[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Pteranodontoidea: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎References: Not a stub
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(27 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Clade of ornithocheiroid pterosaurs from the Cretaceous period}}
{{Automatic taxobox
{{Automatic taxobox
| name = Pteranodontoids
| name = Pteranodontoids
| fossil_range = [[Early Cretaceous|Early]]-[[Late Cretaceous]], <br>~{{fossil_range|140|66}}
| fossil_range = [[Early Cretaceous|Early]]-[[Late Cretaceous]], <br/>~{{fossil_range|140|66}}
| image = Grounded Pteranodon.jpg
| image = Grounded Pteranodon.jpg
| image_caption = Mounted skeleton of a female ''[[Geosternbergia sternbergi]]''
| image_caption = Mounted skeleton of a female ''[[Geosternbergia sternbergi]]''
| image2 = Tropeognathus mesembrinus MN 01.jpg
| image2 = Ferrodraco.png
| image2_caption = Mounted skeleton of ''[[Tropeognathus mesembrinus]]'' in the [[National Museum of Brazil]]
| image2_caption = Reconstruction of ''[[Ferrodraco lentoni]]'' showing the known material, scale bar = 50 mm.
| taxon = Pteranodontoidea
| taxon = Pteranodontoidea
| authority = [[Alexander Kellner|Kellner]], [[1996 in paleontology|1996]]
| authority = [[Alexander Kellner|Kellner]], [[1996 in paleontology|1996]]
| subdivision_ranks = Subgroups
| subdivision_ranks = Subgroups
| subdivision =
| subdivision =
*{{extinct}}''[[Santanadactylus]]''<br>
*{{extinct}}[[Pteranodontia]]
*{{extinct}}[[Pteranodontia]]<br>
*{{extinct}}[[Ornithocheiromorpha]]
*{{extinct}}[[Ornithocheiromorpha]]
| synonyms =
| synonyms =
Line 17: Line 17:
}}
}}


'''Pteranodontoidea''' (or '''pteranodontoids''', from [[Ancient Greek|Greek]] meaning "toothless wings") is an [[extinct]] [[clade]] of [[ornithocheiroid]] [[pterosaur]]s from the [[Early Cretaceous|Early]] to [[Late Cretaceous]] (early [[Valanginian]] to late [[Maastrichtian]] stages) of [[Asia]], [[Africa]], [[Europe]], [[North America]] and [[South America]].<ref name=Butleretal12>{{cite journal |author=Richard J. Butler, Stephen L. Brusatte, Brian B. Andres and Roger B. J. Benson |year=2012 |title=How do geological sampling biases affect studies of morphological evolution in deep time? A case study of the Pterosauria (Reptilia: Archosauria) |journal=Evolution |volume=66 |issue=1 |pages=147–162 |doi=10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01415.x |pmid=22220871}}</ref> It was named by [[Alexander Kellner|Alexander Wilhelm Armin Kellner]] in [[1996 in paleontology|1996]]. In 2003, Kellner defined the clade as a [[node-based taxon]] consisting of the last common ancestor of ''[[Anhanguera (pterosaur)|Anhanguera]]'', ''[[Pteranodon]]'' and all its descendants. The clade Ornithocheiroidea is sometimes considered to be the [[senior synonym]] of Pteranodontoidea, however it depends on its definition.<ref name=Unwin03>Unwin, D. M., (2003): On the phylogeny and evolutionary history of pterosaurs. pp. 139-190. &mdash; ''in'' Buffetaut, E. & Mazin, J.-M., (eds.): ''Evolution and Palaeobiology of Pterosaurs''. Geological Society of London, Special Publications 217, London, 1-347</ref> Brian Andres (2008, 2010, 2014) in his analyses, converts Ornithocheiroidea using the definition of Kellner (2003) to avoid this synonymy.<ref name=BBA10>{{cite book |last=Andres |first=Brian Blake |year=2014 |title=Systematics of the Pterosauria |url=http://gradworks.umi.com/34/40/3440534.html |publisher=Yale University |pages=366}} [https://search.proquest.com/docview/846734901 A preview that shows the cladogram without clade names]</ref>
'''Pteranodontoidea''' (or '''pteranodontoids''', from [[Ancient Greek|Greek]] meaning "toothless wings") is an [[extinct]] [[clade]] of [[ornithocheiroid]] [[pterosaur]]s from the [[Early Cretaceous|Early]] to [[Late Cretaceous]] (early [[Valanginian]] to late [[Maastrichtian]] stages) of [[Asia]], [[Africa]], [[Europe]], [[North America]] and [[South America]].<ref name=Butleretal12>{{cite journal |author=Richard J. Butler |author2=Stephen L. Brusatte |author3=Brian B. Andres |author4=Roger B. J. Benson |name-list-style=amp |year=2012 |title=How do geological sampling biases affect studies of morphological evolution in deep time? A case study of the Pterosauria (Reptilia: Archosauria) |journal=Evolution |volume=66 |issue=1 |pages=147–162 |doi=10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01415.x |pmid=22220871|s2cid=205783384 }}</ref> It was named by [[Alexander Kellner|Alexander Wilhelm Armin Kellner]] in [[1996 in paleontology|1996]]. In 2003, Kellner defined the clade as a [[node-based taxon]] consisting of the last common ancestor of ''[[Anhanguera (pterosaur)|Anhanguera]]'', ''[[Pteranodon]]'' and all its descendants. The clade Ornithocheiroidea is sometimes considered to be the [[senior synonym]] of Pteranodontoidea, however it depends on its definition.<ref name=Unwin03>Unwin, D. M., (2003): On the phylogeny and evolutionary history of pterosaurs. pp. 139-190. &mdash; ''in'' Buffetaut, E. & Mazin, J.-M., (eds.): ''Evolution and Palaeobiology of Pterosaurs''. Geological Society of London, Special Publications 217, London, 1-347</ref> Brian Andres (2008, 2010, 2014) in his analyses, converts Ornithocheiroidea using the definition of Kellner (2003) to avoid this synonymy.<ref name=BBA10>{{cite book |last=Andres |first=Brian Blake |year=2014 |title=Systematics of the Pterosauria |url=http://gradworks.umi.com/34/40/3440534.html |publisher=Yale University |pages=366}} [https://search.proquest.com/docview/846734901 A preview that shows the cladogram without clade names]</ref>


Despite the meaning of the group's name, not all pteranodontoids were toothless, the earlier genera such as the [[istiodactylid]]s and [[ornithocheirid]]s had teeth that they used to catch prey, and several conclusions had led to the idea that they later evolved into the toothless [[pteranodontid]]s. Pteranodontoids were also the most diverse group of pterosaurs throughout the [[Cretaceous]] period, and therefore the most successful flyers during their time.<ref>{{cite journal |author1=Federico L. Agnolin |author2=David Varricchio |lastauthoramp=yes | year = 2012 | title = Systematic reinterpretation of ''Piksi barbarulna'' Varricchio, 2002 from the Two Medicine Formation (Upper Cretaceous) of Western USA (Montana) as a pterosaur rather than a bird | url =http://www.mnhn.fr/museum/front/medias/publication/48099_g2012n4a10.pdf | journal = Geodiversitas | volume = 34 | issue =4 | pages =883–894 | doi=10.5252/g2012n4a10}}</ref> They were mostly replaced by the larger [[azhdarchid]]s at the end of the Late Cretaceous however, which resulted in resource and terrain competitions, but even so, pteranodontoids still managed to thrive with them, and genera such as ''[[Alcione elainus|Alcione]]'', ''[[Barbaridactylus]]'', ''[[Simurghia]]'' and ''[[Tethydraco]]'' lived until the [[Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event]] (commonly known as "the extinction of the [[dinosaurs]]"), around 66 million years ago. Pteranodontoids had similar a similar diet to modern-day [[soaring bird]]s such the [[albatross]], which mainly consisted of fish. Some genera of this group however, fed mainly on [[carrion]], this can be seen on the earlier genera such as ''[[Istiodactylus]]''. They were also known for their proportionally large [[wingspan]]s, though as mentioned earlier, not as large as those of the azhdarchids, which reached about {{convert|12|m|ft|sp=us}}, while the largest wingspan recorded of any pteranodontoid only reached {{convert|8.70|m|ft|sp=us}}.<ref name=kellneretal2013>{{Cite journal | last1 = Kellner | first1 = A. W. A. | last2 = Campos | first2 = D. A. | last3 = Sayão | first3 = J. M. | last4 = Saraiva | first4 = A. N. A. F. | last5 = Rodrigues | first5 = T. | last6 = Oliveira | first6 = G. | last7 = Cruz | first7 = L. A. | last8 = Costa | first8 = F. R. | last9 = Silva | first9 = H. P. | last10 = Ferreira | first10 = J. S. | title = The largest flying reptile from Gondwana: A new specimen of Tropeognathus cf. T. Mesembrinus Wellnhofer, 1987 (Pterodactyloidea, Anhangueridae) and other large pterosaurs from the Romualdo Formation, Lower Cretaceous, Brazil | doi = 10.1590/S0001-37652013000100009 | journal = Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências | volume = 85 | pages = 113 | year = 2013 | pmid = | pmc = | doi-access = free }}</ref>
Despite the meaning of the group's name, not all pteranodontoids were toothless, the earlier genera such as the [[istiodactylid]]s and [[anhanguerid]]s had teeth that they used to catch prey, and several conclusions had led to the idea that they later evolved into the toothless [[pteranodontid]]s. Pteranodontoids were also the most diverse group of pterosaurs throughout the [[Cretaceous]] period, and therefore the most successful flyers during their time.<ref>{{cite journal |author1=Federico L. Agnolin |author2=David Varricchio |name-list-style=amp | year = 2012 | title = Systematic reinterpretation of ''Piksi barbarulna'' Varricchio, 2002 from the Two Medicine Formation (Upper Cretaceous) of Western USA (Montana) as a pterosaur rather than a bird | url =http://www.mnhn.fr/museum/front/medias/publication/48099_g2012n4a10.pdf | journal = Geodiversitas | volume = 34 | issue =4 | pages =883–894 | doi=10.5252/g2012n4a10|s2cid=56002643 }}</ref> They were mostly replaced by the larger [[azhdarchid]]s at the end of the Late Cretaceous however, which resulted in resource and terrain competitions, but even so, pteranodontoids still managed to thrive with them, and genera such as ''[[Alcione elainus|Alcione]]'', ''[[Barbaridactylus]]'', and ''[[Simurghia]]'' lived until the [[Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event]]. Pteranodontoids had similar a similar diet to modern-day [[soaring bird]]s such the [[albatross]], which mainly consisted of fish. Some genera of this group however, fed mainly on [[carrion]], this can be seen on the earlier genera such as ''[[Istiodactylus]]''. They were also known for their proportionally large [[wingspan]]s, the largest recorded of any pteranodontoid reached {{convert|8.70|m|ft|sp=us}}, and it belongs to the genus ''[[Tropeognathus]]''.<ref name=kellneretal2013>{{Cite journal | last1 = Kellner | first1 = A. W. A. | last2 = Campos | first2 = D. A. | last3 = Sayão | first3 = J. M. | last4 = Saraiva | first4 = A. N. A. F. | last5 = Rodrigues | first5 = T. | last6 = Oliveira | first6 = G. | last7 = Cruz | first7 = L. A. | last8 = Costa | first8 = F. R. | last9 = Silva | first9 = H. P. | last10 = Ferreira | first10 = J. S. | title = The largest flying reptile from Gondwana: A new specimen of Tropeognathus cf. T. Mesembrinus Wellnhofer, 1987 (Pterodactyloidea, Anhangueridae) and other large pterosaurs from the Romualdo Formation, Lower Cretaceous, Brazil | doi = 10.1590/S0001-37652013000100009 | journal = Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências | volume = 85 | pages = 113–135 | year = 2013 | issue = 1 | pmid = 23538956 | doi-access = free }}</ref>


==History of research==
==History of early discovered genera==
[[File:Pterodactylus giganteus.jpg|thumb|left|upright|Lectotype rostrum of ''Lonchodraco giganteus'', the first ever known pteranodontoid]]
===Earliest finds===
Several fossil remains were found in the [[Chalk Formation]] of [[England]], a chalk pit known for its wide variety of fossils belonging to different animals. [[British people|British]] [[paleontologist]] [[James Scott Bowerbank]] named and described the specimens found as a new species of ''Pterodactylus'', ''P. giganteus'' due to its much larger size.<ref name=Bowerbank1846>{{cite journal | last1 = Bowerbank | first1 = J.S. | year = 1846 | title = On a new species of pterodactyl found in the Upper Chalk of Kent (''Pterodactylus giganteus'') | url =https://zenodo.org/record/1448505 | journal = Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London | volume = 2 | issue = 1–2| pages = 7–9 | doi=10.1144/gsl.jgs.1846.002.01-02.05| s2cid = 129389179 }}</ref> ''P. giganteus'' is nowadays considered to belong to the genus called ''[[Lonchodraco]]''.<ref name="Rodrigues & Kellner 2013">{{Cite journal | last1 = Rodrigues | first1 = T. | last2 = Kellner | first2 = A. | doi = 10.3897/zookeys.308.5559 | title = Taxonomic review of the ''Ornithocheirus'' complex (Pterosauria) from the Cretaceous of England | journal = ZooKeys | pages = 1–112 | year = 2013 | issue = 308 | pmid = 23794925| pmc = 3689139| doi-access = free }}</ref> In 1851, Bowerbank unearthed more specimens in the same chalk pit as ''P. giganteus'', and assigned these specimens to yet another newly named species of ''Pterodactylus'', known as ''P. cuvieri'', in honor of the German [[naturalist]] and [[zoologist]] [[Georges Cuvier]].<ref name="Bowerbank1851">{{cite journal | last1 = Bowerbank | first1 = J.S. | year = 1851 | title = On the pterodactyles of the Chalk Formation | url = https://zenodo.org/record/1447536| journal = Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London | volume = 19 | pages = 14–20 | doi=10.1111/j.1096-3642.1851.tb01125.x}}</ref> Later that year, British paleontologist Sir [[Richard Owen]] had also unearthed several fossil specimens in the Chalk Formation, in which he assigned them as ''Pterodactylus compressirostris'' during its description.<ref name=Owen1851>Owen, R. (1851). Monograph on the fossil Reptilia of the Cretaceous Formations. ''The Palaeontographical Society'' '''5'''(11):1-118.</ref> Owen later unearthed many fossil specimens from a different fossil site called the [[Cambridge Greensand]], he then assigned these specimens into a new species called ''Pterodactylus simus''. With the naming of this new species, British paleontologist [[Harry Govier Seeley]] created a new separate genus called ''[[Ornithocheirus]]'' (from Ancient Greek "ὄρνις", meaning "bird", and "χεῖρ", meaning "hand"), due to the notion of the time, in which pterosaurs were the direct ancestors of birds. In 1870, Seeley then also reassigned ''Pterodactylus cuvieri'' into a new species called ''Ornithocheirus cuvieri''.<ref>Seeley, H.G., 1869, ''Index to the fossil remains of'' Aves, Ornithosauria, ''and'' Reptilia, ''from the Secondary System of Strata, arranged in the Woodwardian Museum of the University of Cambridge''. St. John's College, Cambridge '''8''': 143. {{doi|10.1080/00222937008696143}}</ref><ref name=HGS70>Seeley, H.G. (1870). ''The Ornithosauria: an Elementary Study of the Bones of Pterodactyles''. Cambridge, 130 pp.</ref> This species is now considered to belong to the genus ''[[Cimoliopterus]]''.<ref name="Rodrigues & Kellner 2013"/> Back in 1874 however, controversies between the naming of species and genera of these pterosaurs started, with the paleontologists Harry Seeley and Richard Owen fighting over reassignings of different species as well as genera. Owen therefore created two new genera: ''[[Coloborhynchus]]'' (meaning "maimed beak") and ''[[Criorhynchus]]'' (meaning "ram beak"), in reference to their unique convex "keeled" crests on top, and underside of their snout. Owen then created a type species for ''Coloborhynchus'', ''C. clavirostris'', and sunk three species which were assigned previously to ''Ornithocheirus'', and ''Criorhynchus'' consisted entirely of former ''Ornithocheirus'' species.<ref name=Owen1874>Owen, R. 1874, ''Monograph on the fossil Reptilia of the Mesozoic Formations''. Palaeontographical Society, London, 14 pp</ref> Later in 1881 however, Seeley disagreed with Owen's conclusions, and he therefore assigned the species he named ''Ornithocheirus simus'' as the type species of ''Ornithocheirus''.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Seeley, H. G.|author-link=Harry Seeley|year=1881|title=The Reptile Fauna of the Gosau Formation preserved in the Geological Museum of the University of Vienna|journal=Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society|volume=37|issue=1|pages=620–706|doi=10.1144/GSL.JGS.1881.037.01-04.49|s2cid=219235284|url=https://jgs.lyellcollection.org/content/37/1-4/620}}</ref>
[[File:Pterodactylus giganteus.jpg|thumb|left|upright|Lectotype rostrum of ''Pterodactylus giganteus'', the first ever known pteranodontoid]]
Several fossil remains were found in the [[Chalk Formation]] of [[England]], a chalk pit known for its wide variety of fossils belonging to different animals. [[British people|British]] [[paleontologist]] [[James Scott Bowerbank]] named and described the specimens found as a new species of ''Pterodactylus'', ''P. giganteus'' due to its much larger size.<ref name=Bowerbank1846>{{cite journal | last1 = Bowerbank | first1 = J.S. | year = 1846 | title = On a new species of pterodactyl found in the Upper Chalk of Kent (''Pterodactylus giganteus'') | url =https://zenodo.org/record/1448505 | journal = Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London | volume = 2 | issue = 1–2| pages = 7–9 | doi=10.1144/gsl.jgs.1846.002.01-02.05}}</ref> The assigning of new pterosaur species to ''Pterodactylus'' was very common at the time, since ''Pterodactylus'' was the best known pterosaur back then. In 1851, Bowerbank unearthed more specimens in the same chalk pit as ''P. giganteus'', and assigned these specimens to yet another newly named species of ''Pterodactylus'', known as ''P. cuvieri'', in honor of the German [[naturalist]] and [[zoologist]] [[Georges Cuvier]].<ref name="Bowerbank1851">{{cite journal | last1 = Bowerbank | first1 = J.S. | year = 1851 | title = On the pterodactyles of the Chalk Formation | url = https://zenodo.org/record/1447536| journal = Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London | volume = 19 | issue = | pages = 14–20 | doi=10.1111/j.1096-3642.1851.tb01125.x}}</ref> Later that year, British paleontologist Sir [[Richard Owen]] had also unearthed several fossil specimens in the Chalk Formation, in which he assigned them as ''Pterodactylus compressirostris'' during its description.<ref name=Owen1851>Owen, R. (1851). Monograph on the fossil Reptilia of the Cretaceous Formations. ''The Palaeontographical Society'' '''5'''(11):1-118.</ref>


Owen later unearthed many fossil specimens from a different fossil site called the [[Cambridge Greensand]], he then assigned these specimens into a new species called ''Pterodactylus simus''. With the naming of this new species, British paleontologist [[Harry Govier Seeley]] created a new separate genus called ''[[Ornithocheirus]]'' (from Ancient Greek "ὄρνις", meaning "bird", and "χεῖρ", meaning "hand"), due to the notion of the time, in which pterosaurs were the direct ancestors of birds. In 1869, Seeley then reassigned ''Pterodactylus cuvieri'' into a new species called ''Ptenodactylus cuvieri'', but in 1870, Seeley had realized that the generic name ''Ptenodactylus'' had been preoccupied, and therefore he reassigned the species into ''Ornithocheirus cuvieri''. Between these two years, Seeley had also reassigned various species of pterosaurs, including the mentioned ''P. cuvieri'' into newly named species of ''[[Ornithocheirus]]'', therefore 27 in total. He then published a book called ''The Ornithosauria'' (meaning "bird lizard"), in reference to the relationship of birds and pterosaurs.<ref>Seeley, H.G., 1869, ''Index to the fossil remains of'' Aves, Ornithosauria, ''and'' Reptilia, ''from the Secondary System of Strata, arranged in the Woodwardian Museum of the University of Cambridge''. St. John's College, Cambridge '''8''': 143. {{DOI|10.1080/00222937008696143}}</ref><ref name=HGS70>Seeley, H.G. (1870). ''The Ornithosauria: an Elementary Study of the Bones of Pterodactyles''. Cambridge, 130 pp.</ref>

===Naming of early discovered genera===
[[File:Pteranodon longiceps YPM1177.jpg|thumb|Specimen YPM1177, the type specimen of ''Pteranodon'', now interpreted as a female individual due to its short cranial crest]]
[[File:Pteranodon longiceps YPM1177.jpg|thumb|Specimen YPM1177, the type specimen of ''Pteranodon'', now interpreted as a female individual due to its short cranial crest]]
The naming of the different pterosaur species, as well as the genus ''Ornithocheirus'' in England resulted in further research in other places. In the [[United States]], American paleontologist [[Othniel Charles Marsh]] led an expedition to the [[Smoky Hill Chalk]] deposits in western [[Kansas]] in 1870.<ref>Betts, C. W. 1871. The Yale College Expedition of 1870. Harper’s New Monthly Magazine, 43(257):663–671</ref> Marsh unearthed the first ever specimens of pterosaur from [[North America]] (specimens YPM 1160 and YPM 1161), which now belong to the genus ''[[Pteranodon]]'', and consisted of partial wing remains and a tooth of the fish ''[[Xiphactinus]]'', which Marsh had once believed that it belonged to ''Pteranodon''.<ref>Marsh, O. C. 1871. Scientific expedition to the Rocky Mountains. ''American Journal of Science'', ser. 3, 1(6):142–143.</ref> In 1871, he assigned these specimens to a new species called ''"Pterodactylus oweni"'' (meaning "Owen's wing finger"),<ref>Marsh, O. C., 1871.
The naming of the different pterosaur species, as well as the genus ''Ornithocheirus'' in England resulted in further research in other places. In the [[United States]], American paleontologist [[Othniel Charles Marsh]] led an expedition to the [[Smoky Hill Chalk]] deposits in western [[Kansas]] in 1870.<ref>Betts, C. W. 1871. The Yale College Expedition of 1870. Harper’s New Monthly Magazine, 43(257):663–671</ref> Marsh unearthed the first ever specimens of pterosaur from [[North America]] (specimens YPM 1160 and YPM 1161), which now belong to the genus ''[[Pteranodon]]'', and consisted of partial wing remains and a tooth of the fish ''[[Xiphactinus]]'', which Marsh had once believed that it belonged to ''Pteranodon''.<ref>Marsh, O. C. 1871. Scientific expedition to the Rocky Mountains. ''American Journal of Science'', ser. 3, 1(6):142–143.</ref> In 1871, he assigned these specimens to a new species called ''"Pterodactylus oweni"'' (meaning "Owen's wing finger"),<ref>Marsh, O. C., 1871.
"Note on a new and gigantic species of Pterodactyle."
"Note on a new and gigantic species of Pterodactyle."
American Journal of Science, ser. 3, 1(6):472 {{URL|http://oceansofkansas.com/Marsh71.htm}}</ref> in honor of Sir Richard Owen, but he realized that the name he had chosen had already been used for a different European pterosaur species described by Harry Seeley, so he renamed his discovery as ''Pterodactylus occidentalis'' (meaning "Western wing finger"), in reference to the location were it was found, he then used this name for its publication in 1872. In the same year, Marsh named two additional species, which were based on size differences: ''Pterodactylus ingens'' (the largest specimen found), and ''Pterodactylus velox'' (the smallest).<ref name=Marsh1872>Marsh, O. C. 1872. Discovery of additional remains of Pterosauria, with descriptions of two new species. ''American Journal of Science'', Series 3, 3(16):241–248.</ref> Marsh's bitter rival, American paleontologist [[Edward Drinker Cope]] had also unearthed several remains of the large North American pterosaur, and based on these remains, Cope named two new species, ''Ornithochirus umbrosus'' and ''Ornithochirus harpyia'', in an attempt to assign them to the large European genus ''Ornithocheirus'', but he had missed the 'e' when describing them. The paper naming these species by Cope's paper naming had been published in 1872, just five days after the publication of Marsh's paper.<ref name=Marsh1872/><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Cope | first1 = E. D. | year = 1872 | title = On two new Ornithosaurians from Kansas | url = | journal = Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society | volume = 12 | issue = 88 | pages = 420–422}}</ref> This led to a dispute between the two paleontologists, which both fought over whose names had priority to the published literature, in what was obviously the same species of pterosaur.<ref name=Bennett/>
American Journal of Science, ser. 3, 1(6):472 {{URL|http://oceansofkansas.com/Marsh71.htm}}</ref> in honor of Sir Richard Owen, but he realized that the name he had chosen had already been used for a different European pterosaur species described by Harry Seeley, so he renamed his discovery as ''Pterodactylus occidentalis'' (meaning "Western wing finger"), in reference to the location where it was found.<ref name=Marsh1872>Marsh, O. C. 1872. Discovery of additional remains of Pterosauria, with descriptions of two new species. ''American Journal of Science'', Series 3, 3(16):241–248.</ref> American paleontologist [[Edward Drinker Cope]] had also unearthed several remains of the large North American pterosaur, and based on these remains, Cope named two new species, ''Ornithochirus umbrosus'' and ''Ornithochirus harpyia'', in an attempt to assign them to the large European genus ''Ornithocheirus'', but he had missed the 'e' when describing them. The paper naming these species by Cope's paper naming had been published in 1872, just five days after the publication of Marsh's paper. This led to a dispute between the two paleontologists, which both fought over whose names had priority to the published literature, in what was obviously the same species of pterosaur.<ref name=Bennett>{{Cite journal | author = Bennett, S.C. | year = 1994 | title = Taxonomy and systematics of the Late Cretaceous pterosaur ''Pteranodon'' (Pterosauria, Pterodactyloida) | journal = Occasional Papers of the Natural History Museum, University of Kansas | volume = 169 | pages = 1–70}}</ref>


In 1876, Marsh had described the first skull specimen of ''Pteranodon'', which as unearthed by American paleontologist [[Samuel Wendell Williston]] in the [[Smoky Hill River]], located in the [[Wallace County, Kansas|Wallace County]] (now Logan County) of Kansas, USA. Later that year, another skull specimen was found, though this time a bit smaller in size.<ref name=marsh1876a/> Soon enough, Marsh recognized a major difference when he described these specimens, they lacked teeth and had bony crests on their skulls. He then described the specimens found as "distinguished from all previously known genera of the order Pterosauria by the entire absence of teeth." Marsh then coined the name ''Pteranodon'' (meaning "wing without tooth"), and pointed that the unique characteristics identified warranted a new generic name. Marsh had also reclassified all the previously named North American species from ''Pterodactylus'' to ''Pteranodon'', and considered the smaller skull to belong to the reassigned ''Pteranodon occidentalis'' based on its size.<ref name=marsh1876a>{{Cite journal | author = Marsh, O.C. | year = 1876a | title = Notice of a new sub-order of Pterosauria | url = https://zenodo.org/record/1450032| journal = American Journal of Science |series=Series 3 | volume = 11 | issue = 65| pages = 507–509 | doi=10.2475/ajs.s3-11.66.507| bibcode = 1876AmJS...11..507M | s2cid = 130203580 }}</ref><ref name=Bennett2000>Bennett, S.C. (2000). "Inferring stratigraphic position of fossil vertebrates from the Niobrara Chalk of western Kansas." ''Current Research in Earth Sciences: Kansas Geological Survey Bulletin'', '''244'''(Part 1): 26 pp.</ref> Specimens of smaller individuals were later uncovered, and Marsh had also named several additional species: ''Pteranodon comptus'' and ''[[Pteranodon nanus]]'', based on these distinct and smaller fragmentary skeletons. He then created another separate species called ''Pteranodon gracilis'', which is now based on a wing bone that he previously mistook for a [[pelvic bone]]. Marsh soon realized his mistake, and therefore reassigned that specimen he found into a separate genus which he named ''[[Nyctosaurus]]'', and the species ''P. nanus'' was soon recognized as a ''Nyctosaurus'' specimen as well, this is due to the [[synapomorphies]] seen in both.<ref name=marsh1876b>{{Cite journal | author = Marsh, O.C. | year = 1876b | title = Principal characters of American pterodactyls | url = https://zenodo.org/record/1450034| journal = American Journal of Science |series=Series 3 | volume = 12 | issue = 72| pages = 479–480 | doi=10.2475/ajs.s3-12.72.479| bibcode = 1876AmJS...12..479M | s2cid = 131057784 }}</ref>
Meanwhile in England, controversies between the naming of species and genera also started, with the paleontologists Harry Seeley and Richard Owen fighting over reassignings of different species as well as genera. In 1874, Owen was not pleased with Seeley's publication of his book ''The Ornithosauria'', and he also considered the name ''Ornithocheirus'' inappropriate.<ref name=Owen1874>Owen, R. 1874, ''Monograph on the fossil Reptilia of the Mesozoic Formations''. Palaeontographical Society, London, 14 pp</ref> Owen therefore created two new genera: ''[[Coloborhynchus]]'' (meaning "maimed beak") and ''[[Criorhynchus]]'' (meaning "ram beak"), in reference to their unique convex "keeled" crests on top, and underside of their snout. Owen then created a type species for ''Coloborhynchus'', ''C. clavirostris'', and sunk three species which were assigned from ''Ornithocheirus'', and ''Criorhynchus'' consisted entirely of 5 former ''Ornithocheirus'' species, including the type species, ''O. simus'', which was later reassigned by Owen as ''Criorhynchus simus''.<ref name=Owen1874/> In 1881 however, Seeley disagreed with Owen's conclusion, and he therefore assigned the species he named ''Ornithocheirus simus'' as the type species of ''Ornithocheirus''. He had also named a new separate species called ''[[Ornithocheirus buenzeli|O. bunzeli]]'' in the same year.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Seeley, H. G.|authorlink=Harry Seeley|year=1881|title=The Reptile Fauna of the Gosau Formation preserved in the Geological Museum of the University of Vienna|journal=Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society|volume=37|issue=1|pages=620–706|doi=10.1144/GSL.JGS.1881.037.01-04.49|url=https://jgs.lyellcollection.org/content/37/1-4/620}}</ref>
<ref name=History>Witton, M. (2010). ''Pteranodon'' and beyond: The history of giant pterosaurs from 1870 onwards. Geological Society of London, Special Publications. 343. 313-323. {{doi|10.1144/SP343.19}}</ref> Later in 1892, Samuel Williston had become the first scientist to critically evaluate all of the ''Pteranodon'' species classified by Cope and Marsh. He agreed with most of Marsh's reassignings and classifications, but several exceptions were still made. Williston revised his earlier conclusion in 1903, in which he stated that there were only three species of ''Pteranodon'', instead of seven. He also considered both ''P. comptus'' and ''P. nanus'' to be specimens of ''Nyctosaurus'', and divided the other species into small (''P. velox''), medium (''P. occidentalis''), and large species (''P. ingens''), based primarily on the shape of their upper arm bones. He also followed his first conclusion of ''P. longiceps'' being a synonym of either ''P. velox'' or ''P. occidentalis'' based on its size.<ref name=W1903>Williston, S. W. 1903. On the osteology of ''Nyctosaurus'' (''Nyctodactylus''), with notes on American pterosaurs. Field Mus. Publ. (Geological Ser.) '''2'''(3):125–163, 2 figs., pls. XL-XLIV.</ref> However, in 1994, Christopher Bennett concluded that ''P. longiceps'' and another species called ''[[Geosternbergia|P. sternbergi]]'' would be the only valid ''Pteranodon'' species, while the other ones were either considered ''[[nomina dubia]]'' or synonyms.<ref name=Bennett/>


[[File:The Quarterly journal of the Geological Society of London (1913) (14784356062).jpg|thumb|Skull elements of the specimens NHMUK R3877 and R176 of ''[[Istiodactylus]]'', and the 1913 long-jawed skull reconstruction by Reginald Hooley]]
In 1875, Cope conceded that Marsh's names, (''P. occidentalis'', ''P. ingens'' and ''P. velox'') did have priority over his, but stated that the species he named ''Ornithochirus umbrosus'', which was formerly assigned as ''Pterodactylus umbrosus'' by Cope himself, was a distinct species, but not genus, from the ones that Marsh had previously name. Later scientists have re-evaluated and supported Marsh's case, and also found that Cope's assertion of ''O. umbrosus'' as a larger and distinct species was most likely incorrect.<ref name=cope1875>Cope, E.D. (1875). "The Vertebrata of the Cretaceous formations of the West." ''Report, U. S. Geological Survey of the Territories (Hayden)'', '''2''': 302 pp., 57 pls.</ref><ref name=Bennett>{{Cite journal | author = Bennett, S.C. | year = 1994 | title = Taxonomy and systematics of the Late Cretaceous pterosaur ''Pteranodon'' (Pterosauria, Pterodactyloida) | url = | journal = Occasional Papers of the Natural History Museum, University of Kansas | volume = 169 | issue = | pages = 1–70}}</ref> In 1876, Marsh had described the first skull specimen of ''Pteranodon'', which as unearthed by American paleontologist [[Samuel Wendell Williston]] in the [[Smoky Hill River]], located in the [[Wallace County, Kansas|Wallace County]] (now Logan County) of Kansas, USA. Later that year, another skull specimen was found, though this time a bit smaller in size.<ref name=marsh1876a/> Soon enough, Marsh recognized a major difference when he described these specimens, they lacked teeth and had bony crests on their skulls. He then described the specimens found as "distinguished from all previously known genera of the order Pterosauria by the entire absence of teeth." Marsh then coined the name ''Pteranodon'' (meaning "wing without tooth"), and pointed that the unique characteristics identified warranted a new generic name. Marsh had also reclassified all the previously named North American species from ''Pterodactylus'' to ''Pteranodon'', and considered the smaller skull to belong to the reassigned ''Pteranodon occidentalis'' based on its size.<ref name=marsh1876a>{{Cite journal | author = Marsh, O.C. | year = 1876a | title = Notice of a new sub-order of Pterosauria | url = https://zenodo.org/record/1450032| journal = American Journal of Science |series=Series 3 | volume = 11 | issue = 65| pages = 507–509 | doi=10.2475/ajs.s3-11.66.507}}</ref><ref name=Bennett2000>Bennett, S.C. (2000). "Inferring stratigraphic position of fossil vertebrates from the Niobrara Chalk of western Kansas." ''Current Research in Earth Sciences: Kansas Geological Survey Bulletin'', '''244'''(Part 1): 26 pp.</ref> He also assigned the larger skull (specimen YPM 1177) to a new species which he named ''Pteranodon longiceps'', and he later thought that this was a medium-sized species, in comparison to the larger ''P. ingens''.<ref name=marsh1876a/> Specimens of smaller individuals were later uncovered, and Marsh had also named several additional species: ''Pteranodon comptus'' and ''[[Pteranodon nanus]]'', based on these distinct and smaller fragmentary skeletons. He then created another separate species called ''Pteranodon gracilis'', which is now based on a wing bone that he previously mistook for a [[pelvic bone]]. Marsh soon realized his mistake, and therefore reassigned that specimen he found into a separate genus which he named ''[[Nyctosaurus]]'', and the species ''P. nanus'' was soon recognized as a ''Nyctosaurus'' specimen as well, this is due to the [[synapomorphies]] seen in both.<ref name=marsh1876b>{{Cite journal | author = Marsh, O.C. | year = 1876b | title = Principal characters of American pterodactyls | url = https://zenodo.org/record/1450034| journal = American Journal of Science |series=Series 3 | volume = 12 | issue = 72| pages = 479–480 | doi=10.2475/ajs.s3-12.72.479}}</ref>
A peculiar discovery was made in 1887 by Seeley in the [[Isle of Wight]], an island off the coast of southern England. Seeley thought that these fossil remains belonged to bird-like creature, which he then named ''[[Ornithodesmus cluniculus]]''.<ref name=seeley1887>{{cite journal|author=Seeley, H. G.|author-link=Harry Seeley|year=1887|title=On a sacrum apparently indicating a new type of bird, ''Ornithodesmus cluniculus'' Seeley from the Wealden of Brook|journal=Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London|volume=43|issue=1–4|pages=206–211|doi=10.1144/GSL.JGS.1887.043.01-04.19|s2cid=129459937|url=https://zenodo.org/record/2017266}}</ref> Seeley also reported another specimen found on the same site. Seeley named the new species ''O. latidens'' in 1901 based on this discovery, the specific name translates to "wide tooth". He presumably assigned this new species to ''Ornithodesmus'' due to synapomorphies between their [[Sacrum|sacra]], but his conclusion was not entirely clear.<ref name=Dragons>{{cite book|author=Seeley, H. G.|title=Dragons of the Air: an Account of Extinct Flying Reptiles|orig-year=1901|year=2015|publisher=D. Appleton & Co.|location=New York|pages=173–175|isbn=978-1440084942}}</ref><ref name="Ornithodesmus'">{{cite journal|author=Howse, S. C. B.|author2=Milner, A. R.|title=''Ornithodesmus'' – a maniraptoran theropod dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous of the Isle of Wight, England|journal=Palaeontology|year=1993|volume=36|pages=425–437|url=https://www.palass.org/publications/palaeontology-journal/archive/36/2/article_pp425-437}}</ref> In 1913, English paleontologist [[Reginald Walter Hooley]] reviewed ''O. latidens'' in detail, based on specimens he had found, and placed the genus ''Ornithodesmus'' within a newly created family, Ornithodesmidae.<ref name=hooley1913>{{cite journal|author=Hooley, R. W.|author-link=Reginald Hooley|title=On the skeleton of ''Ornithodesmus latidens''; an ornithosaur from the Wealden Shales of Atherfield (Isle of Wight)|journal=Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society|year=1913|volume=69|issue=1–4|pages=372–422|doi=10.1144/GSL.JGS.1913.069.01-04.23|s2cid=128604856}}</ref><ref name="PterosaursWight">{{cite book|author=Howse, S. C. B.|author2=Milner, A. R.|author3=Martill, D. M.|year=2001|pages=324–335|title=Dinosaurs of the Isle of Wight|place=London|publisher=The Palaeontological Association|series=Guide 10; Field Guides to Fossils|chapter=Pterosaurs|editor=Martill, D. M.|editor2=Naish, D.|editor-link2=Darren Naish|isbn=978-0-901702-72-2}}</ref> Later in 1993, the British paleontologists [[Stafford C. Howse]] and [[Andrew C. Milner]] concluded that the holotype sacrum and only specimen of the species ''O. cluniculus'' didn't belong to a pterosaur, but instead to a [[maniraptora]]n [[theropod]] dinosaur. They pointed out that no detailed attempts had been made to compare the sacrum of ''O. cluniculus'' with those of pterosaurs, and that the species ''O. latidens'' had in effect been treated as the type species of the genus ''Ornithodesmus'' in their conclusion. Now as a definite species of pterosaur, "''O.''" ''latidens'' thus required a new generic name.<ref name="Ornithodesmus'"/> In 2001, Howse, Milner, and David Martill, reassigned "''O.''" ''latidens'' to a new genus called ''[[Istiodactylus]]'', resulting in a new combination known as ''Istiodactylus latidens''. The generic name ''Istiodactylus'' means "sail finger", in reference to its proportionally large wings.<ref name="PterosaursWight"/>
<ref name=History>Witton, M. (2010). ''Pteranodon'' and beyond: The history of giant pterosaurs from 1870 onwards. Geological Society of London Special Publications. 343. 313-323. {{DOI|10.1144/SP343.19}}</ref>

[[File:Ornithodesmus latidens.jpg|thumb|left|[[Holotype specimen]] (NHMUK R176) of ''Ornithodesmus latidens'', which consisted of a neck vertebra and [[sternal]] elements]]
A peculiar discovery was made in 1887 by Seeley in the [[Isle of Wight]], an island off the coast of southern England. Seeley thought that these fossil remains belonged to bird-like creature, which he then named ''[[Ornithodesmus cluniculus]]''.<ref name=seeley1887>{{cite journal|author=Seeley, H. G.|authorlink=Harry Seeley|year=1887|title=On a sacrum apparently indicating a new type of bird, ''Ornithodesmus cluniculus'' Seeley from the Wealden of Brook|journal=Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London|volume=43|issue=1–4|pages=206–211|doi=10.1144/GSL.JGS.1887.043.01-04.19|url=https://zenodo.org/record/2017266}}</ref> Later that year, British fossil collector [[John Whitaker Hulke]] suggested that ''Ornithodesmus'' was a pterosaur, therefore he found it to be similar to fossils that he had already seen before, but Seeley disagreed with him.<ref name=hulke1887>{{cite journal|author=Seeley, H. G.|title=On ''Patricosaurus merocratus'', Seeley, a lizard from the Cambridge Greensand, preserved in the Woodwardian Museum of the University of Cambridge|journal=Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London|volume=43|issue=1–4|pages=219–220|year=1887|doi=10.1144/gsl.jgs.1887.043.01-04.21|url=https://zenodo.org/record/1448531}}</ref> Seeley reported another specimen found on the same site, after his first discovery of the animal, it was then acquired in the [[British Museum]] in 1882. The specimen had been assigned to ''[[Ornithocheirus nobilis]]'' by [[Richard Lydekker]] in 1888, but Seeley considered it another species of ''Ornithodesmus'', which he now considered a species of pterosaur instead of a bird. Seeley named the new species as ''O. latidens'' in 1901, the specific name translates to "wide tooth". He pressumably assigned this new species to ''Ornithodesmus'' due to synapomorphies between their [[Sacrum|sacra]], but his conclusion was not entirely clear.<ref name=Dragons>{{cite book|author=Seeley, H. G.|title=Dragons of the Air: an Account of Extinct Flying Reptiles|origyear=1901|year=2015|publisher=D. Appleton & Co.|location=New York|pp=173–175|isbn=978-1440084942}}</ref><ref name=Ornithodesmus>{{cite journal|author=Howse, S. C. B.|author2=Milner, A. R.|title=''Ornithodesmus'' – a maniraptoran theropod dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous of the Isle of Wight, England|journal=Palaeontology|year=1993|volume=36|pages=425–437|url=https://www.palass.org/publications/palaeontology-journal/archive/36/2/article_pp425-437}}</ref> The type specimen, NHMUK R176, is a poorly preserved skeleton consisting of the back of the skull, a neck vertebra, a sternum, a sacrum, both right and left [[humeri]], a notarium, part of the [[Radius (bone)|radius]] and ulna, carpals, metacarpals, as well as wing [[Phalanx bone|phalanx bones]].<ref name=Dragons/>

[[File:Pteranodon sternbergi UALVP 24238.jpg|thumb|Holotype specimen (UALVP 24238) of ''Pteranodon sternbergi'']]
American paleontologist [[George Fryer Sternberg]] uncovered several fossil remains from the lower [[Niobrara Formation]] beds in 1958, these specimens looked similar to those of ''P. longiceps'', though the crests were set upright, and in a different position.<ref name=Sternberg>{{cite journal | last1 = Sternberg | first1 = G. F. | last2 = Walker | first2 = M. V. | year = 1958 | title = Observation of articulated limb bones of a recently discovered ''Pteranodon'' in the Niobrara Cretaceous of Kansas | url = | journal = Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science | volume = 61 | issue = 1| pages = 81–85 | doi=10.2307/3626742 | jstor = 3626742}}</ref> Later, in 1966, American paleontologist [[John Christian Harksen]] assigned the specimens found as a new species called ''Pteranodon sternbergi'', due to its distinct upright crest, yet similar to that of ''P. longiceps''.<ref name=Harksen>{{cite journal | last1 = Harksen | first1 = J. C. | year = 1966 | title = ''Pteranodon sternbergi'', a new fossil pterodactyl from the Niobrara Cretaceous of Kansas | url = | journal = Proceedings South Dakota Academy of Science | volume = 45 | issue = | pages = 74–77}}</ref> This complicated the situation of ''Pteranodon'' species assigning however, which prompted another revision of the genus by [[Halsey W. Miller]] in 1971.<ref name=Miller>{{cite journal | last1 = Miller | first1 = H. W. | year = 1971 | title = The taxonomy of the ''Pteranodon'' species from Kansas | url = | journal = Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science | volume = 74 | issue = 1| pages = 1–19 | doi=10.2307/3627663 | jstor = 3627663}}</ref> Miller concluded that all ''Pteranodon'' species except ''P. longiceps'' and ''P. sternbergi'' (the ones based on skulls) must be considered ''[[nomina dubia]]'' and abandoned because the crest shape for all of the species based on headless skeletons were impossible to determine. The conclusion of Miller however, was mostly ignored at the time, and many paleontologists kept assigning previously found specimens to new species.<ref name=Bennett2/> Jeffrey Eaton had once thought that a skull he found belonged to ''P. ingens'', but was later placed in a new species called ''P. marshi'', and the skull he previously assigned to ''P. occidentalis'' was reassigned as ''P. eatoni'', resulting in two new species. Contrary to his first conclusion, Miller had recognized another species based on a skull with a crest similar to that of ''P. sternbergi'', he then assigned its specimen as a new species called ''P. walkeri''.<ref name=Bennett2>Bennett, S.C. (1994). "The Pterosaurs of the Niobrara Chalk". ''The Earth Scientist''. '''11''' (1): 22–25.</ref>

===Revising species===
[[File:Ornithocheirus simus.jpg|thumb|left|upright|Holotype of ''Ornithocheirus simus'' (A to D), and holotype of the junior synonym ''O. platyrhinus'' (E to H)]]
The disputed controversy of ''Ornithocheirus'' was reviewed by British paleontologist [[Edwin Tulley Newton]] in 1888, in which he reassigned 13 existing species into ''Ornithocheirus'', interestingly, he also reassigned Cope's ''Ornithochirus umbrosus'' and ''Ornithochirus harpyia'' into ''Ornithocheirus'', now with the correct spelling (which includes the 'e' that Cope missed).<ref>Newton, E. T., 1888, "On the Skull, Brain, and Auditory Organ of a new species of Pterosaurian (''Scaphognathus purdoni''), from the Upper Lias near Whitby, Yorkshire", ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London'', v. 179, p. 503-537</ref>

Meanwhile in the USA, Samuel Williston examined the classification of ''Pteranodon'' by Marsh in 1892, and he noticed that back in 1871, a mention by Seeley about a partial set of toothless pterosaur jaws from the [[Cambridge Greensand]] of [[England]] had taken place, which he then named his discovery as "[[Ornithostoma]]". Williston also noted that the primary characteristic Marsh had used to separate ''Pteranodon'' from other pterosaurs was its lack of teeth, and because "Ornithostoma" was toothless, this made Williston conclude that "Ornithostoma" must be considered the senior synonym of ''Pteranodon''.<ref name=Williston>Williston, S.W., 1892, "Kansas pterodactyls, Part II", ''Kansas University Quarterly'', '''2''': 97-81</ref> German paleontologist [[Felix Plieninger]] in 1901 however, pointed out that "Ornithostoma" had never been scientifically described or even assigned to a species name until Williston's conclusion, and therefore had been considered a ''[[nomen nudum]]'', which in this case could not beat out ''Pteranodon'' for naming priority.<ref>Plieninger F., 1901. Beiträge zur kenntnis der Flugsaurier. ''Palaeontolographica'', '''53''', 209-213.</ref> Williston accepted his conclusion, and went back to calling the genus ''Pteranodon'', but both Williston and Plieninger however, were incorrect, because unnoticed by both of them was the fact that in 1891, Seeley himself had finally described and properly named ''Ornithostoma'', assigning it to a new species called ''O. sedgwicki''.<ref name=Seeley>Seeley, H.G., 1891, "On the shoulder girdle in Cretaceous Ornithosauria", ''Annals and Magazine of Natural History'' Series 6 '''7''': 237-255</ref> Much later in the 2010s, more research on the identity of ''Ornithostoma'' had shown that it was not ''Pteranodon'' or even a close relative, but may in fact have been an [[azhdarchoid]] pterosaur similar to ''[[Quetzalcoatlus]]'', which are also toothless pterosaurs.<ref name=Averianov2012>{{cite journal | last1 = Averianov | first1 = A.O. | year = 2012 | title = ''Ornithostoma sedgwicki'' – valid taxon of azhdarchoid pterosaurs | url = | journal = Proceedings of the Zoological Institute RAS | volume = 316 | issue = 1 | pages = 40–49}}</ref><ref name=Bennett/> Later in 1892, Williston had become the first scientist to critically evaluate all of the ''Pteranodon'' species classified by Cope and Marsh. He agreed with most of Marsh's reassignings and classifications, but several exceptions were still made.<ref name=marsh1876b/> He did not believe that ''P. ingens'' and ''O. umbrosus'' could be considered synonyms, which even Cope had come to believe, and he also considered both ''P. velox'' and ''P. longiceps'' to be dubious. Williston's reason was that ''P. velox'' was mainly based on non-diagnostic fragments, and ''P. longiceps'' was probably a synonym of one of the other previously named species.<ref name=Williston/> Williston revised his earlier conclusion in 1903, in which he stated that there were only three species of ''Pteranodon'', instead of seven. He also considered both ''P. comptus'' and ''P. nanus'' to be specimens of ''Nyctosaurus'', and divided the other species into small (''P. velox''), medium (''P. occidentalis''), and large species (''P. ingens''), based primarily on the shape of their upper arm bones. He also followed his first conclusion of ''P. longiceps'' being a synonym of either ''P. velox'' or ''P. occidentalis'' based on its size.<ref name=W1903>Williston, S. W. 1903. On the osteology of ''Nyctosaurus'' (''Nyctodactylus''), with notes on American pterosaurs. Field Mus. Publ. (Geological Ser.) '''2'''(3):125–163, 2 figs., pls. XL-XLIV.</ref> Later that year, paleontologist [[Jeffrey G. Eaton]] became the first scientist to publish a more detailed description of the entire skeleton of ''Pteranodon''. He used most of his findings to revise its classification, once again based on a better understanding of the differences in pteranodontian anatomy.<ref name=Bennett/> Experiments using clay models of bones was conducted by Eaton to help determine the effects of crushing and flattening of the shapes of the arm bones that Williston had used in his own classifications.<ref name=W1903/> Eaton concluded that most of the differences in bone shapes could be easily explained by the pressures of fossilization, and concluded that none of the skeletons of ''Pteranodon'' had any significant differences from each other besides their size. Therefore, Eaton was left to decide his classification scheme only based on skull differences, in which he assigned them to three different species according to their size. He only recognized three valid species in the end of his description: ''P. occidentalis'', ''P. ingens'', and ''P. longiceps''.<ref>Eaton, G. F. 1903. The characters of ''Pteranodon''. ''American Journal of Science'', ser. 4, '''16'''(91):82–86, pl. 6-7.</ref><ref>Eaton, G. F., 1904. The characters of ''Pteranodon'' (second paper). ''American Journal of Science'', ser. 4, 17(100):318–320, pl. 19-20.</ref>

[[File:The Quarterly journal of the Geological Society of London (1913) (14784356062).jpg|thumb|Skull elements of the specimens NHMUK R3877 and R176, and the 1913 long-jawed skull reconstruction by Reginald Hooley]]
In 1913, the British amateur paleontologist [[Reginald Walter Hooley]] described two more specimens found that belonged to ''O. latidens'', which were collected in 1904 from the sea after a [[rockfall]] near Atherfield Point on the Isle of Wight. Specimen NHMUK R3877 was the first to be collected, and consisted of a skull, neck and trunk vertebrae, a shoulder blade, an [[ischium]], and parts of the forelimbs. Specimen NHMUK R3878, was the second to be collected, and includes parts of the [[pectoral girdle]] as well as forelimbs. These specimens found represent the most complete remains of Cretaceous pterosaurs in England, more complete than even ''Ornithocheirus'', and specimen NHMUK R3877 was one of the only known three-dimensionally preserved pterosaur skeletons during the 20th century. Hooley also reviewed ''O. latidens'' in detail, and placed the genus ''Ornithodesmus'' in its own family, Ornithodesmidae.<ref name=hooley1913>{{cite journal|author=Hooley, R. W.|authorlink=Reginald Hooley|title=On the skeleton of ''Ornithodesmus latidens''; an ornithosaur from the Wealden Shales of Atherfield (Isle of Wight)|journal=Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society|year=1913|volume=69|issue=1–4|pages=372–422|doi=10.1144/GSL.JGS.1913.069.01-04.23}}</ref><ref name="PterosaursWight">{{cite book|author=Howse, S. C. B.|author2=Milner, A. R.|author3=Martill, D. M.|year=2001|pages=324–335|title=Dinosaurs of the Isle of Wight|place=London|publisher=The Palaeontological Association|series=Guide 10; Field Guides to Fossils|chapter=Pterosaurs|editor=Martill, D. M.|editor2=Naish, D.|editorlink2=Darren Naish|isbn=978-0-901702-72-2}}</ref> Williston from the USA, subsequently reviewed Hooley's article, disagreeing with some of his conclusions about the anatomy and classification of the animal.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Wllliston, S. W.|authorlink=Samuel Wendell Williston|title=Reviews: the skeleton of ''Ornithodesmus latidens''|journal=The Journal of Geology|year=1913|volume=21|issue=8|pages=754–756|jstor=30058408|doi=10.1086/622124|bibcode=1913JG.....21..754W|doi-access=free}}</ref> After the [[monograph]] of Hooley about ''Ornithodesmus'', little was written about the animal for the rest of the century, and similar pterosaurs were nowhere to be found for decades.<ref name=Witton2013>{{cite book|author=Witton, Mark|year=2013|title=''Pterosaurs: Natural History, Evolution, Anatomy''.|pages=31-44|publisher=Princeton University Press.|ISBN=978-0691150611}}</ref> Later in 1993, the British paleontologists [[Stafford C. Howse]] and [[Andrew C. Milner]] concluded that the holotype sacrum and only specimen of the species ''O. cluniculus'' didn't belong to a pterosaur, but instead to a [[maniraptora]]n [[theropod]] dinosaur. They pointed out that no detailed attempts had been made to compare the sacrum of ''O. cluniculus'' with those of pterosaurs, and that the species ''O. latidens'' had in effect been treated as the type species of the genus ''Ornithodesmus'' in their conclusion. Now as a definite species of pterosaur, "''O.''" ''latidens'' thus required a new generic name.<ref name="Ornithodesmus'">{{cite journal|author=Howse, S. C. B.|author2=Milner, A. R.|title=''Ornithodesmus'' – a maniraptoran theropod dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous of the Isle of Wight, England|journal=Palaeontology|year=1993|volume=36|pages=425–437|url=https://www.palass.org/publications/palaeontology-journal/archive/36/2/article_pp425-437}}</ref> In 2001, Howse, Milner, and David Martill, reassigned "''O.''" ''latidens'' to a new genus called ''[[Istiodactylus]]'', resulting in a new combination known as ''I. latidens''. The generic name ''Istiodactylus'' means "sail finger", in reference to its proportionally large wings. Howse, Milner, and David Martill had also named a new family called [[Istiodactylidae]] after moving "''O.''" ''latidens'' into ''Istiodactylus'', with ''Istiodactylus'' as the only member of the family.<ref name="PterosaursWight"/>

In 1914, Hooley had made a brief review of the pterosaur ''Ornithocheirus'', he kept its generic name, but created two new genera: ''[[Lonchodectes]]'' (meaning "[[lance]] biter"), and ''[[Amblydectes]]'' (meaning "blunt biter"), in reference to the shape of their snouts.<ref name=Unwin2006>Unwin, D.M. (2006). ''The Pterosaurs: From Deep Time.'' Pi Press:New York, p. 251. {{ISBN|0-13-146308-X}}.</ref> Many paleontologists weren't aware of this reassigning however, and therefore it wasn't used much at the time.<ref name=RH14/> The species ''Pterodactylus compressirostris'', uncovered by Owen back in 1851, was formerly transferred to ''Ornithocheirus'' in 1870 by Seeley, but it became the type species of ''Lonchodectes'' in Hooley's review.<ref name=HGS70/> This species however, was confusingly regarded, incorrectly, as the type species of ''Ornithocheirus''. Hooley reassigned the species ''O. crassidens'' as the type species of ''Amblydectes'', but fossil remains are scarce, so little of the animal is known.<ref name=RH14>Hooley, R.W. (1914). On the Ornithosaurian genus ''Ornithocheirus'' with a review of the specimens from the Cambridge Greensand in the Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge. ''Annals and Magazine of Natural History'', series 8, '''78''': 529-557.</ref>


==Classification==
==Classification==
Originally defined by [[Alexander Kellner]] in 1996, Pteranodontoidea is sometimes considered a synonym of the clade Ornithocheiroidea according to several studies. The name Ornithocheiroidea was originally defined as an [[apomorphy]]-based taxon by Christopher Bennett in 1994. In 2003 however, Kellner redefined Ornithocheiroidea to represent the node of ''Anhanguera'', ''Pteranodon'', ''[[Quetzalcoatlus]]'' and ''[[Dsungaripterus]]'', thus making Ornithocheiroidea a more inclusive group.<ref name=Kellner03>Kellner, A. W. A., (2003): Pterosaur phylogeny and comments on the evolutionary history of the group. pp. 105-137. &mdash; ''in'' Buffetaut, E. & Mazin, J.-M., (eds.): ''Evolution and Palaeobiology of Pterosaurs''. Geological Society of London, Special Publications 217, London, 1-347</ref> Later that year, David Unwin suggested a different definition, the node that contains ''[[Pteranodon longiceps]]'' and ''[[Istiodactylus latidens]]'', as a resulting, he considered Pteranodontoidea a [[junior synonym]] of Ornithocheiroidea.<ref name=Unwin03>Unwin, D. M., (2003): On the phylogeny and evolutionary history of pterosaurs. pp. 139-190. &mdash; ''in'' Buffetaut, E. & Mazin, J.-M., (eds.): ''Evolution and Palaeobiology of Pterosaurs''. Geological Society of London, Special Publications 217, London, 1-347</ref> Brian Andres (2008, 2010, 2014) in his analyses, converts Ornithocheiroidea using the definition of Kellner (2003) to avoid this synonymy.<ref name=BBA10>{{cite book |last=Andres |first=Brian Blake |year=2014 |title=Systematics of the Pterosauria |url=http://gradworks.umi.com/34/40/3440534.html |publisher=Yale University |pages=366}} [https://search.proquest.com/docview/846734901 A preview that shows the cladogram without clade names]</ref> Andres & Myers (2013) presented a [[phylogenetic]] analysis that placed Pteranodontoidea within the group [[Pteranodontia]], as the sister taxon of the family [[Nyctosauridae]]. In 2018 however, Longrich, Martill, and Andres revisited the classification, and concluded that Pteranodontoidea would be the more inclusive group containing both [[Ornithocheiromorpha]] and Pteranodontia.<ref name=LoneStarPterosaurs/><ref name=longrichetal2018/>
Originally defined by [[Alexander Kellner]] in 1996, Pteranodontoidea is sometimes considered a synonym of the clade Ornithocheiroidea according to several studies. The name Ornithocheiroidea was originally defined as an [[apomorphy]]-based taxon by Christopher Bennett in 1994. In 2003 however, Kellner redefined Ornithocheiroidea to represent the node of ''Anhanguera'', ''Pteranodon'', ''[[Quetzalcoatlus]]'' and ''[[Dsungaripterus]]'', thus making Ornithocheiroidea a more inclusive group.<ref name=Kellner03>Kellner, A. W. A., (2003): Pterosaur phylogeny and comments on the evolutionary history of the group. pp. 105-137. &mdash; ''in'' Buffetaut, E. & Mazin, J.-M., (eds.): ''Evolution and Palaeobiology of Pterosaurs''. Geological Society of London, Special Publications 217, London, 1-347</ref> Later that year, David Unwin suggested a different definition, the node that contains ''[[Pteranodon longiceps]]'' and ''[[Istiodactylus latidens]]'', as a resulting, he considered Pteranodontoidea a [[junior synonym]] of Ornithocheiroidea.<ref name=Unwin03/> Brian Andres (2008, 2010, 2014) in his analyses, converts Ornithocheiroidea using the definition of Kellner (2003) to avoid this synonymy.<ref name=BBA10/> In 2013, Andres & Timothy Myers presented a [[phylogenetic]] analysis that placed Pteranodontoidea within the group [[Pteranodontia]], as the sister taxon of the family [[Nyctosauridae]].<ref name=LoneStarPterosaurs/> In 2019 however, Kellner and colleagues revisited the classification, and concluded that Pteranodontoidea, which was sister taxon to [[Tapejaroidea]], would be the more inclusive group containing both the [[Lanceodontia]] and the Pteranodontia.<ref name="Kellner2019">{{Cite journal|last1=Kellner|first1=Alexander W. A.|last2=Weinschütz|first2=Luiz C.|last3=Holgado|first3=Borja|last4=Bantim|first4=Renan A. M.|last5=Sayão|first5=Juliana M.|date=August 19, 2019|title=A new toothless pterosaur (Pterodactyloidea) from Southern Brazil with insights into the paleoecology of a Cretaceous desert|journal=Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências|language=en|volume=91|issue=suppl 2|pages=e20190768|doi=10.1590/0001-3765201920190768|pmid=31432888|issn=0001-3765|doi-access=free}}</ref>


{{col-begin|width=100%}}
{{col-begin|width=100%}}
'''Topology 1:''' Andres & Myers (2013).<ref name=LoneStarPterosaurs>{{Cite journal | last1 = Andres | first1 = B. | last2 = Myers | first2 = T. S. | doi = 10.1017/S1755691013000303 | title = Lone Star Pterosaurs | journal = Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh | volume = 103 | issue = 3–4 | pages = 383–398 | year = 2013 | pmid = | pmc =}}</ref>
'''Topology 1:''' Andres & Myers (2013).<ref name=LoneStarPterosaurs>{{Cite journal | last1 = Andres | first1 = B. | last2 = Myers | first2 = T. S. | doi = 10.1017/S1755691013000303 | title = Lone Star Pterosaurs | journal = Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh | volume = 103 | issue = 3–4 | pages = 383–398 | year = 2013 | s2cid = 84617119 }}</ref>
{{col-2}}
{{col-2}}
{{clade| style=font-size:85%;line-height:85%
{{clade| style=font-size:90%;line-height:90%
|label1=&nbsp;[[Ornithocheiroidea]]&nbsp;
|label1=[[Pterodactyloidea]]
|1={{clade
|1={{clade
|1=[[Archaeopterodactyloidea]]
|2={{clade
|1=''[[Haopterus gracilis]]''
|label2=[[Ornithocheiroidea]]
|2={{clade
|1=[[Azhdarchoidea]]
|1=[[Azhdarchoidea]]
|label2=&nbsp;[[Pteranodontia]]&nbsp;
|label2=[[Pteranodontia]]
|2={{clade
|2={{clade
|1=[[Nyctosauridae]]
|1=[[Nyctosauridae]]
|2={{clade
|label2=&nbsp;'''Pteranodontoidea'''&nbsp;
|1=''[[Alamodactylus byrdi]]''
|label2='''Pteranodontoidea'''
|2={{clade
|2={{clade
|1=''[[Pteranodon]]''
|1={{clade
|1=''[[Pteranodon longiceps]]''
|2=''[[Pteranodon sternbergi]]''
|2={{clade
}}
|1=''[[Hongshanopterus]]''
|2={{clade
|1=''[[Lonchodectes]]''
|2={{clade
|2={{clade
|1=[[Istiodactylidae]]
|1=[[Istiodactylidae]]
|2={{clade
|2={{clade
|1=[[Boreopteridae]]
|1=''[[Lonchodectes compressirostris]]''
|2=USNM 13804
|3={{clade
|1=''[[Aetodactylus halli]]''
|2={{clade
|2={{clade
|1=''[[Cearadactylus]]''
|1=''[[Cearadactylus atrox]]''
|2={{clade
|2={{clade
|1=''[[Brasileodactylus]]''
|1=''[[Brasileodactylus araripensis]]''
|2={{clade
|2={{clade
|1=''[[Ludodactylus]]''
|1=''[[Ludodactylus sibbicki]]''
|2={{clade
|2={{clade
|1=[[Anhangueridae]]
|1=[[Anhangueridae]]
|2=[[Ornithocheiridae]]
|2=[[Ornithocheiridae]]
}} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }}
}} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }}
{{col-2}}
{{col-2}}
'''Topology 2:''' Kellner and colleagues (2019).<ref name="Kellner2019"/>
'''Topology 2:''' Longrich, Martill, and Andres (2018).<ref name=longrichetal2018>Longrich, N.R., Martill, D.M., and Andres, B. (2018). [http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2001663 Late Maastrichtian pterosaurs from North Africa and mass extinction of Pterosauria at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary.] ''PLoS Biology'', '''16'''(3): e2001663. {{doi|10.1371/journal.pbio.2001663}}</ref>
{{clade| style=font-size:85%;line-height:85%
{{clade| style=font-size:90%;line-height:90%
|label1=[[Ornithocheiroidea]]&nbsp;
|label1=[[Ornithocheiroidea]]
|1={{clade
|1={{clade
|label1=&nbsp;[[Azhdarchoidea]]&nbsp;
|label1=[[Tapejaroidea]]
|1={{clade
|1={{clade
|1=[[Tapejaromorpha]]
|1=[[Dsungaripteridae]]
|2=[[Azhdarchoidea]]
|label2=&nbsp;[[Neoazhdarchia]]&nbsp;
}}
|2={{clade
|label2='''Pteranodontoidea'''
|label1=&nbsp;[[Dsungaripteromorpha]]&nbsp;
|1={{clade
|2={{clade
|label1=[[Pteranodontia]]
|1=[[Dsungaripteridae]]
|1={{clade
|2=[[Thalassodromidae]] }}
|label1=[[Pteranodontidae]]
|label2=&nbsp;[[Neopterodactyloidea]]&nbsp;
|2={{clade
|1={{clade
|1=''[[Pteranodon longiceps]]''
|1=[[Azhdarchidae]]
|2=''[[Tethydraco regalis]]''
|2=[[Chaoyangopteridae]]
}}
}} }} }}
|label2=[[Nyctosauridae]]
|2={{clade
|1=''[[Nyctosaurus gracilis]]''
|2=''[[Muzquizopteryx coahuilensis]]''
}}
}}
|label2=[[Lanceodontia]]
|2={{clade
|1={{clade
|1=''[[Hongshanopterus lacustris]]''
|label2=[[Istiodactylidae]]
|2={{clade
|1=''[[Nurhachius ignaciobritoi]]''
|label2=[[Istiodactylinae]]
|2={{clade
|1=''[[Istiodactylus latidens]]''
|2=''[[Istiodactylus sinensis]]''
}}
}}
}}
|2={{clade
|1=''[[Haopterus gracilis]]''
|2={{clade
|1=''[[Lonchodraco giganteus]]''
|2=''[[Ikrandraco avatar]]''
|label3=[[Ornithocheirae]]
|3={{clade
|1=''[[Ornithocheirus simus]]''
|2={{clade
|2={{clade
|1=''[[Piksi barbarulna]]''
|1=''[[Cimoliopterus cuvieri]]''
|2=[[Anhangueria]]
|label2=&nbsp;[[Pteranodontoidea]]&nbsp;
|2={{clade
}} }} }} }} }} }} }} }}
|1=[[Ornithocheiromorpha]]
|label2=&nbsp;[[Pteranodontia]]&nbsp;
|2={{clade
|1=[[Pteranodontidae]]
|2=[[Nyctosauridae]]
}} }} }} }} }}
{{col-end}}
{{col-end}}


==Paleobiology==
==Paleobiology==
===Locomotion===
===Locomotion===
Pteranodontoids, like other pterosaurs, are considered to have been skilled fliers as well as adept at moving on the ground. Evidence from footprints shows that most pterosaurs did not sprawl their limbs to a large degree, as in modern reptiles, but rather held the limbs relatively erect when walking, like [[dinosaur]]s. While no pteranodontoid footprints are known, it is likely that they also walked erect.<ref name=wittonhabib2010>{{cite journal | last1 = Witton | first1 = M.P. | last2 = Habib | first2 = M.B. | year = 2010 | title = On the Size and Flight Diversity of Giant Pterosaurs, the Use of Birds as Pterosaur Analogues and Comments on Pterosaur Flightlessness | url = http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0013982 | journal = PLoS ONE | volume = 5 | issue = 11| page = e13982 | doi = 10.1371/journal.pone.0013982 | pmid=21085624 | pmc=2981443}}</ref> Among pterosaurs, pteranodontoids had unusually uneven limb proportions, with the forelimbs much longer than the hind limbs. This would likely have required them to use unique modes of locomotion when on the ground compared to other pterosaurs. It is possible that pteranodontoids ran (but not walked) bipedally, or that they used a hopping gait.<ref name=wittonhabib2010/> Pterosaur researcher Mike Habib has noted that the limbs proportions of pteranodontoids like ''[[Anhanguera (pterosaur)|Anhanguera]]'' are consistent with hopping.<ref name=habibblog>Habib, M. (2011). "[http://h2vp.blogspot.com/2011/09/dinosaur-revolution-anhanguera.html Dinosaur Revolution: ''Anhanguera''.]" ''H2VP: Paleobiomechanics''. Weblog entry, 20-SEP-2011. Accessed 28-SEP-2011: http://h2vp.blogspot.com/2011/09/dinosaur-revolution-anhanguera.html</ref>
Pteranodontoids, like other pterosaurs, are considered to have been skilled fliers as well as adept at moving on the ground. Evidence from footprints shows that most pterosaurs did not sprawl their limbs to a large degree, as in modern reptiles, but rather held the limbs relatively erect when walking, like [[dinosaur]]s. While no pteranodontoid footprints are known, it is likely that they also walked erect.<ref name=wittonhabib2010>{{cite journal | last1 = Witton | first1 = M.P. | last2 = Habib | first2 = M.B. | year = 2010 | title = On the Size and Flight Diversity of Giant Pterosaurs, the Use of Birds as Pterosaur Analogues and Comments on Pterosaur Flightlessness | journal = PLOS ONE | volume = 5 | issue = 11| page = e13982 | doi = 10.1371/journal.pone.0013982 | pmid=21085624 | pmc=2981443| bibcode = 2010PLoSO...513982W | doi-access = free }}</ref> Among pterosaurs, pteranodontoids had unusually uneven limb proportions, with the forelimbs much longer than the hind limbs. This would likely have required them to use unique modes of locomotion when on the ground compared to other pterosaurs. It is possible that pteranodontoids ran (but not walked) bipedally, or that they used a hopping gait.<ref name=wittonhabib2010/> Pterosaur researcher Mike Habib has noted that the limbs proportions of pteranodontoids like ''[[Anhanguera (pterosaur)|Anhanguera]]'' are consistent with hopping.<ref name=habibblog>Habib, M. (2011). "[http://h2vp.blogspot.com/2011/09/dinosaur-revolution-anhanguera.html Dinosaur Revolution: ''Anhanguera''.]" ''H2VP: Paleobiomechanics''. Weblog entry, 20-SEP-2011. Accessed 28-SEP-2011: http://h2vp.blogspot.com/2011/09/dinosaur-revolution-anhanguera.html</ref>


==References==
==References==
{{Reflist}}
{{Reflist}}
{{Portal|Paleontology|Cretaceous}}
{{Portal|Paleontology}}
{{Pterosauria|P.}}
{{Pterosauria|P.}}
{{Taxonbar|from=Q2597187}}
{{Taxonbar|from=Q2597187}}
Line 135: Line 146:
[[Category:Barremian first appearances]]
[[Category:Barremian first appearances]]
[[Category:Campanian extinctions]]
[[Category:Campanian extinctions]]
[[Category:Ornithocheiroids]]

Latest revision as of 06:11, 15 May 2024

Pteranodontoids
Temporal range: Early-Late Cretaceous,
~140–66 Ma
Mounted skeleton of a female Geosternbergia sternbergi
Reconstruction of Ferrodraco lentoni showing the known material, scale bar = 50 mm.
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Order: Pterosauria
Suborder: Pterodactyloidea
Clade: Ornithocheiroidea
Clade: Pteranodontoidea
Kellner, 1996
Subgroups
Synonyms
  • Euornithocheira Unwin, 2003

Pteranodontoidea (or pteranodontoids, from Greek meaning "toothless wings") is an extinct clade of ornithocheiroid pterosaurs from the Early to Late Cretaceous (early Valanginian to late Maastrichtian stages) of Asia, Africa, Europe, North America and South America.[1] It was named by Alexander Wilhelm Armin Kellner in 1996. In 2003, Kellner defined the clade as a node-based taxon consisting of the last common ancestor of Anhanguera, Pteranodon and all its descendants. The clade Ornithocheiroidea is sometimes considered to be the senior synonym of Pteranodontoidea, however it depends on its definition.[2] Brian Andres (2008, 2010, 2014) in his analyses, converts Ornithocheiroidea using the definition of Kellner (2003) to avoid this synonymy.[3]

Despite the meaning of the group's name, not all pteranodontoids were toothless, the earlier genera such as the istiodactylids and anhanguerids had teeth that they used to catch prey, and several conclusions had led to the idea that they later evolved into the toothless pteranodontids. Pteranodontoids were also the most diverse group of pterosaurs throughout the Cretaceous period, and therefore the most successful flyers during their time.[4] They were mostly replaced by the larger azhdarchids at the end of the Late Cretaceous however, which resulted in resource and terrain competitions, but even so, pteranodontoids still managed to thrive with them, and genera such as Alcione, Barbaridactylus, and Simurghia lived until the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event. Pteranodontoids had similar a similar diet to modern-day soaring birds such the albatross, which mainly consisted of fish. Some genera of this group however, fed mainly on carrion, this can be seen on the earlier genera such as Istiodactylus. They were also known for their proportionally large wingspans, the largest recorded of any pteranodontoid reached 8.70 meters (28.5 ft), and it belongs to the genus Tropeognathus.[5]

History of early discovered genera

[edit]
Lectotype rostrum of Lonchodraco giganteus, the first ever known pteranodontoid

Several fossil remains were found in the Chalk Formation of England, a chalk pit known for its wide variety of fossils belonging to different animals. British paleontologist James Scott Bowerbank named and described the specimens found as a new species of Pterodactylus, P. giganteus due to its much larger size.[6] P. giganteus is nowadays considered to belong to the genus called Lonchodraco.[7] In 1851, Bowerbank unearthed more specimens in the same chalk pit as P. giganteus, and assigned these specimens to yet another newly named species of Pterodactylus, known as P. cuvieri, in honor of the German naturalist and zoologist Georges Cuvier.[8] Later that year, British paleontologist Sir Richard Owen had also unearthed several fossil specimens in the Chalk Formation, in which he assigned them as Pterodactylus compressirostris during its description.[9] Owen later unearthed many fossil specimens from a different fossil site called the Cambridge Greensand, he then assigned these specimens into a new species called Pterodactylus simus. With the naming of this new species, British paleontologist Harry Govier Seeley created a new separate genus called Ornithocheirus (from Ancient Greek "ὄρνις", meaning "bird", and "χεῖρ", meaning "hand"), due to the notion of the time, in which pterosaurs were the direct ancestors of birds. In 1870, Seeley then also reassigned Pterodactylus cuvieri into a new species called Ornithocheirus cuvieri.[10][11] This species is now considered to belong to the genus Cimoliopterus.[7] Back in 1874 however, controversies between the naming of species and genera of these pterosaurs started, with the paleontologists Harry Seeley and Richard Owen fighting over reassignings of different species as well as genera. Owen therefore created two new genera: Coloborhynchus (meaning "maimed beak") and Criorhynchus (meaning "ram beak"), in reference to their unique convex "keeled" crests on top, and underside of their snout. Owen then created a type species for Coloborhynchus, C. clavirostris, and sunk three species which were assigned previously to Ornithocheirus, and Criorhynchus consisted entirely of former Ornithocheirus species.[12] Later in 1881 however, Seeley disagreed with Owen's conclusions, and he therefore assigned the species he named Ornithocheirus simus as the type species of Ornithocheirus.[13]

Specimen YPM1177, the type specimen of Pteranodon, now interpreted as a female individual due to its short cranial crest

The naming of the different pterosaur species, as well as the genus Ornithocheirus in England resulted in further research in other places. In the United States, American paleontologist Othniel Charles Marsh led an expedition to the Smoky Hill Chalk deposits in western Kansas in 1870.[14] Marsh unearthed the first ever specimens of pterosaur from North America (specimens YPM 1160 and YPM 1161), which now belong to the genus Pteranodon, and consisted of partial wing remains and a tooth of the fish Xiphactinus, which Marsh had once believed that it belonged to Pteranodon.[15] In 1871, he assigned these specimens to a new species called "Pterodactylus oweni" (meaning "Owen's wing finger"),[16] in honor of Sir Richard Owen, but he realized that the name he had chosen had already been used for a different European pterosaur species described by Harry Seeley, so he renamed his discovery as Pterodactylus occidentalis (meaning "Western wing finger"), in reference to the location where it was found.[17] American paleontologist Edward Drinker Cope had also unearthed several remains of the large North American pterosaur, and based on these remains, Cope named two new species, Ornithochirus umbrosus and Ornithochirus harpyia, in an attempt to assign them to the large European genus Ornithocheirus, but he had missed the 'e' when describing them. The paper naming these species by Cope's paper naming had been published in 1872, just five days after the publication of Marsh's paper. This led to a dispute between the two paleontologists, which both fought over whose names had priority to the published literature, in what was obviously the same species of pterosaur.[18]

In 1876, Marsh had described the first skull specimen of Pteranodon, which as unearthed by American paleontologist Samuel Wendell Williston in the Smoky Hill River, located in the Wallace County (now Logan County) of Kansas, USA. Later that year, another skull specimen was found, though this time a bit smaller in size.[19] Soon enough, Marsh recognized a major difference when he described these specimens, they lacked teeth and had bony crests on their skulls. He then described the specimens found as "distinguished from all previously known genera of the order Pterosauria by the entire absence of teeth." Marsh then coined the name Pteranodon (meaning "wing without tooth"), and pointed that the unique characteristics identified warranted a new generic name. Marsh had also reclassified all the previously named North American species from Pterodactylus to Pteranodon, and considered the smaller skull to belong to the reassigned Pteranodon occidentalis based on its size.[19][20] Specimens of smaller individuals were later uncovered, and Marsh had also named several additional species: Pteranodon comptus and Pteranodon nanus, based on these distinct and smaller fragmentary skeletons. He then created another separate species called Pteranodon gracilis, which is now based on a wing bone that he previously mistook for a pelvic bone. Marsh soon realized his mistake, and therefore reassigned that specimen he found into a separate genus which he named Nyctosaurus, and the species P. nanus was soon recognized as a Nyctosaurus specimen as well, this is due to the synapomorphies seen in both.[21] [22] Later in 1892, Samuel Williston had become the first scientist to critically evaluate all of the Pteranodon species classified by Cope and Marsh. He agreed with most of Marsh's reassignings and classifications, but several exceptions were still made. Williston revised his earlier conclusion in 1903, in which he stated that there were only three species of Pteranodon, instead of seven. He also considered both P. comptus and P. nanus to be specimens of Nyctosaurus, and divided the other species into small (P. velox), medium (P. occidentalis), and large species (P. ingens), based primarily on the shape of their upper arm bones. He also followed his first conclusion of P. longiceps being a synonym of either P. velox or P. occidentalis based on its size.[23] However, in 1994, Christopher Bennett concluded that P. longiceps and another species called P. sternbergi would be the only valid Pteranodon species, while the other ones were either considered nomina dubia or synonyms.[18]

Skull elements of the specimens NHMUK R3877 and R176 of Istiodactylus, and the 1913 long-jawed skull reconstruction by Reginald Hooley

A peculiar discovery was made in 1887 by Seeley in the Isle of Wight, an island off the coast of southern England. Seeley thought that these fossil remains belonged to bird-like creature, which he then named Ornithodesmus cluniculus.[24] Seeley also reported another specimen found on the same site. Seeley named the new species O. latidens in 1901 based on this discovery, the specific name translates to "wide tooth". He presumably assigned this new species to Ornithodesmus due to synapomorphies between their sacra, but his conclusion was not entirely clear.[25][26] In 1913, English paleontologist Reginald Walter Hooley reviewed O. latidens in detail, based on specimens he had found, and placed the genus Ornithodesmus within a newly created family, Ornithodesmidae.[27][28] Later in 1993, the British paleontologists Stafford C. Howse and Andrew C. Milner concluded that the holotype sacrum and only specimen of the species O. cluniculus didn't belong to a pterosaur, but instead to a maniraptoran theropod dinosaur. They pointed out that no detailed attempts had been made to compare the sacrum of O. cluniculus with those of pterosaurs, and that the species O. latidens had in effect been treated as the type species of the genus Ornithodesmus in their conclusion. Now as a definite species of pterosaur, "O." latidens thus required a new generic name.[26] In 2001, Howse, Milner, and David Martill, reassigned "O." latidens to a new genus called Istiodactylus, resulting in a new combination known as Istiodactylus latidens. The generic name Istiodactylus means "sail finger", in reference to its proportionally large wings.[28]

Classification

[edit]

Originally defined by Alexander Kellner in 1996, Pteranodontoidea is sometimes considered a synonym of the clade Ornithocheiroidea according to several studies. The name Ornithocheiroidea was originally defined as an apomorphy-based taxon by Christopher Bennett in 1994. In 2003 however, Kellner redefined Ornithocheiroidea to represent the node of Anhanguera, Pteranodon, Quetzalcoatlus and Dsungaripterus, thus making Ornithocheiroidea a more inclusive group.[29] Later that year, David Unwin suggested a different definition, the node that contains Pteranodon longiceps and Istiodactylus latidens, as a resulting, he considered Pteranodontoidea a junior synonym of Ornithocheiroidea.[2] Brian Andres (2008, 2010, 2014) in his analyses, converts Ornithocheiroidea using the definition of Kellner (2003) to avoid this synonymy.[3] In 2013, Andres & Timothy Myers presented a phylogenetic analysis that placed Pteranodontoidea within the group Pteranodontia, as the sister taxon of the family Nyctosauridae.[30] In 2019 however, Kellner and colleagues revisited the classification, and concluded that Pteranodontoidea, which was sister taxon to Tapejaroidea, would be the more inclusive group containing both the Lanceodontia and the Pteranodontia.[31]

Topology 1: Andres & Myers (2013).[30]

Paleobiology

[edit]

Locomotion

[edit]

Pteranodontoids, like other pterosaurs, are considered to have been skilled fliers as well as adept at moving on the ground. Evidence from footprints shows that most pterosaurs did not sprawl their limbs to a large degree, as in modern reptiles, but rather held the limbs relatively erect when walking, like dinosaurs. While no pteranodontoid footprints are known, it is likely that they also walked erect.[32] Among pterosaurs, pteranodontoids had unusually uneven limb proportions, with the forelimbs much longer than the hind limbs. This would likely have required them to use unique modes of locomotion when on the ground compared to other pterosaurs. It is possible that pteranodontoids ran (but not walked) bipedally, or that they used a hopping gait.[32] Pterosaur researcher Mike Habib has noted that the limbs proportions of pteranodontoids like Anhanguera are consistent with hopping.[33]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Richard J. Butler; Stephen L. Brusatte; Brian B. Andres & Roger B. J. Benson (2012). "How do geological sampling biases affect studies of morphological evolution in deep time? A case study of the Pterosauria (Reptilia: Archosauria)". Evolution. 66 (1): 147–162. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01415.x. PMID 22220871. S2CID 205783384.
  2. ^ a b Unwin, D. M., (2003): On the phylogeny and evolutionary history of pterosaurs. pp. 139-190. — in Buffetaut, E. & Mazin, J.-M., (eds.): Evolution and Palaeobiology of Pterosaurs. Geological Society of London, Special Publications 217, London, 1-347
  3. ^ a b Andres, Brian Blake (2014). Systematics of the Pterosauria. Yale University. p. 366. A preview that shows the cladogram without clade names
  4. ^ Federico L. Agnolin & David Varricchio (2012). "Systematic reinterpretation of Piksi barbarulna Varricchio, 2002 from the Two Medicine Formation (Upper Cretaceous) of Western USA (Montana) as a pterosaur rather than a bird" (PDF). Geodiversitas. 34 (4): 883–894. doi:10.5252/g2012n4a10. S2CID 56002643.
  5. ^ Kellner, A. W. A.; Campos, D. A.; Sayão, J. M.; Saraiva, A. N. A. F.; Rodrigues, T.; Oliveira, G.; Cruz, L. A.; Costa, F. R.; Silva, H. P.; Ferreira, J. S. (2013). "The largest flying reptile from Gondwana: A new specimen of Tropeognathus cf. T. Mesembrinus Wellnhofer, 1987 (Pterodactyloidea, Anhangueridae) and other large pterosaurs from the Romualdo Formation, Lower Cretaceous, Brazil". Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 85 (1): 113–135. doi:10.1590/S0001-37652013000100009. PMID 23538956.
  6. ^ Bowerbank, J.S. (1846). "On a new species of pterodactyl found in the Upper Chalk of Kent (Pterodactylus giganteus)". Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London. 2 (1–2): 7–9. doi:10.1144/gsl.jgs.1846.002.01-02.05. S2CID 129389179.
  7. ^ a b Rodrigues, T.; Kellner, A. (2013). "Taxonomic review of the Ornithocheirus complex (Pterosauria) from the Cretaceous of England". ZooKeys (308): 1–112. doi:10.3897/zookeys.308.5559. PMC 3689139. PMID 23794925.
  8. ^ Bowerbank, J.S. (1851). "On the pterodactyles of the Chalk Formation". Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London. 19: 14–20. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1851.tb01125.x.
  9. ^ Owen, R. (1851). Monograph on the fossil Reptilia of the Cretaceous Formations. The Palaeontographical Society 5(11):1-118.
  10. ^ Seeley, H.G., 1869, Index to the fossil remains of Aves, Ornithosauria, and Reptilia, from the Secondary System of Strata, arranged in the Woodwardian Museum of the University of Cambridge. St. John's College, Cambridge 8: 143. doi:10.1080/00222937008696143
  11. ^ Seeley, H.G. (1870). The Ornithosauria: an Elementary Study of the Bones of Pterodactyles. Cambridge, 130 pp.
  12. ^ Owen, R. 1874, Monograph on the fossil Reptilia of the Mesozoic Formations. Palaeontographical Society, London, 14 pp
  13. ^ Seeley, H. G. (1881). "The Reptile Fauna of the Gosau Formation preserved in the Geological Museum of the University of Vienna". Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society. 37 (1): 620–706. doi:10.1144/GSL.JGS.1881.037.01-04.49. S2CID 219235284.
  14. ^ Betts, C. W. 1871. The Yale College Expedition of 1870. Harper’s New Monthly Magazine, 43(257):663–671
  15. ^ Marsh, O. C. 1871. Scientific expedition to the Rocky Mountains. American Journal of Science, ser. 3, 1(6):142–143.
  16. ^ Marsh, O. C., 1871. "Note on a new and gigantic species of Pterodactyle." American Journal of Science, ser. 3, 1(6):472 oceansofkansas.com/Marsh71.htm
  17. ^ Marsh, O. C. 1872. Discovery of additional remains of Pterosauria, with descriptions of two new species. American Journal of Science, Series 3, 3(16):241–248.
  18. ^ a b Bennett, S.C. (1994). "Taxonomy and systematics of the Late Cretaceous pterosaur Pteranodon (Pterosauria, Pterodactyloida)". Occasional Papers of the Natural History Museum, University of Kansas. 169: 1–70.
  19. ^ a b Marsh, O.C. (1876a). "Notice of a new sub-order of Pterosauria". American Journal of Science. Series 3. 11 (65): 507–509. Bibcode:1876AmJS...11..507M. doi:10.2475/ajs.s3-11.66.507. S2CID 130203580.
  20. ^ Bennett, S.C. (2000). "Inferring stratigraphic position of fossil vertebrates from the Niobrara Chalk of western Kansas." Current Research in Earth Sciences: Kansas Geological Survey Bulletin, 244(Part 1): 26 pp.
  21. ^ Marsh, O.C. (1876b). "Principal characters of American pterodactyls". American Journal of Science. Series 3. 12 (72): 479–480. Bibcode:1876AmJS...12..479M. doi:10.2475/ajs.s3-12.72.479. S2CID 131057784.
  22. ^ Witton, M. (2010). Pteranodon and beyond: The history of giant pterosaurs from 1870 onwards. Geological Society of London, Special Publications. 343. 313-323. doi:10.1144/SP343.19
  23. ^ Williston, S. W. 1903. On the osteology of Nyctosaurus (Nyctodactylus), with notes on American pterosaurs. Field Mus. Publ. (Geological Ser.) 2(3):125–163, 2 figs., pls. XL-XLIV.
  24. ^ Seeley, H. G. (1887). "On a sacrum apparently indicating a new type of bird, Ornithodesmus cluniculus Seeley from the Wealden of Brook". Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London. 43 (1–4): 206–211. doi:10.1144/GSL.JGS.1887.043.01-04.19. S2CID 129459937.
  25. ^ Seeley, H. G. (2015) [1901]. Dragons of the Air: an Account of Extinct Flying Reptiles. New York: D. Appleton & Co. pp. 173–175. ISBN 978-1440084942.
  26. ^ a b Howse, S. C. B.; Milner, A. R. (1993). "Ornithodesmus – a maniraptoran theropod dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous of the Isle of Wight, England". Palaeontology. 36: 425–437.
  27. ^ Hooley, R. W. (1913). "On the skeleton of Ornithodesmus latidens; an ornithosaur from the Wealden Shales of Atherfield (Isle of Wight)". Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society. 69 (1–4): 372–422. doi:10.1144/GSL.JGS.1913.069.01-04.23. S2CID 128604856.
  28. ^ a b Howse, S. C. B.; Milner, A. R.; Martill, D. M. (2001). "Pterosaurs". In Martill, D. M.; Naish, D. (eds.). Dinosaurs of the Isle of Wight. Guide 10; Field Guides to Fossils. London: The Palaeontological Association. pp. 324–335. ISBN 978-0-901702-72-2.
  29. ^ Kellner, A. W. A., (2003): Pterosaur phylogeny and comments on the evolutionary history of the group. pp. 105-137. — in Buffetaut, E. & Mazin, J.-M., (eds.): Evolution and Palaeobiology of Pterosaurs. Geological Society of London, Special Publications 217, London, 1-347
  30. ^ a b Andres, B.; Myers, T. S. (2013). "Lone Star Pterosaurs". Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. 103 (3–4): 383–398. doi:10.1017/S1755691013000303. S2CID 84617119.
  31. ^ a b Kellner, Alexander W. A.; Weinschütz, Luiz C.; Holgado, Borja; Bantim, Renan A. M.; Sayão, Juliana M. (August 19, 2019). "A new toothless pterosaur (Pterodactyloidea) from Southern Brazil with insights into the paleoecology of a Cretaceous desert". Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 91 (suppl 2): e20190768. doi:10.1590/0001-3765201920190768. ISSN 0001-3765. PMID 31432888.
  32. ^ a b Witton, M.P.; Habib, M.B. (2010). "On the Size and Flight Diversity of Giant Pterosaurs, the Use of Birds as Pterosaur Analogues and Comments on Pterosaur Flightlessness". PLOS ONE. 5 (11): e13982. Bibcode:2010PLoSO...513982W. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013982. PMC 2981443. PMID 21085624.
  33. ^ Habib, M. (2011). "Dinosaur Revolution: Anhanguera." H2VP: Paleobiomechanics. Weblog entry, 20-SEP-2011. Accessed 28-SEP-2011: http://h2vp.blogspot.com/2011/09/dinosaur-revolution-anhanguera.html