[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Talk:Wiki: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m off-topic
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 98: Line 98:


the third paragraph of this article, the part talking about wikipedia, sounds a little promotional to me. it mentions some extra content about wikipedia that is either not necessary, or conveyed in a way to make wikipedia sound special in some way. but i'm a student, and i don't know everything about grammar, tone, and stuff like that so idk, tell me what you guys think and if we should change it
the third paragraph of this article, the part talking about wikipedia, sounds a little promotional to me. it mentions some extra content about wikipedia that is either not necessary, or conveyed in a way to make wikipedia sound special in some way. but i'm a student, and i don't know everything about grammar, tone, and stuff like that so idk, tell me what you guys think and if we should change it

== Semi-protected edit request on 14 March 2022 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Wiki|answered=no}}
[[Special:Contributions/2600:6C40:5300:641:DD6D:846:A8DB:617A|2600:6C40:5300:641:DD6D:846:A8DB:617A]] ([[User talk:2600:6C40:5300:641:DD6D:846:A8DB:617A|talk]]) 02:20, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Rhhrehehhehdgd

Revision as of 02:20, 14 March 2022

Template:Vital article

Former good articleWiki was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day...Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 16, 2004Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 28, 2006Good article nomineeListed
June 15, 2006Good article reassessmentDelisted
August 13, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 25, 2005, March 25, 2012, and March 25, 2015.
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of May 9, 2024.
Current status: Delisted good article

"WikiText" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect WikiText. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 25#WikiText until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Antoine Legrand (talk) 12:07, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

wikitext, wiki markup and wikicode are common names!

A discussion is taking place to address the wrong spelling and/or unjustified capitalization of wikitext, wiki markup and wikicode all over Wikipedia. The discussion will occur at Help_talk:Wikitext until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

Antoine Legrand (talk) 13:45, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 September 2021

12.108.159.67 (talk) 16:35, 23 September 2021 (UTC) Hello wiki I have noticed some of your info is wrong but I Dayvonte can help you fix it.[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:40, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikiwikiwiki" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikiwikiwiki and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 30#Wikiwikiwiki until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Faster than Thunder (talk) 19:42, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(possibly) promotional paragraph

the third paragraph of this article, the part talking about wikipedia, sounds a little promotional to me. it mentions some extra content about wikipedia that is either not necessary, or conveyed in a way to make wikipedia sound special in some way. but i'm a student, and i don't know everything about grammar, tone, and stuff like that so idk, tell me what you guys think and if we should change it

Semi-protected edit request on 14 March 2022

2600:6C40:5300:641:DD6D:846:A8DB:617A (talk) 02:20, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rhhrehehhehdgd