[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Talk:Edenton Tea Party: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Yobot (talk | contribs)
m Tagging for WikiProject Women's History phase 1 using AWB (11766)
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Food and drink}}, {{WikiProject United States}}, {{WikiProject United States History}}, {{WikiProject Women's History}}.
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Merged-from|Penelope Barker|20 March 2023}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Food and drink|drink=Yes|class=Start|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{WikiProject United States|class=Start|importance=Low|NC=Yes|NC-importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Food and drink|drink=Yes|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject United States History|class=Start|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|NC=Yes|NC-importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Women's History|class=Start|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject United States History|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Women's History|importance=Low}}
}}
}}
{{DYK talk|5 September|2009|{{*mp}}... that the '''[[Edenton Tea Party]]''' was one of the first instances of political activism by women in the [[Thirteen Colonies]]?}}
{{DYK talk|5 September|2009|... that the '''[[Edenton Tea Party]]''' was one of the first instances of political activism by women in the [[Thirteen Colonies]]?}}

== Merge articles ==

I have expanded the [[Penelope Barker]] article and there's more content about the Tea Party, what led up to it, and the aftermath.

It may be wise to merge content from [[Penelope Barker#Womens' protest against the British]] into this article... or merge it all into one article with a Redirect for Edenton Tea Party to [[Penelope Barker#Womens' protest against the British]].

Do either of these make sense? Something else?–[[User:CaroleHenson|CaroleHenson]] ([[User talk:CaroleHenson|talk]]) 08:08, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
:{{done}} I merged content from this article to [[Edenton Tea Party]] in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Edenton_Tea_Party&oldid=1145734346 this edit].–[[User:CaroleHenson|CaroleHenson]] ([[User talk:CaroleHenson|talk]]) 18:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

== Penelope Barker quotation about tea parties ==

The quotation by Penelope Barker supposedly "said at the time" she sent the statement to London rings ''incredibly'' false. It's not in an 18th-century idiom at all, it does not approach men's & women's relationship in society in the way that any contemporary writers do (including women who openly share their political views, like Abigail Adams, Mercy Otis Warren & Hannah Winthrop), and--critically--it refers to tea protests as "tea parties," something which didn't start happening until a hundred years later. It's cited to the National Women's History Museum's biography of Barker, which in fact makes no mention of the quote. I am removing the quote (and correcting the NWHM's URL) until someone can provide an ''ironclad'' citation for it. [[User:Binabik80|Binabik80]] ([[User talk:Binabik80|talk]]) 16:14, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:33, 17 January 2024

Merge articles

[edit]

I have expanded the Penelope Barker article and there's more content about the Tea Party, what led up to it, and the aftermath.

It may be wise to merge content from Penelope Barker#Womens' protest against the British into this article... or merge it all into one article with a Redirect for Edenton Tea Party to Penelope Barker#Womens' protest against the British.

Do either of these make sense? Something else?–CaroleHenson (talk) 08:08, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I merged content from this article to Edenton Tea Party in this edit.–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Penelope Barker quotation about tea parties

[edit]

The quotation by Penelope Barker supposedly "said at the time" she sent the statement to London rings incredibly false. It's not in an 18th-century idiom at all, it does not approach men's & women's relationship in society in the way that any contemporary writers do (including women who openly share their political views, like Abigail Adams, Mercy Otis Warren & Hannah Winthrop), and--critically--it refers to tea protests as "tea parties," something which didn't start happening until a hundred years later. It's cited to the National Women's History Museum's biography of Barker, which in fact makes no mention of the quote. I am removing the quote (and correcting the NWHM's URL) until someone can provide an ironclad citation for it. Binabik80 (talk) 16:14, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]