[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

John Derbyshire: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 72.221.92.43 to last revision by Will Beback (HG)
Line 106: Line 106:
In 2006 Derbyshire published another book that attempted to popularize mathematics: ''Unknown Quantity: A Real And Imaginary History of Algebra''. Like his previous book, this survey includes many vignettes of individual mathematicians as well as thorough but accessible discussions of the actual mathematics involved.
In 2006 Derbyshire published another book that attempted to popularize mathematics: ''Unknown Quantity: A Real And Imaginary History of Algebra''. Like his previous book, this survey includes many vignettes of individual mathematicians as well as thorough but accessible discussions of the actual mathematics involved.


==Appearance in the Bruce Lee movie ''Way of the Dragon''==
==Appearance in Bruce Lee movie==
Derbyshire had an uncredited role in "[[Way of the Dragon|Meng long guojiang]]", a 1972 martial arts film starring [[Bruce Lee]] released in [[Western world|Western countries]] under various titles, such as "Way of the Dragon" and "Return of the Dragon". Of landing the part, Derbyshire says: "[T]he casting director had obviously just trawled around the low-class guesthouses for unemployed foreigners of a sufficiently thuggish appearance." He even took directions from the legendary Lee himself: "'Hey, Slim, let's try that again—and this time look mean. You hate me, remember? I'm a runty obnoxious little chink, just stole your woman, trashed your car and pissed in your beer. Whaddya gonna do to me? Huh? ''Whaddya gonna do? Come on...''' (He spoke perfect idiomatic [[American English]] the whole time.)"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nationalreview.com/derbyshire/derbyshire200310150828.asp|title=Thug (Uncredited)|author=John Derbyshire|date=2003-10-15|publisher=National Review Online|accessdate=2007-04-13}}</ref>
Derbyshire had an uncredited role in "[[Way of the Dragon|Meng long guojiang]]" (released in the West as "Way of the Dragon" and "Return of the Dragon"), a 1972 martial arts film starring [[Bruce Lee]]. Of landing the part, Derbyshire says: "[T]he casting director had obviously just trawled around the low-class guesthouses for unemployed foreigners of a sufficiently thuggish appearance." He even took directions from the legendary Lee himself: "'Hey, Slim, let's try that again—and this time look mean. You hate me, remember? I'm a runty obnoxious little chink, just stole your woman, trashed your car and pissed in your beer. Whaddya gonna do to me? Huh? ''Whaddya gonna do? Come on...''' (He spoke perfect idiomatic [[American English]] the whole time.)"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nationalreview.com/derbyshire/derbyshire200310150828.asp|title=Thug (Uncredited)|author=John Derbyshire|date=2003-10-15|publisher=National Review Online|accessdate=2007-04-13}}</ref>


==Published works==
==Published works==

Revision as of 14:37, 2 July 2009

John Derbyshire
2003

John Derbyshire (born June 3, 1945) is a British-American writer. His columns in National Review and New English Review cover a broad range of political-cultural topics, including immigration, China, history, mathematics, and race.[1][2] Derbyshire's 1996 book, Seeing Calvin Coolidge in a Dream, was a New York Times "Notable Book of the Year". His 2004 book, Prime Obsession, won the Mathematical Association of America's inaugural Euler Book Prize.[3]

Derbyshire graduated from University College London, where he studied mathematics. Before turning to writing full-time, he worked on Wall Street as a computer programmer.

Derbyshire's wife, Rosie, is from China[4] and, with her, he has fathered two children, Dannie and Nellie. While raised an Anglican, Derbyshire now considers himself a Mysterian.[5] He lives in Huntington, New York.

Writing and views

Conflicts of peoples

Race and homosexuality

Derbyshire has stated: "I am a homophobe, though a mild and tolerant one, and a racist, though an even more mild and tolerant one."[6] He has also stated : "The U.S.A. was born with two race problems: the African Americans and the Native Americans. We struggle with those problems still, and must continue to struggle."[7]

Derbyshire is a strong believer in the genetic origin of the racial gap in IQ, which he believes causes the economic disparity between the races in the United States.[8] In response to research by geneticist Bruce Lahn on the human genes, ASPM and the microcephalins, and their possible role in the evolution of human intelligence, Derbyshire commented, "our cherished national dream of a well-mixed and harmonious meritocracy...may be unattainable." He is influenced[9] by Carleton S. Coon's "great 1965 classic" The Living Races of Man, and says he has "never been without a copy since."[10]

During a debate with Jared Taylor at the Robert A. Taft club in August 2006 Derbyshire joked that the only reason he was not an open white nationalist was because "it would get me in trouble at home." During the question and answer session Derbyshire jokingly described his two mixed-race children as "Danny-mud and Nellie-mud."[11]

Immigration

Derbyshire opposes illegal immigrants, particularly those from Mexico and further south: the "hordes of Central Americans pouring into our country."[12] From an earlier ambivalent attitude to a fence on the U.S.-Mexico border[12], Derbyshire has moved to support: "Demand a wall...A wall! A wall!"[13]

Despite his oft-voiced opposition to illegal entrants and those who overstay their visas, Derbyshire has admitted overstaying his U.S. visa by five years before achieving legal residence and eventual citizenship.[14][15] He has joked about his former illegal status, comparing himself to a "reformed drunk at a temperance meeting."[16] According to Derbyshire, no American ever expressed any concern about his immigration status, supporting his belief that Americans are very reluctant to think seriously about immigration issues.[15]

China

Derbyshire opposes the current government of China: "China needs democracy. China needs democracy. The twentieth century taught us, via an ocean of blood and a mountain of corpses, that nothing else will do. Without democracy, a country — any country — is on a slope to disaster." He wrote in the same article that China in its current state can best be described as the "sick man of Asia", borrowing "the phrase applied by fascist Japan to the chaotic warlord China of the 1920s."[17]

In 2005, he opined on possible future war between the United States and China:

I have no doubt that Chinese servicemen and U.S. servicemen will be shooting at each other some day soon; but I doubt it will come to a full-blown, city-flattening, carrier-sinking, massed-tank-battles kind of war, because I am unable to imagine any casus belli that would persuade Americans of the necessity for that. The Chinese are another matter; but it takes two to tango, and in the current state of our culture, with self-loathing anti-Americanism a required course at our elite universities, I am sure we would back down in any Sino-American conflict that did not have our own territory at stake. (Yes, including a conflict over Taiwan. Bye-bye, Taiwan.) But this is all guesswork. Of course nobody really knows whether there will be a war... perhaps my opinion is colored by wishful thinking.[18]

Derbyshire has argued that the internment of Americans with Japanese ancestry during World War II was "not a very deplorable thing to do" and noted that in the event of serious war with China, similar internment of Americans with Chinese ancestry will occur and "I hope the camps will not be very uncomfortable, for I shall be there too-- the Derbyshires travel as a family."[19]

Iraq and terrorism

On the War on Terror and the War in Iraq, he has described himself as a "To Hell With Them Hawk", writing in National Review:

We don’t particularly care whether the Sunnis, Shias, and Kurds of Iraq put down their arms. We only want them to put down their arms against us. Henry Kissinger (who has been hanging around on the fringe of the THWTH clique--come on in, Henry!) famously said of the Iran–Iraq War that it was a pity both sides couldn’t lose. One doesn’t want to be accused of inhuman callousness; but I am willing to confess, and believe I speak for a lot of THWTHs (and a lot of other Americans, too) that the spectacle of Middle Eastern Muslims slaughtering each other is one that I find I can contemplate with calm composure.[20]

Other general issues

Religion versus science

In National Review, Derbyshire dismissed what he called a contention by "foolish people" such as Richard Dawkins that science excludes religion. Derbyshire did maintain that scientists, in their professional research, owe allegiance to objective, measurable reality, uninfluenced by religious or ideological belief.[21]

Derbyshire wrote that Intelligent Design is:

not just lousy science, but lousy religion. I dislike it, in fact, for the same reasons... that I dislike the "Left Behind" books & movies, and unbelievers telling me that natural disasters like the recent tsunami "prove" the non-existence of God.
All that kind of thinking trivializes God... [According to proponents of intelligent design] God is a sort of scientist himself, sticking his finger in to make things work when natural laws — His laws! — can't do the job... I am certain... that we are not the children of some celestial lab technician.[22]

He described the criticism he received after writing a critical article in National Review magazine as a conflict "worse than the bloody Middle East."[23]

The Hypothesis of Collective Imprudence

Coined by Derbyshire in July 2006, the Hypothesis of Collective Imprudence (HCI) stipulates that "no large collectivity of human beings (nation-state or larger) will ever act to avert an obvious calamity until that calamity begins to cause really major, dramatic, unignorable damage."[24] Often, when humanity is confronted with prospect of a catastrophe, "Nothing will get done until something awful happens. Then something will get done."

HCI seems to be a phenomenon attributable only to large groups of human beings. According to Derbyshire, "Individual human beings can, and often do, act with prudence. Insurance companies would be out of business otherwise. For nations, let alone for humanity at large, acting with prudence is so much the exception rather than the rule..." Examples of HCI cited by Derbyshire include World War II, 9/11, global warming and, potentially, illegal immigration. Derbyshire himself admits that the HCI is hard to falsify, insofar as any collectivity of humanity that does act prudently against potential dangers thereby prevents the "obvious calamity" from occurring.[25]

Women's fleeting attractiveness

Reason magazine editor Nick Gillespie criticized Derbyshire's assertion:

It is, in fact, a sad truth about human life that beyond our salad days, very few of us are interesting to look at in the buff. Added to that sadness is the very unfair truth that a woman's salad days are shorter than a man's — really, in this precise context, only from about 15 to 20. The Nautilus and the treadmill can add a half decade or so, but by 36 the bloom is definitely off the rose. Very few of us, however, can face up to this fact honestly, and I am sure this diary item will generate more angry e-mails of protest than everything else I have written this month.[26]

Gillespie responded, "Alas, Derb's clock ticks even for the Olsen twins."[27] Garance Franke-Ruta in The American Prospect denounced Derbyshire for "his own barely legal visual preferences."[28]

Incidents

Virginia Tech massacre

The day after the killing of 32 students in the Virginia Tech massacre, Derbyshire was criticized for commenting on the lack of immediate action against the shooter. Derbyshire wrote in National Review's Corner blog: "Where was the spirit of self-defense here? Setting aside the ludicrous campus ban on licensed conceals, why didn't anyone rush the guy?...I hope, however, that if I thought I was going to die anyway, I'd at least take a run at the guy."[29]

In response, former National Review writer John Podhoretz commented harshly on Derbyshire's assessment: "The notion that a human being or group of human beings holding no weapon whatever should somehow 'fight back' against someone calmly executing other people right in front of their eyes is ludicrous beyond belief, irrational beyond bounds, and tasteless beyond the limits of reason. 'Why didn't anyone rush the guy?' Derb asks. Gee, I don't know. Because he was executing people? Because if you rush a guy with a gun, he shoots you in the head the way he executed the teachers in each classroom?"[30]

Removal of children from YFZ Ranch

Derbyshire was one of the few columnists to protest the removal of children from the FLDS-run YFZ Ranch in 2008 as an "atrocity".[31]

Disagreements with other writers

Fellow National Review writers

Derbyshire has differed from his fellow writers at National Review on important subjects. For example, Derbyshire supported Michael Schiavo's position in the Terri Schiavo case, showed sympathy for class-warfare themes in movies such as Titanic, argued that Pope John Paul II was totally unable to stop the secularization of the West, ridiculed George W. Bush's "itty-bitty tax cut, paid for by dumping a slew of federal debt on your children and grandchildren",[32] has derided Bush in general for being too sure of his religious convictions and for his "rich-kid-ness",[33] dismisses small-government conservatism as unlikely to ever take hold (although is not unsympathetic to it), has called for immediate U.S. withdrawal from Iraq (but favored the invasion), opposes market reforms or any other changes in Social Security, defended Michael Jackson as harmless, is pro-choice on abortion, supports euthanasia in a fairly wide range of circumstances, and has suggested that he might (in a time of international crisis) vote for Hillary Clinton as president.[34] Derbyshire's views on the Schiavo case attracted harsh condemnation from fellow writers at National Review Online. NRO writer and frequent blogger, Ramesh Ponnuru, attacked Derbyshire in language far more forceful than customary in National Review's internal debates.[35] The Derbyshire-Ponnuru dispute arose again over Ponnuru's recently published book, Party of Death. Derbyshire reviewed the book harshly in the New English Review,[36] and Ponnuru replied on NRO with another strongly worded attack on Derbyshire as "wrong," "florid," "anti-intellectual," "gaseous" and "preposterous" among other terms.[37]

Though Derbyshire broadly agrees with many other writers at National Review Online on immigration, he encountered strong opposition from former NRO blogger John Podhoretz, who described Derbyshire's comments on restricting immigration to maintain "ethnic balance" in severe terms: "But maintaining 'ethnic balance' is not fine. It is chillingly, horrifyingly not fine."[38] In response, fellow [Corner] contributor Jonah Goldberg, who described himself as philosophically "in the middle" of the two, noted:

"I should say that I think JPod is getting too hung up on the phrase "ethnic balance" as a codeword for all sorts of unlovely things. It seems to me that if you're going to sit down and have any immigration policy at all, it's unavoidable that you're going to address the issue of ethnic balance in one way or another, no matter what you call it. Ultimately, you have to choose where people come from if you have an immigration policy, even if you emphasize other factors like skills or family unification. So you can either look at it directly or you can skirt around it. But you can't avoid it."[39]

Andrew Sullivan

Blogger and journalist Andrew Sullivan has vigorously criticized Derbyshire, mostly over social issues involving race, homosexuality and feminism.[40] Andrew Sullivan has called him "Herr Derbyshire"—a slightly veiled Nazi reference[41]—and suggested that Derbyshire's opinions on immigration are the result of his admitted racism.[42] Sullivan also has a "Derbyshire Award" on his blog "for the nuttiest expression of bigotry from National Review's John Derbsyhire [sic]."[43]

Sullivan describes Derbyshire as a paleoconservative.[44] Derbyshire has been criticized by Sullivan regarding the use of coercive force on prisoners in Iraq by U.S. troops.[40]

Sullivan has posted respectful notices about Derbyshire for his apparent agreement with some of Sullivan's personal philosophy (although clearly not with respect to issues surrounding homosexuality): "Derb really is a conservative of doubt, I think, and, despite his bouts of curmudgeon and prejudice, I've come to admire and respect his intellectual honesty...."[45]

Mathematics popularizing

Prime Obsession: Bernhard Riemann and the Greatest Unsolved Problem in Mathematics by John Derbyshire

Derbyshire's book, Prime Obsession: Bernhard Riemann and the Greatest Unsolved Problem in Mathematics was first published in hardcover in 2003 and then paperback in 2004. It focuses on the Riemann hypothesis, one of the Millennium Problems. The book is aimed, as Derbyshire puts it in his prologue, "at the intelligent and curious but nonmathematical reader... I think I have pitched my book to the level of a person who finished high school math satisfactorily and perhaps went on to a couple of college courses...."

Prime Obsession explores such topics as complex numbers, field theory, the prime number theorem, the zeta function, the harmonic series, and others. The biographical sections give relevant information about the lives of mathematicians who worked in these areas, including Euler, Gauss, Dirichlet, Lobachevsky, Chebyshev, Poussin, Hadamard, as well as Riemann himself.

In 2006 Derbyshire published another book that attempted to popularize mathematics: Unknown Quantity: A Real And Imaginary History of Algebra. Like his previous book, this survey includes many vignettes of individual mathematicians as well as thorough but accessible discussions of the actual mathematics involved.

Appearance in Bruce Lee movie

Derbyshire had an uncredited role in "Meng long guojiang" (released in the West as "Way of the Dragon" and "Return of the Dragon"), a 1972 martial arts film starring Bruce Lee. Of landing the part, Derbyshire says: "[T]he casting director had obviously just trawled around the low-class guesthouses for unemployed foreigners of a sufficiently thuggish appearance." He even took directions from the legendary Lee himself: "'Hey, Slim, let's try that again—and this time look mean. You hate me, remember? I'm a runty obnoxious little chink, just stole your woman, trashed your car and pissed in your beer. Whaddya gonna do to me? Huh? Whaddya gonna do? Come on...' (He spoke perfect idiomatic American English the whole time.)"[46]

Published works

He has also written numerous articles for various publications, including National Review, The New Criterion, and The Washington Times. On the National Review website, he maintains a weekly audio commentary on current events.

References

  1. ^ "John Derbyshire archive". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  2. ^ "Articles by John Derbyshire at New English Review". New English Review. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  3. ^ "The Mathematical Association of America's Euler Book Prize". MAA Online. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  4. ^ John Derbyshire (writing as "Giles Matthews") (1987-07-25). "Getting Married in Manchuria". The Spectator. Retrieved 2007-04-13. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  5. ^ John Derbyshire (2006-10-30). "God & Me"". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  6. ^ "An interview with John Derbyshire". Collected Miscellany. 2003-11-11. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  7. ^ John Derbyshire (2006-07-10). "Jonah's Immigration Point". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  8. ^ John Derbyshire (2006-09). "Race and Conservatism". New English Review. Retrieved 2007-04-13. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  9. ^ "E pluribus plurimum". New Criterion. 2003-01-03. Retrieved 2007-07-10.
  10. ^ John Derbyshire (2007-07-02). "June Diary". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-07-10.
  11. ^ Race and Conservatism
  12. ^ a b John Derbyshire (2004-01-12). "Mr. Bush, Tear Down This Wall!". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  13. ^ John Derbyshire (2006-05-16). "Prez Speech". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  14. ^ John Derbyshire (2007-05-22). "The Bill". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-05-22.
  15. ^ a b John Derbyshire (2003-03-24). "I Was an Illegal Alien". National Review. Retrieved 2007-04-13. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  16. ^ John Derbyshire (2006-04-11). "Reformed". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  17. ^ John Derbyshire (2001-11-30). "Sick Man of Asia". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  18. ^ John Derbyshire (2005-03-16). "Soft Power, Soft Despotism". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  19. ^ Thinking About Internment
  20. ^ John Derbyshire (2006-03-21). "To Hell with the "To Hell With The 'To Hell With Them' Hawks" Hawks". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  21. ^ John Derbyshire (2005-11-07). "The specter of difference: what science is uncovering, we will have to come to grips with". National Review. Retrieved 2007-07-14.
  22. ^ John Derbyshire (2005-01-12). "Intelligent Design". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  23. ^ John Derbyshire (2005-01-11). "Re: Intelligent Design". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  24. ^ John Derbyshire (2006-07-05). "How I Came to Stop Worrying and Love Global Warming". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  25. ^ John Derbyshire (2006-07-06). "The HCI -- A Corollary". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  26. ^ Derbyshire, John (November 30, 2005). "November Diary". National Review. Retrieved 2007-04-19. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  27. ^ Gillespie, Nick (December 2, 2005). "Grasping the Ontological Significance of Janet..." Reason (magazine). Retrieved 2007-04-19. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  28. ^ Garance Franke-Ruta (December 4, 2005). "Ew is right". The American Prospect. Retrieved 2007-05-11. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  29. ^ Derbyshire, John (April 17, 2007). "Spirit of Self-Defense". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-04-17. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  30. ^ John Podhoretz (2007-04-19). "In a Classroom With a Gunman". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-11-07.
  31. ^ Derbyshire, John (1 May 2008). "April Diary: Atrocity of the month".
  32. ^ John Derbyshire (2005-05-10). "Twilight of Conservatism". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  33. ^ John Derbyshire (2006-07-05). "Gone, but Not Forgotten". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  34. ^ John Derbyshire (2005-06-24). "Just Got Back From The Windy City..." National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  35. ^ Ramesh Ponnuru (2005-03-23). "Contra Derbyshire". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  36. ^ John Derbyshire (2006-06). "A Frigid and Pitiless Dogma". New English Review. Retrieved 2007-04-13. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  37. ^ Ramesh Ponnuru (2006-06-07). "Unreason". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  38. ^ John Podhoretz (2006-05-12). "Ethnic Balance?". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  39. ^ Jonah Goldberg (2006-05-12). "Superior Immigrants". National Review Online. Retrieved 2008-05-11.
  40. ^ a b Andrew Sullivan (2006-11-21). "Orwell Lives!". The Daily Dish. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  41. ^ Jonah Goldberg (2006-05-13). "Clearing the Record". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  42. ^ Andrew Sullivan (2006-05-13). "Get a Grip". The Daily Dish. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  43. ^ Andrew Sullivan (2006-01-16). "The Daily Dish Awards". The Daily Dish. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  44. ^ Andrew Sullivan (2006-06-12). "A Paleocon Lament". The Daily Dish. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  45. ^ Andrew Sullivan (2006-10-31). "Quote for the Day". The Daily Dish. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  46. ^ John Derbyshire (2003-10-15). "Thug (Uncredited)". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-04-13.

External links