Talk:The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion: Difference between revisions

Reception

The reception needs to be rewritten... at least the cons section as alot is comes off as personal opinion despite there being a number of real reviewers with actual cons. Stabby Joe (talk)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070518140252/http://www.gamerevolution.com/review/xbox360/elder_scrolls_4_ to http://www.gamerevolution.com/review/xbox360/elder_scrolls_4_
• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6Eg3h6CHj?url=http://www.1up.com/features/rpg-dead to http://www.1up.com/do/feature?cId=3148996

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:44, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed merge of ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion into The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion#Rating change

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The article itself states that "the events passed by with little notice from the public at large". Overall, it seems like a "much ado about nothing" situation that can easily be summed up in several paragraphs in the main article, if that.

Ultimately, Oblivion remained extremely popular despite the M rating, and Skyrim got an M rating from the get-go and became one of the most popular games of all time, making it dubiously relevant as a controversy.

I should add that the FAC for the article was very basic and lax, being done in 2007 when standards were far lower than they are now, so it shouldn't be a reason to retain the article simply because of that. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

• Merge per nom. The basic details can easily be summarized and covered here. -- ferret (talk) 19:13, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
• Merge. This is a relic of an older time in WP:VG's history when we spent a lot of time seeing if we could without asking if we should. Textbook molehill mountains. There's some meat here to merge, but not that much. Axem Titanium (talk) 18:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Merge. The change of rating post-release was unusual, but not notable enough to warrant an entire article. A healthy sub-section in the main article is sufficient to cover the situation. TomFitz77 (talk) 00:42, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cast?

I read some of the voice actor names in the plot section of the article, but is there another one with the entire Oblivion cast? I specifically want to see who voices Sheogorath, if it's no trouble. Triviatronic9000 (talk) 16:44, 23 December 2023 (UTC)