Talk:Rugby railway station: Difference between revisions
delist GA |
Maltesedog (talk | contribs) why remove when its the only photo which shows the name of the station |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
{{TrainsWikiProject|UK=yes|stations=yes|class=C|importance=low|UK-importance=mid|portalSAweek=13, 2007}} |
{{TrainsWikiProject|UK=yes|stations=yes|class=C|importance=low|UK-importance=mid|portalSAweek=13, 2007}} |
||
{{WikiProject Warwickshire|class=C|importance=}} |
{{WikiProject Warwickshire|class=C|importance=}} |
||
==Removal of Picture== |
|||
I have added a photo yesterday showing Rugby station with snow. This is the only photo which clearly shows the name of the station in it. I would suggest that its removal is reconsidered. [[User:Maltesedog|Maltesedog]] ([[User talk:Maltesedog|talk]]) 08:54, 13 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
==Scissors Crossovers== |
==Scissors Crossovers== |
Revision as of 08:54, 13 December 2010
Rugby railway station was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
Trains: Stations / in UK C‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Warwickshire C‑class | ||||||||||
|
Removal of Picture
I have added a photo yesterday showing Rugby station with snow. This is the only photo which clearly shows the name of the station in it. I would suggest that its removal is reconsidered. Maltesedog (talk) 08:54, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Scissors Crossovers
Singular or Plural?
Syd1435 07:00, 2004 Nov 14 (UTC)
Good evening (GMT time); I have reviewed this article on 04:07, Thursday November 7 2024 (UTC) in accordance with the Good Article (GA) criteria. There are seven main criteria that the article must comply with to pass:
I have concluded that, in my opinion, the article has passed all categories and I therefore award it GA status. Congratulations to the lead editors, and keep up the excellent work! Kindest regards, |
GA Reassessment
- This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Rugby railway station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
At current, the article does not meet the GA criteria. The reason is that it is virtually unreferenced (criterion 2). I am therefor delisting the article. If at a later stage the article is adequately referenced, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. If there is an error in this reassessment, it can be listed at WP:GAR. Note that the GA criteria have changed since the article was approved. Arsenikk (talk) 20:25, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delisted good articles
- C-Class rail transport articles
- Low-importance rail transport articles
- C-Class Stations articles
- WikiProject Stations articles
- C-Class UK Railways articles
- Mid-importance UK Railways articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages
- C-Class WikiProject Warwickshire articles
- Unknown-importance WikiProject Warwickshire articles
- WikiProject Warwickshire articles