Talk:Firefox Portable: Difference between revisions

Redirect

This shouldn't redirect to Mozilla Firefox directly... should it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.235.8.2 (talk • contribs)

No, the redirect feature is misused enough as it is, if it redircts there then we would have to add a section there exlaining the differences.... Who would wanna type all that just to goto and article that says Firefox? RealG187 16:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Where are the cookies stored?

Perhaps the article could be more clear on the fact cookies are stored on the USB drive instead of the host computer, so that the end user does not need to "clear private data" on each and every exit? The whole point of having a portable browser is to carry your forum passwords/memberships with you, without having to relogin everywhere you go. Automatically deleting private data on each and every exit sort of defeats the purpose, doesn't it? 87.101.51.81 17:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Use of Firefox logo

My understanding is that this is not software from Mozilla, and so is not allowed to use the Firefox logo. I checked the Mozilla Firefox - Portable Edition website, and it also uses the logo, but appears to be a 3rd party build. I've removed the Firefox logo (contained in the TOC) from the other 3rs party build articles, but NOT here, being as it is used on the website. Please could someone check this. This is a Trademark issue that Mozilla are strict about.

In particular: I've removed Firefox logo from non Firefox / Mozilla software page - see Template_talk:Firefox_TOC, image allows use only if "It is non-confusing and non-disparaging;" Image:Firefox_logo_305x150.png) I would say that usage on a non official build is confusing (and I know they don't normally allow it to be included in 3rd party builds). Widefox 00:59, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Firefox Portable does use official builds from Mozilla. It is Firefox, but it just doesn't need to be installed (thanks to the launcher) and it's very useful for people with Flash drives. --AlexJohnc3 ^(talk) 16:57, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

It also notes on the Firefox Portable page that "Mozilla®, Firefox® and the Firefox logo are registered trademarks of the Mozilla Foundation and are used with permission." Mozilla gave permission for the use of these logos in this package.

Life of Flash Drive

It says enabling history, cache, etc will redice the life of a flash drive. Do flash drives stop working after you write them so many times? RealG187 16:34, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

NAND Flash chips have a limited write cycle life but so does every medium available. Flash chips have a typical write life of ~100,000 writes in most cases, and given that nearly ALL flash controllers in USB drives do wear leveling, this is not ever going to impact anyone before the drive itself simply stops working. It would be years before any problems occurred even if you write to the drive constantly. Mrsteveman1 10:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:FirfoxPortableTemp.PNG

Image:FirfoxPortableTemp.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:08, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Drive life

Perhaps someone could provide an actual source that explains the implications of running a browser or other app off of a flash drive or other portable device. It would probably be a good idea to use such data in the creation of a section detailing this implications. After all it is the reason the package was created.--Oni Ookami Alfador^Talk|@ 19:22, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

what licensing got to do with this?

"(Firefox Portable's ability to delete cookies and the download history on exit is not enabled by default as per a licensing agreement with Mozilla)"

Why did they require that those features be like that? shouldn't there be a citation or somthing? --TiagoTiago (talk) 23:17, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

The settings actually mimic the standard Firefox settings on the desktop by default with the exception of ones that specifically help portable users without impacting functionality too badly. Specifically, disk cache is disabled (it makes Firefox run slower from flash devices), check for default browser is disabled (obvious), etc. As a user you can do additional things like set it to disable cookies or history, but those options are not on by default. And all option changes are reviewed with Mozilla as per our licensing agreement with them. CritterNYC (talk) 05:09, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Notability

I see the notice concerning notability of Firefox Portable. It is notable as it is one of the two flagship applications of the portableapps website, and in fact Portable Firefox is used often in universities (where students use Windows computers that are not their own). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dotancohen (talk • contribs) 18:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Virus

I went to the download link, avast Antivirus aborted the install since it came bundled with the Virtumonde virus —Preceding unsigned comment added by IlllllllllIlllllllllIff (talk • contribs) 15:22, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

It's a false positive, it's the way the program is compressed, even if it was a virus or a known issue, this would be original research and can't be used on this article. Antonio López ^(desu) 01:50, 16 July 2009 (UTC)