[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Talk:Graph (abstract data type): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
:: i think not. BUT! rename it to something like *applications* of graph theory in CS... and make it as root to access all ADT's on wiki (for they are all graphs;). like given those constrains thing we have is tree, this one is special case of tree aka linked list, that one is forest - hash ... i'm gona do it one day [[Special:Contributions/84.16.123.194|84.16.123.194]] ([[User talk:84.16.123.194|talk]]) 11:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
:: i think not. BUT! rename it to something like *applications* of graph theory in CS... and make it as root to access all ADT's on wiki (for they are all graphs;). like given those constrains thing we have is tree, this one is special case of tree aka linked list, that one is forest - hash ... i'm gona do it one day [[Special:Contributions/84.16.123.194|84.16.123.194]] ([[User talk:84.16.123.194|talk]]) 11:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC)


: As someone who stumbled on this article searching for just an overview of graphs as a data structure, I liked the article, particularly the 'representation' section. I think the article is fine except for the last four lines, which make no sense (as a result of being copied from somewhere else?)
: As someone who stumbled on this article searching for just an overview of graphs as a data structure, I liked the article, particularly the 'representation' section. I think the article is fine except for the last four lines, which make no sense (as a result of being copied from somewhere else?) [[User:Roshangeorge|Roshangeorge]] ([[User talk:Roshangeorge|talk]]) 12:38, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:38, 30 January 2009

What's the point of this page? It is the same idea of graph as in mathematics.

It seems to be a summary of different ways of representing a graph on a computer. The title should perhaps be "Graph representation" or something like that? --P0nc 18:56, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's about graphs as a data structure in CS. However, the section for that in Graph theory sounds complete enough to me. Should they be merged?
i think not. BUT! rename it to something like *applications* of graph theory in CS... and make it as root to access all ADT's on wiki (for they are all graphs;). like given those constrains thing we have is tree, this one is special case of tree aka linked list, that one is forest - hash ... i'm gona do it one day 84.16.123.194 (talk) 11:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As someone who stumbled on this article searching for just an overview of graphs as a data structure, I liked the article, particularly the 'representation' section. I think the article is fine except for the last four lines, which make no sense (as a result of being copied from somewhere else?) Roshangeorge (talk) 12:38, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]