be a driver from Arizona getting cited for tinted windows while traveling through Virginia, even though the tinted windows are legal back at home. The driver is ordered to fix the tint to meet Virginia law even though the driver left Virginia. Under the NRVC, to retain said license, the driver just pays the fine but with DLA, the driver must do what the court says including paying a fine, but also fixing vehicle equipment, and/or community service.

History[edit]

Work on the Driver License Agreement started in 1994/1995 by the Driver License Compact and the Non-Resident Violator Compact Joint Executive Board with the idea to combine and improve the compacts and make them enforceable, possibly with federal grant funding. Around the same time, Congress passed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Joint Executive Board decided jurisdictions in Mexico and Canada could join.

The federal government through appropriations in Congress funded the Joint Executive Board in writing the new Driver License Agreement. In 2000, the agreement was ratified by the U.S. states with two votes against. After the September 11 attacks in 2001, the Joint Executive Board strengthened driver license security provisions in the DLA, and the revised DLA was again ratified by the U.S. states with some votes against. The information on who voted against the DLA is considered confidential and proprietary information by the AAMVA.[citation needed]

Connecticut was the first state to join in January 2002.

States that are members[edit]

Notes[edit]

Legislation and other[edit]

References[edit]