[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Talk:1870–71 United States House of Representatives elections: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎"Conservative" members issue: Follow-up - I have an explanation for this, but I still intend to strike the "Conservatives" from the Infobox.
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=List|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Elections and Referendums}}
{{WikiProject Elections and Referendums}}
{{WikiProject United States|class=list|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject U.S. Congress|class=list|importance=mid|subject=event}}
{{WikiProject U.S. Congress|importance=mid|subject=event}}
}}
}}


Line 12: Line 12:


: ''Follow-up:'' While Dubin (e.g. p. 221) seems to make this distinction of "10 Conservative" members of the House (along with 94 Democrats), Martis (pp. 124–125) (and {{cite web | url=http://history.house.gov/Institution/Party-Divisions/Party-Divisions/ |title=Party Divisions of the House of Representatives* 1789–Present |publisher=Office of the Historian, House of United States House of Representatives |date= |accessdate=}}) do not. So I am following Martis' lead here and striking the "Conservative" membership from the Infobox to this article (and several succeeding U.S. House elections articles). I will add a 'Note' about this to the Democratic Party figures in the Infobox, however... --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] ([[User talk:IJBall|talk]]) 17:57, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
: ''Follow-up:'' While Dubin (e.g. p. 221) seems to make this distinction of "10 Conservative" members of the House (along with 94 Democrats), Martis (pp. 124–125) (and {{cite web | url=http://history.house.gov/Institution/Party-Divisions/Party-Divisions/ |title=Party Divisions of the House of Representatives* 1789–Present |publisher=Office of the Historian, House of United States House of Representatives |date= |accessdate=}}) do not. So I am following Martis' lead here and striking the "Conservative" membership from the Infobox to this article (and several succeeding U.S. House elections articles). I will add a 'Note' about this to the Democratic Party figures in the Infobox, however... --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] ([[User talk:IJBall|talk]]) 17:57, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

== Results ==
[[File:House042ElectionMap.png|thumb|Election map]]
According to this map California and Texas elected three Democrats and four Republicans, respectively. However, in the table it is just the other way round? --'''''[[User:Furfur|<span style="color: #8806CE; font-family: Palatino, Times, serif">Furfur</span>]]'''''<sup> &#8258; [[User talk:Furfur| Diskussion]]</sup> 16:43, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

== Orphaned references in [[:1870 and 1871 United States House of Representatives elections]] ==

I check pages listed in [[:Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting]] to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for [[User:AnomieBOT/docs/OrphanReferenceFixer|orphaned references]] in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of [[:1870 and 1871 United States House of Representatives elections]]'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for ''this'' article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

<b>Reference named "directory1869":</b><ul>
<li>From [[1868 and 1869 United States House of Representatives elections]]: {{cite book |title=Congressional Directory for the First Session of the Forty-First Congress |author=Ben. Perley Poore |year=1869 |edition=2nd |location=Washington DC |publisher=Government Printing Office |chapter= Massachusetts |hdl=2027/nyp.33433081796686 }}</li>
<li>From [[Massachusetts's 6th congressional district]]: {{cite book |title=Congressional Directory for the First Session of the Forty-First Congress |author=Ben. Perley Poore |year=1869 |edition=2nd |location=Washington DC |publisher=Government Printing Office |chapter= Massachusetts |chapter-url= http://hdl.handle.net/2027/nyp.33433081796686?urlappend=%3Bseq=34 }}</li>
<li>From [[Massachusetts's 9th congressional district]]: {{cite book |title=Congressional Directory for the First Session of the Forty-First Congress |author=Ben. Perley Poore |year=1869 |edition=2nd |location=Washington DC |publisher=Government Printing Office |chapter= Massachusetts |hdl=2027/nyp.33433081796686?urlappend=%3Bseq=34 |chapter-url= http://hdl.handle.net/2027/nyp.33433081796686?urlappend=%3Bseq=34 }}</li>
<li>From [[Massachusetts's 3rd congressional district]]: {{cite book | title=Congressional Directory for the First Session of the Forty-First Congress | first1=Ben. Perley | last1=Poore | year=1869 | edition=2nd | location=Washington DC | publisher=Government Printing Office | chapter=Massachusetts | hdl=2027/nyp.33433081796686?urlappend=%3Bseq=34 | chapter-url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/nyp.33433081796686?urlappend=%3Bseq=34 }}</li>
<li>From [[Massachusetts's 1st congressional district]]: {{Cite book |last=Ben. Perley Poore |title=Congressional Directory for the First Session of the Forty-First Congress |publisher=[[United States Government Publishing Office|Government Printing Office]] |year=1869 |edition=2nd |location=[[Washington, D.C.]] |chapter=Massachusetts |author-link=Benjamin Perley Poore |chapter-url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/nyp.33433081796686?urlappend=%3Bseq=34}}</li>
</ul>

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. [[User:AnomieBOT|AnomieBOT]][[User talk:AnomieBOT|<span style="color:#880">⚡</span>]] 22:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

== Move discussion in progress ==

There is a move discussion in progress on [[Talk:1788 and 1789 United States House of Representatives elections#Requested move 19 November 2022|Talk:1788 and 1789 United States House of Representatives elections]] which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. <!-- Talk:1788 and 1789 United States House of Representatives elections#Requested move 19 November 2022 crosspost --> —[[User:RMCD bot|RMCD bot]] 21:19, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:51, 15 January 2024

"Conservative" members issue

[edit]

There is no sourcing at this article (or at some of the other U.S. House of Representatives elections articles in the later 1870s) justifying counting 10 "Conservative" members as distinct from the other Democratic Party members. (They certainly don't seem to be members of any formal "Conservative Party" – e.g. see Conservative Party of Virginia, which specifically states that such members were only elected in the 41st Congress, not the 42nd Congress.) Certainly neither Martis, nor the Party Divisions of the House of Representatives* 1789–Present from the Office of the Historian, House of United States House of Representatives reference, make nor justify such a distinction.

Unless someone can justify such a distinction with sourcing, I am going to eliminate the "Conservative" entries from the Infobox, and merge their figures into the Democratic Party figures. --IJBall (talk) 20:57, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up: While Dubin (e.g. p. 221) seems to make this distinction of "10 Conservative" members of the House (along with 94 Democrats), Martis (pp. 124–125) (and "Party Divisions of the House of Representatives* 1789–Present". Office of the Historian, House of United States House of Representatives.) do not. So I am following Martis' lead here and striking the "Conservative" membership from the Infobox to this article (and several succeeding U.S. House elections articles). I will add a 'Note' about this to the Democratic Party figures in the Infobox, however... --IJBall (talk) 17:57, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Results

[edit]
Election map

According to this map California and Texas elected three Democrats and four Republicans, respectively. However, in the table it is just the other way round? --Furfur Diskussion 16:43, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 1870 and 1871 United States House of Representatives elections's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "directory1869":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 22:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1788 and 1789 United States House of Representatives elections which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:19, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]