[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Talk:Gun violence in the United States: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 213.205.242.2 (talk) to last version by Darknipples
Line 101: Line 101:


The citation and methodology is listed here. [https://everytownresearch.org/report/methodological-note-cost-of-gun-violence/] [[User:Darknipples|DN]] ([[User talk:Darknipples|talk]]) 00:38, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
The citation and methodology is listed here. [https://everytownresearch.org/report/methodological-note-cost-of-gun-violence/] [[User:Darknipples|DN]] ([[User talk:Darknipples|talk]]) 00:38, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

== Please update with: "Firearms: the leading cause of years of potential life lost" ==

It could be added as a brief note to the lead, or to a new section such as "Deaths" that has Suicides and Homicides as subsections, or to a new section such as "Years of potential life lost" or something else or multiple of these.

It's currently featured in [[2022 in science]] like so:

<blockquote>A study uses '[[years of potential life lost]]' (YPLL) to show that firearms have become the [[List of causes of death by rate|largest co-cause]] of [[major trauma|traumatic]] death (or are associated with its causes) in the U.S. in 2017 and 2018 (1.42 M YPLL), slightly more than from motor vehicle crashes.<ref>{{cite news |title=Premature deaths from guns expose another toll of the firearms crisis |url=https://www.gpb.org/news/2022/02/23/premature-deaths-guns-expose-another-toll-of-the-firearms-crisis |access-date=16 March 2022 |work=Georgia Public Broadcasting |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Klein |first1=Joshua |last2=Prabhakaran |first2=Kartik |last3=Latifi |first3=Rifat |last4=Rhee |first4=Peter |title=Firearms: the leading cause of years of potential life lost |journal=Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open |date=1 February 2022 |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages=e000766 |doi=10.1136/tsaco-2021-000766 |language=en |issn=2397-5776}}</ref> One year earlier, a study suggested the global 'mean loss of life expectancy' (LLE) from all forms of direct violence is about 0.3 years, while [[air pollution]] accounts for about 2.9 years.<ref name="10.1093/cvr/cvaa025">{{cite journal |last1=Lelieveld |first1=Jos |last2=Pozzer |first2=Andrea |last3=Pöschl |first3=Ulrich |last4=Fnais |first4=Mohammed |last5=Haines |first5=Andy |last6=Münzel |first6=Thomas |title=Loss of life expectancy from air pollution compared to other risk factors: a worldwide perspective |journal=Cardiovascular Research |date=1 September 2020 |volume=116 |issue=11 |pages=1910–1917 |doi=10.1093/cvr/cvaa025 |pmid=32123898 |pmc=7449554 |issn=0008-6363}}</ref>
</blockquote>

For comparison and to prevent addition of text that makes it seem like it's leading cause of YPLL in total (especially because the study's title seems to be wrong): according to the table in the YPLL article, cancer caused 8.6 M YPLL in 2006.

{{reflist-talk}} [[User:Prototyperspective|Prototyperspective]] ([[User talk:Prototyperspective|talk]]) 20:33, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:33, 24 March 2022

Former good articleGun violence in the United States was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 14, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
November 30, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 9, 2007Good article nomineeListed
October 1, 2007Good article reassessmentKept
June 25, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
April 6, 2015Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 12, 2006.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that at nearly seventy percent, the rate of homicides in the United States involving gun violence is significantly higher than that of other developed countries?
Current status: Delisted good article


Out of date source, can someone see if there's something more recent? I have no database access.

Last sentence before the "Homicide" section heading: this source is over 30 years old. It begs the question as to the accuracy of this data and the intent behind choosing this source. There must be something more recent available; possibly one that accounts for income/poverty as well as guns in the home. Can anyone help out?

The risk of someone attempting suicide is also 4.8 times greater if they are exposed to a firearm on a regular basis; for example, in the home.[1] CALESCiENCE (talk) 19:00, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Kellermann, Arthur L; Reay, Donald T (1986). "Protection or Peril?". New England Journal of Medicine. 314 (24): 1557–60. doi:10.1056/NEJM198606123142406. PMID 3713749.

Also:

The most common type of gun confiscated by police and traced by the ATF are .38 special revolvers, such as this Smith & Wesson Model 60 .38 Special revolver with a 3-inch barrel

(my emphasis). The source for this was, we're told, published in 1994. -- Hoary (talk) 02:02, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 2 June 2019

The last paragraph of the "Mass shootings" section has an irrelevant fact that has nothing to do with supporting the section or article whatsoever, and should be removed. It is entirely sensational and should not be in a Wikipedia article.

For reference the line is, "Between Jan. 1 and May 18, 2018, 31 students and teachers were killed inside U.S. schools. That exceeds the number of U.S. military servicemembers who died in combat and noncombat roles during the same period." ArchangelJW (talk) 09:07, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. MrClog (talk) 18:05, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New addition to intervention programs?

In 2016, Chicago saw a 58% increase in homicides.[1] In response to the spike in gun violence, a group of foundations and social service agencies created the Rapid Employment and Development Initiative (READI) Chicago.[2] A Heartland Alliance program,[3] READI Chicago targets those most at risk of being involved in gun violence – either as perpetrator or a victim.[4] Individuals are provided with 18 months of transitional jobs, cognitive behavioral therapy and legal and social services.[5] Individuals are also provided with 6 months of support as they transition to full-time employment at the end of the 18 months.[6] The University of Chicago Crime Lab is evaluating READI Chicago’s impact on gun violence reduction.[7] The evaluation, expected to be completed in Spring 2021, is showing early signs of success.[8] Eddie Bocanegra, senior directer of READI Chicago, hopes that the early success of READI Chicago will result in funding from the City of Chicago.[9] Drax Gon Give It To Ya (talk) 17:18, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Gun Violence in Chicago, 2016" (PDF). University of Chicago Urban Labs.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  2. ^ Rosenberg, Tina (2018-05-15). "Opinion | Want to Quit the Gang Life? Try This Job On". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2019-11-28.
  3. ^ Sweeney, Annie. "In hopes of stopping bloodshed, a multimillion-dollar effort is providing jobs, therapy to city's most violent". chicagotribune.com. Retrieved 2019-11-28.
  4. ^ "Radical New Program Finds Men Most Likely To Be Shot — And Hires Them". Block Club Chicago. Retrieved 2019-11-28.
  5. ^ "Radical New Program Finds Men Most Likely To Be Shot — And Hires Them". Block Club Chicago. Retrieved 2019-11-28.
  6. ^ "Radical New Program Finds Men Most Likely To Be Shot — And Hires Them". Block Club Chicago. Retrieved 2019-11-28.
  7. ^ Smith, Patrick. "A Pricey Effort To Employ Men Most Likely To Shoot Or Be Shot". WBEZ. Retrieved 2019-11-28.
  8. ^ Smith, Patrick. "UChicago Touts Early Numbers On Anti-Violence Program". WBEZ. Retrieved 2019-11-28.
  9. ^ Smith, Patrick. "A Pricey Effort To Employ Men Most Likely To Shoot Or Be Shot". WBEZ. Retrieved 2019-11-28.

Could including the movie be OK? It is an extremely effective way of fighging the National Rifle Association - what is the group that has a anti-gun bias on Wikipedia? Infinitepeace (talk) 03:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 stats

[1] These numbers are much higher than the ones in the wiki article, which are older. 2601:648:8200:970:0:0:0:1A5F (talk) 05:27, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Everytown.org as a Reliable Source

The citation and methodology is listed here. [2] DN (talk) 00:38, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please update with: "Firearms: the leading cause of years of potential life lost"

It could be added as a brief note to the lead, or to a new section such as "Deaths" that has Suicides and Homicides as subsections, or to a new section such as "Years of potential life lost" or something else or multiple of these.

It's currently featured in 2022 in science like so:

A study uses 'years of potential life lost' (YPLL) to show that firearms have become the largest co-cause of traumatic death (or are associated with its causes) in the U.S. in 2017 and 2018 (1.42 M YPLL), slightly more than from motor vehicle crashes.[1][2] One year earlier, a study suggested the global 'mean loss of life expectancy' (LLE) from all forms of direct violence is about 0.3 years, while air pollution accounts for about 2.9 years.[3]

For comparison and to prevent addition of text that makes it seem like it's leading cause of YPLL in total (especially because the study's title seems to be wrong): according to the table in the YPLL article, cancer caused 8.6 M YPLL in 2006.

References

  1. ^ "Premature deaths from guns expose another toll of the firearms crisis". Georgia Public Broadcasting. Retrieved 16 March 2022.
  2. ^ Klein, Joshua; Prabhakaran, Kartik; Latifi, Rifat; Rhee, Peter (1 February 2022). "Firearms: the leading cause of years of potential life lost". Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open. 7 (1): e000766. doi:10.1136/tsaco-2021-000766. ISSN 2397-5776.
  3. ^ Lelieveld, Jos; Pozzer, Andrea; Pöschl, Ulrich; Fnais, Mohammed; Haines, Andy; Münzel, Thomas (1 September 2020). "Loss of life expectancy from air pollution compared to other risk factors: a worldwide perspective". Cardiovascular Research. 116 (11): 1910–1917. doi:10.1093/cvr/cvaa025. ISSN 0008-6363. PMC 7449554. PMID 32123898.

Prototyperspective (talk) 20:33, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]