[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Globe Newspaper Co. v. Walker: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
add google scholar
add "use mdy dates" template
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}}
{{Infobox SCOTUS case
{{Infobox SCOTUS case
|Litigants=Globe Newspaper Co. v. Walker
|Litigants=Globe Newspaper Co. v. Walker
Line 32: Line 33:


{{USArticleI}}
{{USArticleI}}
{{SCOTUS-case-stub}}


[[Category:1908 in United States case law]]
[[Category:1908 in United States case law]]
Line 38: Line 38:
[[Category:United States Supreme Court cases]]
[[Category:United States Supreme Court cases]]
[[Category:United States Supreme Court cases of the Fuller Court]]
[[Category:United States Supreme Court cases of the Fuller Court]]


{{SCOTUS-case-stub}}

Latest revision as of 02:17, 13 September 2023

Globe Newspaper Co. v. Walker
Argued April 23, 1908
Decided June 1, 1908
Full case nameGlobe Newspaper Co. v. Walker
Citations210 U.S. 356 (more)
28 S. Ct. 726; 52 L. Ed. 1096
Holding
Congress having provided a remedy for those whose copyrights in maps are infringed, a civil action at common law for money damages cannot be maintained against the infringers.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Melville Fuller
Associate Justices
John M. Harlan · David J. Brewer
Edward D. White · Rufus W. Peckham
Joseph McKenna · Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
William R. Day · William H. Moody
Case opinion
MajorityDay, joined by unanimous

Globe Newspaper Co. v. Walker, 210 U.S. 356 (1908), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held Congress having provided a remedy for those whose copyrights in maps are infringed, a civil action at common law for money damages cannot be maintained against the infringers.[1]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Globe Newspaper Co. v. Walker, 210 U.S. 356 (1908).

External links[edit]