Globe Newspaper Co. v. Walker: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Legalskeptic (talk | contribs) added library of congress source for scan of U.S. Reports; citation tweaks |
m →top: Task 33: Remove old SCOTUS parameter |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|Subsequent= |
|Subsequent= |
||
|Holding=Congress having provided a remedy for those whose copyrights in maps are infringed, a civil action at common law for money damages cannot be maintained against the infringers. |
|Holding=Congress having provided a remedy for those whose copyrights in maps are infringed, a civil action at common law for money damages cannot be maintained against the infringers. |
||
|SCOTUS=1906–1909 |
|||
|Majority=Day |
|Majority=Day |
||
|JoinMajority=''unanimous'' |
|JoinMajority=''unanimous'' |
Revision as of 05:24, 7 May 2019
Globe Newspaper Co. v. Walker | |
---|---|
Argued April 23, 1908 Decided June 1, 1908 | |
Full case name | Globe Newspaper Co. v. Walker |
Citations | 210 U.S. 356 (more) 28 S. Ct. 726; 52 L. Ed. 1096 |
Holding | |
Congress having provided a remedy for those whose copyrights in maps are infringed, a civil action at common law for money damages cannot be maintained against the infringers. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Day, joined by unanimous |
Globe Newspaper Co. v. Walker, 210 U.S. 356 (1908), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held Congress having provided a remedy for those whose copyrights in maps are infringed, a civil action at common law for money damages cannot be maintained against the infringers.[1]
References
External links
- Text of Globe Newspaper Co. v. Walker, 210 U.S. 356 (1908) is available from: CourtListener Justia Library of Congress