[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Talk:Gold reserves of the United Kingdom: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by I Hate Banner adds - "→‎1940 figure: new section"
Line 5: Line 5:
The figure for 1940 seems to be an order of magnitude bigger than the numbers before and after, but the 1945 figure is shown as an increase over 1940.
The figure for 1940 seems to be an order of magnitude bigger than the numbers before and after, but the 1945 figure is shown as an increase over 1940.
Does someone have the correct figure? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:I Hate Banner adds|I Hate Banner adds]] ([[User talk:I Hate Banner adds#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/I Hate Banner adds|contribs]]) 16:56, 24 August 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Does someone have the correct figure? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:I Hate Banner adds|I Hate Banner adds]] ([[User talk:I Hate Banner adds#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/I Hate Banner adds|contribs]]) 16:56, 24 August 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:It does look odd. I've checked the references and it is the figure which is published in [https://famguardian.org/subjects/moneybanking/federalreserve/centralbankgoldreserves.pdf here] on page 17. So if it is a typo, its not a transcription error from the reference to WP. Thinking logically, with a little speculation, it could simply be a case that the UK was buying lots of gold in order to finance the war. The government was issuing [[War Bonds]] in the form of the [[National Savings Movement]] which by 1946 was raising £105,000 per week from ordinary citizens. Therefore funds may have been put into gold as a tradable commodity, would be interesting to find out and if true tie the two articles together. But it would mean doing a little research to prove either way. [[User:ThinkingTwice|<font color="darkgreen" face="comic sans ms">'''ThinkingTwice'''</font>]] <sup>''[[Special:Contributions/ThinkingTwice|contribs]] &#124; [[User talk:ThinkingTwice|talk]]''</sup> 17:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:33, 24 August 2017

WikiProject iconNumismatics: British currency Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the British currency task force (assessed as High-importance).

1940 figure

The figure for 1940 seems to be an order of magnitude bigger than the numbers before and after, but the 1945 figure is shown as an increase over 1940. Does someone have the correct figure? — Preceding unsigned comment added by I Hate Banner adds (talkcontribs) 16:56, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It does look odd. I've checked the references and it is the figure which is published in here on page 17. So if it is a typo, its not a transcription error from the reference to WP. Thinking logically, with a little speculation, it could simply be a case that the UK was buying lots of gold in order to finance the war. The government was issuing War Bonds in the form of the National Savings Movement which by 1946 was raising £105,000 per week from ordinary citizens. Therefore funds may have been put into gold as a tradable commodity, would be interesting to find out and if true tie the two articles together. But it would mean doing a little research to prove either way. ThinkingTwice contribs | talk 17:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]