[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Talk:Road signs in the United States: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 1095516634 by 2601:C6:C580:6B20:B028:EFB8:F80B:2A2B (talk) We're not doing this again. Keep it in the archives.
Tags: Undo Reverted
Tags: Reverted New topic
Line 20: Line 20:
:::So the only removal would be location specific items? I think the MUTCD tries to state the usual items first and then unique situations are either stated afterwards or in the supplement documents. I guess I could wait until the draft is made for comments. – [[User:The Grid|<span style="color:navy">The Grid</span>]] ([[User talk:The Grid|<span style="color:navy">talk</span>]]) 14:06, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
:::So the only removal would be location specific items? I think the MUTCD tries to state the usual items first and then unique situations are either stated afterwards or in the supplement documents. I guess I could wait until the draft is made for comments. – [[User:The Grid|<span style="color:navy">The Grid</span>]] ([[User talk:The Grid|<span style="color:navy">talk</span>]]) 14:06, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
::::The cleanup has been done by [[User:Fredddie]], already. No more location specific signs! [[Special:Contributions/2601:C6:C580:6B20:895B:1CAF:7E5F:742|2601:C6:C580:6B20:895B:1CAF:7E5F:742]] ([[User talk:2601:C6:C580:6B20:895B:1CAF:7E5F:742|talk]]) 23:32, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
::::The cleanup has been done by [[User:Fredddie]], already. No more location specific signs! [[Special:Contributions/2601:C6:C580:6B20:895B:1CAF:7E5F:742|2601:C6:C580:6B20:895B:1CAF:7E5F:742]] ([[User talk:2601:C6:C580:6B20:895B:1CAF:7E5F:742|talk]]) 23:32, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

== Using MUTCD language ==

I would like this page to be very close to the MUTCD. Does anyone agree? [[Special:Contributions/50.241.14.29|50.241.14.29]] ([[User talk:50.241.14.29|talk]]) 21:12, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:12, 21 July 2022

WikiProject iconU.S. Roads List‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on the project's quality scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article does not require a map.
 
WikiProject iconCivil engineering List‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Page cleanup?

I'd like to gauge the interest of removing location-specific images and only have images found in the national MUTCD. The MUTCD is inherently flexible, so it's not necessary to list every example. I would not be against creating Road signs in X pages for those locations that have their own manuals. –Fredddie 19:30, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the cleanup. There's a reason why there's a supplement specifically for signage. There's also a new edition expected next year. There's just going to be more examples to use. (For instance, RRFBs will definitely be added) – The Grid (talk) 02:48, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia editors at large are very good at creating exhaustive lists of instances rather than explaining why anything does anything. This article doesn't explain the importance of sign shape and color at all! I suppose I'll start a draft and see where it goes. –Fredddie 03:11, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So the only removal would be location specific items? I think the MUTCD tries to state the usual items first and then unique situations are either stated afterwards or in the supplement documents. I guess I could wait until the draft is made for comments. – The Grid (talk) 14:06, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The cleanup has been done by User:Fredddie, already. No more location specific signs! 2601:C6:C580:6B20:895B:1CAF:7E5F:742 (talk) 23:32, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Using MUTCD language

I would like this page to be very close to the MUTCD. Does anyone agree? 50.241.14.29 (talk) 21:12, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]