Texas puppy mill bill: Difference between revisions
to prove puppy mils are bad |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''Texas puppy mill bill''' formally House Bill 1451: The Large-Scale Commercial Dog and Cat Breeder Bill is a [https://www.tdlr.texas.gov/bre/brelaw.htm law] that lays guidelines for welfare of animals with large-scale commercial breeders in [[Texas]], a state in the United States of America. The bill specifies parameters such as feed, space, shelter, ventilation and medical care. The law was passed on June 17, 2011, and took effect on September 1, 2012. This legislation was authored by state Rep. Senfronia Thompson, D-Houston. The law considers those breeders who keep 11 or more breeding females or sell 20 or more off-springs in a year as large-scale breeders and thus under its scope. A motion was filed in [[Austin]]'s federal district court by three breeders and the Responsible Pet Owners Alliance (RPOA), which represents 305 American Kennel Club groups in Texas, seeking that the bill be struck down as unconstitutional. An [[amicus curiae]] was presented by the [[Www.thln.org|Texas Humane Legislation Network]] with support from the Humane Society of the United States urging the court to uphold the bill. The bill was defended by the Texas Attorney General's office. On 31 January, 2013 federal district judge James R. Nowlin denied the motion and upheld the constitution validity of the bill.<ref name="ST-20130201">{{cite news|url=http://www.star-telegram.com/2013/02/01/4593309/federal-judge-strikes-down-challenge.html|title=Federal judge strikes down challenge to Texas' new 'puppy mill' law| last=Walker| first=Patrick M. |date=2013-02-01|work=Star-Telegram|accessdate=13 February 2013}}</ref><ref name="C2-20130208" /><ref name="AAS-20110426" /> Although the legislation is popularly known as "puppy mill bill", it addresses large-scale breeders.<ref name="ST-20111124">{{cite news|url=http://www.star-telegram.com/2011/11/24/3549653/putting-teeth-behind-texas-new.html|title=Putting teeth behind Texas' new 'puppy mill' law |date=2011-11-24|work=Star-Telegram|accessdate=13 February 2013}}</ref> This law does not regulate hobby breeders. |
Puppy mills are bad.............The '''Texas puppy mill bill''' formally House Bill 1451: The Large-Scale Commercial Dog and Cat Breeder Bill is a [https://www.tdlr.texas.gov/bre/brelaw.htm law] that lays guidelines for welfare of animals with large-scale commercial breeders in [[Texas]], a state in the United States of America. The bill specifies parameters such as feed, space, shelter, ventilation and medical care. The law was passed on June 17, 2011, and took effect on September 1, 2012. This legislation was authored by state Rep. Senfronia Thompson, D-Houston. The law considers those breeders who keep 11 or more breeding females or sell 20 or more off-springs in a year as large-scale breeders and thus under its scope. A motion was filed in [[Austin]]'s federal district court by three breeders and the Responsible Pet Owners Alliance (RPOA), which represents 305 American Kennel Club groups in Texas, seeking that the bill be struck down as unconstitutional. An [[amicus curiae]] was presented by the [[Www.thln.org|Texas Humane Legislation Network]] with support from the Humane Society of the United States urging the court to uphold the bill. The bill was defended by the Texas Attorney General's office. On 31 January, 2013 federal district judge James R. Nowlin denied the motion and upheld the constitution validity of the bill.<ref name="ST-20130201">{{cite news|url=http://www.star-telegram.com/2013/02/01/4593309/federal-judge-strikes-down-challenge.html|title=Federal judge strikes down challenge to Texas' new 'puppy mill' law| last=Walker| first=Patrick M. |date=2013-02-01|work=Star-Telegram|accessdate=13 February 2013}}</ref><ref name="C2-20130208" /><ref name="AAS-20110426" /> Although the legislation is popularly known as "puppy mill bill", it addresses large-scale breeders.<ref name="ST-20111124">{{cite news|url=http://www.star-telegram.com/2011/11/24/3549653/putting-teeth-behind-texas-new.html|title=Putting teeth behind Texas' new 'puppy mill' law |date=2011-11-24|work=Star-Telegram|accessdate=13 February 2013}}</ref> This law does not regulate hobby breeders. |
||
The law is administered by the [https://www.tdlr.texas.gov/index.htm Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation], who issued [https://www.tdlr.texas.gov/bre/brerules.htm rules] regarding the administration of the program. |
The law is administered by the [https://www.tdlr.texas.gov/index.htm Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation], who issued [https://www.tdlr.texas.gov/bre/brerules.htm rules] regarding the administration of the program. |
Revision as of 20:10, 11 January 2019
Puppy mills are bad.............The Texas puppy mill bill formally House Bill 1451: The Large-Scale Commercial Dog and Cat Breeder Bill is a law that lays guidelines for welfare of animals with large-scale commercial breeders in Texas, a state in the United States of America. The bill specifies parameters such as feed, space, shelter, ventilation and medical care. The law was passed on June 17, 2011, and took effect on September 1, 2012. This legislation was authored by state Rep. Senfronia Thompson, D-Houston. The law considers those breeders who keep 11 or more breeding females or sell 20 or more off-springs in a year as large-scale breeders and thus under its scope. A motion was filed in Austin's federal district court by three breeders and the Responsible Pet Owners Alliance (RPOA), which represents 305 American Kennel Club groups in Texas, seeking that the bill be struck down as unconstitutional. An amicus curiae was presented by the Texas Humane Legislation Network with support from the Humane Society of the United States urging the court to uphold the bill. The bill was defended by the Texas Attorney General's office. On 31 January, 2013 federal district judge James R. Nowlin denied the motion and upheld the constitution validity of the bill.[1][2][3] Although the legislation is popularly known as "puppy mill bill", it addresses large-scale breeders.[4] This law does not regulate hobby breeders.
The law is administered by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, who issued rules regarding the administration of the program.
Alicia Graef, writing for Care2, has described the ruling as triumph of puppies over angry breeders.[2] Opponents of the bill, such as members of RPOA argued that the bill wouldn't alleviate the sufferings of badly treated animals but would create a "dog Gestapo".[3]
External links
References
- ^ Walker, Patrick M. (2013-02-01). "Federal judge strikes down challenge to Texas' new 'puppy mill' law". Star-Telegram. Retrieved 13 February 2013.
- ^ a b Graef, Alicia (2013-02-08). "Puppies Triumph Over Angry Breeders in Texas Court". Care2. Retrieved 13 February 2013.
- ^ a b Eaton, Tim (2011-04-26). "House OKs 'puppy mill bill'". Austin American-Statesman. Retrieved 13 February 2013.
- ^ "Putting teeth behind Texas' new 'puppy mill' law". Star-Telegram. 2011-11-24. Retrieved 13 February 2013.