[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Talk:Pizza theorem: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Rating article for WikiProject Mathematics. Quality: Start / Priority: Low / Field: geometry (script assisted)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{maths rating|field=geometry|quality=|priority=low}}
{{maths rating|class=Start|priority=Low|field=geometry}}

{{dyktalk|24 December|2009|{{*mp}}... that, according to the '''[[pizza theorem]]''', a [[disk (mathematics)|circular]] [[pizza]] that is sliced off-center into eight equal-angled wedges can still be [[fair division|divided equally]] between two people?}}
{{dyktalk|24 December|2009|{{*mp}}... that, according to the '''[[pizza theorem]]''', a [[disk (mathematics)|circular]] [[pizza]] that is sliced off-center into eight equal-angled wedges can still be [[fair division|divided equally]] between two people?}}



Revision as of 02:27, 1 February 2010

WikiProject iconMathematics Start‑class Low‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Illustration

The only request I have for this otherwise delicious article is that the illustration be rendered in less hectic colours. Grey and white, say. Thore Husfeldt (talk) 19:23, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I think some amount of color is not bad but it should be more muted. The illustration should be redone in svg format in any case. It would probably also be worth checking with someone color-blind whether the colors of the illustration can be distinguished from each other (though if one is significantly darker than the other, that shouldn't be a problem). We could combine both the eight and twelve sector subdivisions into a single side-by-side image and save a lot of space; perhaps we could use the saved space to add a picture of some actual pizza (there are plenty on commons: commons:Category:Pizza). —David Eppstein (talk) 19:59, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Here is a grey-and-white SVG version. — Miym (talk) 20:00, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Two different versions. — Miym (talk) 20:14, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually personally I prefer a (somewhat) colored version though it doesn't have to be the current colors. As far as as additional pictures are concerned the article currently has enough text allowing us to add some without causing an unpleasant layout, therefore i think there is no need to combine pictures for saving space. Aside from an additional real pizza picture we possibly could an illustration for some generalizations as well. I will upload some SVG-version later on (in particular for the 12 sector case that is still missing). Another option might be to add numbers to the illustrations as well, then the illustrations will be more in sync with numbering scheme used in the article.--Kmhkmh (talk) 23:08, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The green and blue areas in the second example are not equal: the angles are not equal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.137.59.41 (talk) 11:59, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will the replace the pictures soon by excactly computed ones.--Kmhkmh (talk) 13:20, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The colors on the blue-green one were at least calmer, but I undid that change because of its geometric inaccuracy. I don't think the purple-yellow one is any less hectic than the orange-green. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:09, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]