[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Talk:Amirante Islands: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
m Substing templates: {{WikiProject Seychelles}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.
m bot malfunctioning
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Africa|class=|importance=|Seychelles=yes|Seychelles-importance=}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Africa|importance=|Seychelles=yes|Seychelles-importance=}}
{{WikiProject Islands}}
{{WikiProject Islands}}
}}
{{Vital article|topic=Geography|subpage=Physical|level=5|class=}}

==Untitled==
I'm thinking of making 13 separate articles for the individual atolls, islands, etc., moving the information in the respective paragraphs of this articles to the new respective articles, and linking to the new articles from the table entries (actually, the [[Desroches]] article already existed, and I already copied information from the paragraph to the article). Whoever thinks this is not a good idea please respond here.[[User:Ratzer|Ratzer]] 12:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm thinking of making 13 separate articles for the individual atolls, islands, etc., moving the information in the respective paragraphs of this articles to the new respective articles, and linking to the new articles from the table entries (actually, the [[Desroches]] article already existed, and I already copied information from the paragraph to the article). Whoever thinks this is not a good idea please respond here.[[User:Ratzer|Ratzer]] 12:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC)



Latest revision as of 16:20, 2 April 2024

Untitled

[edit]

I'm thinking of making 13 separate articles for the individual atolls, islands, etc., moving the information in the respective paragraphs of this articles to the new respective articles, and linking to the new articles from the table entries (actually, the Desroches article already existed, and I already copied information from the paragraph to the article). Whoever thinks this is not a good idea please respond here.Ratzer 12:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that the articles were deleted, and I am therefore taking the liberty of removing the useless links --Maurice45 (talk) 14:31, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I see there are 3 links on this. Given the guidelines suggest multiple links are undesirable when an index page is available is there a good reason for the deep links? The whole lot are indexed at http://www.botany.hawaii.edu/faculty/duffy/atoll.htm which seems a valid link, I know it means people will have to explore for themselves but given the difficulty in finding that index from the linked articles despite it's obvious worth and EL policy it seems preferable to the multi-links adding up. Caomhin (talk) 08:14, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]