[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Talk:Imagery analysis: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
This article is base on my training, open-sourced information and my experience with the technologies covered in the article.
This article is base on my training, open-sourced information and my experience with the technologies
covered in the article.


If there are retired IA's and technicians involved with the development of these technologies, feel free in adding dates and details in order to provide more exact information in this article. If you have questions or comments, feel free to join right in.
If there are retired IA's and technicians involved with the development of these technologies, feel
free in adding dates and details in order to provide more exact information in this article. If you have
questions or comments, feel free to join right in.
[[User:Radical man 7|Radical man 7]] 04:30, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
[[User:Radical man 7|Radical man 7]] 04:30, 5 January 2007 (UTC)


As I mentioned in the article, many details related to the development, use and analysis have their origin in the history of military intelligence, and are pretty close to impossible to confirm. When an author publishes a book on a given subject, he has to back up his subject matter with open-source information and the insight provided by a specialist or eye-witness.
As I mentioned in the article, many details related to the development, use and analysis have their origin
in the history of military intelligence, and are pretty close to impossible to confirm. When an author
publishes a book on a given subject, he has to back up his subject matter with open-source information and the
insight provided by a specialist or eye-witness.
The book is only as good as the research.
The book is only as good as the research.

My training, exposure and experience in the intelligence field, the imaging technologies and actual staffwork at different levels
My training, exposure and experience in the intelligence field, the imaging technologies and actual staffwork
places me as such an expert. The few references mentioned in the article are readily verified in encyclopedia articles of the time.
at different levels places me as such an expert. The few references mentioned in the article are readily verified
The importance, use and participation of eye-witnesses is both included and encouraged. [[User:Radical man 7|Radical man 7]] 00:13, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
in encyclopedia articles of the time.
The importance, use and participation of eye-witnesses is both included and encouraged.
[[User:Radical man 7|Radical man 7]] 00:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:16, 7 January 2007

   This article is base on my training, open-sourced information and my experience with the technologies 

covered in the article.

   If there are retired IA's and technicians involved with the development of these technologies, feel
free in adding dates and details in order to provide more exact information in this article. If you have
questions or comments, feel free to join right in.

Radical man 7 04:30, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  As I mentioned in the article, many details related to the development, use and analysis have their origin

in the history of military intelligence, and are pretty close to impossible to confirm. When an author publishes a book on a given subject, he has to back up his subject matter with open-source information and the insight provided by a specialist or eye-witness.

  The book is only as good as the research.
  My training, exposure and experience in the intelligence field, the imaging technologies and actual staffwork

at different levels places me as such an expert. The few references mentioned in the article are readily verified in encyclopedia articles of the time.

  The importance, use and participation of eye-witnesses is both included and encouraged.

Radical man 7 00:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]