Talk:Class (knowledge representation): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 18:26, 12 January 2024

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cognitive science Unassessed (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Libraries Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Relationship between other class articles

I would try to conceptualise the `class` Wikipedia articles as : Class (knowledge representation) uses Class (set theory); and Class (computer science) implements Class (knowledge representation). Does that seem reasonable? John Vandenberg ^(chat) 23:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Proposal

Could we merge Class (philosophy) with this article? They describe the same things and the other article barely has references. @TomT0m @Fgnievinski @Bruceanthro @Phrygas Lectrician1 (talk) 19:35, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Class (philosophy) contains important flaws - it does not adequately distinguish class, type, set, kind. I'll offer an edit. Phrygas (talk) 18:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 19:35, 9 January 2024 edit Lectrician1 (talk \| contribs) 466 edits →‎Merge Proposal: new section Tag: New topic ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:26, 12 January 2024 edit undo Phrygas (talk \| contribs) 84 edits →‎Merge Proposal: Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Could we merge [[Class (philosophy)]] with this article? They describe the same things and the other article barely has references. @[[User:TomT0m\|TomT0m]] @[[User:Fgnievinski\|Fgnievinski]] @[[User:Bruceanthro\|Bruceanthro]] @[[User:Phrygas\|Phrygas]] [[User:Lectrician1\|Lectrician1]] ([[User talk:Lectrician1\|talk]]) 19:35, 9 January 2024 (UTC)		Could we merge [[Class (philosophy)]] with this article? They describe the same things and the other article barely has references. @[[User:TomT0m\|TomT0m]] @[[User:Fgnievinski\|Fgnievinski]] @[[User:Bruceanthro\|Bruceanthro]] @[[User:Phrygas\|Phrygas]] [[User:Lectrician1\|Lectrician1]] ([[User talk:Lectrician1\|talk]]) 19:35, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

			:The article Class (philosophy) contains important flaws - it does not adequately distinguish class, type, set, kind. I'll offer an edit. [[User:Phrygas\|Phrygas]] ([[User talk:Phrygas\|talk]]) 18:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC)