[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Sthānakavāsī: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Improved wording
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Altered url. URLs might have been anonymized. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by LeapTorchGear | #UCB_webform 224/267
(16 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Sub-tradition of Svetambara Jainism}}
{{Short description|Sub-tradition of Svetambara Jainism}}
<noinclude>{{User:RMCD bot/subject notice|1=Sthānakavāsī|2=Talk:Sthanakvasi#Requested move 23 June 2024}}
{{Multiple issues|
</noinclude>{{Jainism}}
{{More footnotes|date=February 2016}}
{{more citations needed|date=February 2016}}
}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=January 2016}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=January 2016}}
{{Use Indian English|date=January 2016}}
{{Use Indian English|date=January 2016}}
{{Jainism}}
[[File:Shravak Priests, Guzerat, 19515701.jpg|thumb|Some Sthanakvasi monks from Gujarat. ]]
[[File:Shravak Priests, Guzerat, 19515701.jpg|thumb|Some Sthanakvasi monks from Gujarat. ]]
'''''Sthānakavāsī''''' is a [[sect]] of [[Śvētāmbara|Śvētāmbara Jainism]].The Sthanakvasi sect is different from the [[Murtipujaka]] sect in that it rejects idolatry. It believes that idol worship is not essential in the path of soul purification and attainment of [[Nirvana]]/[[Moksha]]. Sthānakavāsī accept thirty-two of the [[Jain Agamas]], the Svetambara canon, contending that the scriptures make no mention of idol worship and temples<ref>Jains in the World, Religious Values and Ideology in India, John E. Cort, p. 46</ref>. According to the sect, Lord Mahavira himself never endorsed idol worship, and they argue that such practices were borrowed from other religions by the Murtipujaka Jains.
'''''Sthānakavāsī''''' is a [[sect]] of [[Śvetāmbara Jainism]] which was created in medieval era. The Sthanakvasi, whose name refers to the sect’s preference for performing religious duties at a secular place such as a monks’ meetinghouse (''sthanak'') rather than at a temple, is different from the [[Murtipujaka]] sect in that it rejects idolatry. It believes that idol worship is not essential in the path of soul purification and attainment of [[Nirvana]]/[[Moksha]]. Sthānakavāsī accept thirty-two of the [[Jain Agamas]], the Śvetāmbara canon, contending that the scriptures make no mention of idol worship and temples.<ref>Jains in the World, Religious Values and Ideology in India, John E. Cort, p. 46</ref> According to the sect, [[Mahavira]] himself never endorsed idol worship, and they argue that such practices were borrowed from other religions by the Murtipujaka Jains.


In the 15th century, the Jain reformer Loṅkā Śāh, a scribe in the Gujarat region, played a pivotal role in the development of the Sthanakavasi tradition.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Jains|last=Dundas|first=Paul|publisher=Routledge|year=2002|isbn=978-0415266062|location=London, UK|pages=246}}</ref> Armed with access to numerous Jain scriptures and manuscripts, Loṅkā interpreted them as lacking references to temple construction or image worship, despite these practices being prevalent at the time. He asserted that such practices were spiritually hazardous, violating the principle of ''[[Ahimsa in Jainism|ahiṃsā]]'' (non-injury) central to Jain philosophy.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Jains|last=Dundas|first=Paul|publisher=Routledge|year=2002|isbn=978-0415266062|location=London, UK|pages=249}}</ref> Loṅkā argued that building temples led to the destruction of microscopic organisms, and ritualistic pūjā (worship) involved subtle forms of harm through material offerings like flowers or incense.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Framing the Jina: Narratives of Icons and Idols in Jain History|url=https://archive.org/details/framingjinanarra00cort|url-access=limited|last=Cort|first=John|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2010|isbn=978-0195385021|location=Oxford, UK|pages=[https://archive.org/details/framingjinanarra00cort/page/n23 5]}}</ref>
In the 15th century, the Jain reformer Loṅkā Śāh, a scribe in the Gujarat region, played a pivotal role in the development of the Sthanakavasi tradition.<ref name=":2">{{Cite book|title=The Jains|last=Dundas|first=Paul|publisher=Routledge|year=2002|isbn=978-0415266062|location=London, UK|pages=246}}</ref> Armed with access to numerous Jain scriptures and manuscripts, Loṅkā interpreted them as lacking references to temple construction or image worship, despite these practices being prevalent at the time. He asserted that such practices were spiritually hazardous, violating the principle of ''[[Ahimsa in Jainism|ahiṃsā]]'' (non-injury) central to Jain philosophy.<ref name=":2" /> Loṅkā argued that building temples led to the destruction of microscopic organisms, and ritualistic pūjā (worship) involved subtle forms of harm through material offerings like flowers or incense.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Framing the Jina: Narratives of Icons and Idols in Jain History|url=https://archive.org/details/framingjinanarra00cort|url-access=limited|last=Cort|first=John|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2010|isbn=978-0195385021|location=Oxford, UK|pages=[https://archive.org/details/framingjinanarra00cort/page/n23 5]}}</ref>


Loṅkā's influence endures, revealing an iconoclastic tendency within a strict doctrinal interpretation of Jain teachings. TBoth the Śvetāmbara Sthānakavāsī and Terāpanthī sects align with Loṅkā, asserting that mental worship (bhāva-pūjā) is the most appropriate form of religious practice. They argue that reliance on images and temples signifies an attachment to material objects that is spiritually counterproductive.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Jainism: An Introduction|last=Long|first=Jeffrey|publisher=I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd|year=2009|isbn=978-1845116262|location=London, UK|pages=20}}</ref>
Loṅkā's influence endures, revealing an iconoclastic tendency within a strict doctrinal interpretation of Jain teachings. The Sthanakvasi sect was founded in the 17th century by Lava of Surat, a follower of Loṅkā. Today, both the Śvetāmbara Sthānakavāsī and Terāpanthī sects align with Loṅkā, asserting that mental worship (bhāva-pūjā) is the most appropriate form of religious practice. They argue that reliance on images and temples signifies an attachment to material objects that is spiritually counterproductive.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Jainism: An Introduction|last=Long|first=Jeffrey|publisher=I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd|year=2009|isbn=978-1845116262|location=London, UK|pages=20}}</ref>


In contrast, Mūrtipūjaka Jains respond to these criticisms by highlighting the scriptural prevalence of image worship and emphasizing the necessity of images for the spiritual practices of laypeople. A notable figure in this discourse is [[Vijayanandsuri|Ātmārām]] (1837 – 1896), initially a Śvetāmbara Sthānakavāsī monk who later became the mendicant leader [[Acharya|Ācārya]] Vijayānandasūri. Upon studying early Jain texts in Prakrit and their Sanskrit commentaries, Ātmārām discovered abundant references to image worship.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book|title=Framing the Jina: Narratives of Icons and Idols in Jain History|url=https://archive.org/details/framingjinanarra00cort|url-access=limited|last=Cort|first=John|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2010|isbn=978-0195385021|location=Oxford, UK|pages=[https://archive.org/details/framingjinanarra00cort/page/n24 6]}}</ref> This revelation led him to challenge the non-Mūrtipūjaka position, asserting that it contradicted Jain scripture.<ref name=":1" />
In contrast, Mūrtipūjaka Jains respond to these criticisms by highlighting the scriptural prevalence of image worship and emphasizing the necessity of images for the spiritual practices of laypeople. A notable figure in this discourse is [[Vijayanandsuri|Ātmārām]] (1837 – 1896), initially a Śvetāmbara Sthānakavāsī monk who later became the mendicant leader [[Acharya|Ācārya]] Vijayānandasūri. Upon studying early Jain texts in Prakrit and their Sanskrit commentaries, Ātmārām discovered abundant references to image worship.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book|title=Framing the Jina: Narratives of Icons and Idols in Jain History|url=https://archive.org/details/framingjinanarra00cort|url-access=limited|last=Cort|first=John|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2010|isbn=978-0195385021|location=Oxford, UK|pages=[https://archive.org/details/framingjinanarra00cort/page/n24 6]}}</ref> This revelation led him to challenge the non-Mūrtipūjaka position, asserting that it contradicted Jain scripture.<ref name=":1" />




==Notes==
==Notes==
Line 32: Line 27:


*{{Cite book|title=Framing the Jina: Narratives of Icons and Idols in Jain History|url=https://archive.org/details/framingjinanarra00cort|url-access=limited|last=Cort|first=John|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2010|isbn=978-0195385021|location=Oxford, UK|pages=[https://archive.org/details/framingjinanarra00cort/page/n23 5]}}
*{{Cite book|title=Framing the Jina: Narratives of Icons and Idols in Jain History|url=https://archive.org/details/framingjinanarra00cort|url-access=limited|last=Cort|first=John|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2010|isbn=978-0195385021|location=Oxford, UK|pages=[https://archive.org/details/framingjinanarra00cort/page/n23 5]}}
* {{cite conference |last=Flügel |first=Peter |date=2008 |chapter=The Unknown Loṅkā: Tradition and the Cultural Unconscious |url=https://books.google.com/books/about/Jaina_Studies.html?id=ecKCrO6nLiAC |title=Jaina Studies |conference=12th World Sanskrit Conference, Helsinki, 13–18 July 2003 |editor1=Nalini Balbir |editor2= Colette Caillat |location=Delhi |publisher=Motilal Banarsidas |pages=181–279 |isbn=978-8120832473}}
* {{cite conference |last=Flügel |first=Peter |date=2008 |chapter=The Unknown Loṅkā: Tradition and the Cultural Unconscious |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ecKCrO6nLiAC |title=Jaina Studies |conference=12th World Sanskrit Conference, Helsinki, 13–18 July 2003 |editor1=Nalini Balbir |editor2= Colette Caillat |location=Delhi |publisher=Motilal Banarsidas |pages=181–279 |isbn=978-8120832473}}
*Long, Jeffrey (2009). ''[https://books.google.com/books/about/Jainism.html?id=ehzdGQAACAAJ Jainism: An Introduction]''. London, UK: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd. {{ISBN|978-1845116262}}.
*Long, Jeffrey (2009). ''[https://books.google.com/books/about/Jainism.html?id=ehzdGQAACAAJ Jainism: An Introduction]''. London, UK: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd. {{ISBN|978-1845116262}}.
*Wiley, Kristi L. (2004). ''[https://books.google.com/books/about/The_A_to_Z_of_Jainism.html?id=kUz9o-EKTpwC The A to Z of Jainism]''. Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press, Inc. {{ISBN|978-0810868212}}.
*Wiley, Kristi L. (2004). ''[https://books.google.com/books/about/The_A_to_Z_of_Jainism.html?id=kUz9o-EKTpwC The A to Z of Jainism]''. Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press, Inc. {{ISBN|978-0810868212}}.
Line 41: Line 36:


{{DEFAULTSORT:Sthanakavasi}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Sthanakavasi}}
[[Category:Śvētāmbara sects]]
[[Category:Śvetāmbara sects]]
[[Category:Schools of Jainism]]

Revision as of 10:13, 3 July 2024

Some Sthanakvasi monks from Gujarat.

Sthānakavāsī is a sect of Śvetāmbara Jainism which was created in medieval era. The Sthanakvasi, whose name refers to the sect’s preference for performing religious duties at a secular place such as a monks’ meetinghouse (sthanak) rather than at a temple, is different from the Murtipujaka sect in that it rejects idolatry. It believes that idol worship is not essential in the path of soul purification and attainment of Nirvana/Moksha. Sthānakavāsī accept thirty-two of the Jain Agamas, the Śvetāmbara canon, contending that the scriptures make no mention of idol worship and temples.[1] According to the sect, Mahavira himself never endorsed idol worship, and they argue that such practices were borrowed from other religions by the Murtipujaka Jains.

In the 15th century, the Jain reformer Loṅkā Śāh, a scribe in the Gujarat region, played a pivotal role in the development of the Sthanakavasi tradition.[2] Armed with access to numerous Jain scriptures and manuscripts, Loṅkā interpreted them as lacking references to temple construction or image worship, despite these practices being prevalent at the time. He asserted that such practices were spiritually hazardous, violating the principle of ahiṃsā (non-injury) central to Jain philosophy.[2] Loṅkā argued that building temples led to the destruction of microscopic organisms, and ritualistic pūjā (worship) involved subtle forms of harm through material offerings like flowers or incense.[3]

Loṅkā's influence endures, revealing an iconoclastic tendency within a strict doctrinal interpretation of Jain teachings. The Sthanakvasi sect was founded in the 17th century by Lava of Surat, a follower of Loṅkā. Today, both the Śvetāmbara Sthānakavāsī and Terāpanthī sects align with Loṅkā, asserting that mental worship (bhāva-pūjā) is the most appropriate form of religious practice. They argue that reliance on images and temples signifies an attachment to material objects that is spiritually counterproductive.[4]

In contrast, Mūrtipūjaka Jains respond to these criticisms by highlighting the scriptural prevalence of image worship and emphasizing the necessity of images for the spiritual practices of laypeople. A notable figure in this discourse is Ātmārām (1837 – 1896), initially a Śvetāmbara Sthānakavāsī monk who later became the mendicant leader Ācārya Vijayānandasūri. Upon studying early Jain texts in Prakrit and their Sanskrit commentaries, Ātmārām discovered abundant references to image worship.[5] This revelation led him to challenge the non-Mūrtipūjaka position, asserting that it contradicted Jain scripture.[5]

Notes

  1. ^ Jains in the World, Religious Values and Ideology in India, John E. Cort, p. 46
  2. ^ a b Dundas, Paul (2002). The Jains. London, UK: Routledge. p. 246. ISBN 978-0415266062.
  3. ^ Cort, John (2010). Framing the Jina: Narratives of Icons and Idols in Jain History. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 5. ISBN 978-0195385021.
  4. ^ Long, Jeffrey (2009). Jainism: An Introduction. London, UK: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd. p. 20. ISBN 978-1845116262.
  5. ^ a b Cort, John (2010). Framing the Jina: Narratives of Icons and Idols in Jain History. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 6. ISBN 978-0195385021.

References