[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Talk:Tar pit: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Wiparker (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{American English}}
{{WikiProject Geology
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
|class=Stub
|importance= mid
{{WikiProject Geology|importance=Mid}}
|attention=
|needs-infobox=
|peer-review=
|old-peer-review=
}}
}}


Line 26: Line 22:


Does anyone have any sources I could use for this? [[User:Wiparker|Wiparker]] ([[User talk:Wiparker|talk]]) 00:48, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Does anyone have any sources I could use for this? [[User:Wiparker|Wiparker]] ([[User talk:Wiparker|talk]]) 00:48, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

== Redirect or disambig needed ==

[[Tarpit]] redirects here, but there's also [[Tarpit (networking)]]. Should be findable somehow... [[User:Equinox|Equinox]] [[User_talk:Equinox|◑]] 14:53, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

== "Only the skull and parts of the skeleton" ==

" Only the skull and parts of the skeleton"
Extremely vague.

That could be anything from the skull and one vertebrae to a skull and all the other bones minus one. [[User:Robcat2075|Robcat2075]] ([[User talk:Robcat2075|talk]]) 04:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:06, 15 September 2024

Dead Sea

[edit]

The Hebrews knew tar pits. According to the Holy Bible there used to be tar pits in the vale of Siddim before there was the Dead Sea.--80.141.246.121 (talk) 22:32, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The day we start citing the Bible as a historic reference work is the day Wikipedia stops being taken even remotely seriously... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.40.46.110 (talk) 15:51, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The bible has more archaeological supporting sources than any other document has. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.226.6.204 (talk) 03:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This could be added if you made sure to clearly state that it came from the Bible. This would tell the reader that the facts came from a less reliable source then others. Wiparker (talk) 16:27, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adding content

[edit]

I was think about adding more sentences to the intro to add a description about what happens to the asphalt as it is coming to the surface. Does this make sense? Wiparker (talk) 16:21, 23 April 2012 (UTC) D[reply]

Does it make sense to add more to each section to make the definitions bigger?Wiparker (talk) 16:37, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone have any sources I could use for this? Wiparker (talk) 00:48, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect or disambig needed

[edit]

Tarpit redirects here, but there's also Tarpit (networking). Should be findable somehow... Equinox 14:53, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Only the skull and parts of the skeleton"

[edit]

" Only the skull and parts of the skeleton" Extremely vague.

That could be anything from the skull and one vertebrae to a skull and all the other bones minus one. Robcat2075 (talk) 04:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]