Talk:5 euro note: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
GA Granted |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GA|22:52, 27 November 2011 (UTC)|topic=Economics and business|page=}} |
|||
{{GA nominee|17:22, 18 November 2011 (UTC)|nominator=– <span style="background-color:lime;color:green;">Plarem</span> <sup>([[User:Plarem|User]] [[User talk:Plarem|talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Plarem|contribs]])</sup>|page=1|subtopic=Economics and business|status=|note=}} |
|||
{{Numismaticnotice|class=B|importance=Mid}} |
{{Numismaticnotice|class=B|importance=Mid}} |
||
{{European Union|class=B|importance=Low}} |
{{European Union|class=B|importance=Low}} |
Revision as of 22:52, 27 November 2011
5 euro note has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 27, 2011. |
Numismatics B‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |