Talk:Economy of India under the British Raj: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:04, 25 February 2009

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pakistan Stub‑class

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I see that Fowler's unproposed and undiscussed move of this article from Economy of British India to Economy of India under the British Raj, and the unlinking of British India in the lead, follows my referring to the page at Talk:British India. But what is the article to be about? Clearly, British India had an economy, but did the whole of India, including the Princely states, have a single economy? Xn4 (talk) 00:44, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Google gives 1890 hits for "Economy of British India" but none for "Economy of India under the British Raj". I see Fowler has also created a new page with the even more comical title of Economy of India under Company rule, clearly seeking to pre-empt the obvious point that Economy of India under the British Raj can't deal with the years before 1858. Clearly Economy of India under Company rule can only refer to British India, as the Company ruled nothing else. Xn4 (talk) 01:04, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 00:44, 25 February 2009 edit Xn4 (talk \| contribs) 24,128 edits question ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:04, 25 February 2009 edit undo Xn4 (talk \| contribs) 24,128 edits question (2) Next edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:

	I see that Fowler's unproposed and undiscussed move of this article from [[Economy of British India]] to [[Economy of India under the British Raj]], and the unlinking of [[British India]] in the lead, follows my referring to the page at [[Talk:British India]]. But what is the article to be about? Clearly, British India had an economy, but did the whole of India, including the [[Princely state]]s, have a single economy? [[User:Xn4\|<span style="color:#9911DD">Xn4</span>]] ([[User talk:Xn4\|<span style="color:#9911DD">talk</span>]]) 00:44, 25 February 2009 (UTC)		I see that Fowler's unproposed and undiscussed move of this article from [[Economy of British India]] to [[Economy of India under the British Raj]], and the unlinking of [[British India]] in the lead, follows my referring to the page at [[Talk:British India]]. But what is the article to be about? Clearly, British India had an economy, but did the whole of India, including the [[Princely state]]s, have a single economy? [[User:Xn4\|<span style="color:#9911DD">Xn4</span>]] ([[User talk:Xn4\|<span style="color:#9911DD">talk</span>]]) 00:44, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

			:Google gives 1890 hits for "Economy of British India" but none for "Economy of India under the British Raj". I see Fowler has also created a new page with the even more comical title of [[Economy of India under Company rule]], clearly seeking to pre-empt the obvious point that [[Economy of India under the British Raj]] can't deal with the years before 1858. Clearly [[Economy of India under Company rule]] can only refer to British India, as the Company ruled nothing else. [[User:Xn4\|<span style="color:#9911DD">Xn4</span>]] ([[User talk:Xn4\|<span style="color:#9911DD">talk</span>]]) 01:04, 25 February 2009 (UTC)