Talk:Features new to Windows 10: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:47, 9 May 2016

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Microsoft Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Should this article only be about the RTM version of Windows 10?

Windows 10 is being updated continuously with major new features being introduced even before the first year since release has passed. If Windows 10 is the last major version of Windows, this means new features will keep rolling in, making this article become ambiguous. It will be hard to determine which feature was actually new to Windows 10. I suggest we limit this article for only the RTM version of Windows 10. We have another article for subsequent releases of Windows 10 in the Windows 10 version history page.

What are your thoughts? --NazmusLabs (A small part of a bigger movement to better the world!) (talk) 22:45, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think a better way of organising it is to structure this article to contain information of features new to each build in order (TH1, TH2, Redstone 1, etc.) and then remove that information from the version history article so that the version history article can be focus on individual builds (10240, 10586, etc.). 115.188.97.88 (talk) 21:19, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good idea. We need more input form other users before taking definitive action NazmusLabs (A small part of a bigger movement to better the world!) (talk) 01:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It is too soon discuss stuff like this. This article is tiny; 8938 bytes of readable prose size only. (See WP:SIZERULE.) And it is missing a whole lot of info too. (See the tag on top of it.) So, no! Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 15:39, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose you're right, this is kind of a small article with a lot of missing info tbat should be tackled before any major reorganisation. Just putting an idea out there! 115.188.119.161 (talk) 19:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 15:39, 9 May 2016 edit Codename Lisa (talk \| contribs) 55,077 edits →‎Should this article only be about the RTM version of Windows 10?: re ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:47, 9 May 2016 edit undo 115.188.119.161 (talk) →‎Should this article only be about the RTM version of Windows 10? Next edit →
Line 13:		Line 13:

	:Hi. It is too soon discuss stuff like this. This article is tiny; 8938 bytes of readable prose size only. (See [[WP:SIZERULE]].) And it is missing a whole lot of info too. (See the tag on top of it.) So, no! Best regards, [[User:Codename Lisa\|Codename Lisa]] ([[User talk:Codename Lisa\|talk]]) 15:39, 9 May 2016 (UTC)		:Hi. It is too soon discuss stuff like this. This article is tiny; 8938 bytes of readable prose size only. (See [[WP:SIZERULE]].) And it is missing a whole lot of info too. (See the tag on top of it.) So, no! Best regards, [[User:Codename Lisa\|Codename Lisa]] ([[User talk:Codename Lisa\|talk]]) 15:39, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

			::I suppose you're right, this is kind of a small article with a lot of missing info tbat should be tackled before any major reorganisation. Just putting an idea out there! [[Special:Contributions/115.188.119.161\|115.188.119.161]] ([[User talk:115.188.119.161\|talk]]) 19:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)