[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Talk:Imagery analysis: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Sthomson06 (talk | contribs)
Page move
Sthomson06 (talk | contribs)
Line 14: Line 14:
The importance, use and participation of eye-witnesses is both included and encouraged.
The importance, use and participation of eye-witnesses is both included and encouraged.
[[User:Radical man 7|Radical man 7]] 04:43, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
[[User:Radical man 7|Radical man 7]] 04:43, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[[WP:NOT|Wikipedia is not]] the place for unpublished research. Please see my comment on your talk page. -[[User:Sthomson06|sthomson06]] ([[User talk:Sthomson06|Talk]]) 15:55, 25 January 2007 (UTC)


== Page move ==
== Page move ==

Revision as of 15:55, 25 January 2007

   This article is base on my training, open-sourced information and my experience with

the technologies covered in the article.

   If there are retired IA's and technicians involved with the development of these 

technologies, feel free in adding dates and details in order to provide more exact information in this article. If you have questions or comments, feel free to join right in. Radical man 7 04:30, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  As I mentioned in the article, many details related to the development, use and analysis have their origin

in the history of military intelligence, and are pretty close to impossible to confirm. When an author publishes a book on a given subject, he has to back up his subject matter with open-source information and the insight provided by a specialist or eye-witness. The book is only as good as the research.

  My training, exposure and experience in the intelligence field, the imaging technologies and actual staffwork

at different levels places me as such an expert. The few references mentioned in the article are readily verified in encyclopedia articles of the time.

  The importance, use and participation of eye-witnesses is both included and encouraged.

Radical man 7 04:43, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not the place for unpublished research. Please see my comment on your talk page. -sthomson06 (Talk) 15:55, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

I moved the page from Imagery Analysis to Imagery analysis to comply with the convention on article names. -sthomson06 (Talk) 15:52, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]