Talk:7th Lok Sabha

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 7th Lok Sabha article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

India: History / Politics High‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as High-importance).

Substituting the cabinet template

please don't simply substitute the Indian cabinet template. if you want to replace it with a simple wikitable, that's fine, but substituting it leaves a mess. Frietjes (talk) 15:30, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's not an adequate description. What do you mean by "mess"? And why should the parent template not be used? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:31, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

consistency, see 15th Lok Sabha for example. Frietjes (talk) 15:33, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That is also not an adequate explanation; please be more specific. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:37, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]