[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎top: Ce; however, Hollywood Boulevard doesn't sound anything like this film
 
(45 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|1928 short silent film by Robert Florey}}
{{short description|1928 film}}
{{good article}}
{{good article}}
{{use mdy dates|date=November 2015}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=October 2020}}
{{Infobox film
{{Infobox film
| name = The Life and Death of 9413:<br />a Hollywood Extra
| name = The Life and Death of 9413:<br />a Hollywood Extra
| image = The Life and Death of 9413 A Hollywood Extra title card.jpg
| image = The Life and Death of 9413 A Hollywood Extra title card.jpg
| alt = A gray screen with the words "the life and death of 9413 a hollywood extra" written in white text, in an an angled, jagged font.
| alt = A gray screen with the words "the life and death of 9413 a hollywood extra" written in white text, in an angled, jagged font.
| caption = Title card from the film
| caption = Title card from the film
| writer = {{plainlist|
| writer = {{plainlist|
Line 24: Line 24:
* [[Douglas Fairbanks]]
* [[Douglas Fairbanks]]
}}
}}
| music = [[George Gershwin]]
| music = [[George Gershwin]]
| cinematography = {{plainlist|
| cinematography = {{plainlist|
* [[Gregg Toland]]
* [[Gregg Toland]]
Line 31: Line 31:
| distributor = [[Film Booking Offices of America|FBO Pictures Corporation]]
| distributor = [[Film Booking Offices of America|FBO Pictures Corporation]]
| country = United States
| country = United States
| released = 1928
| released = {{Film date|1928}}
| runtime = 11 minutes
| runtime = 11 minutes
| language = [[Silent film|Silent]] ([[English language|English]] [[intertitle]]s)
| language = [[Silent film|Silent]] (English [[intertitle]]s)
| budget = {{dollarsign|USD|lk=on}}97
| budget = {{dollarsign|USD|lk=on}}97
}}
}}
'''''The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra''''' is a 1928 American [[silent film|silent]] [[experimental film|experimental]] short film co-written and co-directed by [[Robert Florey]] and [[Slavko Vorkapić]]. Considered a landmark of American [[avant-garde]] cinema, it tells the story of a man (Jules Raucourt) who comes to [[Hollywood]] with dreams of becoming a star; he fails and become dehumanized, with studio executives reducing him to the role of an [[Extra (acting)|extra]] and writing the number "9413" on his forehead.
'''''The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra''''' is a 1928 American [[silent film|silent]] [[experimental film|experimental]] short film co-written and co-directed by [[Robert Florey]] and [[Slavko Vorkapić]]. Considered a landmark of American [[avant-garde]] cinema, it tells the story of a man (Jules Raucourt) who comes to [[Hollywood, Los Angeles|Hollywood]] with dreams of becoming a star; he fails and becomes [[dehumanized]], with studio executives reducing him to the role of an [[Extra (acting)|extra]] and writing the number "9413" on his forehead.


The film has abrupt cuts, rapid camera movement, extensive superimposition, dim lighting, and twisted shapes and forms at disorienting angles. Filmed on a budget of only $97 (${{Inflation|US|97|1928|fmt=c}} in today's dollars), it includes a combination of close-ups of live actors and long shots of miniature sets constructed from cardboard, paper cubes, tin cans, cigar boxes, and toy trains. With no access to Hollywood studios or equipment, most of the film was made in the filmmakers' homes (their walls painted black to provide a background).
The film has abrupt cuts, rapid camera movement, extensive superimposition, dim lighting, and twisted shapes and forms at disorienting angles. Filmed on a budget of only $97 (${{Inflation|US|97|1928|fmt=c}} in today's dollars), it includes a combination of close-ups of live actors and long shots of miniature sets constructed from cardboard, paper cubes, tin cans, cigar boxes, and toy trains. With no access to Hollywood studios or equipment, most of the film was made in the filmmakers' homes (their walls painted black to provide a background).
Line 42: Line 42:
The story was inspired by Florey's own experiences in Hollywood and [[George Gershwin]]'s ''[[Rhapsody in Blue]]''. It was one of the first films shot by [[Gregg Toland]], who was later acclaimed for his work on such films as ''[[The Grapes of Wrath (film)|The Grapes of Wrath]]'' (1939) and ''[[Citizen Kane]]'' (1941). The film is a satire of Hollywood's social conditions, practices and ideologies, and the film industry's alleged mistreatment of actors. [[Douglas Fairbanks]] assisted with its development, and [[Charlie Chaplin]] and [[Joseph M. Schenck]] helped to promote it.
The story was inspired by Florey's own experiences in Hollywood and [[George Gershwin]]'s ''[[Rhapsody in Blue]]''. It was one of the first films shot by [[Gregg Toland]], who was later acclaimed for his work on such films as ''[[The Grapes of Wrath (film)|The Grapes of Wrath]]'' (1939) and ''[[Citizen Kane]]'' (1941). The film is a satire of Hollywood's social conditions, practices and ideologies, and the film industry's alleged mistreatment of actors. [[Douglas Fairbanks]] assisted with its development, and [[Charlie Chaplin]] and [[Joseph M. Schenck]] helped to promote it.


Unlike most experimental films, it received a wide release by [[Film Booking Offices of America|FBO Pictures Corporation]] in more than 700 theaters in North America and Europe. The film has been well-received by contemporary and present-day critics; according to film historian Brian Taves, "More than any other American film, it initiated the avant-garde in this country".<ref name="Taves114" /> It was selected for preservation by the [[National Film Registry]]. Florey later co-wrote and directed ''[[Hollywood Boulevard (1936 film)|Hollywood Boulevard]]'' (1936).
Unlike most experimental films, it received a wide release by [[Film Booking Offices of America|FBO Pictures Corporation]] in more than 700 theaters in North America and Europe. The film has been well received by contemporary and present-day critics; according to film historian Brian Taves, "More than any other American film, it initiated the avant-garde in this country".<ref name="Taves114" /> In 1997, it was selected for preservation by the [[National Film Registry]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Complete National Film Registry Listing |url=https://www.loc.gov/programs/national-film-preservation-board/film-registry/complete-national-film-registry-listing/|website=Library of Congress |access-date=May 4, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=New to the National Film Registry |date=December 1997|url=https://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/9712/nfr.html|access-date=July 22, 2020|website=www.loc.gov – Library of Congress Information Bulletin}}</ref> Florey co-wrote and directed ''[[Hollywood Boulevard (1936 film)|Hollywood Boulevard]]'' (1936), a lighter version of the film.


==Plot==
==Plot==
Mr. Jones (Jules Raucourt), an artist and aspiring movie star, arrives in [[Hollywood]] and is immediately star-struck by the glitz and glamour of the film industry. He speaks with a film studio representative, presenting a letter of recommendation and attempting to speak on his own behalf, but the representative cuts him off and writes the number "9413" on his forehead. From this point on, 9413 speaks only in unintelligible gibberish and moves in a mechanical fashion, mindlessly following the instructions of film directors and studio representatives. He goes on a series of casting calls, but is unable to find any success, constantly being confronted with signs that read, "No Casting Today". A series of images are interspersed throughout these scenes, including shots of Hollywood, cameras filming, the word "DREAMS" written in the stars, and an endlessly repeating loop of a man walking up a stairway toward the word "SUCCESS", without ever reaching the top.
Mr. Jones (Jules Raucourt), an artist and aspiring movie star, arrives in [[Hollywood, Los Angeles|Hollywood]] and is immediately star-struck by the film industry's glitz and glamour. He speaks with a film-studio representative, presenting a letter of recommendation and trying to speak on his own behalf. The representative cuts him off, however, and writes the number "9413" on his forehead. From this point on, 9413 speaks only in unintelligible gibberish and moves mechanically, mindlessly following the instructions of film directors and studio representatives. He goes on a series of casting calls, but is unable to find success; he is repeatedly confronted with signs reading "No Casting Today". A series of images are interspersed through these scenes: shots of Hollywood, cameras filming, the word "Dreams" written in the stars, and a repeating loop of a man walking up a stairway toward the word "Success" without ever reaching the top.


[[File:The Life and Death of 9413 a Hollywood Extra - Mask.jpg|thumb|left|alt=Two men look at each other while applauding in the direction of a third man, who holds a paper mask in front of his face.|Spectators applaud Extra #15 (Voya George) as he holds paper masks in front of his face, symbolizing his performances.]]
[[File:The Life and Death of 9413 a Hollywood Extra - Mask.jpg|thumb|left|alt=Two men look at each other while applauding in the direction of a third man, who holds a paper mask in front of his face.|Studio executives applaud Extra #15 (Voya George) as he holds paper masks in front of his face, symbolizing his performances.]]
Unlike 9413, other extras around him begin to find success. A woman (Adriane Marsh) with the number "13" on her head constantly kneels and stands back up at the behest of a film director, and eventually succeeds in landing a part, greeted by a "Casting Today" sign. Another extra (Voya George) with the number "15", who unlike 9413 has expressionless and unenthusiastic facial expressions, holds paper masks in front of his face, symbolizing his performances. He is greeted with enthusiasm by the cheering masses, all of whom speak in the same gibberish as 9413. His number 15 is replaced with a star and he achieves tremendous success. 9413 admires this new movie star and attempts to mimic him, presenting his own, much more impressive-looking mask. But the star is unimpressed and disregards 9413, who sadly cradles his mask like a baby, lamenting his inability to achieve success.
Unlike 9413, other extras around him become successful. A woman (Adriane Marsh) with the number 13 on her forehead repeatedly sits down and stands back up at the behest of a film director, and eventually succeeds in landing a part after she is greeted by a "Casting Today" sign. Another extra (Voya George) with the number 15, who (unlike 9413) has an expressionless, unenthusiastic facial expression, holds paper masks symbolizing his performances in front of his face. He is greeted enthusiastically by cheering crowds, all of whom speak in the same gibberish as 9413. His number is replaced with a star, and he becomes tremendously successful. 9413 admires the new movie star and can't contain his excitement when the two meet in person. He presents his own (much more impressive-looking) mask to the star to show he is also an actor. The star is unimpressed and turns his back on 9413, who sadly cradles his mask like a baby and laments his inability to achieve success.


Time passes and 9413 remains unable to find work in Hollywood. Despite constant phone calls to studio representatives begging for work, he is repeatedly confronted by "No Casting Today" signs. He cannot afford to buy food, and bills that he is unable to pay are constantly slipped under his door. A series of images symbolizing his mental anguish are shown, including twisted trees blowing in the wind, and a man laying on the stairway leading to "SUCCESS", still unable to reach the top. He falls to the ground, starving, exhausted, and in a state of despair over his failures. Finally, he dies, and after images are shown of the other actors laughing at him, his tombstone is revealed to read "Here Lies No. 9413, a Hollywood Extra", next to the words "No Casting Today".
Time passes, and 9413 remains unable to find work in Hollywood. Despite repeated phone calls to studio representatives begging for work, he is always confronted by "No Casting Today" signs. He cannot afford food, and bills he is unable to pay are slipped under his door. A series of images symbolizing his mental anguish include twisted trees blowing in the wind and a man lying on the stairway leading to "Success", still unable to reach the top. Starving, exhausted, and in despair about his failures, he collapses and dies. After the other actors laugh at him, his tombstone is shown. It reads: "Here Lies No. 9413, a Hollywood Extra"; the words "No Casting Today" appear next to it.


After his death, 9413's spirit leaves his body and is pulled by a platform into the sky. As he gets higher, he grows angel wings and ascends into heaven, a place with glittering crystal towers and bright blinking lights. A hand removes the "9413" from his forehead, and he smiles happily before flying further into heaven.
After his death, 9413's spirit leaves his body and is pulled up a ramp into the sky. As he gets higher, he grows angelic wings and ascends into heaven: a place with glittering crystal towers and bright, blinking lights. A hand removes the "9413" from his forehead, he smiles happily, and he flies further into heaven.


==Production==
==Production==


===Conception===
===Conception===
[[Robert Florey]] and [[Slavko Vorkapić]], who met after Florey attended one of Vorkapić's [[American Society of Cinematographers]] lectures,<ref name="Zecevic11">{{Harvnb|Zecević|1983|p=11}}</ref> are credited as co-writers and co-directors of ''The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra''.<ref name="James39">{{Harvnb|James|2005|p=39}}</ref> Accounts differ as to the level of involvement the two men had in the creation of the film, but most identify Florey as primarily responsible.<ref name="James51">{{Harvnb|James|2001|p=51}}</ref> Film historian Brian Taves has claimed Vorkapić was not involved in the writing or direction of the film, and that his contribution was limited to set design and miniature lighting, but that Florey nevertheless insisted on sharing equal credit with him for his role in bringing the film to fruition.<ref name="James51" /><ref name="Taves 1998 116">{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|p=116}}</ref> Some early journalistic stories about the film uphold this viewpoint, including a 1928 article about Florey in ''[[Motion Picture Magazine|Hollywood Magazine]]''.<ref name="James51" /> Taves further claims that while Vorkapić did nothing to promote the film when it was first released, he later exaggerated his role in the production of the film when it became so esteemed.<ref name="James51" /><ref name="Taves88">{{Harvnb|Taves|1987|p=88}}</ref> [[Paul Ivano]], who did camerawork on the film, echoed these sentiments, saying: "Vorkapić tries to get credit, but he didn't do much."<ref name="Taves86"/> For his part, Vorkapić himself has said the initial idea was Florey's, and that they discussed it and drafted a rough one-page synopsis together. But Vorkapić said "all the effects were devised, designed, photographed, and added by me", and that "at least 90 percent of the editing and montage" was his work.<ref name="Zecevic11" /> He claimed to have directed most of the opening and ending sequences himself, while he credited Florey with filming the casting scene and shots of laughing extras, and said the rise of Voya George's character to stardom was filmed jointly.<ref name="Zecevic11" />
[[Robert Florey]] and [[Slavko Vorkapić]], who met after Florey attended one of Vorkapić's [[American Society of Cinematographers]] lectures,<ref name="Zecevic11">{{Harvnb|Zecević|1983|p=11}}</ref> are credited as co-writers and co-directors of ''The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra''.<ref name="James39">{{Harvnb|James|2005|p=39}}</ref> Although accounts differ about the two men's level of involvement in the film's creation, most identify Florey as primarily responsible.<ref name="James51">{{Harvnb|James|2001|p=51}}</ref> According to film historian Brian Taves, Vorkapić was not involved in the writing or direction of the film; his contributions were limited to set design and miniature lighting, but Florey insisted on equal credit for Vorkapić's role in bringing the film to fruition.<ref name="James51" /><ref name="Taves 1998 116">{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|p=116}}</ref> Early reports about the film support this view, including a 1928 article about Florey in ''[[Motion Picture Magazine|Hollywood Magazine]]''.<ref name="James51" /> Taves also says that Vorkapić did nothing to promote the film when it was first released, later exaggerating his role in its production when it became respected.<ref name="James51" /><ref name="Taves88">{{Harvnb|Taves|1987|p=88}}</ref> [[Paul Ivano]], who did camerawork on the film, agreed: "Vorkapić tries to get credit, but he didn't do much."<ref name="Taves86"/> Vorkapić has said that the initial idea was Florey's, and they discussed it and drafted a rough one-page synopsis together. However, "all the effects were devised, designed, photographed, and added by me", and "at least 90 percent of the editing and montage" was Vorkapić's work.<ref name="Zecevic11" /> He said that he directed most of the opening and ending sequences, crediting Florey with filming the casting scene and the shots of laughing extras, and the rise of Voya George's character to stardom was filmed jointly.<ref name="Zecevic11" />


Within a few years of his first arrival in Hollywood, Florey conceived the idea of making a film about the common actor's dreams of becoming a star, and subsequent failure to achieve his hopes.<ref>{{Harvnb|Taves|1987|p=80}}</ref> Florey's work as a publicist and journalist covering the film industry gave him familiarity with the struggles of aspiring actors and their disappointment at failing to achieve their dreams, which informed the writing of ''A Hollywood Extra''.<ref name="Taves95">{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|p=95}}</ref> But the final inspiration for the film came after Florey attended a performance of the [[George Gershwin]] composition ''[[Rhapsody in Blue]]''.<ref name="Taves95" /><ref name="Eagan141">{{Harvnb|Eagan|2010|p=141}}</ref><ref name="Weinberg866" /> Florey had been working in Hollywood for only a few months when he heard the music, and it inspired him to incorporate the rhythm of the blues into a film.<ref name="Weinberg866" /> He would later describe the film as a "continuity in musical rhythm of the adventures of my extra in Hollywood, the movements and attitudes of which appeared to synchronize themselves with Gershwin's notes".<ref name="Taves95" /> Although most avant-garde films of the time emphasized moods rather than emotion, he wanted his script to merge both abstraction and narrative in equal parts.<ref name="Taves94">{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|p=94}}</ref> Florey wrote the script in precise detail, describing each shot in proportion to the length of film it would take to shoot it, which was necessary due to the high cost of film stock.<ref name="Taves95" />
Within a few years of his arrival in Hollywood, Florey conceived a film about an ordinary actor's dreams of becoming a star and his failure to realize his hopes.<ref>{{Harvnb|Taves|1987|p=80}}</ref> Florey's work as a publicist and journalist covering the film industry gave him a familiarity with the struggles of aspiring actors, and their disappointment at failing to achieve their dreams, which influenced the writing of ''A Hollywood Extra''.<ref name="Taves95">{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|p=95}}</ref> The final inspiration for the film, however, came after Florey attended a performance of [[George Gershwin]]'s ''[[Rhapsody in Blue]]''.<ref name="Taves95" /><ref name="Eagan141">{{Harvnb|Eagan|2010|p=141}}</ref><ref name="Weinberg866" /> Florey had been working in Hollywood for only a few months when he heard Gershwin's music, and it inspired him to incorporate its rhythms into a film.<ref name="Weinberg866" /> He later described the film as a "continuity in musical rhythm of the adventures of my extra in Hollywood, the movements and attitudes of which appeared to synchronize themselves with Gershwin's notes".<ref name="Taves95" /> Although most avant-garde films of the time emphasized mood over emotion, he wanted his script to be equal parts abstraction and narrative.<ref name="Taves94">{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|p=94}}</ref> Florey wrote it in precise detail, describing each shot relative to the length of film required (a budget necessity, due to the expense of film stock).<ref name="Taves95" />


===Development===
===Development===
Florey owned no camera at the time, and his efforts to obtain one were unsuccessful until he met Vorkapić.<ref name="Weinberg866" /><ref name="Taves96">{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|p=96}}</ref> Florey said of their discussion: "I say to Slav, 'Slav, I have an idea but not much money. You have a camera and are a clever painter. Let's make the picture in collaboration and we split the benefit.'"<ref name="Taves96"/> Vorkapić himself claimed to have said: "Florey, you get me 100 dollars and I'll make you a picture in my own kitchen."<ref name="Zecevic11" /> Vorkapić allowed Florey to borrow a small box camera that he had purchased with the proceeds from the sale of one of his oil paintings.<ref name="Weinberg866" /><ref name="Moritz216">{{Harvnb|Moritz|1996|p=216}}</ref> It was a DeVry camera with one lens, a type that Florey said was sold as a "toy".<ref name="Taves96" /> Florey also had trouble obtaining film, as he found it cost-prohibitive to purchase negative and positive film from film laboratories.<ref name="Weinberg866" /> However, Florey knew that "film ends", scraps of leftover unexposed film stock, were often discarded after shooting on big budget Hollywood films, so he attempted to persuade filmmakers to give them to him.<ref name="Eagan141" /><ref name="Weinberg866" /> Camera work had just been completed on ''[[The Gaucho]]'' (1927), a film starring [[Douglas Fairbanks]], and he was able to obtain more than 1,000 feet of film from the production in 10- and 20-foot strips.<ref name="Weinberg866" /> Florey then spliced the film ends together by hand, a process he found time-consuming and frustrating, but one that resulted in the equivalent of a full reel of negative film.<ref name="Weinberg866" /> Fairbanks, who had previously hired Florey to handle his European public relations, provided financial assistance for the production of ''A Hollywood Extra''.<ref name="Eagan141" /> He also gave Florey access to his editing rooms and helped provide him with film ends.<ref name="Eagan141" /><ref name="NYT0415">{{cite news |work=[[The New York Times]] |title=Projection Jottings: Film Made for $94 Impresses Chaplin |date=April 15, 1928 |page=A119 |url=https://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9A0CE0D7103CE33ABC4D52DFB2668383639EDE |accessdate=November 13, 2015}}</ref>
Florey did not own a camera at the time, and his efforts to obtain one were unsuccessful until he met Vorkapić.<ref name="Weinberg866" /><ref name="Taves96">{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|p=96}}</ref> Florey recalled, "I say to Slav, 'Slav, I have an idea but not much money. You have a camera and are a clever painter. Let's make the picture in collaboration and we split the benefit.{{'"}}<ref name="Taves96"/> According to Vorkapić, he said: "Florey, you get me $100 and I'll make you a picture in my own kitchen."<ref name="Zecevic11" /> Vorkapić allowed Florey to borrow a small [[box camera]] which he had bought with the proceeds from the sale of one of his oil paintings.<ref name="Weinberg866" /><ref name="Moritz216">{{Harvnb|Moritz|1996|p=216}}</ref> It was a DeVry camera with one lens, a type which Florey said was sold as a "toy".<ref name="Taves96" /> Florey had trouble obtaining film, since he found it too expensive to purchase [[Negative (photography)#Negative film|negative]] and [[Reversal film|positive film]] from film laboratories.<ref name="Weinberg866" /> Florey knew that film ends (scraps of leftover, unexposed film stock) were often discarded after shooting on big-budget Hollywood films, however, and he tried to persuade filmmakers to give them to him.<ref name="Eagan141" /><ref name="Weinberg866" /> Camerawork had just been completed on ''[[The Gaucho]]'' (1927), a film starring [[Douglas Fairbanks]], and Florey obtained more than 1,000 feet of film from the production in 10- and 20-foot strips.<ref name="Weinberg866" /> He then spliced the film ends together by hand (a process he found time-consuming and frustrating), which resulted in the equivalent of a full reel of negative film.<ref name="Weinberg866" /> Fairbanks (who had employed Florey to handle his European public relations) provided financial assistance,<ref name="Eagan141" /> gave Florey access to his editing rooms, and helped provide him with film ends.<ref name="Eagan141" /><ref name="NYT0415">{{cite news |work=The New York Times |title=Projection Jottings: Film Made for $94 Impresses Chaplin |date=April 15, 1928 |page=A119 |url=https://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9A0CE0D7103CE33ABC4D52DFB2668383639EDE |access-date=November 13, 2015}}</ref>


The film was shot by [[Gregg Toland]], credited simply as "Gregg",<ref>{{Harvnb|Dixon|2015|p=97}}</ref> who was simultaneously working as an assistant to cinematographer [[George Barnes (cinematographer)|George Barnes]] at the [[Samuel Goldwyn Studio]].<ref name="Eagan141" /> It was one of the first films for Toland,<ref>{{Harvnb|Merritt|2000|p=52}}</ref> who later received acclaim for his cinematography on such films as ''[[The Grapes of Wrath (film)|The Grapes of Wrath]]'' (1939) and ''[[Citizen Kane]]'' (1941).<ref name="Moritz216" /><ref>{{Harvnb|Bawden|1976|p=694}}</ref><ref name="James43">{{Harvnb|James|2005|p=43}}</ref> ''The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra'' cost $97 (${{Inflation|US|97|1928|fmt=c}} today) to make,<ref name="Eagan141" /><ref name="Watson848">{{Harvnb|Watson|1929|p=848}}</ref><ref name="Weinberg879">{{Harvnb|Weinberg|1929|p=879}}</ref> which was covered entirely by Florey.<ref>{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|pp=95–96}}</ref> The budget was composed of $55 (${{Inflation|US|55|1928|fmt=c}} today) for development and printing, $25 (${{Inflation|US|25|1928|fmt=c}} today) for negatives, $14 (${{Inflation|US|14|1928|fmt=c}} today) for transportation, and $3 (${{Inflation|US|3|1928|fmt=c}} today) for store props, most of which cost five or ten cents individually.<ref>{{Harvnb|Taves|1987|p=83}}</ref> From the development costs, the salary expenses for everyone involved in the film totaled $3.<ref name="Zecevic11" /> Toland had use of a [[Mitchell Camera|Mitchell camera]] during filming, which allowed for some shots that would have been impossible with the DeVry camera, including about 300 feet of closeups.<ref name="Taves98">{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|p=98}}</ref> Additional camerawork was done by Paul Ivano,<ref name="Taves97">{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|p=97}}</ref> and Taves has in fact argued that Ivano was primarily responsible for much of the film's camerawork, with Toland handling primarily the close-ups.<ref name="James51" /> The film was shot on [[35mm movie film|35 mm film]],<ref name="James39" /> over a period of three weeks in late 1927,<ref name="Taves96" /> filmed mostly on weekends.<ref name="James39" /> No subtitles are used in the film. Only two captions are used, each with one word "DREAMS" and "SUCCESS" – but they are created not through subtitles, but by reflecting moving light through cardboard cutouts, creating words among the shadows.<ref name="Taves97" />
The film was shot by [[Gregg Toland]] (credited simply as "Gregg"),<ref>{{Harvnb|Dixon|2015|p=97}}</ref> who was also working as an assistant to cinematographer [[George Barnes (cinematographer)|George Barnes]] at the [[Samuel Goldwyn Studio]].<ref name="Eagan141" /> It was one of Toland's first films,<ref>{{Harvnb|Merritt|2000|p=52}}</ref> and the cinematographer was later acclaimed for his work on ''[[The Grapes of Wrath (film)|The Grapes of Wrath]]'' (1939) and ''[[Citizen Kane]]'' (1941).<ref name="Moritz216" /><ref>{{Harvnb|Bawden|1976|p=694}}</ref><ref name="James43">{{Harvnb|James|2005|p=43}}</ref> ''The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra'' cost $97 (${{Inflation|US|97|1928|fmt=c}} today) to make,<ref name="Eagan141" /><ref name="Watson848">{{Harvnb|Watson|1929|p=848}}</ref><ref name="Weinberg879">{{Harvnb|Weinberg|1929|p=879}}</ref> paid entirely by Florey.<ref>{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|pp=95–96}}</ref> The budget consisted of $55 (${{Inflation|US|55|1928|fmt=c}} today) for development and printing, $25 (${{Inflation|US|25|1928|fmt=c}} today) for negatives, $14 (${{Inflation|US|14|1928|fmt=c}} today) for transportation, and $3 (${{Inflation|US|3|1928|fmt=c}} today) for store props (most of which cost five or ten cents apiece).<ref>{{Harvnb|Taves|1987|p=83}}</ref> Of the development costs, the salaries for everyone involved in the film totaled $3.<ref name="Zecevic11" /> Toland had the use of a [[Mitchell Camera|Mitchell camera]], which permitted some shots which would have been impossible with the DeVry camera (including about 300 feet of closeups).<ref name="Taves98">{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|p=98}}</ref> Additional camerawork was by Paul Ivano;<ref name="Taves97">{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|p=97}}</ref> according to Taves, Ivano was primarily responsible for much of the film's camerawork and Toland primarily handled the closeups.<ref name="James51" /> ''A Hollywood Extra'' was shot on [[35mm movie film|35mm film]],<ref name="James39" /> over a three-week period in late 1927,<ref name="Taves96" /> mainly on weekends.<ref name="James39" /> No subtitles are used in the film. Only two captions are used, each with one word ("Dreams" and "Success"); they were produced by reflecting a moving light through cardboard cutouts, creating words among the shadows.<ref name="Taves97" />


===Casting===
===Casting===
[[File:The Life and Death of 9413 a Hollywood Extra - Jules Raucourt.jpg|thumb|right|alt=A man wearing a suit jacket and tie stares forward with a shocked and confused facial expression, with the numbers "9413" written across his forehead.|Jules Raucourt stars as the protagonist, who is dehumanized after studio representatives make him a film extra and write the number "9413" on his forehead.]]
[[File:The Life and Death of 9413 a Hollywood Extra - Jules Raucourt.jpg|thumb|right|alt=A man wearing a suit jacket and tie stares forward with a shocked and confused facial expression, with the numbers "9413" written across his forehead.|Jules Raucourt played the protagonist, who is dehumanized after studio representatives make him a film extra and write the number 9413 on his forehead.]]
The role of extra 9413 was played by [[Cinema of Belgium|Belgian actor]] Jules Raucourt, credited in the film simply as "Raucourt". Although Raucourt started his career as a leading man of silent action films, he ironically became a film extra himself after cinema transitioned into the [[Sound film|sound era]].<ref name="Slide48">{{Harvnb|Slide|2012|p=48}}</ref><ref name="James42">{{Harvnb|James|2005|p=42}}</ref> Raucourt later wrote a novel using the title of the film.<ref name="Taves86" /> The role of Extra #13 was played by Adriane Marsh, herself a film extra,<ref name="Slide48" /><ref name="James42" /> who never again obtained a named role in cinema.<ref name="James42" /> Extra #15, who then becomes a movie star, was portrayed by Voya George, a personal friend of Vorkapić,<ref name="Slide48" /><ref name="James42" /> who went on to a career in European films.<ref name="Zecevic11" /> Robert Florey also himself appears in the film as a casting director,<ref name="Taves86">{{Harvnb|Taves|1987|p=86}}</ref><ref name="Moritz216" /> although only his disembodied mouth and hand are visible, shaking his finger at the protagonist.<ref name="Taves86" /> Slavko Vorkapić also had a brief role in the film as the man constantly walking up the stairs toward the words "SUCCESS".<ref name="Zecevic11" />
The extra 9413 was played by [[Cinema of Belgium|Belgian actor]] Jules Raucourt, who was credited in the film simply as "Raucourt". Although Raucourt began his career as a leading man in silent action films, he became a film extra himself after cinema transitioned to the [[Sound film|sound era]].<ref name="Slide48">{{Harvnb|Slide|2012|p=48}}</ref><ref name="James42">{{Harvnb|James|2005|p=42}}</ref> Raucourt later wrote a novel, using the title of the film.<ref name="Taves86" /> Extra 13 was played by Adriane Marsh, a film extra in real life<ref name="Slide48" /><ref name="James42" /> who never again had a credited film role.<ref name="James42" /> Extra 15 (who becomes a movie star) was played by Voya George, a friend of Vorkapić<ref name="Slide48" /><ref name="James42" /> who went on to a career in European films.<ref name="Zecevic11" /> Florey appears in the film as a casting director,<ref name="Taves86">{{Harvnb|Taves|1987|p=86}}</ref><ref name="Moritz216" /> although only his disembodied mouth and hand are visible as he shakes his finger at the protagonist.<ref name="Taves86" /> Vorkapić also had a brief role in the film, as the man endlessly climbing the staircase to "Success".<ref name="Zecevic11" />


===Filming===
===Filming===
The filmmakers had no access to a studio,<ref name="Weinberg879" /> so shooting took place in rooms at their homes, with the walls painted black for use as a background.<ref name="Weinberg879" /> [[Herman G. Weinberg]], a writer for ''Movie Makers'', and Jack Spears of ''Films in Review'', said it was filmed mostly at Florey's residence,<ref name="Weinberg879" /><ref name="Spears216">{{Harvnb|Spears|1960|p=216}}</ref> while film historian David E. James claimed it was filmed in Vorkapić's kitchen.<ref name="James39" /> In an interview, Florey claimed the filming took place both in his kitchen and in Vorkapić's living room.<ref name="Zecevic11" /> Some scenes were also filmed in Toland's garage.<ref name="Spears216" /><ref name="Taves84">{{Harvnb|Taves|1987|p=84}}</ref> The film is shot in three basic types of compositions: miniature sets, close-ups of live actors, and newsreel-like scenes of Hollywood and film studios. The film's visual motif includes abrupt cuts, rapid camera movement, extensive superimposition, dim lighting, and shapes and forms in twisted and disoriented angles. In this way, it shares some similarities with [[German Expressionism]],<ref name="Taves97" /><ref name="James40" /><ref name="Jacobs9">{{Harvnb|Jacobs|2002|p=9}}</ref> particularly the film ''[[The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari]]'' (1920).<ref name="Jacobs9" /><ref>{{Harvnb|Taves|1987|p=89}}</ref> The opening credits, in particular, are angular and expressionistic.<ref name="James39" /> A single 400-watt lamp was used as lighting in the film;<ref name="Watson848" /><ref name="Taves97" /> they originally planned to use two lamps, but one of them burned out before filming began.<ref name="Zecevic11" /> During close-up shots, the actors would hold the light bulb in their hands so their faces would be lit. When an actor changed position, he or she would switch the bulb from one hand to another.<ref name="Weinberg879" /><ref name="Taves98" /> As a result, the faces of the actors are often kept in partial shadow, keeping their features obscured.<ref name="Taves97" /> Toland also used small reflectors that he borrowed from film studios, which included a light bulb hung inside a mirror shaped like a cone.<ref name="Zecevic11" /> The film's acting is heavily abstract and stylized, with the actors mouthing gibberish instead of speaking actual words.<ref name="Moritz216" /><ref name="Jacobs9" /> A record of ''Rhapsody in Blue'' was played constantly during filming, so that the actors would, in Florey's words, become "saturated" with the rhythm of the "blues". This was a source of aggravation for Florey's neighbors and landlord.<ref name="Taves86" />
Since the filmmakers had no access to a studio,<ref name="Weinberg879" /> the film was shot at their homes; walls were painted black, to provide a background.<ref name="Weinberg879" /> According to ''Movie Makers'' writer [[Herman G. Weinberg]] and Jack Spears of ''Films in Review'', it was filmed primarily at Florey's house;<ref name="Weinberg879" /><ref name="Spears216">{{Harvnb|Spears|1960|p=216}}</ref> however, film historian David E. James said that it was filmed in Vorkapić's kitchen.<ref name="James39" /> In an interview, Florey said that filming was done in his kitchen and in Vorkapić's living room.<ref name="Zecevic11" /> Some scenes were filmed in Toland's garage.<ref name="Spears216" /><ref name="Taves84">{{Harvnb|Taves|1987|p=84}}</ref> The film has three basic types of composition: miniature sets, close-ups of live actors, and newsreel-like scenes of Hollywood and film studios. It includes abrupt cuts, rapid camera movement, extensive superimposition, dim lighting, and twisted shapes and forms at disorienting angles. The film has elements of [[German expressionist cinema|German Expressionism]],<ref name="Taves97" /><ref name="James40" /><ref name="Jacobs9">{{Harvnb|Jacobs|2002|p=9}}</ref> echoing ''[[The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari]]'' (1920);<ref name="Jacobs9" /><ref>{{Harvnb|Taves|1987|p=89}}</ref> its opening credits, in particular, are angular and expressionistic.<ref name="James39" /> A single 400-watt lamp was used as lighting for the film;<ref name="Watson848" /><ref name="Taves97" /> two lamps were originally planned, but one burned out before filming began.<ref name="Zecevic11" /> During closeups, the actors would hold the light bulb in their hands to light their faces. When an actor changed position, they would switch the bulb from one hand to another.<ref name="Weinberg879" /><ref name="Taves98" /> The actors' faces are often in partial shadow as a result, their features obscured.<ref name="Taves97" /> Toland also used small reflectors which he borrowed from film studios, which included a light bulb hung inside a cone-shaped mirror.<ref name="Zecevic11" /> The film's acting is abstract and stylized, with the actors mouthing gibberish instead of speaking words.<ref name="Moritz216" /><ref name="Jacobs9" /> A recording of ''Rhapsody in Blue'' was played constantly during filming, so that the actors would (in Florey's words) become "saturated" with the rhythm of the "blues". This was a source of annoyance for his neighbors and landlord.<ref name="Taves86" />


{{multiple image|caption_align=center|header_align=center
{{multiple image|caption_align=center|header_align=center
Line 77: Line 77:
| direction = vertical
| direction = vertical
| width = 200
| width = 200
| header =
| header =
| image1 = The Life and Death of 9413 a Hollywood Extra - Hollywood set.jpg
| image1 = The Life and Death of 9413 a Hollywood Extra - Hollywood set.jpg
| caption1 =
| caption1 =
| alt1 = A series of slanted and curving girders representing an abstract city landscape are set in front of a hazy white backdrop. A slanted black sign appears in the foreground with the words "CASTING TODAY" written in jagged white text.
| alt1 = A series of slanted and curving girders representing an abstract city landscape are set in front of a hazy white backdrop. A slanted black sign appears in the foreground with the words "CASTING TODAY" written in jagged white text.
| image2 = The Life and Death of 9413 a Hollywood Extra - Heaven set.jpg
| image2 = The Life and Death of 9413 a Hollywood Extra - Heaven set.jpg
| caption2 = Scenes of Hollywood cityscapes (top), and of heaven at the end of the film (bottom), were achieved through the creation of miniature sets made from such items as paper cubes, tin cans, cigar boxes, toy trains, and an [[Erector Set]].
| caption2 = Scenes of Hollywood cityscapes ''(top)'' and of heaven at the end of the film ''(bottom)'' were achieved with miniature sets made from paper cubes, tin cans, cigar boxes, toy trains and an Erector Set.
| alt2 = A silhouette of a man holding his arms in the air stands atop a wheeled platform ascending a diagonal girder. The backdrop is foggy and white, with silhouettes of curving trees and shapes visible.
| alt2 = A silhouette of a man holding his arms in the air stands atop a wheeled platform ascending a diagonal girder. The backdrop is foggy and white, with silhouettes of curving trees and shapes visible.
}}
}}
Scenes of Hollywood cityscapes, as well as shots of heaven at the end of the film, were achieved through the creation of miniature sets that were filmed in long shots to give the appearance that they were large and expansive.<ref name="Weinberg867" /><ref name="Watson887">{{Harvnb|Watson|1929|p=887}}</ref> A total of 45 sets were built in total, none larger than about two square feet, with the most expensive costing $1.67. It took days to prepare these sets. Florey cut cardboard from laundered shirts and shaped them into squares while Vorkapić painted them impressionistically to resemble buildings.<ref name="Taves84" /> The elevated trains in the cityscape scenes were actually toy trains Florey purchased and mounted on pasteboard runaways. He would pull them along the track on a string with one hand while he shot the scene with the other.<ref name="Weinberg867" /> Movement on the miniature sets was simulated by moving lamps and casting shadows.<ref name="Watson887" /> To make the miniature sets look more realistic and to conceal defects, prisms and kaleidoscopes were placed in front of the camera lens and moved during filming, and cylinder lens systems were used and rotated during shooting to magnify the image to the desired diameter. Florey said this was useful in "giving the scenes the rhythms which we thought they required".<ref name="Watson888">{{Harvnb|Watson|1929|p=888}}</ref>
Scenes of Hollywood cityscapes and shots of heaven at the end of the film were achieved with miniature sets which were filmed in [[long shot]]s to appear large and expansive.<ref name="Weinberg867" /><ref name="Watson887">{{Harvnb|Watson|1929|p=887}}</ref> A total of 45 sets were built, none larger than about two square feet and the most expensive costing $1.67. It took days to prepare the sets; Florey removed cardboard from laundered shirts and cut them into squares, which Vorkapić painted impressionistically to resemble buildings.<ref name="Taves84" /> The elevated trains in the cityscapes were toy trains which Florey purchased and mounted on [[Card stock|pasteboard]] runways; he pulled them along the track on a string with one hand, and shot the scene with the other.<ref name="Weinberg867" /> Movement on the miniature sets was simulated by moving lamps and casting shadows.<ref name="Watson887" /> To make the sets look more realistic (and to conceal defects), prisms and kaleidoscopes were placed in front of the camera lens and moved during filming; a [[cylindrical lens]] was rotated during filming to magnify an image to the desired diameter. According to Florey, this was useful in "giving the scenes the rhythms which we thought they required".<ref name="Watson888">{{Harvnb|Watson|1929|p=888}}</ref>


Skyscrapers in the sets were oblong cubes that were shot from an angle that exaggerated their height. To create the effect of sunlight glimmering off the buildings, one person would stand on one side of the cubes with a mirror, and another would stand on the opposite side with a light bulb and swing it back and forth, so the mirror could catch reflections of the swinging light and throw it back onto the skyscrapers.<ref name="Weinberg867" /> To create a sense of hysteria and excitement surrounding an opening night performance, a skyscraper was photographed with the camera swinging quickly up and down from side to side.<ref name="Weinberg867" /> While scenes from miniature sets were composed of long shots, scenes were actors were shot entirely in close-ups,<ref name="Watson887" /> which make up about 300 feet of the final film reel.<ref name="Taves84" /> Rather than attempting to put the actor into the miniature backgrounds through trick photography, the scenes were cut rapidly and successively, so the viewer first sees the actor and then the set, creating the impression they are in the same place.<ref name="Watson887" /> Sets involving actors were minimalistic, with some consisting of only a few elements like a table, telephone, two chairs, and a cigar.<ref name="Eagan141" />
Skyscrapers were oblong cubes filmed from an angle which exaggerated their height. To create the effect of sunlight reflecting from buildings, one person would stand on one side of the cubes with a mirror; another would stand on the opposite side with a light bulb and swing it back and forth. The mirror would catch the reflection of the swinging light and throw it back onto the skyscrapers.<ref name="Weinberg867" /> To create the excitement surrounding an opening night, a skyscraper was photographed with the camera swinging quickly up and down and side to side.<ref name="Weinberg867" /> Although the scenes of the miniature sets were long shots, the actors were filmed entirely in closeups<ref name="Watson887" /> (about 300 feet of the final film reel).<ref name="Taves84" /> Instead of trying to place an actor into the miniature backgrounds with trick photography, the scenes were cut rapidly and successively: the viewer first sees the actor and then the set, creating the impression they are in the same place.<ref name="Watson887" /> Sets involving actors were minimalistic; some consisted of only a few elements, such as a table, telephone, two chairs, and a cigar.<ref name="Eagan141" />


A film studio set was created by photographing several reel spools with strips of film dangling against a background of blinking lights. The casting office was created by silhouetting strips of cardboard against a white background.<ref name="Weinberg867" /> To portray the mental anguish of the protagonist, strips of paper were cut into the shape of twisted trees, which were silhouetted against a background of moving shadows and set in motion with an electric fan.<ref name="Weinberg867" /> To create a scene near the end of the film, when the protagonist starts becoming delirious, the camera moves through a maze of different sized cubes, with geometric designs inside them, all placed on a flat, shiny service.<ref name="Weinberg867" /> The heaven setting was also a miniature set created from paper cubes, tin cans, cigar boxes, toy trains, and a motorized [[Erector Set]].<ref name="Spears216" /><ref name="Weinberg867" /><ref name="Allen12">{{Harvnb|Allen|1983|p=12}}</ref> No still photos were taken for the film, but illustrations showing prism and kaleidoscope effects have been made by enlarging frames of negative. The paper prints were considerably softer than the movie print in order to avoid graininess.<ref name="Watson888" /> The final film was edited to a one-reel length of 1,200 feet of film strip,<ref name="James39" /><ref name="Taves98" /> featuring about 150 scenes.<ref name="Taves86" /> Florey said it featured the same number of angles as full-length feature films of the time.<ref name="Zecevic11" /> Although the film was carefully edited to be synchronized with ''Rhapsody in Blue'', much of the original lyrical quality has been lost in shortened and modified versions of the film.<ref name="Taves98" /><ref name="Spears216" />
A film-studio set was created by photographing several reel spools with strips of film dangling against a background of blinking lights. The casting office was created by silhouetting strips of cardboard against a white background.<ref name="Weinberg867" /> To depict the protagonist's mental anguish, strips of paper were cut into twisted trees, which were silhouetted against a background of moving shadows and set in motion with an electric fan.<ref name="Weinberg867" /> To create a scene near the end of the film when the protagonist becomes delirious, the camera moves through a maze of different-sized cubes (with geometric designs inside them) on a flat, shiny surface.<ref name="Weinberg867" /> Heaven was a miniature set created from paper cubes, tin cans, cigar boxes, toy trains, and a motorized [[Erector Set]].<ref name="Spears216" /><ref name="Weinberg867" /><ref name="Allen12">{{Harvnb|Allen|1983|p=12}}</ref> Although no still photos were taken for the film, illustrations of prismatic and kaleidoscopic effects have been obtained by enlarging frames of negative film. The paper prints were considerably softer than the movie print, to avoid graininess.<ref name="Watson888" />{{clarify|date=February 2020|reason=What paper prints?}} The final film was edited to a one-reel length of 1,200 feet of [[filmstrip]],<ref name="James39" /><ref name="Taves98" /> with about 150 scenes;<ref name="Taves86" /> according to Florey, it had the same number of [[camera angle]]s as contemporary full-length feature films.<ref name="Zecevic11" /> Although the film was carefully edited for [[synchronization]] with ''Rhapsody in Blue'', much of its original, lyrical quality has been lost in modified versions.<ref name="Taves98" /><ref name="Spears216" />


==Themes and interpretations==
==<span id="Themes and interpretations"></span>Themes and interpretation==
The film serves as a satire of the social conditions, dominant practices, and ideologies of Hollywood, as well as the film industry's perceived mistreatment of actors.<ref name="James39" /><ref name="Zimmermann88">{{Harvnb|Zimmerman|1995|p=88}}</ref> Filmmaking was becoming more expensive and requiring larger technical resources, particularly with the rise of sound production, making it increasingly difficult for amateur filmmakers to enter the profession. This deepened a divide between amateurs and Hollywood professionals, and as a result, a growing number of amateurs started lampooning Hollywood in their films, including ''A Hollywood Extra''.<ref name="Zimmermann88" /> The subject of the film is an extra who starts his Hollywood career with hopes and dreams, but ultimately finds himself used and discarded by the industry, and his artistic ambitions destroyed.<ref name="Weinberg866">{{Harvnb|Weinberg|1929|p=866}}</ref> At the start of the film, the protagonist has a name (Mr. Jones) and a letter of recommendation outlining his talents, but his abilities are ignored and he is reduced to a number, symbolizing his dehumanization.<ref name="James39" /><ref>{{Harvnb|Slide|2012|pp=48–49}}</ref>
The film is a satire of the social conditions, dominant practices, and ideologies of Hollywood, and the film industry's mistreatment of actors.<ref name="James39" /><ref name="Zimmermann88">{{Harvnb|Zimmerman|1995|p=88}}</ref> Filmmaking was becoming more expensive and required greater technical resources (particularly with the rise of sound production), making it increasingly difficult for amateur filmmakers to enter the profession. This deepened a divide between amateurs and Hollywood professionals; as a result, a growing number of amateurs began lampooning Hollywood.<ref name="Zimmermann88" /> The film is about an extra who starts his Hollywood career with hopes and dreams but finds himself used and discarded by the industry, his artistic ambitions destroyed.<ref name="Weinberg866">{{Harvnb|Weinberg|1929|p=866}}</ref> When it begins, the protagonist has a name (Mr. Jones) and a letter of recommendation outlining his talents; they are ignored and he is reduced to a number, symbolizing his dehumanization.<ref name="James39" /><ref>{{Harvnb|Slide|2012|pp=48–49}}</ref>


[[File:The Life and Death of 9413 a Hollywood Extra - Audience.jpg|thumb|right|alt=A photo from a low angle of three men looking ahead, clapping their hands and opening their mouths widely.|Spectators applauding a performance by Voya George's character. Actors and spectators alike are portrayed as unintelligent automatons in the film, their mouths yapping senselessly.]]
[[File:The Life and Death of 9413 a Hollywood Extra - Audience.jpg|thumb|right|alt=A photo from a low angle of three men looking ahead, clapping their hands and opening their mouths widely.|Applause for a performance by Voya George's character]]
The movie star served as an illustration of hero worship in American culture, and the painted masks he dons represent his performances.<ref name="Slide49">{{Harvnb|Slide|2012|p=49}}</ref> Actors and spectators alike are portrayed as unintelligent automatons, their mouths yapping senselessly as they respond to Hollywood films and to hand signals from film directors.<ref name="Weinberg866" /><ref name="James40">{{Harvnb|James|2005|p=40}}</ref> One scene repeatedly loops the same shot of a man climbing a flight of stairs with the word "SUCCESS" atop it, representing the actors' vain attempts to find fulfillment and advancement in his career. Film historians [[William Moritz]] and David E. James have compared this to a similar scene involving a washerwoman in the [[Dadaism|Dadaist]] post-[[Cubism|Cubist]] film ''[[Ballet Mécanique]]'' (1924).<ref name="Moritz216" /><ref name="James40" /> Other segments in ''A Hollywood Extra'' are also frequently repeated, like views of the city lights, and shots of "Hollywood" and "No Casting" signs. This further exemplifies the protagonist's constant struggle to succeed in Hollywood.<ref>{{Harvnb|James|2005|pp=40–41}}</ref>
The movie star inspires hero worship in American culture, and the painted masks he dons represent his performances.<ref name="Slide49">{{Harvnb|Slide|2012|p=49}}</ref> Actors and audience are depicted as unintelligent automatons, their mouths yapping senselessly as they respond to Hollywood films or hand signals from film directors.<ref name="Weinberg866" /><ref name="James40">{{Harvnb|James|2005|p=40}}</ref> One scene loops a shot of a man climbing a staircase toward the word "Success", representing an actor's vain attempt to achieve fulfillment and advancement in his career. Film historians [[William Moritz]] and David E. James have compared this to a similar scene with a washerwoman in the [[Dadaism|Dadaist]], post-[[Cubism|Cubist]] film ''[[Ballet Mécanique]]'' (1924).<ref name="Moritz216" /><ref name="James40" /> Other scenes in ''A Hollywood Extra'' are frequently repeated, such as views of the city lights and shots of "Hollywood" and "No Casting" signs, which exemplify the protagonist's constant struggle to succeed in Hollywood.<ref>{{Harvnb|James|2005|pp=40–41}}</ref>


The film's abrupt cuts, artificial scenery, extreme close-ups, and twisted angles all metaphorically amplify the dark and somber narrative.<ref name="James40" /> Shots of film producers and critics in ''A Hollywood Extra'' are shot from low angles with dark backdrops, giving the characters a powerful and foreboding ambiance. Gregg Toland would make use of similar camera techniques in his later work on ''Citizen Kane''.<ref name="Moritz216" /> Due to the lighting, close-ups of the actors' faces are often shadowed, shrouding some of their features and depriving the characters of wholeness.<ref name="Taves97" /> The all-black backdrops in these close-ups also deprive the film of a real-world presence.<ref name="James40" /> During a scene in which the protagonist awaits phone calls to learn about casting decisions, the image of a telephone is superimposed directly onto the actor's forehead, symbolizing his growing obsession with finding work.<ref name="Moritz216" /> His failure to achieve success mocks him even after his death, as the words "No Casting Today" appear next to his gravestone.<ref name="James40" /> His death is symbolized by a pair of scissors cutting a film strip.<ref name="Taves96" /><ref name="James40" />
The film's abrupt cuts, artificial scenery, extreme closeups, and twisted angles metaphorically amplify its somber narrative.<ref name="James40" /> Film producers and critics in ''A Hollywood Extra'' are shot from low angles with dark backdrops, giving the characters a powerful, foreboding appearance. Gregg Toland later used similar camera techniques in ''Citizen Kane''.<ref name="Moritz216" /> Closeups of the actors' faces are often shadowed, partially shrouding their features and depriving the characters of wholeness.<ref name="Taves97" /> The all-black backdrops in the closeups remove a real-world presence from the film.<ref name="James40" /> When the protagonist is waiting for phone calls with casting decisions, a telephone is superimposed on the actor's forehead to symbolize his growing desperation.<ref name="Moritz216" /> His failure follows him to the grave (where the words "No Casting Today" appear next to his tombstone),<ref name="James40" /> and his death is symbolized by a pair of scissors cutting a strip of film.<ref name="Taves96" /><ref name="James40" />


While the film portrays the reality of the protagonist's experience in an expressionistic style, the glamour of Hollywood is portrayed more objectively. In reversing these conventional expectations, however, the film invites the viewer to interpret this version of Hollywood as merely "the material of dreams" and "an unreal paradise of cruelty and failure", according to Taves.<ref>{{Harvnb|Taves|1987|p=91}}</ref> Scenes on the streets of Hollywood are filmed with a wildly moving camera from tilted angles, and edited into rapid juxtapositions, to reflect the false and excessive nature of the Hollywood film industry.<ref name="Taves97" /> The protagonist's ascension to heaven at the end of the film serves simultaneously as a fitting conclusion to the story, and as a satire of Hollywood's desire for traditional happy endings.<ref name="Taves96" /><ref name="Spears216" /><ref name="Jacobs10">{{Harvnb|Jacobs|2002|p=10}}</ref> As he ascends, heaven is located in the opposite direction from Hollywood, another jab at the industry.<ref name="Taves96" /> James wrote that the vision of heaven as an escape from the film industry's brutality "figures the avant-garde's recurrent utopian aspirations".<ref name="James41">{{Harvnb|James|2005|p=41}}</ref>
Although the film depicts the protagonist's experience expressionistically, the glamour of Hollywood is portrayed more objectively. According to Taves, by reversing conventional expectations it invites the audience to interpret this version of Hollywood as "the material of dreams" and "an unreal paradise of cruelty and failure".<ref>{{Harvnb|Taves|1987|p=91}}</ref> Hollywood street scenes were filmed with a wildly-moving camera from tilted angles, edited into rapid juxtapositions to reflect the falsity and excess of the film industry.<ref name="Taves97" /> The protagonist's trip to heaven at the end of the film is both a satisfying conclusion and a satire of Hollywood's desire for happy endings.<ref name="Taves96" /><ref name="Spears216" /><ref name="Jacobs10">{{Harvnb|Jacobs|2002|p=10}}</ref> Heaven is in the opposite direction from Hollywood, another poke at the industry.<ref name="Taves96" /> James wrote that the image of heaven as an escape from film-industry brutality "figures the avant-garde's recurrent utopian aspirations".<ref name="James41">{{Harvnb|James|2005|p=41}}</ref>


The film also touches upon Hollywood's perceived mistreatment of women. While the male actors wear masks, which symbolize their ability to act, the female Extra #13 does not wear any and is instead expected to simply stand obediently and listen to the male filmmakers. Her only role is to be an object for men to look upon.<ref name="Allen12" /> The fact that she is able to achieve success by filling this simple role, contrasted against the protagonist's inability to succeed despite his hard work, reveals how differently the film industry views the roles of male and female actors.<ref name="Allen12" />
''A Hollywood Extra'' also touches on the mistreatment of women. Although the actors wear masks—symbolizing their ability to act—the female extra #13 does not; she is expected to simply obey the (male) filmmakers, and her only role is as an object for men to look at.<ref name="Allen12" /> Her success in this simple role, contrasted with the protagonist's inability to succeed despite hard work, reveals how differently the film industry views male and female actors.<ref name="Allen12" />


==Release==
==Release==
[[File:The Life and Death of 9413 a Hollywood Extra (1928).webm|thumb|thumbtime=85|right|''The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra'' (1928)]]
[[File:The Life and Death of 9413 a Hollywood Extra (1928).webm|thumb|thumbtime=85|alt=Link to the film|''The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra'' (1928)]]
Although most commonly known by its proper title, ''The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra'' has also been released and advertised under different titles at various times, including ''Hollywood Extra 9413'', and ''$97'', a reference to the film's low budget.<ref>{{Harvnb|Taves|2001|p=103}}</ref> Other titles include ''The Rhapsody of Hollywood'',<ref name="NYT0415" /><ref name="Eagan142" /><ref name="Glassgold290">{{Harvnb|Glassgold|1928|p=290}}</ref> a name suggested by comic actor and filmmaker [[Charlie Chaplin]],<ref name="NYT0415" /><ref name="TavesThesis">{{Harvnb|Taves|1984|p=19}}</ref> and ''The Suicide of a Hollywood Extra'',<ref name="Eagan142">{{Harvnb|Eagan|2010|p=142}}</ref> a misnomer created by the distributor, [[Film Booking Offices of America|FBO Pictures Corporation]].<ref name="TavesThesis" /> While many experimental films from the period were simply screened in the filmmakers' homes for private audiences of families and friends, ''A Hollywood Extra'' received a wide public exhibition.<ref>{{Harvnb|Posner|2001|p=39}}</ref> Upon its release, Florey described the film this way:<ref name="Slide49" />
Most commonly known by its proper title, ''The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra'' has been released and advertised as ''Hollywood Extra 9413'' and ''$97'' (a reference to the film's budget).<ref>{{Harvnb|Taves|2001|p=103}}</ref> Other titles include ''The Rhapsody of Hollywood''<ref name="NYT0415" /><ref name="Eagan142" /><ref name="Glassgold290">{{Harvnb|Glassgold|1928|p=290}}</ref> (a name suggested by [[Charlie Chaplin]])<ref name="NYT0415" /><ref name="TavesThesis">{{Harvnb|Taves|1984|p=19}}</ref> and ''The Suicide of a Hollywood Extra'',<ref name="Eagan142">{{Harvnb|Eagan|2010|p=142}}</ref> a misnomer created by distributor [[Film Booking Offices of America|FBO Pictures Corporation]].<ref name="TavesThesis" /> Although many experimental films from the period were screened in the filmmakers' homes to audiences of families and friends, ''A Hollywood Extra'' had a wide release.<ref>{{Harvnb|Posner|2001|p=39}}</ref> Florey described the film at the time:<ref name="Slide49" />


{{quote|It is not much. Just about a man who is a fine actor in Iowa or somewhere and who comes to Hollywood and expects to conquer it overnight.&nbsp;... The would-be idol goes to the studios.&nbsp;... The casting director, he is merely a hand that rejects or selects.&nbsp;... And the rest just tells how he loses out all around.}}
{{blockquote|It is not much. Just about a man who is a fine actor in Iowa or somewhere and who comes to Hollywood and expects to conquer it overnight.&nbsp;... The would-be idol goes to the studios.&nbsp;... The casting director, he is merely a hand that rejects or selects.&nbsp;... And the rest just tells how he loses out all around.}}


Sources differ on when and where the film premiered. According to film critic Daniel Eagan, Florey premiered the film in a movie club in [[Los Angeles]],<ref name="Eagan142" /> while film writer [[Anthony Slide]] wrote that it opened at [[New York City]]'s Cameo Theatre on June 17, 1928.<ref name="Slide49" /> However, David E. James said the film had its true premiere at Charlie Chaplin's villa in [[Beverly Hills, California]].<ref name="James43" /> Chaplin, who by this time was disenchanted with many aspects of Hollywood filmmaking,<ref name="Eagan142" /> was so impressed with the film that he watched it five times,<ref name="James43" /><ref name="Taves98" /> and then screened it for guests at his home. This audience included elites from the film industry,<ref name="James43" /><ref name="Taves98" /><ref name="Eagan142" /> including Douglas Fairbanks, [[John Considine (impresario)|John Considine]], [[Harry d'Abbadie d'Arrast|Harry d'Arrast]], [[D. W. Griffith]], [[Jesse L. Lasky]], [[Ernst Lubitsch]], [[Lewis Milestone]], [[Mary Pickford]], [[Joseph M. Schenck]], [[Norma Talmadge]], [[Josef von Sternberg]], and [[King Vidor]].<ref name="Zecevic12">{{Harvnb|Zecević|1983|p=12}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|James|2001|p=47}}</ref> The screening was accompanied by a record of ''Rhapsody in Blue'', as well as Chaplin himself playing the organ.<ref name="Zecevic12" /> Florey was so fearful of a negative reaction due to the film's satire of Hollywood that he removed his name from the credits and hid in the projection room during the screening. While the audience originally expected it to be one of Chaplin's gags,<ref name="Taves88" /><ref name="Zecevic12" /> they were very impressed with the film,<ref name="Taves98" /><ref name="Eagan142" /><ref name="Zecevic12" /> and Schenck arranged for it to be shown on a [[Regal Entertainment Group|United Artists Theater]] on [[Broadway (Manhattan)|Broadway]] starting on March 21, 1928.<ref name="James43" /><ref name="Spears216" /><ref name="Taves99">{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|p=99}}</ref> A special musical score, based on ''Rhapsody in Blue'', was prepared by [[Hugo Riesenfeld]] for the showing, which was played by a live orchestra,<ref name="Zecevic12" /><ref name="Taves99" /> and made heavy use of the [[saxophone]].<ref name="Zecevic12" /> With a presentation usually reserved for bigger budget films, it played twice nightly along with the [[Gloria Swanson]] film ''[[Sadie Thompson]]'' (1928), and was billed as "the first of the impressionistic photoplays to be made in America".<ref name="Taves99" />
Sources differ about when and where the film premiered. According to film critic Daniel Eagan, Florey premiered the film in a movie club in Los Angeles;<ref name="Eagan142" /> according to [[Anthony Slide]], it opened at [[New York City]]'s Cameo Theatre on June 17, 1928.<ref name="Slide49" /> David E. James said that the film had its true premiere at Charlie Chaplin's Beverly Hills villa.<ref name="James43" /> Chaplin, who had become disenchanted with many aspects of Hollywood filmmaking,<ref name="Eagan142" /> was so impressed with the film that he watched it five times<ref name="James43" /><ref name="Taves98" /> and screened it for guests at his home. His audience included film-industry elites<ref name="James43" /><ref name="Taves98" /><ref name="Eagan142" /> including Douglas Fairbanks, [[John Considine (impresario)|John Considine]], [[Harry d'Abbadie d'Arrast|Harry d'Arrast]], [[D. W. Griffith]], [[Jesse L. Lasky]], [[Ernst Lubitsch]], [[Lewis Milestone]], [[Mary Pickford]], [[Joseph M. Schenck]], [[Norma Talmadge]], [[Josef von Sternberg]], and [[King Vidor]].<ref name="Zecevic12">{{Harvnb|Zecević|1983|p=12}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|James|2001|p=47}}</ref> Chaplin's screening was accompanied by a record of ''Rhapsody in Blue'' and the comedian playing the organ.<ref name="Zecevic12" /> Florey was so concerned about a negative reaction to the film's satire of Hollywood that he removed his name from the credits and hid in the projection room during the screening. Although the audience originally expected it to be one of Chaplin's gags,<ref name="Taves88" /><ref name="Zecevic12" /> they were impressed with the film<ref name="Taves98" /><ref name="Eagan142" /><ref name="Zecevic12" /> and Schenck arranged for it to begin screening at a [[Regal Cinemas|United Artists theater]] on [[Broadway (Manhattan)|Broadway]] on March 21, 1928.<ref name="James43" /><ref name="Spears216" /><ref name="Taves99">{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|p=99}}</ref> A musical score, based on ''Rhapsody in Blue'' and played by a live orchestra (featuring the [[saxophone]]), was prepared by [[Hugo Riesenfeld]] for the showing.<ref name="Zecevic12" /><ref name="Taves99" /> With a presentation usually reserved for bigger-budget films, it played twice nightly with the [[Gloria Swanson]] film ''[[Sadie Thompson (film)|Sadie Thompson]]'' and was billed as "the first of the impressionistic photoplays to be made in America".<ref name="Taves99" />


The film was heavily publicized,<ref>{{Harvnb|Moritz|1996|p=217}}</ref> which many of the media reports emphasizing its low budget of $97.<ref name="Zecevic12" /> It achieved enough fame to become picked up for distribution by FBO Pictures Corporation,<ref name="Jacobs9" /><ref name="Eagan142" /><ref name="Taves99" /> which eventually became [[RKO Pictures]] through a merger.<ref name="Eagan142" /><ref name="Taves99" /> The company released the film to more than 700 theaters in North America and Europe.<ref name="Jacobs9" /><ref name="Zecevic12" /> In North America, it was shown not only in New York and Hollywood, but also in the [[Philadelphia]], [[Cleveland]], [[Montreal]], and [[Washington, D.C.]] areas.<ref name="Taves99" /> It played in Philadelphia along with ''[[Prem Sanyas]]'' (1925), but it generated more praise than the main attraction film and earned $32 in a single week.<ref name="Taves117">{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|p=117}}</ref> ''A Hollywood Extra'' became one of the first widely seen American avant-garde films, not only in the United States but also throughout the [[Soviet Union]] and Europe,<ref name="James41" /><ref name="Taves113">{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|p=113}}</ref> including [[England]], [[France]], [[Germany]], and [[Italy]].<ref name="Taves113" /> The French rights for the film, along with Florey's ''[[The Love of Zero]]'' (1928), were sold for $390.<ref name="Taves117" />
The film was heavily publicized,<ref>{{Harvnb|Moritz|1996|p=217}}</ref> with many media reports emphasizing its $97 budget.<ref name="Zecevic12" /> It received enough notice to be picked up for distribution by FBO Pictures Corporation,<ref name="Jacobs9" /><ref name="Eagan142" /><ref name="Taves99" /> which eventually became part of [[RKO Pictures]].<ref name="Eagan142" /><ref name="Taves99" /> The company released ''A Hollywood Extra'' to more than 700 theaters in North America and Europe.<ref name="Jacobs9" /><ref name="Zecevic12" /> In North America, it was shown in New York, Hollywood, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Montreal, and Washington, D.C.<ref name="Taves99" /> The film played in Philadelphia with ''[[Prem Sanyas]]'' (1925), receiving more praise than the main attraction and earning $32 in one week.<ref name="Taves117">{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|p=117}}</ref> ''A Hollywood Extra'' became one of the first widely-seen American avant-garde films in the United States, the Soviet Union, and Europe<ref name="James41" /><ref name="Taves113">{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|p=113}}</ref> (England, France, Germany, and Italy).<ref name="Taves113" /> The French rights for the film and Florey's ''The Love of Zero'' (1928) were sold for $390.<ref name="Taves117" />


Although the film was made in opposition to classical style, it was embraced by those within the Hollywood industry,<ref name="James41" /><ref name="Taves93">{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|p=93}}</ref> and ultimately helped Florey, Vorkapić, and Toland get more prestigious assignments within the film industry.<ref name="James43" /><ref name="Taves93" /> Vorapich was offered a special effects position at [[Paramount Pictures]] shortly after ''A Hollywood Extra'' was released.<ref name="James43" /> Paramount wanted to hire Florey for the position, but after Josef von Sternberg clarified that Vorkapić was most responsible for ''A Hollywood Extra''{{'}}s special effects, they made the offer to him.<ref name="Zecevic12" /> Film production designer [[William Cameron Menzies]] was anxious to work with Florey after watching ''A Hollywood Extra'', so the two co-authored ''The Love of Zero'', with Florey directing and Menzies designing the sets.<ref name="Taves 1998 116"/><ref name="Taves193">{{Harvnb|Taves|1987|p=193}}</ref>
Although ''A Hollywood Extra'' avoided conventional filmmaking, it was embraced by Hollywood<ref name="James41" /><ref name="Taves93">{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|p=93}}</ref> and aided Florey, Vorkapić, and Toland's careers;<ref name="James43" /><ref name="Taves93" /> Vorkapić was offered a special-effects position at [[Paramount Pictures]] shortly after the film's release.<ref name="James43" /> Paramount wanted to hire Florey for the position, but after Josef von Sternberg said that Vorkapić was primarily responsible for ''A Hollywood Extra''{{'}}s special effects they offered him the job instead.<ref name="Zecevic12" /> Film [[production designer]] [[William Cameron Menzies]] wanted to work with Florey after seeing ''A Hollywood Extra'', so they collaborated on ''The Love of Zero''; Florey directed, and Menzies designed the sets.<ref name="Taves 1998 116"/><ref name="Taves193">{{Harvnb|Taves|1987|p=193}}</ref>


==Reception==
==Reception==
{{Quote box |bgcolor=#FFFFF0 |salign=center |width=225px |align=right | quote = To the extent that ''The Life and Death of 9413: A Hollywood Extra'' dramatizes the condition of human life enthralled by and ruined by the entertainment industry, the all-pervading, massively powerful imagery of capital itself, it is the prototypical 20th century avant-garde film. | source = David E. James, film historian<ref name="James47" />}}
{{Quote box |bgcolor=#FFFFF0 |salign=center |width=225px |align=right | quote = To the extent that ''The Life and Death of 9413: A Hollywood Extra'' dramatizes the condition of human life enthralled by and ruined by the entertainment industry, the all-pervading, massively powerful imagery of capital itself, it is the prototypical 20th century avant-garde film. | source = David E. James, film historian<ref name="James47" />}}
The film was well received by critics, both in its time period and in modern day.<ref name="James41" /><ref name="Taves113" /> One reviewer said it ranked in cinema "where [[Gertrude Stein]] ranks in poetry",<ref name="James41" /> while another praised Florey as "the [[Eugene O'Neill]] of the cinema".<ref name="Taves88" /> A 1929 edition of ''Movie Makers'', the official publication of the Amateur Cinema League, called it a triumph of amateur experimentation and imaginative use of limited resources.<ref name="Zimmermann88" /> In a separate ''Movie Makers'' article, Herman G. Weinberg called the scenery "a fantastically beautiful vision of a dream metropolis, done in the expressionistic manner, but done with a fine eye for the camera and the context of the piece".<ref name="Weinberg867">{{Harvnb|Weinberg|1929|p=867}}</ref> C. Adolph Glassgold, contributing editor for the journal ''The Arts'', called it "a truly tremendous picture" and said Florey could become "the eventual leader of cinematic art". He added: "It has movement, tempo, form, intensity of feeling, highly dramatic moments; in short, it is a real motion picture."<ref name="Glassgold290" /> In a ''Film Mercury'' review, Anabel Lane predicted Florey would "one day hold a position of one of the bigger film directors", and said of the film: "If this production had been made in Europe and heralded as a hit, it would&nbsp;... have been called a masterpiece."<ref name="Taves88" /> One reviewer from ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' even speculated as to whether ''A Hollywood Extra'' was "an unannounced foreign-made short" given how similar in style it was to European art films.<ref name="James41" /><ref name="Taves113" /> Film director [[Henry King (director)|Henry King]] praised the film as "way ahead of its time" and "a stroke of genius", declaring: "It was the most original thought I ever saw".<ref name="Taves98" />
The film was well received by contemporary and present-day critics.<ref name="James41" /><ref name="Taves113" /> According to one reviewer, it ranked in cinema "where [[Gertrude Stein]] ranks in poetry";<ref name="James41" /> another called Florey "the [[Eugene O'Neill]] of the cinema".<ref name="Taves88" /> A 1929 edition of ''Movie Makers'', the official publication of the Amateur Cinema League, called it a triumph of amateur experimentation and an imaginative use of limited resources.<ref name="Zimmermann88" /> In a separate ''Movie Makers'' article, Herman G. Weinberg called its scenery "a fantastically beautiful vision of a dream metropolis, done in the expressionistic manner, but done with a fine eye for the camera and the context of the piece".<ref name="Weinberg867">{{Harvnb|Weinberg|1929|p=867}}</ref> C. Adolph Glassgold, contributing editor of the journal ''The Arts'', called ''A Hollywood Extra'' "a truly tremendous picture" and said that Florey could become "the eventual leader of cinematic art": "It has movement, tempo, form, intensity of feeling, highly dramatic moments; in short, it is a real motion picture."<ref name="Glassgold290" /> In a ''Film Mercury'' review, Anabel Lane predicted that Florey would "one day hold a position of one of the bigger film directors": "If this production had been made in Europe and heralded as a hit, it would&nbsp;... have been called a masterpiece."<ref name="Taves88" /> A ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' reviewer wondered if ''A Hollywood Extra'' was "an unannounced foreign-made short", given its stylistic similarity to European art films.<ref name="James41" /><ref name="Taves113" /> Film director [[Henry King (director)|Henry King]] called it "way ahead of its time" and "a stroke of genius": "It was the most original thought I ever saw".<ref name="Taves98" />


It has also been acclaimed by modern-day film historians and critics, and has often been included in lists of the most prominent experimental films.<ref name="James41" /> Brian Taves called it a "landmark" of avant-garde film,<ref name="Taves94" /> and said: "''A Hollywood Extra'' was something entirely new, in both style and substance; more than any other American film, it initiated the avant-garde in this country."<ref name="Taves114">{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|p=114}}</ref> Film historian William Moritz called it "a genuine little masterpiece",<ref name="Moritz216" /> and "perhaps the most famous American experimental film of the 1920s".<ref>{{Harvnb|Moritz|1996|p=214}}</ref> Hye Seung Chung, a film professor at [[Colorado State University]], called the film an "early American avant-garde masterpiece" and described Florey as "one of the most undeservingly neglected B film auteurs".<ref>{{Harvnb|Chung|2006|p=67}}</ref> David E. James called it the "prototypical 20th-century avant-garde film",<ref name="James47">{{Harvnb|James|2005|p=47}}</ref> and wrote that ''A Hollywood Extra''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s successful commercial distribution indicates experimental films were acceptable among a popular audience during its time period, "rather than only an elite or mandarin audience".<ref name="James43" /> Director and author [[Lewis Jacobs]] wrote: "Its style, broad and impressionistic, disclosed a remarkable sensitivity and resourcefulness in the use of props, painting, camera, and editing."<ref name="Jacobs9" />
''A Hollywood Extra'' has been praised by modern film historians and critics, who often include it on lists of prominent experimental films.<ref name="James41" /> Brian Taves called it a "landmark" of avant-garde film:<ref name="Taves94" /> "''A Hollywood Extra'' was something entirely new, in both style and substance; more than any other American film, it initiated the avant-garde in this country."<ref name="Taves114">{{Harvnb|Taves|1998|p=114}}</ref> Film historian William Moritz called it "a genuine little masterpiece"<ref name="Moritz216" /> and "perhaps the most famous American experimental film of the 1920s".<ref>{{Harvnb|Moritz|1996|p=214}}</ref> [[Colorado State University]] film professor Hye Seung Chung called the film an "early American avant-garde masterpiece", and described Florey as "one of the most undeservingly neglected B film auteurs".<ref>{{Harvnb|Chung|2006|p=67}}</ref> David E. James described it as the "prototypical 20th-century avant-garde film",<ref name="James47">{{Harvnb|James|2005|p=47}}</ref> and ''A Hollywood Extra''{{'s}} commercial success indicates that experimental films were acceptable to contemporary popular viewers "rather than only an elite or mandarin audience".<ref name="James43" /> Director and author [[Lewis Jacobs]] wrote, "Its style, broad and impressionistic, disclosed a remarkable sensitivity and resourcefulness in the use of props, painting, camera, and editing."<ref name="Jacobs9" />


The entirety of the original ''A Hollywood Extra'' has not survived.<ref name="Slide48" /> In 1997, the film was selected for preservation in the United States [[National Film Registry]] by the [[Library of Congress]] as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant".<ref>{{cite web |title=New to the National Film Registry |publisher=[[Library of Congress]] |date=December 1997 |url=https://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/9712/nfr.html |accessdate=November 14, 2015}}</ref> The film has been restored and released on two DVD collections: ''Unseen Cinema: Early American Avant Garde Film 1894–1941'', by [[Image Entertainment]],<ref>{{Harvnb|Krinsky|2005}}</ref> and ''Avant-Garde: Experimental Cinema of the 1920s and 1930s'', by [[Kino International (company)|Kino International]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Erickson|2005}}</ref> In 1996, the [[British Film Institute|BFI]] commissioned composer [[David Sawer]] to write a score for the film. It and first performed by the Matrix Ensemble, conducted by Robert Ziegler. The work, called ''Hollywood Extra'', is scored for eight musicians and was published by [[Universal Edition]].<ref>{{cite web |title=David Sawer: Hollywood Extra |publisher=[[Universal Edition]] |url=https://www.universaledition.com/david-sawer-632/works/hollywood-extra-2757 |accessdate=November 14, 2015}}</ref>
The full, original film has not survived.<ref name="Slide48" />{{Disputed inline|talk=Talk:The_Life_and_Death_of_9413:_a_Hollywood_Extra#"The_full,_original_film_has_not_survived"?|for=conflicts between length listings|date=March 2024}} In 1997, however, it was selected for preservation in the United States [[National Film Registry]] by the [[Library of Congress]] as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant".<ref>{{cite web |title=New to the National Film Registry |publisher=Library of Congress |date=December 1997 |url=https://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/9712/nfr.html |access-date=November 14, 2015}}</ref> ''A Hollywood Extra'' has been restored and released on two DVD collections: ''Unseen Cinema: Early American Avant Garde Film 1894–1941'' (by [[Image Entertainment]])<ref>{{Harvnb|Krinsky|2005}}</ref> and ''Avant-Garde: Experimental Cinema of the 1920s and '30s'', by [[Kino International (company)|Kino International]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Erickson|2005}}</ref> The [[British Film Institute]] commissioned [[David Sawer]] to compose a score in 1996; it was first performed by the Matrix Ensemble, conducted by Robert Ziegler. The score, ''Hollywood Extra'', was written for eight musicians and published by [[Universal Edition]].<ref>{{cite web |title=David Sawer: Hollywood Extra |publisher=Universal Edition|url=https://www.universaledition.com/david-sawer-632/works/hollywood-extra-2757 |access-date=November 14, 2015}}</ref>


==Remake==
==Remake==
{{main|Hollywood Boulevard (1936 film)}}
{{main|Hollywood Boulevard (1936 film)}}
''The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra'' was adapted into a remake called ''[[Hollywood Boulevard (1936 film)|Hollywood Boulevard]]'' (1936), which was co-written and directed by Florey.<ref name="Taves99" /><ref>{{Harvnb|Posner|2001|p=19}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Giovacchini|2001|p=23}}</ref> Like in the original film, the remake's central character is an actor seeking a job in Hollywood, who is subjected to the cruelties of the film industry and the whims of studio executives and film producers.<ref name="Taves99" /><ref name="Taves198">{{Harvnb|Taves|1987|p=198}}</ref> ''Hollywood Boulevard'' also includes some visual similarities to the original film, such as unusual angles to reflect the disordered nature of Hollywood.<ref name="Taves99" /> However, the remake includes several subplots that lengthen the running time of the film and make it more attractive to mass audiences,<ref name="Taves193" /><ref name="Taves198" /> which Brian Taves said "tend(s) to diminish the importance of the central characterization, depriving ''Hollywood Boulevard'' of the singleness of purpose that made ''A Hollywood Extra'' so unforgettable".<ref name="Taves198" />
''The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra'' was remade as ''Hollywood Boulevard'', a 1936 film co-written and directed by Florey.<ref name="Taves99" /><ref>{{Harvnb|Posner|2001|p=19}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Giovacchini|2001|p=23}}</ref> Like ''A Hollywood Extra'', its central character is an actor seeking a job in Hollywood who experiences the cruelty of the film industry and the whims of producers and studio executives.<ref name="Taves99" /><ref name="Taves198">{{Harvnb|Taves|1987|p=198}}</ref> ''Hollywood Boulevard'' has visual similarities to the original film, such as unusual angles which reflect Hollywood's disordered nature.<ref name="Taves99" /> It includes several subplots which extend its running time and appeal to mass audiences<ref name="Taves193" /><ref name="Taves198" />—but, Brian Taves said, "tend to diminish the importance of the central characterization, depriving ''Hollywood Boulevard'' of the singleness of purpose that made ''A Hollywood Extra'' so unforgettable".<ref name="Taves198" />


==References==
==References==
Line 133: Line 133:


===Bibliography===
===Bibliography===
*{{cite journal |last=Allen |first=Richard |title=The Life and Death of 9413, a Hollywood Extra |journal=Framework: The Journal of Cinema & Media |year=1983 |volume=21 |publisher=[[Wayne State University Press]] |location=[[Detroit]] |url=http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/entertainment-reviews/31170659/archeology-film-theory-7-slavko-vorkapich-hollywood-extra-1927 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite journal |last=Allen |first=Richard |title=The Life and Death of 9413, a Hollywood Extra |journal=Framework: The Journal of Cinema & Media |year=1983 |volume=21 |publisher=[[Wayne State University Press]] |location=Detroit]|url=http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/entertainment-reviews/31170659/archeology-film-theory-7-slavko-vorkapich-hollywood-extra-1927 }}{{dead link|date=November 2020|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}
*{{cite book |editor-last=Bawden |editor-first=Liz-Anne |title=The Oxford Companion to Film |year=1976 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |location=[[Oxford]] |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nYIYAAAAIAAJ |isbn=0192115413 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |editor-last=Bawden |editor-first=Liz-Anne |title=The Oxford Companion to Film |year=1976 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |location=[[Oxford]] |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nYIYAAAAIAAJ |isbn=0192115413 }}
*{{cite book |last=Chung |first=Hye Seung |title=Hollywood Asian: Philip Ahn and the Politics of Cross-Ethnic Performance |year=2006 |publisher=[[Temple University Press]] |location=[[Philadelphia]] |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OZzweQ9L8dsC |isbn=1592135161 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=Chung |first=Hye Seung |title=Hollywood Asian: Philip Ahn and the Politics of Cross-Ethnic Performance |year=2006 |publisher=[[Temple University Press]] |location=Philadelphia |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OZzweQ9L8dsC |isbn=1592135161 }}
*{{cite book |last=Dixon |first=Wheeler Winston |title=Black and White Cinema: A Short History |year=2015 |chapter=The 1940s: A Black-and-White World |publisher=[[Rutgers University Press]] |location=[[New Brunswick, New Jersey]] |isbn=978-0813572413 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=Dixon |first=Wheeler Winston |title=Black and White Cinema: A Short History |year=2015 |chapter=The 1940s: A Black-and-White World |publisher=[[Rutgers University Press]] |location=[[New Brunswick, New Jersey]] |isbn=978-0813572413 }}
*{{cite book |last=Eagan |first=Daniel |title=America's Film Legacy: The Authoritative Guide to the Landmark Movies in the National Film Registry |year=2010 |publisher=[[Continuum International Publishing Group]] |location=[[London]] |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=deq3xI8OmCkC |isbn=978-0826429773 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=Eagan |first=Daniel |title=America's Film Legacy: The Authoritative Guide to the Landmark Movies in the National Film Registry |year=2010 |publisher=[[Continuum International Publishing Group]] |location=London |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=deq3xI8OmCkC |isbn=978-0826429773 }}
*{{cite web |last=Erickson |first=Glenn |title=Avant Garde – Experimental Cinema of the 1920s & 1930s |publisher=[[DVD Talk]] |date=June 29, 2005 |url=http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/16585/avant-garde-experimental-cinema-of-the-1920s-1930s/ |accessdate=November 14, 2015 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite web |last=Erickson |first=Glenn |title=Avant Garde – Experimental Cinema of the 1920s & 1930s |publisher=[[DVD Talk]] |date=June 29, 2005 |url=http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/16585/avant-garde-experimental-cinema-of-the-1920s-1930s/ |access-date=November 14, 2015 }}
*{{cite journal |last=Glassgold |first=C. Adolph |journal=The Arts |title=9413 |year=1928 |publisher=The Arts Publishing Corporation |location=[[New York City]] |ref=harv}}
* {{cite journal |last=Glassgold |first=C. Adolph |journal=The Arts |title=9413 |year=1928 |publisher=The Arts Publishing Corporation |location=New York City }}
*{{cite book |last=Giovacchini |first=Saverio |title=Hollywood Modernism: Film and Politics in the Age of the New Deal |year=2001 |chapter=Modernism, Intellectual Immigrants, and the Rebirth of Hollywood |publisher=[[Temple University Press]] |location=[[Philadelphia]] |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&id=Qh9AvqM501AC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=%22The+Life+and+Death+of+9413:+a+Hollywood+Extra%22&sig=HiJXBh6rDhl5AHJQu-uhlXeC2Iw#v=onepage&q=%22Hollywood%20Extra%22 |isbn=1566398630 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=Giovacchini |first=Saverio |title=Hollywood Modernism: Film and Politics in the Age of the New Deal |year=2001 |chapter=Modernism, Intellectual Immigrants, and the Rebirth of Hollywood |publisher=[[Temple University Press]] |location=Philadelphia |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Qh9AvqM501AC&q=%22The+Life+and+Death+of+9413:+a+Hollywood+Extra%22&pg=PR9 |isbn=1566398630 }}
*{{cite book |last=Jacobs |first=Lewis |author-link=Lewis Jacobs |title=Hollywood Quarterly: Film Culture in Postwar America, 1945–1957 |year=2002 |chapter=Experimental Cinema in America: Part One: 1921–1941 |editor1-last=Smoodin |editor1-first=Eric |editor2-last=Martin |editor2-first=Ann |publisher=[[University of California Press]] |location=[[Oakland, California]] |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=R-Fs0Vwa_nQC&pg=PA9&lpg=PA9 |isbn=0520232747 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=Jacobs |first=Lewis |author-link=Lewis Jacobs |title=Hollywood Quarterly: Film Culture in Postwar America, 1945–1957 |year=2002 |chapter=Experimental Cinema in America: Part One: 1921–1941 |editor1-last=Smoodin |editor1-first=Eric |editor2-last=Martin |editor2-first=Ann |publisher=[[University of California Press]] |location=[[Oakland, California]] |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=R-Fs0Vwa_nQC&pg=PA9 |isbn=0520232747 }}
*{{cite book |last=James |first=David E. |title=Unseen Cinema: Early American Avant-Garde Film 1893–1941 |year=2001 |chapter=Hollywood Extras: One Tradition of "Avant-Garde" Film in Los Angeles |editor-first=Bruce Charles |editor-last=Posner |publisher=[[Anthology Film Archives]] |location=[[New York City]] |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ENljuNjmehYC&pg=PA45 |isbn=0962818178 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=James |first=David E. |title=Unseen Cinema: Early American Avant-Garde Film 1893–1941 |year=2001 |chapter=Hollywood Extras: One Tradition of "Avant-Garde" Film in Los Angeles |editor-first=Bruce Charles |editor-last=Posner |publisher=[[Anthology Film Archives]] |location=New York City |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ENljuNjmehYC&pg=PA45 |isbn=0962818178 }}
*{{cite book |last=James |first=David E. |title=The Most Typical Avant-Garde: History and Geography of Minor Cinemas in Los Angeles |year=2005 |publisher=[[University of California Press]] |location=[[Oakland, California]] |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=n0mkbWQ6hIcC&pg=PA39 |isbn=0520242580 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=James |first=David E. |title=The Most Typical Avant-Garde: History and Geography of Minor Cinemas in Los Angeles |year=2005 |publisher=[[University of California Press]] |location=Oakland, California |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=n0mkbWQ6hIcC&pg=PA39 |isbn=0520242580 }}
* {{cite web |last=Krinsky |first=Tamara |title='Unseen Cinema' Unveiled: Seven-DVD Set of Early Avant-Garde Rarities Released Through Image Entertainment |publisher=[[International Documentary Association]] |date=November 30, 2005 |url=http://www.documentary.org/magazine/unseen-cinema-unveiled-seven-dvd-set-early-avant-garde-rarities-released-through-image-ente |accessdate=November 14, 2015 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite web |last=Krinsky |first=Tamara |title='Unseen Cinema' Unveiled: Seven-DVD Set of Early Avant-Garde Rarities Released Through Image Entertainment |publisher=[[International Documentary Association]] |date=November 30, 2005 |url=http://www.documentary.org/magazine/unseen-cinema-unveiled-seven-dvd-set-early-avant-garde-rarities-released-through-image-ente |access-date=November 14, 2015 }}
*{{cite book |last=Merritt |first=Greg |title=Celluloid Mavericks: A History of American Independent Film Making |year=2000 |publisher=[[Perseus Books Group|Thunder's Mouth Press]] |location=[[New York City]] |isbn=1560252324 |ref=harv |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/celluloidmaveric00merr }}
* {{cite book |last=Merritt |first=Greg |title=Celluloid Mavericks: A History of American Independent Film Making |year=2000 |publisher=[[Perseus Books Group|Thunder's Mouth Press]] |location=New York City |isbn=1560252324 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/celluloidmaveric00merr }}
*{{cite book |last=Moritz |first=William |author-link=William Moritz |title=On the Edge of America: California Modernist Art, 1900–1950 |chapter=Visual Music and Film-as-an-Art before 1950 |year=1996 |publisher=[[University of California Press]] |location=[[Oakland, California]] |isbn=0520088506 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=Moritz |first=William |author-link=William Moritz |title=On the Edge of America: California Modernist Art, 1900–1950 |chapter=Visual Music and Film-as-an-Art before 1950 |year=1996 |publisher=[[University of California Press]] |location=Oakland, California |isbn=0520088506 }}
*{{cite book |last=Posner |first=Bruce |title=Unseen Cinema: Early American Avant-Garde Film 1893–1941 |year=2001 |publisher=[[Anthology Film Archives]] |location=[[New York City]] |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ENljuNjmehYC&pg=PA103 |isbn=0962818178 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=Posner |first=Bruce |title=Unseen Cinema: Early American Avant-Garde Film 1893–1941 |year=2001 |publisher=[[Anthology Film Archives]] |location=New York City |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ENljuNjmehYC&pg=PA103 |isbn=0962818178 }}
*{{cite book |last=Slide |first=Anthony |author-link=Anthony Slide |title=Hollywood Unknowns: A History of Extras, Bit Players, and Stand-Ins |year=2012 |publisher=[[University Press of Mississippi]] |location=[[Jackson, Mississippi]] |isbn=978-1617034749 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=Slide |first=Anthony |author-link=Anthony Slide |title=Hollywood Unknowns: A History of Extras, Bit Players, and Stand-Ins |year=2012 |publisher=[[University Press of Mississippi]] |location=Jackson |isbn=978-1617034749 }}
*{{cite journal |last=Spears |first=Jack |journal=Films in Review |title=Robert Florey |date=April 1960 |volume=11 |publisher=[[National Board of Review|National Board of Review of Motion Pictures]] |location=[[New York City]] |ref=harv}}
* {{cite journal |last=Spears |first=Jack |journal=Films in Review |title=Robert Florey |date=April 1960 |volume=11 |publisher=[[National Board of Review|National Board of Review of Motion Pictures]] |location=New York City }}
*{{cite thesis|last=Taves |first=Brian |date=May 1984 |title=Robert Florey: The French Expressionist: A Critical Biography |type=Thesis |chapter=Early Years, 1900–1928 |publisher=[[University of Southern California]] |docket=Cin '84 T234 3075H3.63 |chapter-url=http://digitallibrary.usc.edu/cdm/ref/collection/p15799coll20/id/38487 |access-date=November 13, 2015 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304194758/http://digitallibrary.usc.edu/cdm/ref/collection/p15799coll20/id/38487 |archivedate=March 4, 2016 |ref=harv |url-status=dead }}
* {{cite thesis|last=Taves |first=Brian |date=May 1984 |title=Robert Florey: The French Expressionist: A Critical Biography |type=Thesis |chapter=Early Years, 1900–1928 |publisher=[[University of Southern California]] |docket=Cin '84 T234 3075H3.63 |chapter-url=http://digitallibrary.usc.edu/cdm/ref/collection/p15799coll20/id/38487 |access-date=November 13, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304194758/http://digitallibrary.usc.edu/cdm/ref/collection/p15799coll20/id/38487 |archive-date=March 4, 2016 |url-status=dead }}
*{{cite book |last=Taves |first=Brian |title=Robert Florey: The French Expressionist |year=1987 |publisher=[[Rowman & Littlefield|Scarecrow Press]] |location=[[Lanham, Maryland]] |isbn=0810819295 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=Taves |first=Brian |title=Robert Florey: The French Expressionist |year=1987 |publisher=[[Rowman & Littlefield|Scarecrow Press]] |location=[[Lanham, Maryland]] |isbn=0810819295 }}
*{{cite book |last=Taves |first=Brian |title=Lovers of Cinema: The First American Film Avant-Garde, 1919–1945 |chapter=Robert Florey and the Hollywood Avant-Garde |year=1998 |publisher=[[University of Wisconsin Press]] |location=[[Madison, Wisconsin]] |isbn=0299146847 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=Taves |first=Brian |title=Lovers of Cinema: The First American Film Avant-Garde, 1919–1945 |chapter=Robert Florey and the Hollywood Avant-Garde |year=1998 |publisher=[[University of Wisconsin Press]] |location=Madison|isbn=0299146847 }}
*{{cite book |last=Taves |first=Brian |title=Unseen Cinema: Early American Avant-Garde Film 1893–1941 |year=2001 |chapter=Robert Florey and the Hollywood Avant-Garde |publisher=[[Anthology Film Archives]] |location=[[New York City]] |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ENljuNjmehYC&pg=PA103 |isbn=0962818178 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=Taves |first=Brian |title=Unseen Cinema: Early American Avant-Garde Film 1893–1941 |year=2001 |chapter=Robert Florey and the Hollywood Avant-Garde |publisher=[[Anthology Film Archives]] |location=New York City |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ENljuNjmehYC&pg=PA103 |isbn=0962818178 }}
*{{cite journal |ref=harv|last=Watson |first=J. S. Jr.|title=The Amateur Takes Leadership: How Experimenters, in Circumventing Production Difficulties, Have Achieved the Greatest Cinematic Advance Since 'The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari' |journal=Movie Makers |date=January 1929 |volume=4 |number=1 |publisher=Amateur Cinema League Inc. |location=[[New York City]]}}
* {{cite journal |last=Watson |first=J. S. Jr.|title=The Amateur Takes Leadership: How Experimenters, in Circumventing Production Difficulties, Have Achieved the Greatest Cinematic Advance Since 'The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari' |journal=Movie Makers |date=January 1929 |volume=4 |number=1 |publisher=Amateur Cinema League Inc. |location=New York City}}
*{{cite journal |ref=harv|last=Weinberg |first=Herman G. |title=A Paradox of the Photoplay: A Professional Turns Amateur and Wins Professional Status |journal=Movie Makers |date=January 1929 |volume=4 |number=1 |publisher=Amateur Cinema League Inc. |location=[[New York City]]}}
* {{cite journal |last=Weinberg |first=Herman G. |title=A Paradox of the Photoplay: A Professional Turns Amateur and Wins Professional Status |journal=Movie Makers |date=January 1929 |volume=4 |number=1 |publisher=Amateur Cinema League Inc. |location=New York City}}
*{{cite journal |last=Zecević |first=Bozidar |title=Archeology of a Film Extra: Slavko Vorkapich: A Hollywood Extra |journal=Framework: The Journal of Cinema & Media |year=1983 |issue=21 |publisher=[[Wayne State University Press]] |location=[[Detroit]] |url=http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/entertainment-reviews/31170659/archeology-film-theory-7-slavko-vorkapich-hollywood-extra-1927 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite journal |last=Zecević |first=Bozidar |title=Archeology of a Film Extra: Slavko Vorkapich: A Hollywood Extra |journal=Framework: The Journal of Cinema & Media |year=1983 |issue=21 |publisher=[[Wayne State University Press]] |location=Detroit |url=http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/entertainment-reviews/31170659/archeology-film-theory-7-slavko-vorkapich-hollywood-extra-1927 }}{{dead link|date=November 2020|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}
*{{cite book |last=Zimmerman |first=Patricia R. |title=Reel Families: A Social History of Amateur Film |year=1995 |publisher=[[Indiana University Press]] |location=[[Bloomington, Indiana]] |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kUlZzGpz_zEC |isbn=0253209447 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=Zimmerman |first=Patricia R. |title=Reel Families: A Social History of Amateur Film |year=1995 |publisher=[[Indiana University Press]] |location=Bloomington |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kUlZzGpz_zEC |isbn=0253209447 }}


==External links==
==External links==
* [https://www.loc.gov/static/programs/national-film-preservation-board/documents/hollywood_extra.pdf ''The Life and Death of 9413: A Hollywood Extra''] by Brian Taves on the [[National Film Registry]] website
*{{IMDb title|0131461}}
* {{IMDb title|0131461}}
*{{youtube|b3M5znXDlm4|''The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra''}}
*[http://www.silentera.com/PSFL/data/L/LifeAndDeathOfNineFour1928.html ''The Life and Death of 9413: A Hollywood Extra''] on SilentEra.com
* {{Internet Archive film|the-life-and-death-of-9413-a-hollywood-extra_1928|title = The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra}}
* [http://www.silentera.com/PSFL/data/L/LifeAndDeathOfNineFour1928.html ''The Life and Death of 9413: A Hollywood Extra''] on SilentEra.com
* {{youTube|_sDgeBZCf7g|The life and death of 9413 a Hollywood extra / with original music}}
{{Robert Florey}}
{{Robert Florey}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Life And Death Of 9413--A Hollywood Extra, The}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Life And Death Of 9413--A Hollywood Extra, The}}
[[Category:1928 films]]
[[Category:1928 films]]
[[Category:1920s short films]]
[[Category:1928 short films]]
[[Category:American films]]
[[Category:1920s avant-garde and experimental films]]
[[Category:American silent short films]]
[[Category:American silent short films]]
[[Category:American avant-garde and experimental films]]
[[Category:American avant-garde and experimental films]]
Line 176: Line 178:
[[Category:Films directed by Slavko Vorkapić]]
[[Category:Films directed by Slavko Vorkapić]]
[[Category:United States National Film Registry films]]
[[Category:United States National Film Registry films]]
[[Category:1920s American films]]
[[Category:Films with screenplays by Robert Florey]]
[[Category:Films about Hollywood, Los Angeles]]
[[Category:Films produced by Robert Florey]]
[[Category:1928 independent films]]

Latest revision as of 19:33, 15 August 2024

The Life and Death of 9413:
a Hollywood Extra
A gray screen with the words "the life and death of 9413 a hollywood extra" written in white text, in an angled, jagged font.
Title card from the film
Directed by
Written by
  • Robert Florey
  • Slavko Vorkapić
Produced by
Starring
  • Jules Raucourt
  • Voya George
  • Adriane Marsh
Cinematography
Music byGeorge Gershwin
Distributed byFBO Pictures Corporation
Release date
  • 1928 (1928)
Running time
11 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageSilent (English intertitles)
BudgetUS$97

The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra is a 1928 American silent experimental short film co-written and co-directed by Robert Florey and Slavko Vorkapić. Considered a landmark of American avant-garde cinema, it tells the story of a man (Jules Raucourt) who comes to Hollywood with dreams of becoming a star; he fails and becomes dehumanized, with studio executives reducing him to the role of an extra and writing the number "9413" on his forehead.

The film has abrupt cuts, rapid camera movement, extensive superimposition, dim lighting, and twisted shapes and forms at disorienting angles. Filmed on a budget of only $97 ($1,721 in today's dollars), it includes a combination of close-ups of live actors and long shots of miniature sets constructed from cardboard, paper cubes, tin cans, cigar boxes, and toy trains. With no access to Hollywood studios or equipment, most of the film was made in the filmmakers' homes (their walls painted black to provide a background).

The story was inspired by Florey's own experiences in Hollywood and George Gershwin's Rhapsody in Blue. It was one of the first films shot by Gregg Toland, who was later acclaimed for his work on such films as The Grapes of Wrath (1939) and Citizen Kane (1941). The film is a satire of Hollywood's social conditions, practices and ideologies, and the film industry's alleged mistreatment of actors. Douglas Fairbanks assisted with its development, and Charlie Chaplin and Joseph M. Schenck helped to promote it.

Unlike most experimental films, it received a wide release by FBO Pictures Corporation in more than 700 theaters in North America and Europe. The film has been well received by contemporary and present-day critics; according to film historian Brian Taves, "More than any other American film, it initiated the avant-garde in this country".[1] In 1997, it was selected for preservation by the National Film Registry.[2][3] Florey co-wrote and directed Hollywood Boulevard (1936), a lighter version of the film.

Plot

[edit]

Mr. Jones (Jules Raucourt), an artist and aspiring movie star, arrives in Hollywood and is immediately star-struck by the film industry's glitz and glamour. He speaks with a film-studio representative, presenting a letter of recommendation and trying to speak on his own behalf. The representative cuts him off, however, and writes the number "9413" on his forehead. From this point on, 9413 speaks only in unintelligible gibberish and moves mechanically, mindlessly following the instructions of film directors and studio representatives. He goes on a series of casting calls, but is unable to find success; he is repeatedly confronted with signs reading "No Casting Today". A series of images are interspersed through these scenes: shots of Hollywood, cameras filming, the word "Dreams" written in the stars, and a repeating loop of a man walking up a stairway toward the word "Success" without ever reaching the top.

Two men look at each other while applauding in the direction of a third man, who holds a paper mask in front of his face.
Studio executives applaud Extra #15 (Voya George) as he holds paper masks in front of his face, symbolizing his performances.

Unlike 9413, other extras around him become successful. A woman (Adriane Marsh) with the number 13 on her forehead repeatedly sits down and stands back up at the behest of a film director, and eventually succeeds in landing a part after she is greeted by a "Casting Today" sign. Another extra (Voya George) with the number 15, who (unlike 9413) has an expressionless, unenthusiastic facial expression, holds paper masks symbolizing his performances in front of his face. He is greeted enthusiastically by cheering crowds, all of whom speak in the same gibberish as 9413. His number is replaced with a star, and he becomes tremendously successful. 9413 admires the new movie star and can't contain his excitement when the two meet in person. He presents his own (much more impressive-looking) mask to the star to show he is also an actor. The star is unimpressed and turns his back on 9413, who sadly cradles his mask like a baby and laments his inability to achieve success.

Time passes, and 9413 remains unable to find work in Hollywood. Despite repeated phone calls to studio representatives begging for work, he is always confronted by "No Casting Today" signs. He cannot afford food, and bills he is unable to pay are slipped under his door. A series of images symbolizing his mental anguish include twisted trees blowing in the wind and a man lying on the stairway leading to "Success", still unable to reach the top. Starving, exhausted, and in despair about his failures, he collapses and dies. After the other actors laugh at him, his tombstone is shown. It reads: "Here Lies No. 9413, a Hollywood Extra"; the words "No Casting Today" appear next to it.

After his death, 9413's spirit leaves his body and is pulled up a ramp into the sky. As he gets higher, he grows angelic wings and ascends into heaven: a place with glittering crystal towers and bright, blinking lights. A hand removes the "9413" from his forehead, he smiles happily, and he flies further into heaven.

Production

[edit]

Conception

[edit]

Robert Florey and Slavko Vorkapić, who met after Florey attended one of Vorkapić's American Society of Cinematographers lectures,[4] are credited as co-writers and co-directors of The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra.[5] Although accounts differ about the two men's level of involvement in the film's creation, most identify Florey as primarily responsible.[6] According to film historian Brian Taves, Vorkapić was not involved in the writing or direction of the film; his contributions were limited to set design and miniature lighting, but Florey insisted on equal credit for Vorkapić's role in bringing the film to fruition.[6][7] Early reports about the film support this view, including a 1928 article about Florey in Hollywood Magazine.[6] Taves also says that Vorkapić did nothing to promote the film when it was first released, later exaggerating his role in its production when it became respected.[6][8] Paul Ivano, who did camerawork on the film, agreed: "Vorkapić tries to get credit, but he didn't do much."[9] Vorkapić has said that the initial idea was Florey's, and they discussed it and drafted a rough one-page synopsis together. However, "all the effects were devised, designed, photographed, and added by me", and "at least 90 percent of the editing and montage" was Vorkapić's work.[4] He said that he directed most of the opening and ending sequences, crediting Florey with filming the casting scene and the shots of laughing extras, and the rise of Voya George's character to stardom was filmed jointly.[4]

Within a few years of his arrival in Hollywood, Florey conceived a film about an ordinary actor's dreams of becoming a star and his failure to realize his hopes.[10] Florey's work as a publicist and journalist covering the film industry gave him a familiarity with the struggles of aspiring actors, and their disappointment at failing to achieve their dreams, which influenced the writing of A Hollywood Extra.[11] The final inspiration for the film, however, came after Florey attended a performance of George Gershwin's Rhapsody in Blue.[11][12][13] Florey had been working in Hollywood for only a few months when he heard Gershwin's music, and it inspired him to incorporate its rhythms into a film.[13] He later described the film as a "continuity in musical rhythm of the adventures of my extra in Hollywood, the movements and attitudes of which appeared to synchronize themselves with Gershwin's notes".[11] Although most avant-garde films of the time emphasized mood over emotion, he wanted his script to be equal parts abstraction and narrative.[14] Florey wrote it in precise detail, describing each shot relative to the length of film required (a budget necessity, due to the expense of film stock).[11]

Development

[edit]

Florey did not own a camera at the time, and his efforts to obtain one were unsuccessful until he met Vorkapić.[13][15] Florey recalled, "I say to Slav, 'Slav, I have an idea but not much money. You have a camera and are a clever painter. Let's make the picture in collaboration and we split the benefit.'"[15] According to Vorkapić, he said: "Florey, you get me $100 and I'll make you a picture in my own kitchen."[4] Vorkapić allowed Florey to borrow a small box camera which he had bought with the proceeds from the sale of one of his oil paintings.[13][16] It was a DeVry camera with one lens, a type which Florey said was sold as a "toy".[15] Florey had trouble obtaining film, since he found it too expensive to purchase negative and positive film from film laboratories.[13] Florey knew that film ends (scraps of leftover, unexposed film stock) were often discarded after shooting on big-budget Hollywood films, however, and he tried to persuade filmmakers to give them to him.[12][13] Camerawork had just been completed on The Gaucho (1927), a film starring Douglas Fairbanks, and Florey obtained more than 1,000 feet of film from the production in 10- and 20-foot strips.[13] He then spliced the film ends together by hand (a process he found time-consuming and frustrating), which resulted in the equivalent of a full reel of negative film.[13] Fairbanks (who had employed Florey to handle his European public relations) provided financial assistance,[12] gave Florey access to his editing rooms, and helped provide him with film ends.[12][17]

The film was shot by Gregg Toland (credited simply as "Gregg"),[18] who was also working as an assistant to cinematographer George Barnes at the Samuel Goldwyn Studio.[12] It was one of Toland's first films,[19] and the cinematographer was later acclaimed for his work on The Grapes of Wrath (1939) and Citizen Kane (1941).[16][20][21] The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra cost $97 ($1,721 today) to make,[12][22][23] paid entirely by Florey.[24] The budget consisted of $55 ($976 today) for development and printing, $25 ($444 today) for negatives, $14 ($248 today) for transportation, and $3 ($53 today) for store props (most of which cost five or ten cents apiece).[25] Of the development costs, the salaries for everyone involved in the film totaled $3.[4] Toland had the use of a Mitchell camera, which permitted some shots which would have been impossible with the DeVry camera (including about 300 feet of closeups).[26] Additional camerawork was by Paul Ivano;[27] according to Taves, Ivano was primarily responsible for much of the film's camerawork and Toland primarily handled the closeups.[6] A Hollywood Extra was shot on 35mm film,[5] over a three-week period in late 1927,[15] mainly on weekends.[5] No subtitles are used in the film. Only two captions are used, each with one word ("Dreams" and "Success"); they were produced by reflecting a moving light through cardboard cutouts, creating words among the shadows.[27]

Casting

[edit]
A man wearing a suit jacket and tie stares forward with a shocked and confused facial expression, with the numbers "9413" written across his forehead.
Jules Raucourt played the protagonist, who is dehumanized after studio representatives make him a film extra and write the number 9413 on his forehead.

The extra 9413 was played by Belgian actor Jules Raucourt, who was credited in the film simply as "Raucourt". Although Raucourt began his career as a leading man in silent action films, he became a film extra himself after cinema transitioned to the sound era.[28][29] Raucourt later wrote a novel, using the title of the film.[9] Extra 13 was played by Adriane Marsh, a film extra in real life[28][29] who never again had a credited film role.[29] Extra 15 (who becomes a movie star) was played by Voya George, a friend of Vorkapić[28][29] who went on to a career in European films.[4] Florey appears in the film as a casting director,[9][16] although only his disembodied mouth and hand are visible as he shakes his finger at the protagonist.[9] Vorkapić also had a brief role in the film, as the man endlessly climbing the staircase to "Success".[4]

Filming

[edit]

Since the filmmakers had no access to a studio,[23] the film was shot at their homes; walls were painted black, to provide a background.[23] According to Movie Makers writer Herman G. Weinberg and Jack Spears of Films in Review, it was filmed primarily at Florey's house;[23][30] however, film historian David E. James said that it was filmed in Vorkapić's kitchen.[5] In an interview, Florey said that filming was done in his kitchen and in Vorkapić's living room.[4] Some scenes were filmed in Toland's garage.[30][31] The film has three basic types of composition: miniature sets, close-ups of live actors, and newsreel-like scenes of Hollywood and film studios. It includes abrupt cuts, rapid camera movement, extensive superimposition, dim lighting, and twisted shapes and forms at disorienting angles. The film has elements of German Expressionism,[27][32][33] echoing The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920);[33][34] its opening credits, in particular, are angular and expressionistic.[5] A single 400-watt lamp was used as lighting for the film;[22][27] two lamps were originally planned, but one burned out before filming began.[4] During closeups, the actors would hold the light bulb in their hands to light their faces. When an actor changed position, they would switch the bulb from one hand to another.[23][26] The actors' faces are often in partial shadow as a result, their features obscured.[27] Toland also used small reflectors which he borrowed from film studios, which included a light bulb hung inside a cone-shaped mirror.[4] The film's acting is abstract and stylized, with the actors mouthing gibberish instead of speaking words.[16][33] A recording of Rhapsody in Blue was played constantly during filming, so that the actors would (in Florey's words) become "saturated" with the rhythm of the "blues". This was a source of annoyance for his neighbors and landlord.[9]

A series of slanted and curving girders representing an abstract city landscape are set in front of a hazy white backdrop. A slanted black sign appears in the foreground with the words "CASTING TODAY" written in jagged white text.
A silhouette of a man holding his arms in the air stands atop a wheeled platform ascending a diagonal girder. The backdrop is foggy and white, with silhouettes of curving trees and shapes visible.
Scenes of Hollywood cityscapes (top) and of heaven at the end of the film (bottom) were achieved with miniature sets made from paper cubes, tin cans, cigar boxes, toy trains and an Erector Set.

Scenes of Hollywood cityscapes and shots of heaven at the end of the film were achieved with miniature sets which were filmed in long shots to appear large and expansive.[35][36] A total of 45 sets were built, none larger than about two square feet and the most expensive costing $1.67. It took days to prepare the sets; Florey removed cardboard from laundered shirts and cut them into squares, which Vorkapić painted impressionistically to resemble buildings.[31] The elevated trains in the cityscapes were toy trains which Florey purchased and mounted on pasteboard runways; he pulled them along the track on a string with one hand, and shot the scene with the other.[35] Movement on the miniature sets was simulated by moving lamps and casting shadows.[36] To make the sets look more realistic (and to conceal defects), prisms and kaleidoscopes were placed in front of the camera lens and moved during filming; a cylindrical lens was rotated during filming to magnify an image to the desired diameter. According to Florey, this was useful in "giving the scenes the rhythms which we thought they required".[37]

Skyscrapers were oblong cubes filmed from an angle which exaggerated their height. To create the effect of sunlight reflecting from buildings, one person would stand on one side of the cubes with a mirror; another would stand on the opposite side with a light bulb and swing it back and forth. The mirror would catch the reflection of the swinging light and throw it back onto the skyscrapers.[35] To create the excitement surrounding an opening night, a skyscraper was photographed with the camera swinging quickly up and down and side to side.[35] Although the scenes of the miniature sets were long shots, the actors were filmed entirely in closeups[36] (about 300 feet of the final film reel).[31] Instead of trying to place an actor into the miniature backgrounds with trick photography, the scenes were cut rapidly and successively: the viewer first sees the actor and then the set, creating the impression they are in the same place.[36] Sets involving actors were minimalistic; some consisted of only a few elements, such as a table, telephone, two chairs, and a cigar.[12]

A film-studio set was created by photographing several reel spools with strips of film dangling against a background of blinking lights. The casting office was created by silhouetting strips of cardboard against a white background.[35] To depict the protagonist's mental anguish, strips of paper were cut into twisted trees, which were silhouetted against a background of moving shadows and set in motion with an electric fan.[35] To create a scene near the end of the film when the protagonist becomes delirious, the camera moves through a maze of different-sized cubes (with geometric designs inside them) on a flat, shiny surface.[35] Heaven was a miniature set created from paper cubes, tin cans, cigar boxes, toy trains, and a motorized Erector Set.[30][35][38] Although no still photos were taken for the film, illustrations of prismatic and kaleidoscopic effects have been obtained by enlarging frames of negative film. The paper prints were considerably softer than the movie print, to avoid graininess.[37][clarification needed] The final film was edited to a one-reel length of 1,200 feet of filmstrip,[5][26] with about 150 scenes;[9] according to Florey, it had the same number of camera angles as contemporary full-length feature films.[4] Although the film was carefully edited for synchronization with Rhapsody in Blue, much of its original, lyrical quality has been lost in modified versions.[26][30]

Themes and interpretation

[edit]

The film is a satire of the social conditions, dominant practices, and ideologies of Hollywood, and the film industry's mistreatment of actors.[5][39] Filmmaking was becoming more expensive and required greater technical resources (particularly with the rise of sound production), making it increasingly difficult for amateur filmmakers to enter the profession. This deepened a divide between amateurs and Hollywood professionals; as a result, a growing number of amateurs began lampooning Hollywood.[39] The film is about an extra who starts his Hollywood career with hopes and dreams but finds himself used and discarded by the industry, his artistic ambitions destroyed.[13] When it begins, the protagonist has a name (Mr. Jones) and a letter of recommendation outlining his talents; they are ignored and he is reduced to a number, symbolizing his dehumanization.[5][40]

A photo from a low angle of three men looking ahead, clapping their hands and opening their mouths widely.
Applause for a performance by Voya George's character

The movie star inspires hero worship in American culture, and the painted masks he dons represent his performances.[41] Actors and audience are depicted as unintelligent automatons, their mouths yapping senselessly as they respond to Hollywood films or hand signals from film directors.[13][32] One scene loops a shot of a man climbing a staircase toward the word "Success", representing an actor's vain attempt to achieve fulfillment and advancement in his career. Film historians William Moritz and David E. James have compared this to a similar scene with a washerwoman in the Dadaist, post-Cubist film Ballet Mécanique (1924).[16][32] Other scenes in A Hollywood Extra are frequently repeated, such as views of the city lights and shots of "Hollywood" and "No Casting" signs, which exemplify the protagonist's constant struggle to succeed in Hollywood.[42]

The film's abrupt cuts, artificial scenery, extreme closeups, and twisted angles metaphorically amplify its somber narrative.[32] Film producers and critics in A Hollywood Extra are shot from low angles with dark backdrops, giving the characters a powerful, foreboding appearance. Gregg Toland later used similar camera techniques in Citizen Kane.[16] Closeups of the actors' faces are often shadowed, partially shrouding their features and depriving the characters of wholeness.[27] The all-black backdrops in the closeups remove a real-world presence from the film.[32] When the protagonist is waiting for phone calls with casting decisions, a telephone is superimposed on the actor's forehead to symbolize his growing desperation.[16] His failure follows him to the grave (where the words "No Casting Today" appear next to his tombstone),[32] and his death is symbolized by a pair of scissors cutting a strip of film.[15][32]

Although the film depicts the protagonist's experience expressionistically, the glamour of Hollywood is portrayed more objectively. According to Taves, by reversing conventional expectations it invites the audience to interpret this version of Hollywood as "the material of dreams" and "an unreal paradise of cruelty and failure".[43] Hollywood street scenes were filmed with a wildly-moving camera from tilted angles, edited into rapid juxtapositions to reflect the falsity and excess of the film industry.[27] The protagonist's trip to heaven at the end of the film is both a satisfying conclusion and a satire of Hollywood's desire for happy endings.[15][30][44] Heaven is in the opposite direction from Hollywood, another poke at the industry.[15] James wrote that the image of heaven as an escape from film-industry brutality "figures the avant-garde's recurrent utopian aspirations".[45]

A Hollywood Extra also touches on the mistreatment of women. Although the actors wear masks—symbolizing their ability to act—the female extra #13 does not; she is expected to simply obey the (male) filmmakers, and her only role is as an object for men to look at.[38] Her success in this simple role, contrasted with the protagonist's inability to succeed despite hard work, reveals how differently the film industry views male and female actors.[38]

Release

[edit]
The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra (1928)

Most commonly known by its proper title, The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra has been released and advertised as Hollywood Extra 9413 and $97 (a reference to the film's budget).[46] Other titles include The Rhapsody of Hollywood[17][47][48] (a name suggested by Charlie Chaplin)[17][49] and The Suicide of a Hollywood Extra,[47] a misnomer created by distributor FBO Pictures Corporation.[49] Although many experimental films from the period were screened in the filmmakers' homes to audiences of families and friends, A Hollywood Extra had a wide release.[50] Florey described the film at the time:[41]

It is not much. Just about a man who is a fine actor in Iowa or somewhere and who comes to Hollywood and expects to conquer it overnight. ... The would-be idol goes to the studios. ... The casting director, he is merely a hand that rejects or selects. ... And the rest just tells how he loses out all around.

Sources differ about when and where the film premiered. According to film critic Daniel Eagan, Florey premiered the film in a movie club in Los Angeles;[47] according to Anthony Slide, it opened at New York City's Cameo Theatre on June 17, 1928.[41] David E. James said that the film had its true premiere at Charlie Chaplin's Beverly Hills villa.[21] Chaplin, who had become disenchanted with many aspects of Hollywood filmmaking,[47] was so impressed with the film that he watched it five times[21][26] and screened it for guests at his home. His audience included film-industry elites[21][26][47] including Douglas Fairbanks, John Considine, Harry d'Arrast, D. W. Griffith, Jesse L. Lasky, Ernst Lubitsch, Lewis Milestone, Mary Pickford, Joseph M. Schenck, Norma Talmadge, Josef von Sternberg, and King Vidor.[51][52] Chaplin's screening was accompanied by a record of Rhapsody in Blue and the comedian playing the organ.[51] Florey was so concerned about a negative reaction to the film's satire of Hollywood that he removed his name from the credits and hid in the projection room during the screening. Although the audience originally expected it to be one of Chaplin's gags,[8][51] they were impressed with the film[26][47][51] and Schenck arranged for it to begin screening at a United Artists theater on Broadway on March 21, 1928.[21][30][53] A musical score, based on Rhapsody in Blue and played by a live orchestra (featuring the saxophone), was prepared by Hugo Riesenfeld for the showing.[51][53] With a presentation usually reserved for bigger-budget films, it played twice nightly with the Gloria Swanson film Sadie Thompson and was billed as "the first of the impressionistic photoplays to be made in America".[53]

The film was heavily publicized,[54] with many media reports emphasizing its $97 budget.[51] It received enough notice to be picked up for distribution by FBO Pictures Corporation,[33][47][53] which eventually became part of RKO Pictures.[47][53] The company released A Hollywood Extra to more than 700 theaters in North America and Europe.[33][51] In North America, it was shown in New York, Hollywood, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Montreal, and Washington, D.C.[53] The film played in Philadelphia with Prem Sanyas (1925), receiving more praise than the main attraction and earning $32 in one week.[55] A Hollywood Extra became one of the first widely-seen American avant-garde films in the United States, the Soviet Union, and Europe[45][56] (England, France, Germany, and Italy).[56] The French rights for the film and Florey's The Love of Zero (1928) were sold for $390.[55]

Although A Hollywood Extra avoided conventional filmmaking, it was embraced by Hollywood[45][57] and aided Florey, Vorkapić, and Toland's careers;[21][57] Vorkapić was offered a special-effects position at Paramount Pictures shortly after the film's release.[21] Paramount wanted to hire Florey for the position, but after Josef von Sternberg said that Vorkapić was primarily responsible for A Hollywood Extra's special effects they offered him the job instead.[51] Film production designer William Cameron Menzies wanted to work with Florey after seeing A Hollywood Extra, so they collaborated on The Love of Zero; Florey directed, and Menzies designed the sets.[7][58]

Reception

[edit]

To the extent that The Life and Death of 9413: A Hollywood Extra dramatizes the condition of human life enthralled by and ruined by the entertainment industry, the all-pervading, massively powerful imagery of capital itself, it is the prototypical 20th century avant-garde film.

David E. James, film historian[59]

The film was well received by contemporary and present-day critics.[45][56] According to one reviewer, it ranked in cinema "where Gertrude Stein ranks in poetry";[45] another called Florey "the Eugene O'Neill of the cinema".[8] A 1929 edition of Movie Makers, the official publication of the Amateur Cinema League, called it a triumph of amateur experimentation and an imaginative use of limited resources.[39] In a separate Movie Makers article, Herman G. Weinberg called its scenery "a fantastically beautiful vision of a dream metropolis, done in the expressionistic manner, but done with a fine eye for the camera and the context of the piece".[35] C. Adolph Glassgold, contributing editor of the journal The Arts, called A Hollywood Extra "a truly tremendous picture" and said that Florey could become "the eventual leader of cinematic art": "It has movement, tempo, form, intensity of feeling, highly dramatic moments; in short, it is a real motion picture."[48] In a Film Mercury review, Anabel Lane predicted that Florey would "one day hold a position of one of the bigger film directors": "If this production had been made in Europe and heralded as a hit, it would ... have been called a masterpiece."[8] A Variety reviewer wondered if A Hollywood Extra was "an unannounced foreign-made short", given its stylistic similarity to European art films.[45][56] Film director Henry King called it "way ahead of its time" and "a stroke of genius": "It was the most original thought I ever saw".[26]

A Hollywood Extra has been praised by modern film historians and critics, who often include it on lists of prominent experimental films.[45] Brian Taves called it a "landmark" of avant-garde film:[14] "A Hollywood Extra was something entirely new, in both style and substance; more than any other American film, it initiated the avant-garde in this country."[1] Film historian William Moritz called it "a genuine little masterpiece"[16] and "perhaps the most famous American experimental film of the 1920s".[60] Colorado State University film professor Hye Seung Chung called the film an "early American avant-garde masterpiece", and described Florey as "one of the most undeservingly neglected B film auteurs".[61] David E. James described it as the "prototypical 20th-century avant-garde film",[59] and A Hollywood Extra's commercial success indicates that experimental films were acceptable to contemporary popular viewers "rather than only an elite or mandarin audience".[21] Director and author Lewis Jacobs wrote, "Its style, broad and impressionistic, disclosed a remarkable sensitivity and resourcefulness in the use of props, painting, camera, and editing."[33]

The full, original film has not survived.[28][disputed (for: conflicts between length listings)  – discuss] In 1997, however, it was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant".[62] A Hollywood Extra has been restored and released on two DVD collections: Unseen Cinema: Early American Avant Garde Film 1894–1941 (by Image Entertainment)[63] and Avant-Garde: Experimental Cinema of the 1920s and '30s, by Kino International.[64] The British Film Institute commissioned David Sawer to compose a score in 1996; it was first performed by the Matrix Ensemble, conducted by Robert Ziegler. The score, Hollywood Extra, was written for eight musicians and published by Universal Edition.[65]

Remake

[edit]

The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra was remade as Hollywood Boulevard, a 1936 film co-written and directed by Florey.[53][66][67] Like A Hollywood Extra, its central character is an actor seeking a job in Hollywood who experiences the cruelty of the film industry and the whims of producers and studio executives.[53][68] Hollywood Boulevard has visual similarities to the original film, such as unusual angles which reflect Hollywood's disordered nature.[53] It includes several subplots which extend its running time and appeal to mass audiences[58][68]—but, Brian Taves said, "tend to diminish the importance of the central characterization, depriving Hollywood Boulevard of the singleness of purpose that made A Hollywood Extra so unforgettable".[68]

References

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Taves 1998, p. 114
  2. ^ "Complete National Film Registry Listing". Library of Congress. Retrieved May 4, 2020.
  3. ^ "New to the National Film Registry". www.loc.gov – Library of Congress Information Bulletin. December 1997. Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Zecević 1983, p. 11
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h James 2005, p. 39
  6. ^ a b c d e James 2001, p. 51
  7. ^ a b Taves 1998, p. 116
  8. ^ a b c d Taves 1987, p. 88
  9. ^ a b c d e f Taves 1987, p. 86
  10. ^ Taves 1987, p. 80
  11. ^ a b c d Taves 1998, p. 95
  12. ^ a b c d e f g Eagan 2010, p. 141
  13. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Weinberg 1929, p. 866
  14. ^ a b Taves 1998, p. 94
  15. ^ a b c d e f g Taves 1998, p. 96
  16. ^ a b c d e f g h Moritz 1996, p. 216
  17. ^ a b c "Projection Jottings: Film Made for $94 Impresses Chaplin". The New York Times. April 15, 1928. p. A119. Retrieved November 13, 2015.
  18. ^ Dixon 2015, p. 97
  19. ^ Merritt 2000, p. 52
  20. ^ Bawden 1976, p. 694
  21. ^ a b c d e f g h James 2005, p. 43
  22. ^ a b Watson 1929, p. 848
  23. ^ a b c d e Weinberg 1929, p. 879
  24. ^ Taves 1998, pp. 95–96
  25. ^ Taves 1987, p. 83
  26. ^ a b c d e f g h Taves 1998, p. 98
  27. ^ a b c d e f g Taves 1998, p. 97
  28. ^ a b c d Slide 2012, p. 48
  29. ^ a b c d James 2005, p. 42
  30. ^ a b c d e f Spears 1960, p. 216
  31. ^ a b c Taves 1987, p. 84
  32. ^ a b c d e f g James 2005, p. 40
  33. ^ a b c d e f Jacobs 2002, p. 9
  34. ^ Taves 1987, p. 89
  35. ^ a b c d e f g h i Weinberg 1929, p. 867
  36. ^ a b c d Watson 1929, p. 887
  37. ^ a b Watson 1929, p. 888
  38. ^ a b c Allen 1983, p. 12
  39. ^ a b c Zimmerman 1995, p. 88
  40. ^ Slide 2012, pp. 48–49
  41. ^ a b c Slide 2012, p. 49
  42. ^ James 2005, pp. 40–41
  43. ^ Taves 1987, p. 91
  44. ^ Jacobs 2002, p. 10
  45. ^ a b c d e f g James 2005, p. 41
  46. ^ Taves 2001, p. 103
  47. ^ a b c d e f g h Eagan 2010, p. 142
  48. ^ a b Glassgold 1928, p. 290
  49. ^ a b Taves 1984, p. 19
  50. ^ Posner 2001, p. 39
  51. ^ a b c d e f g h Zecević 1983, p. 12
  52. ^ James 2001, p. 47
  53. ^ a b c d e f g h i Taves 1998, p. 99
  54. ^ Moritz 1996, p. 217
  55. ^ a b Taves 1998, p. 117
  56. ^ a b c d Taves 1998, p. 113
  57. ^ a b Taves 1998, p. 93
  58. ^ a b Taves 1987, p. 193
  59. ^ a b James 2005, p. 47
  60. ^ Moritz 1996, p. 214
  61. ^ Chung 2006, p. 67
  62. ^ "New to the National Film Registry". Library of Congress. December 1997. Retrieved November 14, 2015.
  63. ^ Krinsky 2005
  64. ^ Erickson 2005
  65. ^ "David Sawer: Hollywood Extra". Universal Edition. Retrieved November 14, 2015.
  66. ^ Posner 2001, p. 19
  67. ^ Giovacchini 2001, p. 23
  68. ^ a b c Taves 1987, p. 198

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]